His 2900pro hits NEWEGG

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for musclesforcier
musclesforcier

2894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 musclesforcier
Member since 2004 • 2894 Posts
[QUOTE="musclesforcier"]

[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"][QUOTE="Hiryuu_"]Due to the fact the HD2900Pro is a much better value than the 8800GTS 640MB and 320MB, and that the 1GB GDDR4 version shows almost no improvement over the standard 512MB GDDR3 version.Wesker776

As Super Mario would say "Okey Dokey!"

You have any benchmarks to prove otherwise, because I can find many that say the 2900 is better then a gts...

www.google.com

Knock yourself out.

Are you saying the XT is not better then the GTS?

Avatar image for LordEC911
LordEC911

9972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LordEC911
Member since 2004 • 9972 Posts

your joking...that card at that price will make Ati alot of $$$kruesader

Not as much as the RV670 would...
80nm, ~700million trannies, huge die, huge pcb, huge 512bit interface, there is nothing cheap about the HD2900Pro, other than the price.

While AMD isn't losing money, they certainly aren't making a large profit.
This is basically a way to liqudate the lower binned XT cores to make back some money and gain a little market share, basically by beating the G92 to market.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

While AMD isn't losing money, they certainly aren't making a large profit.
This is basically a way to liqudate the lower binned XT cores to make back some money and gain a little market share, basically by beating the G92 to market.

LordEC911

If I were Intel, I'd be throwing money at ATI as a token of gratitude right now - with a card like the HD2900Pro on the market, demand for their X38 chipset should shoot through the roof - as cheap and effective as Crossfire on the Pro will be, there's pretty much no reason to pick up an nForce board anymore, unless you're the most die-hard of Nvidia fanboys who doesn't want to upgrade on your current motherboard.

Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts
[QUOTE="LordEC911"]

While AMD isn't losing money, they certainly aren't making a large profit.
This is basically a way to liqudate the lower binned XT cores to make back some money and gain a little market share, basically by beating the G92 to market.

RayvinAzn

If I were Intel, I'd be throwing money at ATI as a token of gratitude right now - with a card like the HD2900Pro on the market, demand for their X38 chipset should shoot through the roof - as cheap and effective as Crossfire on the Pro will be, there's pretty much no reason to pick up an nForce board anymore, unless you're the most die-hard of Nvidia fanboys who doesn't want to upgrade on your current motherboard.

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"][QUOTE="musclesforcier"]

[QUOTE="-CheeseEater-"][QUOTE="Hiryuu_"]Due to the fact the HD2900Pro is a much better value than the 8800GTS 640MB and 320MB, and that the 1GB GDDR4 version shows almost no improvement over the standard 512MB GDDR3 version.musclesforcier

As Super Mario would say "Okey Dokey!"

You have any benchmarks to prove otherwise, because I can find many that say the 2900 is better then a gts...

www.google.com

Knock yourself out.

Are you saying the XT is not better then the GTS?

My apologies. I thought you said that the GTS was better than the XT (it's happening a lot on these forums lately).

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#56 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

your joking...that card at that price will make Ati alot of $$$

kruesader


Not really - the 2900pro costs as much to manufacture as the 2900xt... because it IS a 2900xt... just one that wasn't up to spec. Granted, $270 > $0 for their partners, so it beats throwing it in the trash, but losing that $100 the XT pricing level would have given them, plus completely removing the incentive to buy the XT line? Ehhhh....

-

The benchmarks are great... and also concerning. The noise level, power consumption, and heat dissipation of the HD 2900 line is annoyingly high - the mid-range champion just isn't here yet - the 2900pro is far too loud / hot, yet the 8600gt can't break 10x7 on hardware-intensive games... we're in a weird place.
Avatar image for pcaddict22
pcaddict22

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 pcaddict22
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
yeah, or unless you want to run a high end sli system, which is kind of the market the X38 is targeted to. Yeah, intel might want to thank amd, but their still up **** creek with their X38 situation. BTW, Nvidia, way to stick it to the man with the whole Sli rights thing, I laughed my a@# off after hearing of that.