GTX 560ti 448 vs GTX 570

He's making this too easy for me.

kaitanuvax

muhaha you're comparing Batman "eyefinity", which is stupid because everyone knows ATi does triple monitors best on one card, and Nvidia does surround on two cards - this is not a good comparison, and as I said you're a noob. HardOCP has to basically do a ini hack to get the three monitors working on surround..

Firstly, you must understand how the Galaxy MDT GeForce GTX 580 is running at these high Widescreen resolutions. We will have a full review on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 later, but basically a stock GTX 580 is not able to do NV Surround or triple-display gaming like these AMD video cards. What Galaxy has done is to create a custom video card, with a custom chip on board that combines several HDMI connectors into one large resolution desktop. This allows a single-GTX 580 GPU to power multi-display gaming. To a new game, that detects resolutions, looking for either Eyefinity or NV Surround support, it won't find that with the Galaxy MDT GTX 580, since it does not create its resolution via NV Surround technology. Therefore, the game may not show the appropriate resolution to you in its setup menu.

Thankfully, most games allow you to manually go into configuration files and force resolutions via INI or CFG files.Batmanis one such game where we can edit an INI file and force resolutions. This is what we had to do to get 5040x1050 to work on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 inBatman, otherwise it was only going to run at 1080p resolutions. We found 5040x1050 to be the highest playable resolution, and honestly would not be able to go any higher with the performance experienced.

The benchmark I posted was from the same webpage HardOCP which did the same benchmark without eyefinity and the improvement was 10%. You're completely deluded if you think the 7970 pulls 50% extra FPS in Batman AC muahah. And good job being a noob..

[QUOTE="kaitanuvax"]

He's making this too easy for me.

ShimmerMan

muhaha you're comparing Batman "eyefinity", which is stupid because everyone knows ATi does triple monitors best on one card, and Nvidia does surround on two cards - this is not a good comparison, and as I said you're a noob. HardOCP has to basically do a ini hack to get the three monitors working on surround..

Firstly, you must understand how the Galaxy MDT GeForce GTX 580 is running at these high Widescreen resolutions. We will have a full review on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 later, but basically a stock GTX 580 is not able to do NV Surround or triple-display gaming like these AMD video cards. What Galaxy has done is to create a custom video card, with a custom chip on board that combines several HDMI connectors into one large resolution desktop. This allows a single-GTX 580 GPU to power multi-display gaming. To a new game, that detects resolutions, looking for either Eyefinity or NV Surround support, it won't find that with the Galaxy MDT GTX 580, since it does not create its resolution via NV Surround technology. Therefore, the game may not show the appropriate resolution to you in its setup menu.

Thankfully, most games allow you to manually go into configuration files and force resolutions via INI or CFG files.Batmanis one such game where we can edit an INI file and force resolutions. This is what we had to do to get 5040x1050 to work on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 inBatman, otherwise it was only going to run at 1080p resolutions. We found 5040x1050 to be the highest playable resolution, and honestly would not be able to go any higher with the performance experienced.

The benchmark I posted was from the same webpage HardOCP which did the same benchmark without eyefinity and the improvement was 10%. You're completely deluded if you think the 7970 pulls 50% extra FPS in Batman AC muahah. And good job being a noob..

You have to be the stupidest person on this forum.

You can force your graphics card to run a resolution higher than that of your monitor and it will perform the same as if it were playing the higher resolution on a higher native resolution monitor.

[QUOTE="kaitanuvax"]

He's making this too easy for me.

ShimmerMan

muhaha you're comparing Batman "eyefinity", which is stupid because everyone knows ATi does triple monitors best on one card, and Nvidia does surround on two cards - this is not a good comparison, and as I said you're a noob. HardOCP has to basically do a ini hack to get the three monitors working on surround..

Firstly, you must understand how the Galaxy MDT GeForce GTX 580 is running at these high Widescreen resolutions. We will have a full review on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 later, but basically a stock GTX 580 is not able to do NV Surround or triple-display gaming like these AMD video cards. What Galaxy has done is to create a custom video card, with a custom chip on board that combines several HDMI connectors into one large resolution desktop. This allows a single-GTX 580 GPU to power multi-display gaming. To a new game, that detects resolutions, looking for either Eyefinity or NV Surround support, it won't find that with the Galaxy MDT GTX 580, since it does not create its resolution via NV Surround technology. Therefore, the game may not show the appropriate resolution to you in its setup menu.

