Is a 3D TV worth buying now?

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Time_Child
Time_Child

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Time_Child
Member since 2010 • 704 Posts

I thought 3D TVs were expensive, but I was just looking on BestBuy.com and they have a 40" Samsung for $1299. It's on sale, but with the money I save, I can also buy their package that includes 2 sets of glasses and some 3D movies.

But is it worth buying? Other than the 3D content that comes with the package, what else can I watch? Do any TV stations have shows in 3D?

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

3DTVs are great, but you really should go for Panasonic as they have the best 3D effect according to any reviewer. Plus plasma has a better picture than LCDs. This set is also cheaper and comes with a free 3D Blu-Ray player and 2 free glasses. The combo is under "frequently bought together" section a bit down the page.

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

i am eagerly waiting for the new models, they are literally only a few months away. eyeing off the sexy new samsung 51" model to replace my 4.5 years old trusty 32"

Avatar image for ndawgdrake
ndawgdrake

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ndawgdrake
Member since 2009 • 533 Posts

IMO, as long as 3DTV's require glasses, they will never be worth buying.

Personally I am waiting for the glass-less 3DTV's. Sony recently unveiled a prototype.

Avatar image for fester420
fester420

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 fester420
Member since 2003 • 557 Posts

I got the 55" Bravia and I am loving it. The only problem is the lack of 3D games and movies, but there is quite a bit coming out this year. In my opinion, it's worth it but if you're anything like me, if you have even a single doubt, then you should wait. I bought my TV because I had the money and it was something I have been wanting for a while. If you wait a couple more months the prices will go down.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Currently with the lack of cotent and tvs with no glasses coming out soon, you may as well wait some.

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

I got the 55" Bravia and I am loving it. The only problem is the lack of 3D games and movies, but there is quite a bit coming out this year. In my opinion, it's worth it but if you're anything like me, if you have even a single doubt, then you should wait. I bought my TV because I had the money and it was something I have been wanting for a while. If you wait a couple more months the prices will go down.

fester420
Movies Yeah but games there is no shortage of tons of games i can play in 3D on my pc in full 1080p and the effect is very nice!
Avatar image for Videodogg
Videodogg

12611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Videodogg
Member since 2002 • 12611 Posts

Last week, i bought a Panasonic 42in 3D Plasma display from Amazon for $800.00. I bought it strictly for the 3d because i wanted to play PC and PS3 games in 3D. I was really disappointed.

The main problems;

the display is way too dark when you wear the glasses, even at the brightest settings.

the crosstalk or ghosting of the image was unacceptable. In a game like GT5, i could never get a perfect image. In the "in the car" view i could never get the up close dashboard and the far distant track in focus at the same time. Even using advance setting from 3DTV Play from Nvidia for pc games did not help the matter. Every single pc game i tried in 3D was horrible with ghosting, unless i turned the 3D effects to the lowest level.

I also had to turn down my resolution to 720p and cut out certain graphical effects to make games compatible on the PC. The PS3 cuts down the resolution and graphics too.

As much as i wanted to enjoy 3D gaming, and as much as the good deal i got on that television, i just could not enjoy it. So i returned the set for a refund yesterday.

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

IMO, as long as 3DTV's require glasses, they will never be worth buying.

Personally I am waiting for the glass-less 3DTV's. Sony recently unveiled a prototype.

ndawgdrake

http://www.t3.com.au/2011/02/08/toshiba-glasses-free-3d-tv-struggles-in-japan/

20" for $2860AU? i think not.......the problem with glasses free 3d tv is that right now its very expensive, and by the time they get bigger and cheaper, 3D Tvs WITH glasses will have made feather light glasses (this years samsung glasses are almost half the weight of the first gen models). so if the glasses get lighter, then it'll feel like ur not wearing anything at all!

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

Last week, i bought a Panasonic 42in 3D Plasma display from Amazon for $800.00. I bought it strictly for the 3d because i wanted to play PC and PS3 games in 3D. I was really disappointed.

The main problems;

the display is way too dark when you wear the glasses, even at the brightest settings.

the crosstalk or ghosting of the image was unacceptable. In a game like GT5, i could never get a perfect image. In the "in the car" view i could never get the up close dashboard and the far distant track in focus at the same time. Even using advance setting from 3DTV Play from Nvidia for pc games did not help the matter. Every single pc game i tried in 3D was horrible with ghosting, unless i turned the 3D effects to the lowest level.

