hi guys i just bought and downloaded crysis 1 for 13$ from steam

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"][QUOTE="edgewalker16"] I still believe Crysis 2 looks worse than Crysis...the gameplay in C2 is better, though.Macutchi

him saying crysis2 has better gameplay than the first further backs up your statement

no my eyes are fine, btw i see that crysis run with dx 10, which not good based on research i found online, how do u revert it back to dx 9 because at 2 AA and all medium my fps still looks like 20..... something is wrong with my settingsEyiAtSteam

I'd say something is wrong with your settings. At those settings (except Shaders which is at High), my minimums are in the upper 30's and averaging anywhere from the 40's to the 70's and my PC is way weaker that yours.

Edit:

Framerates in Contact (first level).

sound like someone who used to got eyeful of crysis1's photoshoped bullshots and finally got to see the vanilla crysis's true face.

Well it's not the game's fault, the game has been around for 5 years, and the shader technology used back then is kind blurry and backward, some crysis1 modification does redraw the texture and add some nice post processing effect, but CE2 can do only so much. It's hardly a good looking game anymore sorry.

sound like someone who used to got eyeful of crysis1's photoshoped bullshots and finally got to see the vanilla crysis's true face.

Well it's not the game's fault, the game has been around for 5 years, and the shader technology used back then is kind blurry and backward, some crysis1 modification does redraw the texture and add some nice post processing effect, but CE2 can do only so much. It's hardly a good looking game anymore sorry.

GameFan1983

Your screenshot looks nothing like CSS and why does it need to have mindblowing graphics to be a good game. I recommend you actually finish it, I thought it was a great game.

Hardly good looking game? come on, still looks better that alot of games released years after it.

Hardly good looking game? come on, still looks better that alot of games released years after it.

dav2693

Hardly good looking game? come on, still looks better that alot of games released years after it.

dav2693

Not by 2011-2012 standard, it's a game built for 2010's hardware but pre-released in 2007, and it severed its propose well. but shader quality from CE2 is way too dated to make anything look good anymore compare to what we have now

[QUOTE="EyiAtSteam"]ok im fine with how crysis looked, but now the problem is i cant seem to get 60 fps with 2 AA and very high,and then high,even at medium i cant seem to get 60 fps, its not to the point of choppy but yeah its not smooth either... ohh man....-_-'edgewalker16

Crysis is great looking but is showing its age in some areas. Try Crysis 2. It bumps the quality of Crysis' weaker points up.

-Unreal-

[QUOTE="edgewalker16"][QUOTE="EyiAtSteam"] Not one of those things is true, the human eye can perceive hundreds of frames per second, there's a difference between 50, 60 and 100 frames, a difference of fluidity which is the main reason for various fps variations in videos, a compromise in quality, detail combined with various gimmicks like blur and black frames to make those 24-30 frames seem decent. Saying that 100 frames is worse than 60-80 is pure nonsense.

DanielDust

^^This.

[QUOTE="dav2693"]

Hardly good looking game? come on, still looks better that alot of games released years after it.

GameFan1983

Not by 2011-2012 standard, it's a game built for 2010's hardware but pre-released in 2007, and it severed its propose well. but shader quality from CE2 is way too dated to make anything look good anymore compare to what we have now

Excuse me but Crysis 1 does looks better than some games released in 2011-2012.

[QUOTE="EyiAtSteam"]ok im fine with how crysis looked, but now the problem is i cant seem to get 60 fps with 2 AA and very high,and then high,even at medium i cant seem to get 60 fps, its not to the point of choppy but yeah its not smooth either... ohh man....-_-'edgewalker16