How many of you are going Vista for Bioshock?

  • 64 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mnk622
mnk622

1296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mnk622
Member since 2003 • 1296 Posts

How many of you are planning to upgrade to Vista to play Bioshock in DX10!?

I am seriously considering switching to Vista..

Avatar image for Sleepyz
Sleepyz

3805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Sleepyz
Member since 2003 • 3805 Posts

Should of added already own Vista which i do.

Avatar image for deactivated-62d5c59659078
deactivated-62d5c59659078

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-62d5c59659078
Member since 2007 • 2104 Posts

I have Vista 64x Home Premium booted up - customized - and optimized all for Bioshock and games after it. I already pre-loaded Bioshock from STEAM, and it's already INSTALLED on my computer!

All I have to do is wait for August 21 @ 12 AM and I press "PLAY". Then, maybe I'll be the first to play Bioshock with DX10 graphics maxed out with an average FPS of about 70-100.

Avatar image for madrocketeer
madrocketeer

11201

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -6

User Lists: 0

#4 madrocketeer
Member since 2005 • 11201 Posts
Nah, the game will look great in DX9. Upgrading your PC responsibly is all about research and timing your upgrade just right. I have researched and decided this is not the time to upgrade to DX10/Vista.
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
Not me. Its gonna be hard to resist when Crysis comes out though. Im just hearing too many bad things about Vista at the moment...
Avatar image for greatmax1
greatmax1

1868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 greatmax1
Member since 2006 • 1868 Posts

I have Vista 64x Home Premium booted up - customized - and optimized all for Bioshock and games after it. I already pre-loaded Bioshock from STEAM, and it's already INSTALLED on my computer!

All I have to do is wait for August 21 @ 12 AM and I press "PLAY". Then, maybe I'll be the first to play Bioshock with DX10 graphics maxed out with an average FPS of about 70-100.

OmegaNemesis28
what are you going to do if it doesnt work? How can you be sure it will work perfectly and with an average of 70-100 fps?
Avatar image for linmukai
linmukai

600

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#7 linmukai
Member since 2003 • 600 Posts

I don't do OS upgrades. When I get my next PC is when I get Vista. For now there is no compelling reason to change and there is actually some case to be made for waiting on improvements to DirectX 10, etc. Why beta test for MS and be frustrated and why spend 150 bucks for something that will more likely run me around 50 or less as part of a system purchase. I am guessing a major oem like HP probably pays MS around 50 bucks and passes that cost onto the consumer as part of the total system price.

My last two game rigs have been HP retail boxes with memory, soundblaster and nvidia (BFG) upgrades to make them competent if not screaming gaming systems. Someday I'll have whatever is the future equivalent of todays Falcon Northwest with liquid cooled quad SLI, etc. but for now, those do very nicely for me and when I setup a new one, there's nothing they can't run well for a couple years generally before they might need a new video card, etc.

Tax time next year is when I might get serious about the next PC and therefore get Vista with it.

I've looked at various side by side DX9 and DX10 demos and while DX10 is nice, really when I am in the middle of a firefight in some game that already looks excellent, it does not matter and it does not detract from the fun. So the heck with blowing money for a OS upgrade I do not need for anything is my view.

The improvements are evolutionary, not revolutionary as the purveyor of Vista would like gamers to believe and then open up thier wallets over.

Avatar image for redkckat
redkckat

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 redkckat
Member since 2003 • 26 Posts

I'ts funny how all you guys always talk about the need to upgrade honestly if you know what your doing then you probally already have Vista installed i personally have Vista x64 ultimate installed and there is no game that i can't get to work and work great i think if you guys are pondering the idea of getting it installed and getting the games to work it maybe that you all lack the knowlage of installing an operating system its not that hard but if you had problems doing this with Xp then expect to have problems with Vista I mean honestly its all about having the best hardware and being able to play the games with all the bells and whistles i personally can play Lost planet on the highest setting and i think thats probally one of the most graphic intensive games out at the moment and i play the dx10 version of course here is the list of my specs though.