I also had to turn down my resolution to 720p and cut out certain graphical effects to make games compatible on the PC. The PS3 cuts down the resolution and graphics too.

As much as i wanted to enjoy 3D gaming, and as much as the good deal i got on that television, i just could not enjoy it. So i returned the set for a refund yesterday.

Videodogg

You should have tried using the iZ3D Driver to achieve a 3d effect in games it whats I use for use with my ati 5770 and Mitsubishi 60" dlp and it works great in 3D i don't notice any ghosting in the image possibly due to DLP 16 microsecond pixel response time. Also it lets me transmit a 1080p 3d image over hdmi at 60hz nvidia 3DTV play from what I've heard is limited to 24fps at 1080p or 720p 60fps which is just unacceptable imo. The iZ3D also lets me fine tune the separation and convergance to generate the best looking 3d effect to my eyes for each particular game compared to the 3d ps3 games I've played games played in 3d on my pc where Vastly superior in there 3D effect adding a real sense of depth to games once properly calibrated Assassins creed 2 TF2,Dirt 2, and left 4 dead 2 for example just look amazing in 3D and the image quality completly blows away what the ps3 is capable of which has to lower graphical effects and resolution even lower for its 3d effect combined with the much more impressive 3d effect its just stunning. Looking to upgrade as while games are still achieving playable fps in 3d with my 5770 i would like to run them as well as i can in 2d so going to need some more gpu muscle.

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

[QUOTE="Videodogg"]

Last week, i bought a Panasonic 42in 3D Plasma display from Amazon for $800.00. I bought it strictly for the 3d because i wanted to play PC and PS3 games in 3D. I was really disappointed.

The main problems;

the display is way too dark when you wear the glasses, even at the brightest settings.

the crosstalk or ghosting of the image was unacceptable. In a game like GT5, i could never get a perfect image. In the "in the car" view i could never get the up close dashboard and the far distant track in focus at the same time. Even using advance setting from 3DTV Play from Nvidia for pc games did not help the matter. Every single pc game i tried in 3D was horrible with ghosting, unless i turned the 3D effects to the lowest level.

I also had to turn down my resolution to 720p and cut out certain graphical effects to make games compatible on the PC. The PS3 cuts down the resolution and graphics too.

As much as i wanted to enjoy 3D gaming, and as much as the good deal i got on that television, i just could not enjoy it. So i returned the set for a refund yesterday.

DJ_Headshot

You should have tried using the iZ3D Driver to achieve a 3d effect in games it whats I use for use with my ati 5770 and Mitsubishi 60" dlp and it works great in 3D i don't notice any ghosting in the image possibly due to DLP 16 microsecond pixel response time. Also it lets me transmit a 1080p 3d image over hdmi at 60hz nvidia 3DTV play from what I've heard is limited to 24fps at 1080p or 720p 60fps which is just unacceptable imo. The iZ3D also lets me fine tune the separation and convergance to generate the best looking 3d effect to my eyes for each particular game compared to the 3d ps3 games I've played games played in 3d on my pc where Vastly superior in there 3D effect adding a real sense of depth to games once properly calibrated Assassins creed 2 TF2,Dirt 2, and left 4 dead 2 for example just look amazing in 3D and the image quality completly blows away what the ps3 is capable of which has to lower graphical effects and resolution even lower for its 3d effect combined with the much more impressive 3d effect its just stunning. Looking to upgrade as while games are still achieving playable fps in 3d with my 5770 i would like to run them as well as i can in 2d so going to need some more gpu muscle.

wasnt aware u were able to get the 5XXX series to do 3D like that. should mean my 5770 will be able to used once i get my 3D TV later this year (waiting for Crysis 2, with its apparent .05% FPS drop when 3D is enabled)

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts

IMO, as long as 3DTV's require glasses, they will never be worth buying.

Personally I am waiting for the glass-less 3DTV's. Sony recently unveiled a prototype.

ndawgdrake
Same here. I would rather wait until glasses-free 3D technology goes mainstream before going 3D.
Avatar image for sonic0491
sonic0491

2508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#13 sonic0491
Member since 2006 • 2508 Posts

This kind of technology seems to still be in the beta stage. Don't be a tester, wait it out until that defining 3DTV hits. Hopefully it will be glasses free.

Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

This kind of technology seems to still be in the beta stage. Don't be a tester, wait it out until that defining 3DTV hits. Hopefully it will be glasses free.

sonic0491





Hahah .... yes.
They are going to be released late this year... or next in the very beggining...

