I hate EA but I love their games.

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Origin-
-Origin-

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#1 -Origin-
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

Electronic Arts have always been my enemy, I hate them for a couple reasons to start, they buyout all the good, smaller gaming business, example, Bioware, makers of the KOTOR series, now that EA has bought Bioware, I really don't see another KOTOR coming out just because EA has never worked on a star wars game ever. The second reason why I hate EA is because there have been times where they have bought out a small gaming company and remade one of their games and it was just plain poop! And the third reason why I hate EA is because of their DRM, Secu-ROM has got to be my worst enemy ever....They totally ruin the games by making you activate your games online, only letting you install it like 2,3 times. Like the fact that you can only install a game 2,3 times must really show how little they care for their games, because it's as if their saying, we don't think people are going to want to play our games again because we only let them install the game twice. Like how has it come to this....

Now here's the next thing, I've just recently realized that EA is releasing 3 of the games I want this year:
Red Alert 3, Mass effect and Miror's edge.

To me these are going to be big games for me because I'm really looking forward to them.

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

Avatar image for NightShade999
NightShade999

180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 NightShade999
Member since 2005 • 180 Posts

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

-Origin-

Wow they outdid themselves

Avatar image for fireandcloud
fireandcloud

5118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 fireandcloud
Member since 2005 • 5118 Posts
not sure what an ea game really is. i mean, aren't half the games now published by ea? but that doesn't make them ea games. is crysis an ea game? i would still give credit to the developers first and foremost - hence, i'd call crysis a crytek game, not an ea game. and i'd call kotor and mass effect bioware games, not ea games. after all, these developers weren't dissolved but kept their legal identity.
Avatar image for Helloiseeu
Helloiseeu

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#4 Helloiseeu
Member since 2007 • 786 Posts
You should have seen what they did SCS. You'd be reallt upset.
Avatar image for nevereathim
nevereathim

2161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 nevereathim
Member since 2006 • 2161 Posts
You know it was like that at first, but then the next guy, one of the guys at Bioware said that they were going to take out the one week part cuz everyone hated it so much
Avatar image for zerosaber456
zerosaber456

1363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 zerosaber456
Member since 2005 • 1363 Posts

You know it was like that at first, but then the next guy, one of the guys at Bioware said that they were going to take out the one week part cuz everyone hated it so muchnevereathim

What he said. Shortly after announcing how this DRM works, bioware took out the 10 days validation thing. Instead, what will happen is that everytime you download a patch, it will validate your cd-key if it's legal great. if not........

Avatar image for iamthe1ne
iamthe1ne

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 iamthe1ne
Member since 2003 • 628 Posts
i agree with you TC
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#8 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
I hate EA also... poor support and they buy out every good developer then turn their games into crap.
Avatar image for IamGrunt
IamGrunt

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 IamGrunt
Member since 2006 • 239 Posts

And where has gone the "EA's offer for R*" thingy.

I hope they dont buy out R* or we wont see anymore GTAs...

Oh also they make you buy the sims expansions with stuff that could have always been there in the real game...Anyway thats just a little aspect but I agree with ya OP.

Avatar image for zerosaber456
zerosaber456

1363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 zerosaber456
Member since 2005 • 1363 Posts
EA took down with some of best franchises of all time. When EA bought out Origin they looked at a garbage canand chucked Wing Commander. To this very day I've been very skeiptical on buying their games. Whenever I buy a game from EA, I either wait till it's cheap or if I ever get an EA game I have a tendency to return it. I'm not even quite sure if I own an EA game. The only time I will buy an EA game right off the bat is Mass effect PC only because Bioware developed it
Avatar image for themovi3nut
themovi3nut

946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 themovi3nut
Member since 2007 • 946 Posts
I dislike EA along with most of the games the are asscociated with. They are just monopolizing the industry, plus I don't agree with making a sports game or a harry potter game and releasing it on every system available.
Avatar image for RobertBowen
RobertBowen

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12 RobertBowen
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

-Origin-

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

Avatar image for zeus_gb
zeus_gb

7793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#13 zeus_gb
Member since 2004 • 7793 Posts

I don't like EA at the best of times, I think their tech support is laughable and I hate SecureROM. I have a brand new SATA DVD-RW and I can't play Rainbox Six Las Vegas 2 because SecureROM won't detect the disk (even though it's a UBISoft game I still hate SecureROM).

This new activation crap really makes my blood boil, what gives EA the right to dictate to me how many times I can install it on my own PC. This whole idea of we simply lease the content is a complete load of **** I buy it and it becomes mine end of story.

Avatar image for df853
df853

1433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 df853
Member since 2004 • 1433 Posts
[QUOTE="-Origin-"]

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

RobertBowen

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

Thank you. Someone has stated the truth. Everyone keeps thinking you can only install the game 3 times, and that is clearly bs. The whole concept of activation binding to a specific hardware profile is not new. Win XP with a non-corporate key does this only you get 1 activation, not the 3 this game will provide.

I was unaware that this game did #5 you listed above. That sux. I don't want games messing with low level parts of my OS because I don't know what they are doing and I don't know how to revert back aside from reformatting which is bs. If something starts randomly failing I may have no way of fixing it. Well... I wasn't so against SecureROM before, but now I guess I am...

