I got drunk and preordered THE SIMS 3 on D2D

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"][QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"] It's not a question of us vs them. You can like The Sims 3 and still like a lot of other games that are violent - but to dislike a game, simply because it's about creativity, and because it's not about destruction and killing, is just... childish. I suspect that a lot of the haters here are young males in their early to mid teens. Charles_Dickens

Uh no, most guys dislike it because it is a virtual dollhouse. Now, whether men should be playing around with barbies and dollhouses is another philosophical debate entirely, but that is what Sims essentially is. Taking your sims to the toilet and watching them take a dump, having tea parties, and banging them together to make pretend babies.

You've described The Sims 2.

The Sims 3 is a much better representation of the original idea as envisioned by Will Wright, which was to create an abstraction of life, as we live it. Both of the first two Sims games, I felt, were massive teases, because they were kind of shallow, and only offered glimpses into what a great game it could be. I think of The Sims 3 as really being the first game in the series, and I can't wait to see where the developer goes next in The Sims 4.

As far as your argument is concerned, I can assure you that I've never played with dolls, nor have I ever played with a doll house - and my guess is that I'm going to love The Sims 3 for the thousands of ideas that have gone into this game. One of the developers was talking about that very notion: he said that hundreds of people have been working on this game for years, and that each person has advanced dozens of ideas. This means that there are literally thousands of things to discover in this game.

The PC Gamer reviewer wrote in his review that he had been playing The Sims 3 for days, and yet felt that he was only just scratching the surface. If you want to think of The Sims 3 as being 'just a virtual doll-house' then that's your business. In my opinion... and I'll admit up front that I haven't even played this title yet... that playing The Sims 3 is going to be a much, much, much deeper experience than 'playing with a doll house'.

Being a PC gamer - and loving all types of games - this is not a title I would want to miss. It's going to be so refreshing playing a game in which I don't have to kill people and destroy things.

Hugely looking forward to the release on Tuesday.

Sorry, that all sounds very lovely, but I'm not buying it. Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course). That you would suggest Sims 3 to be a much better representation of Will Wright's original idea, when it's the first one that Will Wright didn't actually work on, is also strange. PC Gamer reviews are notorious for embellishing the truth when it comes to early reviews.
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course)F1_2004

92% PC Gamer.

"While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer."

Preview Eurogamer.

"In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet."

92% PC Zone.

"These improvements over the previous game nailed it - I became absolutely besotted. I've lost so many hours to The Sims 3 the PC Zone team were convinced they'd have to surgically remove my mouse from my hand to get me to work."

I haven't played the game myself yet, so all I have to go on is what I'm reading from the websites - but your statement that... "Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone" - seems to be completely wrong. The evidence doesn't support this. Like that other guy, you can ignore all of this evidence if you want to, and you can dismiss the three review scores (92, 92, and 90) with a wave of the hand and say it means nothing - but if you're going to do that then you might as well stop logging onto the internet and reading reviews for games. What's the point in visiting a place like Gamespot, or IGN, or any website, if all you're going to do is dismiss what they have to write?

It's just absolutely baffling to me that anybody would attack a game in this fashion without ever having played it?

Am I saying that The Sims 3 is a great game - no way! (I might even end up thinking it's shallow) But one thing is clear: we have overwhelming evidence to suggest that this third game is going to be a very deep game.

In my opinion, you, like a lot of people (almost exclusively males) have decided not to like this game in advance, and no matter what gets written about it, or what type of improvements have been made, you're going to find fault with it - what's the deal with you people? Are you so insecure that you need to be a member of a club whose sole purpose is to hate stuff?

Here's my advice: before you start being critical of game, play it first.

Avatar image for neatfeatguy
neatfeatguy

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#53 neatfeatguy
Member since 2005 • 4415 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course)Charles_Dickens

92% PC Gamer.

"While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer."

Preview Eurogamer.

"In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet."

92% PC Zone.

"These improvements over the previous game nailed it - I became absolutely besotted. I've lost so many hours to The Sims 3 the PC Zone team were convinced they'd have to surgically remove my mouse from my hand to get me to work."