Look at this...
A very good youtube channel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzZk03O06wE
TOSHIBA has already 2 models. :)

Avatar image for kungfool69
kungfool69

2584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 kungfool69
Member since 2006 • 2584 Posts

[QUOTE="sonic0491"]

This kind of technology seems to still be in the beta stage. Don't be a tester, wait it out until that defining 3DTV hits. Hopefully it will be glasses free.

Matthew-first





Hahah .... yes.
They are going to be released late this year... or next in the very beggining...

Look at this...
A very good youtube channel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzZk03O06wE
TOSHIBA has already 2 models. :)

u should go back up and read my post....

Avatar image for gagit811
gagit811

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 gagit811
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts
I spent 3k upgrading to 3d TV last year, I find if you want 3d bigger is better. I find myself getting a bigger 3d TV this year from the same company Samsung, only thing is my 3d glasses wont be compatible with the newer TVs only a year apart. It sucks as I will have to buy a whole new 3d kit. If you go 3d get the biggest TV you can get so you don't end up like me.
Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]

[QUOTE="sonic0491"]

This kind of technology seems to still be in the beta stage. Don't be a tester, wait it out until that defining 3DTV hits. Hopefully it will be glasses free.

kungfool69





Hahah .... yes.
They are going to be released late this year... or next in the very beggining...

Look at this...
A very good youtube channel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzZk03O06wE
TOSHIBA has already 2 models. :)

u should go back up and read my post....



I know what is that post about... But is it WRONG that I have replied to this guy?
think.
AND NO its not worth to buy 3DtV now. :)

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts
if you are to go for one now i would go for the one chubby guy suggested, that way you have a great tv for normal hd and sd vieing and the 3d is good when you want to use it. As for glasses-less 3D i think like large oled tvs we are still a few years off them becoming consumer products. The viewing angle is likely to be problematic and i'd imagine there would be colour issues and such. although i may be wrong, i just can't see them dumping the glasses technology so soon, especially as samsung have just got a full 1080p passive technology patented, and are going to implement it next year.
Avatar image for gagit811
gagit811

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 gagit811
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts

I know what is that post about... But is it WRONG that I have replied to this guy?
think.
AND NO its not worth to buy 3DtV now. :)

Matthew-first

3d is mostly in flagship models right now, so if you buy a 3d TV you're getting a top tier 2d TV. On top of that you can get the glasses n 3d player bundle in for free. So if you want a great 2d TV its ok to go 3d. I have a Samsung c8000 and love it but its small at 46", I plan on getting the new 60d8000 which is samsungs flagship model this year, it has tons of new features plus it happens to be 3d. I'm not buying it just for 3d but it's a nice extra. If you want a flagship model from any manufacturer you will end up with a 3d TV, the best thing is you never have to use the 3d if You don't want.

Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]I know what is that post about... But is it WRONG that I have replied to this guy?
think.
AND NO its not worth to buy 3DtV now. :)

gagit811

3d is mostly in flagship models right now, so if you buy a 3d TV you're getting a top tier 2d TV. On top of that you can get the glasses n 3d player bundle in for free. So if you want a great 2d TV its ok to go 3d. I have a Samsung c8000 and love it but its small at 46", I plan on getting the new 60d8000 which is samsungs flagship model this year, it has tons of new features plus it happens to be 3d. I'm not buying it just for 3d but it's a nice extra. If you want a flagship model from any manufacturer you will end up with a 3d TV, the best thing is you never have to use the 3d if You don't want.




But I said... IDEA to wear glasses to see 3D is stoopid... I mean there are already prototypes of toshiba 3D HD TV without glasses... so I'll pass and wait till they appear on market. :)

Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]I know what is that post about... But is it WRONG that I have replied to this guy?
think.
AND NO its not worth to buy 3DtV now. :)

gagit811

3d is mostly in flagship models right now, so if you buy a 3d TV you're getting a top tier 2d TV. On top of that you can get the glasses n 3d player bundle in for free. So if you want a great 2d TV its ok to go 3d. I have a Samsung c8000 and love it but its small at 46", I plan on getting the new 60d8000 which is samsungs flagship model this year, it has tons of new features plus it happens to be 3d. I'm not buying it just for 3d but it's a nice extra. If you want a flagship model from any manufacturer you will end up with a 3d TV, the best thing is you never have to use the 3d if You don't want.