Vista 64 Ultimate

2 Core Duo 2.66 stock / 3.24 Overclocked

2x-EVGA 8800GTX SLI

4 GIG OCZ Ram

2x-150GIG Raptor Drives

850 Watt power Suppply

24" Gateway LCD 1080p

Avatar image for firefly026
firefly026

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 firefly026
Member since 2005 • 3270 Posts
I purchased Vista not only for BioShock, but for the other DX10 games such as UT3 and Crysis, not to mention the fact that I was building a new rig, so it was the logical time to make the jump.
Avatar image for gamerchris810
gamerchris810

2372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 gamerchris810
Member since 2007 • 2372 Posts

Will i for Bioshock - No

Will i for Crysis - Yes

Avatar image for deactivated-62d5c59659078
deactivated-62d5c59659078

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-62d5c59659078
Member since 2007 • 2104 Posts

[QUOTE="OmegaNemesis28"]

I have Vista 64x Home Premium booted up - customized - and optimized all for Bioshock and games after it. I already pre-loaded Bioshock from STEAM, and it's already INSTALLED on my computer!

All I have to do is wait for August 21 @ 12 AM and I press "PLAY". Then, maybe I'll be the first to play Bioshock with DX10 graphics maxed out with an average FPS of about 70-100.

greatmax1

what are you going to do if it doesnt work? How can you be sure it will work perfectly and with an average of 70-100 fps?

It's going to work. I've played over 3 dozen games on Vista without a problem including Lost Planet with DX10 maxed out getting over 100 fps.

And I'm pretty sure I'm gonna get about 70-100 fps because I can get any DX9 game over 150. 3DMARK06 gave me about 90-100 FPS maxed

EDIT:

Idk why people bug out about Vista too because i've yet to encounter a single error or problem in Vista. "Yet" but still - nothing so far and it's been 2 months.

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts
Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD?? You think its worth to go for Vista, just to have slightly better graphics, or should i go for LCD, which wil be big jump, since itll be widescreen?
Avatar image for Smudge_Smill
Smudge_Smill

238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 Smudge_Smill
Member since 2005 • 238 Posts

Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??domke13

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

[QUOTE="domke13"]Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??Smudge_Smill

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Yes. But the problem is that i wont be able to afford new LCD till next summer, since i am only 14 and i can make some money only at summer time jobs. On the other hand i could get Vista, since it costs 2 times less than new LCD i am planning tom get. Hmm really hard decision.

Avatar image for deactivated-62d5c59659078
deactivated-62d5c59659078

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-62d5c59659078
Member since 2007 • 2104 Posts

[QUOTE="domke13"]Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??Smudge_Smill

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Vista, if you're PC can handle it good, can bring great visuals and effects. I love the way it looks on my 22", it's like staring at a crystal when browsing folders and stuff. It look nice but again you got to have a good PC to handle it. 2+GB recommended and at least 2.20 GHz+

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts
[QUOTE="Smudge_Smill"]

[QUOTE="domke13"]Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??OmegaNemesis28

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Vista, if you're PC can handle it good, can bring great visuals and effects. I love the way it looks on my 22", it's like staring at a crystal when browsing folders and stuff. It look nice but again you got to have a good PC to handle it. 2+GB recommended and at least 2.20 GHz+

Well i have C2D E6600, 8800 GTX and 2GB of RAM. And crappy 19" LCD. So either Vista now, and no LCD untill summer 2008, or LCD now, and Vista when Crysis comes.

Avatar image for cmdrmonkey
cmdrmonkey

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 cmdrmonkey
Member since 2004 • 994 Posts
My PC could handle vista easily. But frankly I'm lazy, I don't care about anything Vista offers (other than DX10, which isn't even that compelling as DX9 games look fine), and I have better things to spend a few hundred dollars on.
Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

My PC could handle vista easily. But frankly I'm lazy, I don't care about anything Vista offers (other than DX10, which isn't even that compelling as DX9 games look fine), and I have better things to spend a few hundred dollars on. cmdrmonkey

Ye. You have point. I mean the graphical improvement in Bioshock probably wont be even noticeable when playing the game, but bigger and widescreen LCD will surely be.