Avatar image for BlackAlpha666
BlackAlpha666

2614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 BlackAlpha666
Member since 2005 • 2614 Posts

Yeah, well, the whole Windows activation process is automatized. You are guaranteed to be able to activate your Windows copy, unless you used a banned/illegal serial when you installed Windows. If you don't got internet for whatever reason you can call MS in YOUR OWN country and do the AUTOMATIZED process over the phone. Whether you do it over the internet or by phone, it won't take any longer then 15 minutes and that's if you are very slow.

With EA you must send them an e-mail and wait for a very long time until they reply. You could also contact them by phone and if you are unlucky you'll have to make an international call. Ontop of that, EA can refuse your request and then you'll have to buy another copy or you can tell them to bugger of and you don't buy another copy. I bet that will be the point at which many people will put on their pirate hat and say "ARRR".

Avatar image for Nitrous2O
Nitrous2O

1813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Nitrous2O
Member since 2004 • 1813 Posts

Everyone keeps thinking you can only install the game 3 times, and that is clearly bs. The whole concept of activation binding to a specific hardware profile is not new. Win XP with a non-corporate key does this only you get 1 activation, not the 3 this game will provide. df853

Which means nothing in terms of making it more acceptable, 3 lifetime activations is meager -- for a game!

I know you mean well, but comparing a game to an OS is not a good comparison IMO. A game is more of a personal purchase, something you are proud of, something you add to your collection and fully expect to use it as often and as many times into the future as you want.

Although many people don't like OS activations, operating systems are in general more easily accepted as disposable software once they have become obsolete. Frequently when I build a new machine ground-up, I buy another operating system for it, but....on the other hand, backwards compatibility notwithstanding (has been quite good actually + utils such as DOSBox), I also certainly expect to be able to play all my games I've purchased in the past on the new machine(s) going forward.

In addition, operating systems (Windows) are sold in retail and OEM flavors, retail grants you the license to transfer your copy of the OS to other machines, OEM licenses the OS to the initial machine.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
Yeah, well, the whole Windows activation process is automatized. You are guaranteed to be able to activate your Windows copy, unless you used a banned/illegal serial when you installed Windows. If you don't got internet for whatever reason you can call MS in YOUR OWN country and do the AUTOMATIZED process over the phone.BlackAlpha666
No, you're not guaranteed. OEM Windows licenses (what most buy) are, according to their own EULA and documentation, only good for ONE activation. Ever. Period. MS has traditionally just been nice and allowed you to transfer activations if you bother to give them a good excuse. But if they ever bothered to actually enforce it, you'd be completely up a creek if you ever needed to reactivate - if you planned on reactivating for any reason ever, you should have bought the retail version at 2-3x the price. It's also most definitely not completely automated - the automated online part fails and you have to make the 15 minute (probably much less if you don't count sitting on hold) phone call if your activation is still floating around out there, which is pretty easy and short, as is every other reactivation phone call I've had to make in my life.
Avatar image for BlackAlpha666
BlackAlpha666

2614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 BlackAlpha666
Member since 2005 • 2614 Posts

[QUOTE="BlackAlpha666"]Yeah, well, the whole Windows activation process is automatized. You are guaranteed to be able to activate your Windows copy, unless you used a banned/illegal serial when you installed Windows. If you don't got internet for whatever reason you can call MS in YOUR OWN country and do the AUTOMATIZED process over the phone.Makari
No, you're not guaranteed. OEM Windows licenses (what most buy) are, according to their own EULA and documentation, only good for ONE activation. Ever. Period. MS has traditionally just been nice and allowed you to transfer activations if you bother to give them a good excuse. But if they ever bothered to actually enforce it, you'd be completely up a creek if you ever needed to reactivate - if you planned on reactivating for any reason ever, you should have bought the retail version at 2-3x the price. It's also most definitely not completely automated - the automated online part fails and you have to make the 15 minute (probably much less if you don't count sitting on hold) phone call if your activation is still floating around out there, which is pretty easy and short, as is every other reactivation phone call I've had to make in my life.

I thought the phone call was how you tell them that you "deserve" to get a new activation. I've done loads of Windows activations. With many of them I had to call MS and choose the option that I had replaced the motherboard or another "significant hardware component". If the whole process is automated, I don't see how they can refuse. They could ban your serial if you activate it too many times but they never did that to me, ever. Even when I reinstalled Windows a few times in a row, on the same day, on the same PC with the same hardware, it still worked fine.

I've never had a problem with OEM installations unless I had to use a special installation that would only work on specific hardware combinations/PCs. But not all OEM installations are like that. I believe it's up to the PC manufacturer to choose for that option. OEM is basically a customized Windows installation. But I don't think this has anything to do with activations, you just can't install Windows. I could bypass this with a "special" Windows installation DVD to install it. Once I got into Windows I could activate it just fine.

By the way, you can't buy OEM installations. Atleast, the regular customers are not allowed to buy them. They are meant purely for PC manufacturers and system builders.

But to be honest, I don't see how you can compare a simple game, an extremely simple singleplayer game, with an operating system.