I haven't played the game myself yet, so all I have to go on is what I'm reading from the websites - but your statement that... "Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone" - seems to be completely wrong. The evidence doesn't support this. Like that other guy, you can ignore all of this evidence if you want to, and you can dismiss the three review scores (92, 92, and 90) with a wave of the hand and say it means nothing - but if you're going to do that then you might as well stop logging onto the internet and reading reviews for games. What's the point in visiting a place like Gamespot, or IGN, or any website, if all you're going to do is dismiss what they have to write?

It's just absolutely baffling to me that anybody would attack a game in this fashion without ever having played it?

Am I saying that The Sims 3 is a great game - no way! (I might even end up thinking it's shallow) But one thing is clear: we have overwhelming evidence to suggest that this third game is going to be a very deep game.

In my opinion, you, like a lot of people (almost exclusively males) have decided not to like this game in advance, and no matter what gets written about it, or what type of improvements have been made, you're going to find fault with it - what's the deal with you people? Are you so insecure that you need to be a member of a club whose sole purpose is to hate stuff?

Here's my advice: before you start being critical of game, play it first.

I haven't had anything to say about the Sims series, but as I see it, it's boring. It's just not my type of game. I tried playing the first Sims a little bit (a good hour or two), but I just didn't find it fun.

I used to be big into sim type games - I greatly enjoyed Sim City 1, 2 and 3 (4 was kinda bad). I grew out of them. People that tend to say a game is bad are the ones that just don't like those types of games or they don't have fun playing those types of games. There are obvious reasons to dislike a game - bad graphics, bad controls, bad sound, bad story, bad replay value - but a game shouldn't be based on the fact that you just don't like it because it's boring or not your type of game.

There are games that I've played that I didn't like, doesn't mean they were bad - they had good controls, good sound, good graphics, story may or may not have been good - but I didn't like the game because it wasn't fun for me. I wouldn't try to score the game (if I was a reviewer) bad just because I found it boring.

Charles_Dickens, you've said your peace. You can't change someone's mind if they're not willing to listen. All you're going to do is burn yourself out and become more and more irritated by close-minded people's thoughts/opinions.

Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

[QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course)neatfeatguy

92% PC Gamer.

"While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer."

Preview Eurogamer.

"In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet."

92% PC Zone.

"These improvements over the previous game nailed it - I became absolutely besotted. I've lost so many hours to The Sims 3 the PC Zone team were convinced they'd have to surgically remove my mouse from my hand to get me to work."

I haven't played the game myself yet, so all I have to go on is what I'm reading from the websites - but your statement that... "Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone" - seems to be completely wrong. The evidence doesn't support this. Like that other guy, you can ignore all of this evidence if you want to, and you can dismiss the three review scores (92, 92, and 90) with a wave of the hand and say it means nothing - but if you're going to do that then you might as well stop logging onto the internet and reading reviews for games. What's the point in visiting a place like Gamespot, or IGN, or any website, if all you're going to do is dismiss what they have to write?

It's just absolutely baffling to me that anybody would attack a game in this fashion without ever having played it?

Am I saying that The Sims 3 is a great game - no way! (I might even end up thinking it's shallow) But one thing is clear: we have overwhelming evidence to suggest that this third game is going to be a very deep game.

In my opinion, you, like a lot of people (almost exclusively males) have decided not to like this game in advance, and no matter what gets written about it, or what type of improvements have been made, you're going to find fault with it - what's the deal with you people? Are you so insecure that you need to be a member of a club whose sole purpose is to hate stuff?

Here's my advice: before you start being critical of game, play it first.

ICharles_Dickens, you've said your peace. You can't change someone's mind if they're not willing to listen. All you're going to do is burn yourself out and become more and more irritated by close-minded people's thoughts/opinions.

Yup, it's foolish even responding to a person who's bashing a game that he hasn't even played yet - I can't help myself. I'm a serial poster.
Avatar image for Cdscottie
Cdscottie

1872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 Cdscottie
Member since 2004 • 1872 Posts

Growing up as a kid, you never once had a Cabbage Patch Kid? Or maybe a Garbage Pail Kid? Or you never played with GI Joe figures? Or Transformers? You do realize that all these things are c|assfied as "dolls" don't you? But to get a boy to play with a doll - which they associate as a girl toy, the toy industry started using the term "Action Figure".