Avatar image for henri1960
henri1960

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 henri1960
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts
No way! Not worth it!
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#21 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
DirectX10 will be noticably better than DirectX9, you should believe that. Even motion blur alone makes it look better.
Avatar image for kyrieee
kyrieee

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 kyrieee
Member since 2007 • 978 Posts
Switching to Vista? No way in hell with that EULA. But I probably won't ever switch from a CRT either, I'm picky :P
Avatar image for Skullheart
Skullheart

2054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Skullheart
Member since 2006 • 2054 Posts

How many of you are planning to upgrade to Vista to play Bioshock in DX10!?

I am seriously considering switching to Vista..

mnk622

Well don't. Vista is a complete rip off.

Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

DirectX10 will be noticably better than DirectX9, you should believe that. Even motion blur alone makes it look better.-Unreal-

So you are saying that there will be no motion blur in DX9 version of Bioshock, but it will be in DX10, or it will be just better in DX10??

Avatar image for chrisrooR
chrisrooR

9027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 chrisrooR
Member since 2007 • 9027 Posts
My PC could handle vista easily. But frankly I'm lazy, I don't care about anything Vista offers (other than DX10, which isn't even that compelling as DX9 games look fine), and I have better things to spend a few hundred dollars on. cmdrmonkey
Avatar image for firefly026
firefly026

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 firefly026
Member since 2005 • 3270 Posts

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]DirectX10 will be noticably better than DirectX9, you should believe that. Even motion blur alone makes it look better.domke13

So you are saying that there will be no motion blur in DX9 version of Bioshock, but it will be in DX10, or it will be just better in DX10??

To my knowledge, there's no motion blur in BioShock, however the water, particle and shadow effects are all improved in DX10.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="domke13"]

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]DirectX10 will be noticably better than DirectX9, you should believe that. Even motion blur alone makes it look better.firefly026

So you are saying that there will be no motion blur in DX9 version of Bioshock, but it will be in DX10, or it will be just better in DX10??

To my knowledge, there's no motion blur in BioShock, however the water, particle and shadow effects are all improved in DX10.

I could really care less about the added effects.. The game regardless will look spectacular.. What I am more interested in is the possibility of increased performance over DX9.

Avatar image for ElectricNZ
ElectricNZ

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ElectricNZ
Member since 2007 • 2457 Posts
Hmmmm my 8800gts sitting here..... running XP what to do what to do
Avatar image for bignice12
bignice12

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 bignice12
Member since 2003 • 2124 Posts

I purchased Vista not only for BioShock, but for the other DX10 games such as UT3 and Crysis, not to mention the fact that I was building a new rig, so it was the logical time to make the jump.firefly026

Yep same for me. Too bad I wont have a dx10 card till next month....:*(

Avatar image for Zero_Space
Zero_Space

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#30 Zero_Space
Member since 2007 • 659 Posts

How many of you are planning to upgrade to Vista to play Bioshock in DX10!?

I am seriously considering switching to Vista..

mnk622

I already had vista, so it wasn't a matter of choice in regards to Bioshock. I've had Home Premium for some time now. However, I only have a 7950 GT so I won't get any DX 10 goodies.

Avatar image for ElectricNZ
ElectricNZ

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ElectricNZ
Member since 2007 • 2457 Posts

lolol vista has been sitting on my harddrive for a few months, not installed.

People may call me lazy but Im just that opposed to vista, but I still want dx10 graphics :(

Avatar image for firefly026
firefly026

3270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 firefly026
Member since 2005 • 3270 Posts

lolol vista has been sitting on my harddrive for a few months, not installed.