Avatar image for Drazule
Drazule

8693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Drazule
Member since 2007 • 8693 Posts

I agree with you so much, Although Ive heard that the 10 day thing is out. I love teh games, and hate the publisher. like somebody said, if Rockstar is bought by EA, expect to see either no GTA V or GTA V then GTA V: Luxury Vehicles, then GTA V: pimpin GANSTA! AND SO ON

*sorry caps

Avatar image for iwokojance
iwokojance

1040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 iwokojance
Member since 2005 • 1040 Posts
[QUOTE="RobertBowen"][QUOTE="-Origin-"]

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

df853

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

Thank you. Someone has stated the truth. Everyone keeps thinking you can only install the game 3 times, and that is clearly bs. The whole concept of activation binding to a specific hardware profile is not new. Win XP with a non-corporate key does this only you get 1 activation, not the 3 this game will provide.

I was unaware that this game did #5 you listed above. That sux. I don't want games messing with low level parts of my OS because I don't know what they are doing and I don't know how to revert back aside from reformatting which is bs. If something starts randomly failing I may have no way of fixing it. Well... I wasn't so against SecureROM before, but now I guess I am...

#5 makes me upset, too. I will still probably buy Mass Effect, but I'll wait until Gogamer has a big sale. Still, I'm apprehensive. Similar protection programs have previsously screwed up other software I've run on my pc, and I had to go to a computer shop to have them remedy the situation. Those programs do truly get deeply ingrained in your system and it's pretty hard for the average guy to troubleshoot and fix them.

Avatar image for RobertBowen
RobertBowen

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 RobertBowen
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts

For those who like irony, Sony BMG (Sony are the makers of SecureROM) are now in hot water with French authorities who discovered that 47% of the software being used on one of their servers was pirated. That was back in March this year.

Meanwhile, last October a representative of Sony BMG giving testimony in court reckons each time you rip a CD or make a backup copy (like backing up music you have downloaded onto your hard disk in case it crashes) you are stealing.

So just remember when SecureROM is installing itself on your PC in future, that the company making it 'to combat piracy' have used pirated software themselves. Can we say 'hypocrisy'?

Avatar image for deactivated-5d78b683675c5
deactivated-5d78b683675c5

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5d78b683675c5
Member since 2007 • 3161 Posts

For those who like irony, Sony BMG (Sony are the makers of SecureROM) are now in hot water with French authorities who discovered that 47% of the software being used on one of their servers was pirated. That was back in March this year.

Meanwhile, last October a representative of Sony BMG giving testimony in court reckons each time you rip a CD or make a backup copy (like backing up music you have downloaded onto your hard disk in case it crashes) you are stealing.

So just remember when SecureROM is installing itself on your PC in future, that the company making it 'to combat piracy' have used pirated software themselves. Can we say 'hypocrisy'?

RobertBowen

I have to say, the more talk about SecureRom, the more I feel apprehensive about installing a game with it on my PC. I'm almost regretting pre-ordering it instead of waiting a little while after it comes out. I really hope it doesn't interfere with any programs that I have.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#24 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts

I used to love their games when i was younger.. however they have been releasing some huge dissapointments over the last few years.

C&C Generals, C&C3 and the upcoming RA3 have all dissapointed me hugely.. the upcoming RA3 i dont have high hopes for. They've gone even more into the sillyness that RA2 went to only they've taken it way to far. Look at the bear cannon and you'll see what im talking about.

As far as the Mass Effect activation.. there is no way it would be like that. They wouldn't terminate cd keys for those people that havn't logged in for it to activate in over a week. Obviously people go on holidays and people dont get time to play one particular game every week.. or what if they want to reinstall it later on in say 6-12 months time.. They wont release a game with such a ridiculous method of activation because no one will buy the game and they would have complaints from everyone that did.

Avatar image for GPAddict
GPAddict

5964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 GPAddict
Member since 2005 • 5964 Posts

How ironic that your username is Origin.

R.I.P. Origin Systems! :cry:

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.RobertBowen
This part's going to suck, but Safedisc does the same thing re: dropping files on your hard drive without asking, and late last year was singled out by MS as being a security vulnerability under XP (not Vista). Punkbuster does the same thing, running a service in the background to give itself admin rights. Most of the copy protection programs are switching to that method for Vista compatibility, basically. Older versions of SecuROM that supposedly caused less problem in the past worked by directly modifying your CD drive, IIRC. But yeah, boycotting #5 out of a game currently leads to boycotting Activision, 2K, EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard, and god knows how many other publishers, further including the ones that use PunkBuster. And it is, again, something that these guys have been doing since 1999 or 2000 or so.
Avatar image for gamerguy845
gamerguy845

2074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 gamerguy845
Member since 2007 • 2074 Posts
[QUOTE="-Origin-"]

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

RobertBowen

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

thank you, I had never known that. i am one of the few people who actually don't HATE EA, and now they have let me down

Avatar image for RobertBowen
RobertBowen

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#28 RobertBowen
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts


This part's going to suck, but Safedisc does the same thing re: dropping files on your hard drive without asking, and late last year was singled out by MS as being a security vulnerability under XP (not Vista).

Makari


And Microsoft released a security bulletin and fix to address the problem. Also, after having done a bit of research, the only file that seems to be problematic with SafeDisc is secdrv.sys, which is installed in the /Windows/System directory of your hard disk, and this can easily be deleted or renamed if it is causing a problem. I have found no information about it placing unremovable keys in the registry either. If you have information to the contrary, please feel free to share it as I would find it of interest. Some reported problems include SafeDisc interfering with some CD/DVD burners. Unlike previous versions of SecuROM, SafeDisc does not install itself in a hidden directory with a filename using illegal characters that cannot be deleted.