You can call them what you want, in the end, they're all dolls.

neatfeatguy
G.I. Joe's are Action Figures!..... Their resemblance to Ken is nothing more then a coincidence..... Leave me alone!!!!
Avatar image for Astaroth2k
Astaroth2k

877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Astaroth2k
Member since 2006 • 877 Posts

I always thought the sims was for pre pubescent girls but sims 3 has caught my attention...still not sure if i will buy, but it has perked my interest far more than the other titles thats for sure.

Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

I always thought the sims was for pre pubescent girls but sims 3 has caught my attention...still not sure if i will buy, but it has perked my interest far more than the other titles thats for sure.

Astaroth2k
Now that's more like it.
Avatar image for Morphic
Morphic

4345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 Morphic
Member since 2003 • 4345 Posts

I've never played any of the Sims games, and I'm not sure if i should buy Sims 3 or not. I wish they had a demo.

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course)Charles_Dickens

92% PC Gamer.

"While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer."

Preview Eurogamer.

"In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet."

92% PC Zone.

"These improvements over the previous game nailed it - I became absolutely besotted. I've lost so many hours to The Sims 3 the PC Zone team were convinced they'd have to surgically remove my mouse from my hand to get me to work."

I haven't played the game myself yet, so all I have to go on is what I'm reading from the websites - but your statement that... "Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone" - seems to be completely wrong. The evidence doesn't support this. Like that other guy, you can ignore all of this evidence if you want to, and you can dismiss the three review scores (92, 92, and 90) with a wave of the hand and say it means nothing - but if you're going to do that then you might as well stop logging onto the internet and reading reviews for games. What's the point in visiting a place like Gamespot, or IGN, or any website, if all you're going to do is dismiss what they have to write?

It's just absolutely baffling to me that anybody would attack a game in this fashion without ever having played it?

Am I saying that The Sims 3 is a great game - no way! (I might even end up thinking it's shallow) But one thing is clear: we have overwhelming evidence to suggest that this third game is going to be a very deep game.

In my opinion, you, like a lot of people (almost exclusively males) have decided not to like this game in advance, and no matter what gets written about it, or what type of improvements have been made, you're going to find fault with it - what's the deal with you people? Are you so insecure that you need to be a member of a club whose sole purpose is to hate stuff?

Here's my advice: before you start being critical of game, play it first.

lol? I'm sorry, what part is so baffling? I've played Sims 1 and 2. I've seen just about everything there is to see about Sims 3 at this point without playing the game, You yourself have said you haven't played the game but will play it when it gets released, yet you argue with such conviction as if you've developed the game yourself. Typical professional internet forum arguer. It's fairly obvious that I have a good idea of what Sims 3 has to offer. Furthermore I'm not attacking the game, I'm saying it's the same principle since Sims 1, with new upgrades. I'm sure there's a lot of upgrades, enough to not "leave you feeling like you've purchased half a game" like the ever-so-reputable PCGamer puts it, but it's still the same game. What are those scores supposed to tell me? The Sims 1 got 92% average score, The Sims 2 got 90%. Sims 3 would need a 100% for me to consider it as drastically better than the previous 2.

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#60 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

It's gonna suck

Mr__Peanut
it's apparently the greatest of the 3
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

You didn't even acknowledge that Will Wright isn't on board.

And as for the advance reviews I could care less, I don't know why people put editor's reviews on a pedastal all the time, they're just someone else's opinions and they're too scared to be controversial to the general public to be reliable.

Mr__Peanut

Will Wright isn't the only competent game designer on Earth. Just becuase they make a third Sims game without him actually making it doesn't mean anything. It will still be great and if you don't want you don't have to get it. Just don't come up with lame excuses like 'Oh Will Wright isn't making it so I don't have to buy it now'. They consolted him and Redwood's a good enough company to do things right.

Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

Worse things have been done I suppose.