People may call me lazy but Im just that opposed to vista, but I still want dx10 graphics :(

ElectricNZ
Well, if you're that opposed (I don't see how you can be, seeing as how you haven't even used it yet), then you can always dual boot.
Avatar image for ElectricNZ
ElectricNZ

2457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 ElectricNZ
Member since 2007 • 2457 Posts

I have used it though, I go to lans ...

If I dual boot then I have to waste hdd space installing things twice -_- I only have 1tb hdd space :P

Avatar image for brain20035
brain20035

2043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#34 brain20035
Member since 2004 • 2043 Posts
No way I'm changing to Vista. not unless I had more RAM
Avatar image for Unstoppable_1
Unstoppable_1

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 Unstoppable_1
Member since 2003 • 2005 Posts
My new PC has vista so i'm good to go :).
Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts

Hmm. So i am up to decision. Right now my 2 options are:

1: Go for new 20" LCD widescreen LCD to upgrade from 19" LCD

2: Get Vista home premium, Creative X-Fi extreme gamer fatal1ty sound card, new hard drive for Vista, and i also save around 200 euros compared to first decision.

Sorry for going off topic, but which one should i choose??

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#37 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60826 Posts

I didnt for Halo 2 (that is, if I even wanted it to begin with) and I certainly wont for Bioshock.

Im looking foward to Bioshock, but only for the gameplay. To be honest, the idea of having a seperate team dedicated to water effects frightens me. Reeks of an excessive focus on aesthetics.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#38 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I didnt for Halo 2 (that is, if I even wanted it to begin with) and I certainly wont for Bioshock.

Im looking foward to Bioshock, but only for the gameplay. To be honest, the idea of having a seperate team dedicated to water effects frightens me. Reeks of an excessive focus on aesthetics.

mrbojangles25

Well from what I saw in the demo, one of the best parts of the game was the atmosphere, and a lot of that atmosphere was down to it's really nice graphics. This is one of those games that graphics make the game just more immersive.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#39 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60826 Posts
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

I didnt for Halo 2 (that is, if I even wanted it to begin with) and I certainly wont for Bioshock.

Im looking foward to Bioshock, but only for the gameplay. To be honest, the idea of having a seperate team dedicated to water effects frightens me. Reeks of an excessive focus on aesthetics.

-Unreal-

Well from what I saw in the demo, one of the best parts of the game was the atmosphere, and a lot of that atmosphere was down to it's really nice graphics. This is one of those games that graphics make the game just more immersive.

Ya, I suppose youre right...kinda like how STALKER is spookier with HDR and detailed shadowsthan without it.

Avatar image for kyrieee
kyrieee

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 kyrieee
Member since 2007 • 978 Posts
it was only one programmer actually, an artist too
Avatar image for bluedevil3133
bluedevil3133

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 bluedevil3133
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
a new LCD isn't going to help you out that much in the graphics department... I upgraded to a 20" LCD from a 17" LCD. The only good thing about it is having an increased resolution of 1600x1200 rather than 1280x1024 with the 17", but to tell you the truth, you would be hard pressed to tell the difference between the two unless you took screenshots and compared them side by side. If i were you, I would stick with the 19" LCD and buy the X-Fi and Vista.
Avatar image for scorched1992
scorched1992

324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#42 scorched1992
Member since 2006 • 324 Posts

How many of you are planning to upgrade to Vista to play Bioshock in DX10!?

I am seriously considering switching to Vista..

mnk622

I switched a good while back, so I guess that means yes.

Avatar image for Hesperax929
Hesperax929

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Hesperax929
Member since 2003 • 554 Posts
[QUOTE="Smudge_Smill"]

[QUOTE="domke13"]Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??domke13

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Yes. But the problem is that i wont be able to afford new LCD till next summer, since i am only 14 and i can make some money only at summer time jobs. On the other hand i could get Vista, since it costs 2 times less than new LCD i am planning tom get. Hmm really hard decision.