Punkbuster does the same thing, running a service in the background to give itself admin rights.

Makari


Yes, I was aware of Punkbuster and how it operates, and only allow it to run when I am playing a game that uses it. Again, Punkbuster is also easy to uninstall if it is no longer required (although that will impact any games that need it). Also, it does not install itself secretly in the background without the user's knowledge. You have to confirm installation of Punkbuster for any game that uses it - and you have the choice to say 'no'.



Most of the copy protection programs are switching to that method for Vista compatibility, basically. Older versions of SecuROM that supposedly caused less problem in the past worked by directly modifying your CD drive, IIRC.

Makari


And that frankly sucks.



But yeah, boycotting #5 out of a game currently leads to boycotting Activision, 2K, EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard, and god knows how many other publishers, further including the ones that use PunkBuster. And it is, again, something that these guys have been doing since 1999 or 2000 or so.

Makari


I personally don't have a problem not buying any more games from developers/publishers using intrusive copy protection or restrictive DRM. That's my choice to make, and I'm not so addicted to gaming that I absolutely must have every great looking future title regardless of how it may affect my PC. I will adopt a sit and wait approach, and find out exactly what kind of copy protection or DRM a game is using, and use that information to make an informed deicison about whether I want to purchase it.

Yes, publishers have been using a whole range of copy protection systems for several years, but some are better than others, and some are downright dangerous (like StarForce). I'll be the first person to admit I'm guilty of not researching it more deeply in the past, or realising exactly what some of these copy protection systems have been doing. If I had known, I may very well have not purchased certain games.

As it now stands, I have sorted through my game library and put aside all games using StarForce and SecuROM. I've actually uninstalled all of the games from my PC and will be reformatting the hard drive to remove all traces of these files. As I've indicated in previous threads, I use my PC for work as well as play, so I have to ensure it is secure and that the CD burning software I have will work without issue. Maybe when I can build a new PC, I'll simply use this one as a games machine with nothing else installed, so if something does go wrong it won't impact my work or other hobbies.

For many people they may encounter no problems, or only be inconvenienced in a small way. It's up to everyone else to decide what they do with the information that I and others have posted. However, I think it is a good idea for everyone to educate themselves about how SecuROM, SafeDisc and other copy protection schemes operate, and how they may impact the performance or operation of their PCs. The problem until recent years has been that there was little information available, but now that is no longer the case.
Avatar image for SunToShine
SunToShine

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 SunToShine
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

EA is changing their ways though. They came out and said they were going to adjust their work environments, give developers more creative freedom, and generally put more time and money into their games. They sold some profitable but mediocre IPs. And really, it shows - it's an improved EA, and they did it because we persistently told them we wanted them to. So we should pat ourselves on the back, but also give them credit for their recent efforts.

Avatar image for Fexxe
Fexxe

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 Fexxe
Member since 2004 • 1729 Posts

EA has bought Mythic Entertainment, who is making Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning, and I love it! They are helping a not-so-big company making the greatest mmo ever (imo ofc), and I dont see why people hate EA so much..

After all, they've made a vast majority of my favorite games ever, like the Battlefield series an so on

Avatar image for jfsebastianII
jfsebastianII

1084

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#31 jfsebastianII
Member since 2007 • 1084 Posts
[QUOTE="RobertBowen"]

For those who like irony, Sony BMG (Sony are the makers of SecureROM) are now in hot water with French authorities who discovered that 47% of the software being used on one of their servers was pirated. That was back in March this year.

Meanwhile, last October a representative of Sony BMG giving testimony in court reckons each time you rip a CD or make a backup copy (like backing up music you have downloaded onto your hard disk in case it crashes) you are stealing.

So just remember when SecureROM is installing itself on your PC in future, that the company making it 'to combat piracy' have used pirated software themselves. Can we say 'hypocrisy'?

dahwnpapaya

I have to say, the more talk about SecureRom, the more I feel apprehensive about installing a game with it on my PC. I'm almost regretting pre-ordering it instead of waiting a little while after it comes out. I really hope it doesn't interfere with any programs that I have.

i was apprehensive when i heard about it being with Bioshock, but in the event i was so keen to get the game i did so, and to be honest if you've a broadband connection it takes a few seconds, and doesn't seem to affect anything else - i've got pro malware and anti-virus stuff on my machine, and it didn't suddenly start telling me i was connecting to EA all the time or anything

Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#32 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.

5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.RobertBowen

From what I understand, you are limited at 3 simultaneous activations, not 3 activations period. If you uninstall all 3, you are back at 0 activations. That's how it worked with BioShock, if I'm not mistaken.

Also, going by what BioWare said, SecuROM does not install any software on your PC. SecuROM's authentication call is part of masseffect.exe file and it serves to establish a connection with their server. There are no SecuROM files being installed on your hard drive.

Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
[QUOTE="RobertBowen"][QUOTE="-Origin-"]

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

df853

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

Thank you. Someone has stated the truth. Everyone keeps thinking you can only install the game 3 times, and that is clearly bs. The whole concept of activation binding to a specific hardware profile is not new. Win XP with a non-corporate key does this only you get 1 activation, not the 3 this game will provide.