Mr__Peanut

Bwahahaha...that's funny. :) I feel your pain...and don't feel bad...it can be nearly as bad as drunk dialing an ex.

Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

[QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"]

[QUOTE="F1_2004"]Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone (to be added in expansions, of course)F1_2004

92% PC Gamer.

"While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer."

Preview Eurogamer.

"In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet."

92% PC Zone.

"These improvements over the previous game nailed it - I became absolutely besotted. I've lost so many hours to The Sims 3 the PC Zone team were convinced they'd have to surgically remove my mouse from my hand to get me to work."

I haven't played the game myself yet, so all I have to go on is what I'm reading from the websites - but your statement that... "Everything seems to indicate that Sims 3 is just a more polished step up from the previous Sims games, with many features in Sims 2 actually gone" - seems to be completely wrong. The evidence doesn't support this. Like that other guy, you can ignore all of this evidence if you want to, and you can dismiss the three review scores (92, 92, and 90) with a wave of the hand and say it means nothing - but if you're going to do that then you might as well stop logging onto the internet and reading reviews for games. What's the point in visiting a place like Gamespot, or IGN, or any website, if all you're going to do is dismiss what they have to write?

It's just absolutely baffling to me that anybody would attack a game in this fashion without ever having played it?

Am I saying that The Sims 3 is a great game - no way! (I might even end up thinking it's shallow) But one thing is clear: we have overwhelming evidence to suggest that this third game is going to be a very deep game.

In my opinion, you, like a lot of people (almost exclusively males) have decided not to like this game in advance, and no matter what gets written about it, or what type of improvements have been made, you're going to find fault with it - what's the deal with you people? Are you so insecure that you need to be a member of a club whose sole purpose is to hate stuff?

Here's my advice: before you start being critical of game, play it first.

lol? I'm sorry, what part is so baffling? I've played Sims 1 and 2. I've seen just about everything there is to see about Sims 3 at this point without playing the game, You yourself have said you haven't played the game but will play it when it gets released, yet you argue with such conviction as if you've developed the game yourself. Typical professional internet forum arguer. It's fairly obvious that I have a good idea of what Sims 3 has to offer. Furthermore I'm not attacking the game, I'm saying it's the same principle since Sims 1, with new upgrades. I'm sure there's a lot of upgrades, enough to not "leave you feeling like you've purchased half a game" like the ever-so-reputable PCGamer puts it, but it's still the same game. What are those scores supposed to tell me? The Sims 1 got 92% average score, The Sims 2 got 90%. Sims 3 would need a 100% for me to consider it as drastically better than the previous 2.

LOL at your whole post.

Listen, guy. I'm passionate about computer gaming, and all indications are that The Sims 3 is going to be one of the best games of the summer (Eurogamer wrote: "It's both more of a role-playing game than it's ever been before, and more of a design game than it's ever been before. It may suffer a few glaring compromises, but it's an essential play for anyone with an interest in what videogames can achieve outside of a targeting reticule." - that about sums it up for me.)

So tomorrow there's a strong possibility that I'm going to do what gamers tend to do on a game's release day: I'm going to post about the game. Do us all a favor, guy, and just stay the hell out of that thread. What I'm not going to do is become involved in some twisty-tangly debate with some guy WHO HASN'T EVEN PLAYED THE GAME.

So just stay the hell out of my god-damned thread.

Because you know what, mate, a guy who tries to stir up trouble, by writing bad things about a game he hasn't even played is what's commonly referred to as a troll. That's right, a troll.

And for your information - just to make certain that you understand what I'm trying to say here, because you seem rather thick in the head to me - if... and that's a big if... but IF I feel that the game is actually lacking in certain areas, then you can bet that I'm going to post about it. So don't give me this fan-boy crap. I'm not a fan-boy. I didn't even like the first two games very much. I wrote that in my posts above, but obviously you don't know how to read. Just stay the hell out of my thread, guy. I've had enough of your nonsense.

If you persist in being critical of a game that you've not even played then something is going to have to be done about you.