I got a Dell refurbished 20 inch widescreen monitor for about 200 off their website... plus it comes with a really nice warranty. Dunno how much you planned to pay...

Also, how does one tell if it is a 64 bit version of Vista or not?

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts

No because

1) My PC can't run Bioshock

2) My PC can't run Vista

:cry:

Avatar image for delirin
delirin

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 delirin
Member since 2003 • 745 Posts

I have Vista 64x Home Premium booted up - customized - and optimized all for Bioshock and games after it. I already pre-loaded Bioshock from STEAM, and it's already INSTALLED on my computer!

All I have to do is wait for August 21 @ 12 AM and I press "PLAY". Then, maybe I'll be the first to play Bioshock with DX10 graphics maxed out with an average FPS of about 70-100.

OmegaNemesis28

pssst the game doesn't come out till 4pm EST on the 21st. And you won't be getting 70-100 fps with that or any current rig in dx10 with max detail.

edit: oh and yeah, I'll be playing this on vista 64 bit for sure... preloaded and waiting till 4pm teusday ;)

Avatar image for GlenQuagmire
GlenQuagmire

11783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 GlenQuagmire
Member since 2003 • 11783 Posts
I've had Vista since launch. I plan on upgrading to DX10 when the 9800GTXs come out.
Avatar image for IndianaJosh
IndianaJosh

5159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 IndianaJosh
Member since 2003 • 5159 Posts

I'm going to have one hard drive with Windows XP and the other hard drive with Vista 64.

Avatar image for GamingMonkeyPC
GamingMonkeyPC

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#48 GamingMonkeyPC
Member since 2005 • 3576 Posts
Yep, I already have Vista. Hope to see those DX10 goodness!
Avatar image for domke13
domke13

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 domke13
Member since 2006 • 2891 Posts
[QUOTE="domke13"][QUOTE="Smudge_Smill"]

[QUOTE="domke13"]Dont know yet. I am considering new 20" LCD widescreen, since now i have 19" non-widescreen, or Vista. I know LCD costs more than Vista, but i cant have them both. So what would you recommend. Jump to Vista, or jump to better LCD??Hesperax929

I would recommend jump to Vista. Widescreens will only come down in price (and up in usefulness) in the coming months.

If you're at all intrigued by Vista, then give it a go, but if what you've heard doesn't interest you, stick with new widescreen LCD

Yes. But the problem is that i wont be able to afford new LCD till next summer, since i am only 14 and i can make some money only at summer time jobs. On the other hand i could get Vista, since it costs 2 times less than new LCD i am planning tom get. Hmm really hard decision.

I got a Dell refurbished 20 inch widescreen monitor for about 200 off their website... plus it comes with a really nice warranty. Dunno how much you planned to pay...

Also, how does one tell if it is a 64 bit version of Vista or not?

For new LCD i am not going lower than NEC WGX2 20" LCD, whit S-IPS panel which can be found for around 560 euros in my country. It is also widescreen. But do you think it is worth to get new LCD only cause ill get widescreen whit it and higher resolution??

Avatar image for Sokol4ever
Sokol4ever

6717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#50 Sokol4ever
Member since 2007 • 6717 Posts

I can relate to your struggle very well my friend.

I had 19" LCD 1 month ago and after sitting down on my friends 20.1" wide-screen for 1 hour my decision was final.

To those who said you don't have a graphical improvement with wide-screen, they never experienced it.

all new games and many one that are current support 1680x1050 resolution on 16:10 widescreen format.

The difference is spectacular my friend, but trying for example to play an DVD is gorgeous, even surfing the web is more vivid and colorful then on my previous monitor.

Look for 2 ms response time, 3000:1 rate and at least 250 cm2 or higher.

Right now? You won't gain anything from Vista, there are no true direct x 10 games, upgrade smart. XP does all the job done.

You will not regret the monitor, from personal experience I never did.