I was unaware that this game did #5 you listed above. That sux. I don't want games messing with low level parts of my OS because I don't know what they are doing and I don't know how to revert back aside from reformatting which is bs. If something starts randomly failing I may have no way of fixing it. Well... I wasn't so against SecureROM before, but now I guess I am...

3 installations for your current Hardware is UNACCEPTABLE. I will not support a game that won't be able to play in a year or two. EA is completely disregarding the fact that PC Gamers upgrade, it's part of the deal. I'm getting a new motherboard in the next couple of months, and then I will get a new Video Card probably in the Fall, guess what, If I want to continue playing after that, I'm screwed. People should not support this garbage and send a message of abysmal sales. They are asking for $39 dollars to basically have no game in a year or two.

Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
[QUOTE="RobertBowen"]

For those who like irony, Sony BMG (Sony are the makers of SecureROM) are now in hot water with French authorities who discovered that 47% of the software being used on one of their servers was pirated. That was back in March this year.

Meanwhile, last October a representative of Sony BMG giving testimony in court reckons each time you rip a CD or make a backup copy (like backing up music you have downloaded onto your hard disk in case it crashes) you are stealing.

So just remember when SecureROM is installing itself on your PC in future, that the company making it 'to combat piracy' have used pirated software themselves. Can we say 'hypocrisy'?

dahwnpapaya

I have to say, the more talk about SecureRom, the more I feel apprehensive about installing a game with it on my PC. I'm almost regretting pre-ordering it instead of waiting a little while after it comes out. I really hope it doesn't interfere with any programs that I have.

You can still cancel your pre-order, I did. I'll wait for a better version to come out, if at all.

Avatar image for RobertBowen
RobertBowen

4094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#35 RobertBowen
Member since 2003 • 4094 Posts


From what I understand, you are limited at 3 simultaneous activations, not 3 activations period. If you uninstall all 3, you are back at 0 activations. That's how it worked with BioShock, if I'm not mistaken.

UpInFlames


This is not BioShock we are talking about. There is no 'revoke' tool (so far) as there is with BioShock. Also, BioShock was tied to User Accounts, not hardware IDs, which is why people ran out of activations so fast with that game.

The question has been asked many times on the Bioware Mass Effect forums, and the answer is always that you have only 3 activations tied to your hardware, and must contact EA for further activations beyond that. You do not 'buy back' an activation by uninstalling the game, and that is carefully avoided in the FAQ.



Also, going by what BioWare said, SecuROM does not install any software on your PC. SecuROM's authentication call is part of masseffect.exe file and it serves to establish a connection with their server. There are no SecuROM files being installed on your hard drive.

UpInFlames


I can only go by what SecuROM has done in the past, and forgive me for being sceptical, but I'll believe it when I see it (or at least read about it from those who have clean systems before installing the game). Maybe the way they have configured SecuROM for this particular game will work as you (and they) say. Then again, maybe it won't. That needs to be tested under controlled conditions (ie, installing the game on a PC without any SecuROM files already installed). The Bioware devs were asked to do this by several members of their forums, but no answer was forthcoming. I (and several others) have posted a lot of questions about SecuROM in the Mass Effect FAQ thread, and those questions have been left unanswered.

Not exactly a good basis for trust, in my book.
Avatar image for UpInFlames
UpInFlames

13301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#36 UpInFlames
Member since 2004 • 13301 Posts

The question has been asked many times on the Bioware Mass Effect forums, and the answer is always that you have only 3 activations tied to your hardware, and must contact EA for further activations beyond that. You do not 'buy back' an activation by uninstalling the game, and that is carefully avoided in the FAQ.RobertBowen

That's not good, then. But even so, I think the measure will be removed within a year from the game's release, perhaps even sooner. Publishers are mostly concerned about the launch, as time goes by, such measures become increasingly irrelevant. I don't think EA has any plans to deal with Mass Effect's activations several years down the line. It's just not worth it.

Avatar image for Nitrous2O
Nitrous2O

1813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Nitrous2O
Member since 2004 • 1813 Posts

The question has been asked many times on the Bioware Mass Effect forums, and the answer is always that you have only 3 activations tied to your hardware, and must contact EA for further activations beyond that. You do not 'buy back' an activation by uninstalling the game, and that is carefully avoided in the FAQ.RobertBowen

Indeed, "We wrote the installer and it has nothing to do with SecuROM or activations" according to Derek French

Avatar image for 100000
100000

549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 100000
Member since 2003 • 549 Posts
Blaming EA and hating them for buying out all the smaller developers is a bit silly honestly. It's called a contract, by definition a contract involves an agreement by 2 or more parties. Its not EA's fault anymore than it is of lets say, Bioware for signing the contract.
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts

Suits at EA have come out and said they aren't proud of what's transpired over the years with the smaller companies they've consumed. Publishing contracts are one thing, but buying out smaller devs and neutering them is certainly cause for concern, from a gamer's point of view.. I don't think this will happen with Bioware right away, but it will eventually. I'll never forget Origin or Westwood studios, as that flat out sucked when they were bought and closed down. Two of the best devs for their time that could have easily continued, and were a huge part of what made PC Gaming great. Don't forget about Bullfrog either, though Molyneux was able to continue his work. EA has pretty much treated DICE like a piece of dirt, been firing moving and throwing around, and haven't made a quality title in years. When it's all about profit margins and appeasing shareholders, you can pretty much throw out the creativity and art that's been a big part of what makes games great.