Thankfully, most games allow you to manually go into configuration files and force resolutions via INI or CFG files.Batmanis one such game where we can edit an INI file and force resolutions. This is what we had to do to get 5040x1050 to work on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 inBatman, otherwise it was only going to run at 1080p resolutions. We found 5040x1050 to be the highest playable resolution, and honestly would not be able to go any higher with the performance experienced.

The benchmark I posted was from the same webpage HardOCP which did the same benchmark without eyefinity and the improvement was 10%. You're completely deluded if you think the 7970 pulls 50% extra FPS in Batman AC muahah. And good job being a noob..

Pardon me asking, but why is it not a fair comparison? From what I understand, creating a custom resolution with a .ini tweak doesn't tangibly hurt the performance (unless lack of VRAM becomes a problem, but that's an entirely different issue altogether).

Also:

[QUOTE="ShimmerMan"]

[QUOTE="kaitanuvax"]

He's making this too easy for me.

GS550L

muhaha you're comparing Batman "eyefinity", which is stupid because everyone knows ATi does triple monitors best on one card, and Nvidia does surround on two cards - this is not a good comparison, and as I said you're a noob. HardOCP has to basically do a ini hack to get the three monitors working on surround..

Firstly, you must understand how the Galaxy MDT GeForce GTX 580 is running at these high Widescreen resolutions. We will have a full review on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 later, but basically a stock GTX 580 is not able to do NV Surround or triple-display gaming like these AMD video cards. What Galaxy has done is to create a custom video card, with a custom chip on board that combines several HDMI connectors into one large resolution desktop. This allows a single-GTX 580 GPU to power multi-display gaming. To a new game, that detects resolutions, looking for either Eyefinity or NV Surround support, it won't find that with the Galaxy MDT GTX 580, since it does not create its resolution via NV Surround technology. Therefore, the game may not show the appropriate resolution to you in its setup menu.

Thankfully, most games allow you to manually go into configuration files and force resolutions via INI or CFG files.Batmanis one such game where we can edit an INI file and force resolutions. This is what we had to do to get 5040x1050 to work on the Galaxy MDT GTX 580 inBatman, otherwise it was only going to run at 1080p resolutions. We found 5040x1050 to be the highest playable resolution, and honestly would not be able to go any higher with the performance experienced.

The benchmark I posted was from the same webpage HardOCP which did the same benchmark without eyefinity and the improvement was 10%. You're completely deluded if you think the 7970 pulls 50% extra FPS in Batman AC muahah. And good job being a noob..

Pardon me asking, but why is it not a fair comparison? From what I understand, creating a custom resolution with a .ini tweak doesn't tangibly hurt the performance (unless lack of VRAM becomes a problem, but that's an entirely different issue altogether).

That is correct.

Also:

GS550L

Good point.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/330?vs=499

basically it's worth it if the price is right.

You have to be the stupidest person on this forum.

GummiRaccoon

Muahaha did you know you sound like a *female dog* and you act like one as well :).

Pardon me asking, but why is it not a fair comparison? From what I understand, creating a custom resolution with a .ini tweak doesn't tangibly hurt the performance (unless lack of VRAM becomes a problem, but that's an entirely different issue altogether).

GS550L

Well look at the comparison...

Overclocked NEW-GEN 7970 3GB VRAM @ Eyefinity 5760x resolution (released 2012)

VS

Factory Clocked (lets be honest here they could of easily gotten at least another 100MHZ on this card) OLD-GEN 580GTX 1.5GB (why not use a 3gb card 580)@ NV SURROUND 5760X Resolution. (GPU released 2010 (not the brand)

Muhaha what exactly is fair about this comparison.The fact that AMD fanboys are boasting about this is also hilarious. Wait till 600 series, that's all I can say.

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

wait for the 7950 it will utterly rape destroy the 570/560ti just like the 7970 already rape destroyed the 580 gtx. Hell, from the looks of things even the 6950 radeon is a awesome choice if you care for bf3.

blaznwiipspman1

AMD fanboy crap? Is there something wrong with the statement I made?