Avatar image for lpjazzman220
lpjazzman220

2249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#64 lpjazzman220
Member since 2008 • 2249 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr__Peanut"]

It's gonna suck

lightleggy

it's apparently the greatest of the 3

and yet it will still suck, sad

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Mr__Peanut"]

It's gonna suck

lpjazzman220

it's apparently the greatest of the 3

and yet it will still suck, sad

Wouldn't be surprised, so far its average score is lower than the first two.
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#66 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts

Worse things have been done I suppose.

Mr__Peanut

You could have pre-ordered Big Rigs 2. If they make a single sale, they might plague use with Big Rigs 3.

Avatar image for MadCat46
MadCat46

1494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 MadCat46
Member since 2004 • 1494 Posts
All the reviews have been very positive about the game, averaging an 86 in metacritic. Even the 4 sites that gave it an 80, the lowest score, have had nothing but good things to say about the game. We'll see though I guess.
Avatar image for BLaZe462
BLaZe462

1432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 BLaZe462
Member since 2002 • 1432 Posts

Ha! That's how I ended up with Spore. :P :(mr_mozilla

same

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#69 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

Lol, self owned.

dinuattila

Now he'll have to get drunk again just to play it. :P

Avatar image for crapdog
crapdog

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 crapdog
Member since 2006 • 427 Posts

i still dont get it why anyone should play a "life simulator"

Avatar image for jasopan
jasopan

2360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 jasopan
Member since 2006 • 2360 Posts
What are u talking about! that's a good thing =) now you can get drunk in sims3 instead...
Avatar image for Anthony01355
Anthony01355

1486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Anthony01355
Member since 2006 • 1486 Posts

lol...no.

Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

i still dont get it why anyone should play a "life simulator"

crapdog

At E3 yesterday, during the presentations, there was all sorts of talk about 'destructible environments'.

The Sims, on the other hand, isn't about destruction, but rather about creation, creation of people, of relationships, of buildings, of items, and now, in The Sims 3, of entire communities - and it's wonderful, and refreshing, and unique.

And I can't wait to head on down to the store after work and pick up my copy. This is THE game of the summer.

Avatar image for Dr_Brocoli
Dr_Brocoli

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Dr_Brocoli
Member since 2007 • 3724 Posts

What, are you crazy! I've been waiting for this title for six months! I'm now counting the hours! Tuesday night (when I get to play) cannot come quickly enough.

The Sims 3, by the way, has just received its third review - it got a 90.

So that's two 92's and a 90 - not bad at all. In fact that's awesome. The reviewers are all saying the same thing, that the game is damned difficult to walk away from once you commence trying to satisfy you 'life goals'. They're also saying that it's easily the best Sims game to date, and that the freedom of movement throughout the city is wonderful.

Trust me, you did the right thing. You should get drunk more often.

Charles_Dickens
You DO realise that EA cut out content and will start releasing expansions that are full priced or near full priced every 3 months? Then 7-8 months from now will announce sims 4.
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts
[QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"]

What, are you crazy! I've been waiting for this title for six months! I'm now counting the hours! Tuesday night (when I get to play) cannot come quickly enough.

The Sims 3, by the way, has just received its third review - it got a 90.

So that's two 92's and a 90 - not bad at all. In fact that's awesome. The reviewers are all saying the same thing, that the game is damned difficult to walk away from once you commence trying to satisfy you 'life goals'. They're also saying that it's easily the best Sims game to date, and that the freedom of movement throughout the city is wonderful.

Trust me, you did the right thing. You should get drunk more often.

Dr_Brocoli
You DO realise that EA cut out content and will start releasing expansions that are full priced or near full priced every 3 months? Then 7-8 months from now will announce sims 4.