I don't think EA should be singled out though, 2k isn't anything to brag about either.

Avatar image for -Origin-
-Origin-

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#40 -Origin-
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

You know it was like that at first, but then the next guy, one of the guys at Bioware said that they were going to take out the one week part cuz everyone hated it so muchnevereathim

I actually found this out about 3 hours after I posted this lol.

Avatar image for -Origin-
-Origin-

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#41 -Origin-
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts
[QUOTE="df853"][QUOTE="RobertBowen"][QUOTE="-Origin-"]

But one MAJOR issue with mass effect is the DRM. How the activation and registration for that game is going to be is the following. You buy the game, activate it online and there you have it, it's over with!... NOT! The game requires you to activate your game once every WEEK !!. That means if you buy mass effect and decide to go on vacation and it's been over a week, well sir, you are out of luck because EA has just terminated your cd key and you have wasted your money. I mean how does EA possibly think they're going to get away with this!

mismajor99

That is incorrect. The way it works is this:

1. You need an internet connection, because when you install the game you have to authenticate it online. If you do not have access to an internet connection you cannot play the game. Period.
2. You have a limit of 3 activations. You can install the game on 3 different PCs, or make 2 'significant hardware' changes on the same PC before you use up your activations. Note that the developer has said you can install/uninstall the game on the SAME hardware as many times as you like, as long as you have not changed any hardware or reformatted your hard disk. Changing your OS will also probably trigger using another activation.
3. If you need a fourth activation, you have to contact EA customer support. EA will deal with requests for further activations on a 'case-by-case' basis and will require proof of purchase. They may say 'no', in which case you have yourself a shiny coaster.
4. There is no information on what constitutes a 'significant hardware' change.
5. SecureROM copy protection software will be installed in the background. There will probably be no information whatsoever telling you about this. This software is similar to a virus in that it buries itself deep in your system, putting null values in your registry, hidden files and directories on your hard disk, and it is difficult to remove. SecureROM is NOT uninstalled when you uninstall a game using it. If you use a Limited account to play games, you will probably trigger UAService7.exe which is a SecureROM file intended to give Admin rights access to Limited accounts so that the game can be played. This opens a potential back-door for hackers to exploit. SecureROM also does not like monitoring/debugging software running in the background, and is believed to interfere with totally legal CD burning software (including Nero), and virtual disk software (Alcohol, Daemon Tools etc). Because it does not like 'virtual disk' functions, it is also reported to have an issue with SCSI drives, and some RAID setups. If your CD/DVD drive has problems reading the game disk, SecureROM is directly to blame for that.
6. There will be no revoke tool to buy back activations (it is not in the FAQ on the official forums).
7. All future EA PC games will be using the same DRM scheme, including Spore, Mirror's Edge, Dragon Age and many others.
8. People on dial-up connections will be paying a telephone call every time they activate a game using this DRM.
9. If you telephone customer support for new activations, you will be paying for the calls, hence incur 'hidden costs' to play your game. For those with no local EA offices in their country, they will be charged international call rates when trying to get an additional activation. You can, of course, opt to use Email - and will probably have to at some point to send EA a digital photograph of your game CD, manual, case or receipt and send that as proof of purchase.

Enjoy playing your future EA games (and probably games from 2K as well which use a similar system). Personally, I will be avoiding them like the plague.

Thank you. Someone has stated the truth. Everyone keeps thinking you can only install the game 3 times, and that is clearly bs. The whole concept of activation binding to a specific hardware profile is not new. Win XP with a non-corporate key does this only you get 1 activation, not the 3 this game will provide.

I was unaware that this game did #5 you listed above. That sux. I don't want games messing with low level parts of my OS because I don't know what they are doing and I don't know how to revert back aside from reformatting which is bs. If something starts randomly failing I may have no way of fixing it. Well... I wasn't so against SecureROM before, but now I guess I am...

3 installations for your current Hardware is UNACCEPTABLE. I will not support a game that won't be able to play in a year or two. EA is completely disregarding the fact that PC Gamers upgrade, it's part of the deal. I'm getting a new motherboard in the next couple of months, and then I will get a new Video Card probably in the Fall, guess what, If I want to continue playing after that, I'm screwed. People should not support this garbage and send a message of abysmal sales. They are asking for $39 dollars to basically have no game in a year or two.

Exactly... I agree completely, what happened when you were able to install it as many times as you want, where ever you want to. There goes the days of loving a game and then bringing it over to a friends to show them!!

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
However, I think it is a good idea for everyone to educate themselves about how SecuROM, SafeDisc and other copy protection schemes operate, and how they may impact the performance or operation of their PCs. The problem until recent years has been that there was little information available, but now that is no longer the case.RobertBowen
I actually agree with the rest of your post. :D The only thing is that this information has been out there and pretty easy to find, but nobody really cared about it until recently for whatever reason. Starforce pretty much kicked off copy protection in the consumer's general attention span, and since then people are starting to notice what everything else does right now - just not that they've already been doing it for the last decade of games. I do think the old SecuROM was worse, as quietly modifying your hardware with no notice is pretty unconscionable. Though if it did cause problems like I'd have imagined, I think the collective internet would have figured it out pretty quickly.