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"] Omg something new that is coming out months after something old is going to have better peformance omg lets dance! I see your still spewing your AMD fanboy crap on these forums at every possible chance. You really will use any oppertunity to say an AMD card is faster than an Nvidia one, its sad as hell.

V4LENT1NE

AMD fanboy crap? Is there something wrong with the statement I made?

The point is, AMD is moving ahead in the GPU race, if things continue on this path eventually nvidia will release their refreshes when AMD releases their next gen.

[QUOTE="GummiRaccoon"]

You can force your graphics card to run a resolution higher than that of your monitor and it will perform the same as if it were playing the higher resolution on a higher native resolution monitor.

ShimmerMan

Muahaha did you know you sound like a *female dog* and you act like one as well :).

You forgot to address what is in red, which is why you are stupid.

I just came back from a long day of school only to find out that I started a war :o

hahaha but thanks to those who actually answered my questions

I just came back from a long day of school only to find out that I started a war :o

hahaha but thanks to those who actually answered my questions

yonikko

To avoid being chased by this or that posse, I'd buy a Matrox card if I were you. Doesn't seem safe buying anything else :P

hahaha lol, nvidia fanboys vs amd fanboys

The fact is the 7970 is faster though and there's nothing from nvidia but it will surely come , that's as certain as the sun coming up. And it's not like the gtx 580 is a slouch, besides it's cheaper than the 7970.

You should all be very happy , nvidia and amd are still releasing new cards and they mostly perform better than the ones previously released. The technology is still going forward. There's another duopoly , namely ms and sony that keeps the status quo. But hey at least nintendo will release us of this burden. Hail for the WII-u.

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

kraken2109

There has been an insect infestation. We're just doing a necessary purge.

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

kraken2109

They changed the ToS

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

kraken2109

Also new people like to come in treating this like system wars.

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

kraken2109

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

mitu123

what does it say exactly?

You keep comparing a 79xx with a 580GTX, first of all this is ATI's next line of GPUs.. Of course it will be faster than Nvidia's old line of GPus. And why do you keep using the word "rape".. haha the 7970 is about 15% faster than the 580GTX, do you think this is shaming 580 owners? because really it's not. In the UK I can go now and get a 580GTX and it will support physx, good drivers ambient occlusion all for £350, where as the cheapest 7970 at the moment is about £450. The 79xx at the moment is poor value for money, definitely not worth raving on about on forums.

ShimmerMan

sigh....uve seen the charts kaitanuvx has posted, and each of the games showed 30% improvement with a 7970, and like 60-80% when overclocked over a 580gtx. Yeah we got it, u have nvidias' cajones over your eyes so you can't see anything properly. Anyhow believe what you want buy what you want, its a free country. I live in Canada and over here and the US the 7970 is only $50 more expensive than a 580gtx

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"] Omg something new that is coming out months after something old is going to have better peformance omg lets dance! I see your still spewing your AMD fanboy crap on these forums at every possible chance. You really will use any oppertunity to say an AMD card is faster than an Nvidia one, its sad as hell.

V4LENT1NE

AMD fanboy crap? Is there something wrong with the statement I made?

the onlyy one licking nvidias butt here is you. All im saying and i think you can agree on it is the 7970 beats the 580 gtx by a large margin. Yes its a new series, and nvidia hasn't released their cards yet but its a fact the 7970 destroys the 580gtx, now move on with your life. Also about the 6950 thread, i wasn't about to argue over something that was indeed a FACT. The 6950 toxic edition overclocked in some games matched up with a stock 580gtx. The ones it lost in were games with heavy tesselation....now that tessellation is improved tremendously with the 7000 series, its GG game over. I wasn't dissaperaing anywhere I have stuff to do and can't spend all my time arguing with people.

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

AMD fanboy crap? Is there something wrong with the statement I made?

blaznwiipspman1

the onlyy one licking nvidias butt here is you. All im saying and i think you can agree on it is the 7970 beats the 580 gtx by a large margin. Yes its a new series, and nvidia hasn't released their cards yet but its a fact the 7970 destroys the 580gtx, now move on with your life. Also about the 6950 thread, i wasn't about to argue over something that was indeed a FACT. The 6950 toxic edition overclocked in some games matched up with a stock 580gtx. The ones it lost in were games with heavy tesselation....now that tessellation is improved tremendously with the 7000 series, its GG game over. I wasn't dissaperaing anywhere I have stuff to do and can't spend all my time arguing with people.