But I said... IDEA to wear glasses to see 3D is stoopid... I mean there are already prototypes of toshiba 3D HD TV without glasses... so I'll pass and wait till they appear on market. :)

Avatar image for Matthew-first
Matthew-first

3318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Matthew-first
Member since 2005 • 3318 Posts

[QUOTE="Matthew-first"]I know what is that post about... But is it WRONG that I have replied to this guy?
think.
AND NO its not worth to buy 3DtV now. :)

gagit811

3d is mostly in flagship models right now, so if you buy a 3d TV you're getting a top tier 2d TV. On top of that you can get the glasses n 3d player bundle in for free. So if you want a great 2d TV its ok to go 3d. I have a Samsung c8000 and love it but its small at 46", I plan on getting the new 60d8000 which is samsungs flagship model this year, it has tons of new features plus it happens to be 3d. I'm not buying it just for 3d but it's a nice extra. If you want a flagship model from any manufacturer you will end up with a 3d TV, the best thing is you never have to use the 3d if You don't want.




But I said... IDEA to wear glasses to see 3D is stoopid... I mean there are already prototypes of toshiba 3D HD TV without glasses... so I'll pass and wait till they appear on market. :)

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

3DTVs are great, but you really should go for Panasonic as they have the best 3D effect according to any reviewer. Plus plasma has a better picture than LCDs. This set is also cheaper and comes with a free 3D Blu-Ray player and 2 free glasses. The combo is under "frequently bought together" section a bit down the page.

ChubbyGuy40
in Norway Panasonic VT20 3DTV = $2400... Panasonic V20 2DTV (same picture quality etc.. just no 3D) : $1500.. Not worth it IMO.
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#26 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

3DTVs are great, but you really should go for Panasonic as they have the best 3D effect according to any reviewer. Plus plasma has a better picture than LCDs. This set is also cheaper and comes with a free 3D Blu-Ray player and 2 free glasses. The combo is under "frequently bought together" section a bit down the page.

ChubbyGuy40
in Norway Panasonic VT20 3DTV = $2400... Panasonic V20 2DTV (same picture quality etc.. just no 3D) : $1500.. Not worth it IMO.
Avatar image for Time_Child
Time_Child

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Time_Child
Member since 2010 • 704 Posts
Do all 3DTVs have a 2D option? Or only some of them?
Avatar image for Time_Child
Time_Child

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Time_Child
Member since 2010 • 704 Posts
Do all 3DTVs have a 2D option? Or only some of them?
Avatar image for chaumi
chaumi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 chaumi
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
All of the 3D TVs you'll find in stores at the moment can display 2D content as well
Avatar image for chaumi
chaumi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 chaumi
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
All of the 3D TVs you'll find in stores at the moment can display 2D content as well
Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts

[QUOTE="DJ_Headshot"]

[QUOTE="Videodogg"]

Last week, i bought a Panasonic 42in 3D Plasma display from Amazon for $800.00. I bought it strictly for the 3d because i wanted to play PC and PS3 games in 3D. I was really disappointed.

The main problems;

the display is way too dark when you wear the glasses, even at the brightest settings.

the crosstalk or ghosting of the image was unacceptable. In a game like GT5, i could never get a perfect image. In the "in the car" view i could never get the up close dashboard and the far distant track in focus at the same time. Even using advance setting from 3DTV Play from Nvidia for pc games did not help the matter. Every single pc game i tried in 3D was horrible with ghosting, unless i turned the 3D effects to the lowest level.

I also had to turn down my resolution to 720p and cut out certain graphical effects to make games compatible on the PC. The PS3 cuts down the resolution and graphics too.

As much as i wanted to enjoy 3D gaming, and as much as the good deal i got on that television, i just could not enjoy it. So i returned the set for a refund yesterday.

kungfool69

You should have tried using the iZ3D Driver to achieve a 3d effect in games it whats I use for use with my ati 5770 and Mitsubishi 60" dlp and it works great in 3D i don't notice any ghosting in the image possibly due to DLP 16 microsecond pixel response time. Also it lets me transmit a 1080p 3d image over hdmi at 60hz nvidia 3DTV play from what I've heard is limited to 24fps at 1080p or 720p 60fps which is just unacceptable imo. The iZ3D also lets me fine tune the separation and convergance to generate the best looking 3d effect to my eyes for each particular game compared to the 3d ps3 games I've played games played in 3d on my pc where Vastly superior in there 3D effect adding a real sense of depth to games once properly calibrated Assassins creed 2 TF2,Dirt 2, and left 4 dead 2 for example just look amazing in 3D and the image quality completly blows away what the ps3 is capable of which has to lower graphical effects and resolution even lower for its 3d effect combined with the much more impressive 3d effect its just stunning. Looking to upgrade as while games are still achieving playable fps in 3d with my 5770 i would like to run them as well as i can in 2d so going to need some more gpu muscle.