Suits at EA have come out and said they aren't proud of what's transpired over the years with the smaller companies they've consumed. Publishing contracts are one thing, but buying out smaller devs and neutering them is certainly cause for concern, from a gamer's point of view.. I don't think this will happen with Bioware right away, but it will eventually. I'll never forget Origin or Westwood studios, as that flat out sucked when they were bought and closed down. Two of the best devs for their time that could have easily continued, and were a huge part of what made PC Gaming great. Don't forget about Bullfrog either, though Molyneux was able to continue his work. EA has pretty much treated DICE like a piece of dirt, been firing moving and throwing around, and haven't made a quality title in years. When it's all about profit margins and appeasing shareholders, you can pretty much throw out the creativity and art that's been a big part of what makes games great.

I don't think EA should be singled out though, 2k isn't anything to brag about either.

mismajor99
Molyneux left Bullfrog on good terms with EA (or just guessing, since he chose EA to publish Lionhead's next couple games before MS bought them). Losing 'the' creative figurehead probably left Bullfrog gutted, like Firaxis losing Sid Meier or Maxis losing Will Wright. DICE, though? You're pretty spectacularly wrong there. If Mirror's Edge is the result of losing creativity, then let's keep killing it.
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts
[QUOTE="mismajor99"]

Suits at EA have come out and said they aren't proud of what's transpired over the years with the smaller companies they've consumed. Publishing contracts are one thing, but buying out smaller devs and neutering them is certainly cause for concern, from a gamer's point of view.. I don't think this will happen with Bioware right away, but it will eventually. I'll never forget Origin or Westwood studios, as that flat out sucked when they were bought and closed down. Two of the best devs for their time that could have easily continued, and were a huge part of what made PC Gaming great. Don't forget about Bullfrog either, though Molyneux was able to continue his work. EA has pretty much treated DICE like a piece of dirt, been firing moving and throwing around, and haven't made a quality title in years. When it's all about profit margins and appeasing shareholders, you can pretty much throw out the creativity and art that's been a big part of what makes games great.

I don't think EA should be singled out though, 2k isn't anything to brag about either.

Makari

Molyneux left Bullfrog on good terms with EA (or just guessing, since he chose EA to publish Lionhead's next couple games before MS bought them). Losing 'the' creative figurehead probably left Bullfrog gutted, like Firaxis losing Sid Meier or Maxis losing Will Wright. DICE, though? You're pretty spectacularly wrong there. If Mirror's Edge is the result of losing creativity, then let's keep killing it.

First off, When I'm talking DICE I'm refferring to existing IP that we can gauge, not hype and previews with zero evidence of a great game. The BF series is nothing but a shell and rehashed BS from the original. BF 2142 was nothing but a reskin of BF2 with titan mode slapped on. That's creativity down the drain for such a once talented company. Are you really trying to tell me they've been on the upswing since EA aquired them? Please, keep those thoughts to yourself. That's a ridiculous notion. With Mirror's Edge, we don't have a clue as to how that game is going to turn out or what the limitations are that EA is imposing on them. It's been YEARS since DICE has done something worthwhile and the burden is on them to do otherwise. Until that happens, i'll be waiting. Maybe Mirror's Edge is their new standout game, who knows. All I know is that EA has them churning out games under the BF name, another generic game coming soon, and I really don't think there's an argument there.

I don't trust previews for a second anymore, been burned getting excited for games far too much over the years.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="mismajor99"]First off, When I'm talking DICE I'm refferring to existing IP that we can gauge, not hype and previews with zero evidence of a great game. The BF series is nothing but a shell and rehashed BS from the original. BF 2142 was nothing but a reskin of BF2 with titan mode slapped on. That's creativity down the drain for such a once talented company. Are you really trying to tell me they've been on the upswing since EA aquired them? Please, keep those thoughts to yourself. That's a ridiculous notion. With Mirror's Edge, we don't have a clue as to how that game is going to turn out or what the limitations are that EA is imposing on them. It's been YEARS since DICE has done something worthwhile and the burden is on them to do otherwise. Until that happens, i'll be waiting. Maybe Mirror's Edge is their new standout game, who knows. All I know is that EA has them churning out games under the BF name, another generic game coming soon, and I really don't think there's an argument there. I don't trust previews for a second anymore, been burned getting excited for games far too much over the years.

2142 had a fair number of improvements, for those that actually bothered to play the game. Most of them were aimed at complaints from BF2, like class balance, unlocks, and getting things like stable patches out. On their own, DICE made 1942. DICE Canada made Vietnam. EA was around for much of BF2's dev cycle, and by extension Modern Combat and all that. Mirror's Edge and Heroes are older projects that DICE wanted to try, and Bad Company... yeah, I could see that being a 'hey let's have a well-known studio make a next-gen console game!' One game. Woo. Churning 'em out! Knowing absolutely nothing else about Mirror's Edge besides what we've been shown - how can you even try to argue that it's not creative or different somehow? That and BC have been where a lot of DICE's focus has been for a while. If you actually followed the industry at all from a closer perspective though, the relationship with DICE is singled out in particular as a good one and an example of how to do things right.
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#45 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts

Many people in the BF community would disagree with you, 2142 was more of the same and offered nothing substantially new or exciting. Looking at the reviews across the board, and just the overall popularity of 2142 vs. BF2 would tell you that. It's easily regarded as the worst in the series by clans across the board. Right now as I type, 2142 has less then half the players of BF2, check out game-monitor.com to see for yourself.

