If Quake 5 were to happen, what would your opinions be?

If Quake 5 were to come out being alot like 3 crazy fast paste and crazy weapons the lot. But also had awesome graphics and like destruction with awesome guns! WOuld you be interested? OR like meh?

i'd be intersted
but uh
it depends if the game appeals to hitscan lovers like moi or rocket people
(as in all aim, or positioning)

Quake 4 was all about positioning rather than aim.

Faster paced will def appeal more to rocket people... and will upset noobs who can't strafe jump.

yeah true, would still be interesting in this day and age :D

That would be awsome. Keep the physics and weapons, but add improved lighting and shaders, of course some new maps, but keep the old ones too. Imagine using the Rage engine for Q3. id could easily make it happen IMO, yet they decided to create qlive instead.. Same game, just ruined by ads and priced content. It's sad because in Qlive, you pay for new maps. In Q3, you simply download them freely. At least it has close integration with the browser interface.

I'd be cautious. Quake's history has been:

Quake 1: geared more for multiplayer

Quake 2: had an actual story

Quake 3: pure multi

Quake 4: Had a story

Quake 5: ......

History says it would be pure multi which isn't my thing.

Id be interested. I love Quake series.

I'd be cautious. Quake's history has been:

Quake 1: geared more for multiplayer

Quake 2: had an actual story

Quake 3: pure multi

Quake 4: Had a story

Quake 5: ......

History says it would be pure multi which isn't my thing.

PublicNuisance

I have played through Quake 4 SP so many times, one of my favorite games of all time. I would love to see a Quake 5 with updated graphics and great multiplayer.V4LENT1NE

way too slow paced for quake

And I mean the multiplayer for quake 4 is the fastest of any quake, they should use the same physics for both sp and mp.

Also the strogg are really lame, the whole hell thing is much more interstin

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

I'd be cautious. Quake's history has been:

Quake 1: geared more for multiplayer

Quake 2: had an actual story

Quake 3: pure multi

Quake 4: Had a story

Quake 5: ......

History says it would be pure multi which isn't my thing.

JigglyWiggly_

Gameplay wise I would agree but the story didn't really satisfy me. I thought Quake 2 and 4 were much better for single player.

I would get it. Quake 4 was great, fantastic enemy variety, awesome guns, eerie scenery.

If they do do it, they need to do a follow up to Quake1. Big husking monsters, lava pits, satanic imagery, medievil steampunk weapons and rocket jumping.

Thats just what the industry needs right now.