What the hell is the matter with you people? The Sims 3 is a complete game, okay. Stop it with this endless whining about how The Sims 3 is an empty game that was produced solely to sell expansion packs. That's the lamest, most tired argument about the sims that any person can advance. Some of the reviewers have even foreseen that people will advance that argument. Such as the writer from Euorgamer, who wrote this: "In short: enormously promising. I just don't know if it will be enough to convert those who fill comment threads whining about the stream of add-on packs, and that's a shame. Without losing any of the construction and personalisation elements which have attracted the huge casual audience for The Sims, this is as gamer-centric as the series has ever been. Unless something goes drastically wrong in the next two weeks, I really can't see this not being the best yet." And here's what PC Gamer wrote in their review: ""While there's clearly room to grow The Sims 3 won't leave you feeling like you've purchased just half a game. After spending many hours with it, I still feel like I've seen only a fraction of what it has to offer." It's a given that the series will expand - that's the whole point. You're supposed to look forward to these expansions. The fact is that Redwood Studios is now employing hundreds of people on this franchise. If Crysis, or any other FPS, were to receive this amount of attention (they can't, because the resources just aren't there - when you've sold one hundred million units of a game then you can afford to spend massive amounts of money on strengthening you design team... I mean, obviously) then most of you guys would be wetting yourselves. You'd be wetting yourselves. I'm open to critical remarks about The Sims 3 - I love debates - but I'm not getting anything out of this thread. Not one person has advanced an idea about The Sims 3 that has caused me to think that that person has a good idea about something in the game that can be improved upon. Not one.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
If Crysis, or any other FPS, were to receive this amount of attention (they can't, because the resources just aren't there - when you've sold one hundred million units of a game then you can afford to spend massive amounts of money on strengthening you design team... I mean, obviously) then most of you guys would be wetting yourselves. You'd be wetting yourselves. Charles_Dickens
That is pointless to say, because Crysis is an FPS, and not all gamers play FPS games, compared to Sims that has an entirely different range of consumers, most of which kids (yeah who would of thought millions of kids vs some guys/a few girls that like FPS games) and girls, and a small number or people that play FPS games, etc regularly. About you, trying to defend Sims 3. Yeah look at the Sims 3 store and don't tell me they did all that after they already finished it. Anyway, what I wanted to say, since I'm not really interested in Sims 3, is to stop comparing it to other games, especially FPS games. Sims is in a genre of it's own and when you have a game that is made especially for the kids, but can also be played by grown ups you'll get lots of sales. When you make a game for kids that's appealing to almost anyone of course you'll get lots of sales, do all games have to be made for kids so that they sell more and have the budget of EA? Also those hundred million units are all the expansions put together with the games, of course you'll have hundreds of millions of copies sold when you have 25+ games with a few content packs that are sold for almost the same price as an expansion.
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

This is such an odd thread.

It's filled with people who clearly have no desire to buy the game, nor did they ever have any desire to buy the game - in other words, no matter how well this game was made, clearly some people in this thread were going to hate The Sims 3.

And I can't help but think that if these same people had created their own thread, and were jabbering on about their favorite FPS, or what have you, and some other person came in and started bad-mouthing the game, and it transpired that they hadn't even played the game, and had no intention whatsoever to do so, then that person would be called a troll by every other person participating in that thread.

Yes, a troll.

A troll is somebody who hasn't played a game, has no intention of playing it, and yet participates in threads, and is highly critical of the game in question - that describes perfectly 99% of the people in this thread. If you don't like The Sims, and have no desire to play The Sims 3, then why don't you just buzz off.

Avatar image for Mr__Peanut
Mr__Peanut

828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Mr__Peanut
Member since 2008 • 828 Posts

if you don't like this thread, charlie, Stop bumping it back onto the first page.

Avatar image for F1_2004
F1_2004

8009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 F1_2004
Member since 2003 • 8009 Posts
No kidding. It's pretty obvious this thread started out as a joke topic and a diss on Sims3. And this guy is having a heart attack over it. If this, if that, why this, why that... man chill out and go read something else.
Avatar image for JackBurton
JackBurton

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#81 JackBurton
Member since 2002 • 3808 Posts

So tomorrow there's a strong possibility that[...] I'm going to post about the game. Do us all a favor, guy, and just stay the hell out of that thread. [...] So just stay the hell out of my god-damned thread. Charles_Dickens

Good luck enforcing that, mate - if you post here ANYONE, yes anyone,may reply.

As an aside: LINKS Charles, learn how to use 'em - no need to quote the same reviews over and over and over and over again. :|