DICE hasn't put a game out since BF2 that's been the same or equal quality. I don't see how that's a far out idea either. That's not to say they aren't capable of doing so, but I think it's safe to assume they have an endless budget so long they tow the line and keep churning out a BF title, which is exactly what's going on. There isn't an ounce of proof suggesting EA is the reason Mirror's Edge is in development. In fact, I would bet it was a tough sell to attain the funds to develop, especially since it's an original IP. They could have easily developed whatever game they had planned or wanted to without EA. What I want to know is, what other projects have been denied funding since they've been under EA's umbrella?

There's pros and cons of being swallowed whole, I just don't see the overall benefit in DICE'S case from a gamer's point of view. EA didn't technically "own" them until 2005, they simpy owned a majority of their stock, and a year later in 2006 owned them outright. Since then, I don't see anyone or anything to point out that it is regarded as a great thing for the industry. There are many people that will tell you that DICE put out 2142 to ramp up revenue and build their worth since EA was actively seeking them the year prior after owning just about half of DICE's shares, and it fits perfectly with the timeline. Who knows, but looking at that game, it makes sense. Consolidation is usually rarely a good thing for the consumer.

Avatar image for Darth_Kane
Darth_Kane

2966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 Darth_Kane
Member since 2006 • 2966 Posts
PLEASE don't insult BioWare by saying they made the KOTOR series. BioWare made KOTOR 1 (GOTY 2003, one of the best stories and plot twists ever) and Bugsidian made the crappy KOTOR 2
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
There's pros and cons of being swallowed whole, I just don't see the overall benefit in DICE'S case from a gamer's point of view.mismajor99
DICE's point of view? They get security and money to fund the games they want to make, no matter how unlikely a concept (i.e. Mirror's Edge hihi) along with an absolutely epic publishing/marketing arm to advertise the living hell out of a game until our eyes bleed. Especially when they're given the freedom to make the game along with the time to make it, as seen from, for example, the massive delays they've had on BC. They sacrifice freedom though, yes. On the gamer's end - removing the ability to have a huge safety umbrella over their head, do you think the games would have been better? The horrible BF1942 patches? BIS running out of money and being forced to release a ArmA as a retail beta to make money to finish the game? CD Projekt cutting the English dialogue and voice acting to save money? As long as the evil publisher overlord doesn't actively interfere (that's the big thing), gamers don't notice the difference. Remember that Blizzard has been a wholly owned subisidiary of other companies for almost 15 years, and has been owned by Vivendi in particular for almost a decade - I don't think many would believe that the decisions made haven't been their own. It's awesome when people like Valve can pull off complete independence and do well, but it also sucks when awesome devs like Iron Lore go under because they simply ran out of money and couldn't afford to fund a new project out of pocket. Or, cough, Looking Glass. Try to find some sort of non-random-forum-poster source - say, inside the industry - that believes the EA-DICE relationship is a bad one. You'll have a hard time. Hint: the more you read, the more you might hear that it's considered about the opposite of what you seem to believe.
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#48 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts

Sorry, but I just don't buy the notion that a company like DICE needed to be bought out to fund their projects, They sold multiple millions of copies of 1942 all the way up to BF2, and was the very reason EA set their sites on them. They were purchased through buying a majority of their stock, and at that point, haven't released a quality title since. I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone that would tell you DICE would have struggled to make games without EA dictating to them. DICE could have very well become the next Valve.

Blizzard is a rare example in the industry, they've said it many times that they're extremely lucky to be able to have the creative freedom to do what they like with almost no interference. There's an obvious balancing act that's required, where creativity can thrive while still being in a stringent corporate environment.

Valve is the perfect example of what this industry should look like in a perfect world. Take Left4Dead for instance. The game has been playable and ready to go for quite sometime, but Valve wants to put the extra time into it, adding more and more features, instead of being under the gun to release a product to boost that particular quarter's profits. They've been afforded that luxury for staying independent, and pretty much the biggest gaming community on PC has embraced them for it. Something needs to be said for that behavior, and why that's better for gamers than DICE's situation with EA. Just look at the difference between the two Developers, one is far ahead of the other in terms of quality products. I don't think it's all because Valve has smarter and more creative people, it's the path they have chosen to take.

If Iron Lore was under EA, they would have been closed down long ago, especially if they weren't turning a profit for their parent company.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
quote!mismajor99
Sigh. Well, being blunt, it sounds like your opinions are formed from preconceptions, and mine are from actually being there and knowing the people involved. Not much one can do to change your opinion if you don't care about what's actually happening.
Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#50 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts

And where has gone the "EA's offer for R*" thingy.

I hope they dont buy out R* or we wont see anymore GTAs...

Oh also they make you buy the sims expansions with stuff that could have always been there in the real game...Anyway thats just a little aspect but I agree with ya OP.

IamGrunt
that's not really the issue. EA would be epically **** retarded if they screwed with GTA. The bigger issue is that if EA bought out Take Two (who publishes for R*), they'd also buy out who publishes all of 2k sports' games. In short, EA buys T2 = nobody left to publish for 2k Sports = EA sports just became the monopoly on sports titles in one fell swoop. And of course, Dept. of Justice won't do a damn thing about such a blatantly anti-competitive tactic.