wasnt aware u were able to get the 5XXX series to do 3D like that. should mean my 5770 will be able to used once i get my 3D TV later this year (waiting for Crysis 2, with its apparent .05% FPS drop when 3D is enabled)

yeah depending on what method of 3.d your t.v uses you may have to pay for it for ati users 3d dlp output is free so i didn't pay anything also you need to disable anysort of software overscan in CCC it has to be at 0% for the 3d to work at least on my T.V
Avatar image for kayoticdreamz
kayoticdreamz

3347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 kayoticdreamz
Member since 2010 • 3347 Posts
personally id wait as one guy said they appear to be in the testing phase. i also would like glassesless 3d as well. also i just bought a regular 50 inch about 15 months ago. i waited a good while before getting a big HD tv. so im not in a hurry to get a new one. chances are when i can find it for 700 like i did this one several years after big HD tvs hit the market ill start eyeing a new tv in 3d until then im waiting it out i cannot justify the purchase and im in school so in a few years ill be done with that and hopefully glassesless 3d tvs will be standard. but even if i had money right now i would wait.
Avatar image for chaumi
chaumi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 chaumi
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Hanging on for 3D TV without glasses is a good idea if you're not itching to get into 3D TV now, though some of the sets out currently are giving top class performance. Problem is it's not clear how long we're going to need to wait for no glasses TVs...ceratinly not in big screen versions, the demo'd ones have been not quite up to scratch meaning there's some way to go till they're perfected and available at a reasonable price. Small screens is a different matter, and it's possible that mobile 3D TVs could become very popular before the bigger screens hit. For more on 3D TVs in general http://www.3dtvguide.org For stuff on no glasses versions http://www.3dtvguide.org/3d-tv-without-glasses.html
Avatar image for l34052
l34052

3906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 l34052
Member since 2005 • 3906 Posts

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

Alter_Echo

Where do u live? ive been on google and found kuro's for sale brand new, there's not many left but u can still buy them if u look around in the right places.

Avatar image for gagit811
gagit811

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 gagit811
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts

[QUOTE="Alter_Echo"]

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

l34052

Where do u live? ive been on google and found kuro's for sale brand new, there's not many left but u can still buy them if u look around in the right places.

True, but you will pay a premium for one. Its funny because I've seen people who own kuros and still want to upgrade to newer TVs just for the new features. You would think once You owned one you would never want a new TV even tho nothing else really compares.
Avatar image for NVIDIATI
NVIDIATI

8463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 NVIDIATI
Member since 2010 • 8463 Posts

[QUOTE="l34052"]

[QUOTE="Alter_Echo"]

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

gagit811

Where do u live? ive been on google and found kuro's for sale brand new, there's not many left but u can still buy them if u look around in the right places.

True, but you will pay a premium for one. Its funny because I've seen people who own kuros and still want to upgrade to newer TVs just for the new features. You would think once You owned one you would never want a new TV even tho nothing else really compares.

Something must be wrong with those people, I wouldn't let mine go for any TV on the market.

Avatar image for gagit811
gagit811

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 gagit811
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts

Something must be wrong with those people, I wouldn't let mine go for any TV on the market.

NVIDIATI

I think it more the need to have something new. Any one who would spend the money for a Kuro probably loves new tech, so they get the new stuff because they just want it. I would love to get ahold of a kuro but I couldn't justify the price of one to the wife.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#39 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts

for me it was , it may not be for everyone though

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#40 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
I got one last month (primarily for gaming) and I am loving it. Killzone 3D looks terrific, as does prince of persia and black ops. I eagerly await Splinter Cell, Uncharted 3, and Crysis 2. There aren't many movies out now, but the one's I've seen impress for sure, plus if you have Fios and HBO, there are some free on demand movies (Monsters V Aliens, Clash of the Titans) for free, and later Verizon is getting dedicated 3d channels that stream 1080p 3D, which they demoed at CES this year. Direct TV currently has 3D channels, but other providers will follow suit in the near future. I say yes, it's worth it. I highly recommend the Panasonic plasmas if you want the best 3D possible... I got a best buy bundle with 3 pairs of glasses, Avatar 3D, and a Blu Ray player (which I didn't need, but nice nontheless) for $1800.
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#41 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

3DTVs are great, but you really should go for Panasonic as they have the best 3D effect according to any reviewer. Plus plasma has a better picture than LCDs. This set is also cheaper and comes with a free 3D Blu-Ray player and 2 free glasses. The combo is under "frequently bought together" section a bit down the page.

in Norway Panasonic VT20 3DTV = $2400... Panasonic V20 2DTV (same picture quality etc.. just no 3D) : $1500.. Not worth it IMO.