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"] Because the 7970 is obviously better then the GTX 5series, its newer tech by months and months, yet all you can do is brag and talk how it will "destory" Nvidia and other stupid words, you think we dont know that already? Isnt that the point of the 7 series? Its like you will use anything to say that AMD will beat Nvidia at something, you also have a horrible tendancy to favour AMD biasly when talking about GPUS to buy and proceed to talk trash then to. Most of youyr posts wreak of AMD butt licking and you have been called out on it before to, I seem to remember a 6950 thread that you had going a while a go that you kept dissapearing from to soon as someone calls you out...V4LENT1NE

the onlyy one licking nvidias butt here is you. All im saying and i think you can agree on it is the 7970 beats the 580 gtx by a large margin. Yes its a new series, and nvidia hasn't released their cards yet but its a fact the 7970 destroys the 580gtx, now move on with your life. Also about the 6950 thread, i wasn't about to argue over something that was indeed a FACT. The 6950 toxic edition overclocked in some games matched up with a stock 580gtx. The ones it lost in were games with heavy tesselation....now that tessellation is improved tremendously with the 7000 series, its GG game over. I wasn't dissaperaing anywhere I have stuff to do and can't spend all my time arguing with people.

haha cute penguin

Anyways there were no exaggerations...in titles that had normal tessellation, the radeon 6950 kept up with the gtx 580. I didn't dissapear, i don't have time to argue with 20 different fanboys, i stated my points, nobody really proved me wrong, i have things to do just like anybody else. Some people are just so blinded by brand loyalty they can't see the truth right in front of their face.

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

AMD fanboy crap? Is there something wrong with the statement I made?

blaznwiipspman1

the onlyy one licking nvidias butt here is you. All im saying and i think you can agree on it is the 7970 beats the 580 gtx by a large margin. Yes its a new series, and nvidia hasn't released their cards yet but its a fact the 7970 destroys the 580gtx, now move on with your life. Also about the 6950 thread, i wasn't about to argue over something that was indeed a FACT. The 6950 toxic edition overclocked in some games matched up with a stock 580gtx. The ones it lost in were games with heavy tesselation....now that tessellation is improved tremendously with the 7000 series, its GG game over. I wasn't dissaperaing anywhere I have stuff to do and can't spend all my time arguing with people.

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

the onlyy one licking nvidias butt here is you. All im saying and i think you can agree on it is the 7970 beats the 580 gtx by a large margin. Yes its a new series, and nvidia hasn't released their cards yet but its a fact the 7970 destroys the 580gtx, now move on with your life. Also about the 6950 thread, i wasn't about to argue over something that was indeed a FACT. The 6950 toxic edition overclocked in some games matched up with a stock 580gtx. The ones it lost in were games with heavy tesselation....now that tessellation is improved tremendously with the 7000 series, its GG game over. I wasn't dissaperaing anywhere I have stuff to do and can't spend all my time arguing with people.

blaznwiipspman1

haha cute penguin

Anyways there were no exaggerations...in titles that had normal tessellation, the radeon 6950 kept up with the gtx 580. I didn't dissapear, i don't have time to argue with 20 different fanboys, i stated my points, nobody really proved me wrong, i have things to do just like anybody else. Some people are just so blinded by brand loyalty they can't see the truth right in front of their face.

Are you ****in serious? Everyone here knows how much of a fanboy you are, everyone.

I don't know that. That automatically puts your statement into hyperbole status.

BTW I own both AMD/Nvidia graphics cards.

wait for the 7950 it will utterly rape destroy the 570/560ti just like the 7970 already rape destroyed the 580 gtx. Hell, from the looks of things even the 6950 radeon is a awesome choice if you care for bf3.

blaznwiipspman1

Yup, agreed.

I don't know that. That automatically puts your statement into hyperbole status.

BTW I own both AMD/Nvidia graphics cards.

GummiRaccoon

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

What the hell has happened to this forum over the last month or so?

Every thread is an argument now.

blaznwiipspman1

what does it say exactly?