I got the 3d version in the US for a lot less, but I can understand in your situation why it wasn't.
Avatar image for dbowman
dbowman

6836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 dbowman
Member since 2005 • 6836 Posts

Whilst the 3D effect is impressive we are still only on the first generation of 3D TVs. Things are only going to get better, so i can't see the point in buying a first generation TV.

Personally I'd only ever consider buying one once you don't need the glasses.

Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
[QUOTE="dbowman"]

Whilst the 3D effect is impressive we are still only on the first generation of 3D TVs. Things are only going to get better, so i can't see the point in buying a first generation TV.

Personally I'd only ever consider buying one once you don't need the glasses.

i for example am enjoying the 1st gen of 3D tvs and till newer , significantly better models will be released i'll most probably have enough cash to buy a new one , can you see the point now ?
Avatar image for gagit811
gagit811

3632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 gagit811
Member since 2005 • 3632 Posts
[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="dbowman"]

Whilst the 3D effect is impressive we are still only on the first generation of 3D TVs. Things are only going to get better, so i can't see the point in buying a first generation TV.

Personally I'd only ever consider buying one once you don't need the glasses.

i for example am enjoying the 1st gen of 3D tvs and till newer , significantly better models will be released i'll most probably have enough cash to buy a new one , can you see the point now ?

People are a bit confused, The 3d tvs out now aren't first generation. This tech has been around for more then 10+ years and first showed up in dlp and plasma around 2006. So this whole 1st gen talk is a bit misinformed alto there is improvements to be made it is much better then some think and its not going to change much for years to come. What is out now is active/passive, large glasses free displays can be made but the viewing angels are limited and the other tech is better right now. The way things are going in a year or two if you want any brands mid-range to high-end tv you will end up with a 3d tv like it or not. 3d doesn't really add cost to the tv for active, for passive it will as the screen has different filters for 3d. On top of that the 3d tvs out now are great 2d tvs and top of the line, I figure you don't like don't buy.
Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

og course they are... but the glasses??? not so much:P

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts
[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"][QUOTE="dbowman"]

Whilst the 3D effect is impressive we are still only on the first generation of 3D TVs. Things are only going to get better, so i can't see the point in buying a first generation TV.

Personally I'd only ever consider buying one once you don't need the glasses.

i for example am enjoying the 1st gen of 3D tvs and till newer , significantly better models will be released i'll most probably have enough cash to buy a new one , can you see the point now ?

holly crap that dude in that video sig looks just like me in real life lol. i also cant stop laughing at him knocking his tv over:lol:
Avatar image for Time_Child
Time_Child

704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Time_Child
Member since 2010 • 704 Posts
Hey I have another question for anyone who knows. If I own a PS3, does that mean I don't need to buy a 3D blu ray player to play 3D media?
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Hey I have another question for anyone who knows. If I own a PS3, does that mean I don't need to buy a 3D blu ray player to play 3D media?Time_Child

PS3 is a 3D player. Just make sure you have it updated with the latest firmware.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
No, not enough content heck Avatar 3D isn't even out, some channels don't even have their HD versions out either. Of course this is talking about the average bells n whistles flat panel marked up a ton at your local BB that Joe Blow will want. You could have had a 3D RPTV for years now and it's a great price for the size, also the projectors i happened to get happened to be 3D as well but i haven't tried it, cause like i said i'm waiting for Avatar to buy the glasses.
[QUOTE="l34052"]

[QUOTE="Alter_Echo"]

I purchased a 3d TV last week but only because it was the highest rated 2D display currently available outside of finding a Kuro in working condition. Having 3d was just a bonus.

gagit811

Where do u live? ive been on google and found kuro's for sale brand new, there's not many left but u can still buy them if u look around in the right places.

True, but you will pay a premium for one. Its funny because I've seen people who own kuros and still want to upgrade to newer TVs just for the new features. You would think once You owned one you would never want a new TV even tho nothing else really compares.

Maybe they wanted something above 60'' and don't care for the loss in PQ? To add to your other post yes i heard 3D movies were even demoed as far back as the 1950's!