is battlefield 3 still worth getting on PC?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ClassicRockFTW
ClassicRockFTW

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 ClassicRockFTW
Member since 2012 • 1106 Posts

Enjoyed it immensely on consoles, but I never did get it for PC. Is it still worth getting?

HOw is the online community? Still alive or dead?

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#2 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

Avatar image for ClassicRockFTW
ClassicRockFTW

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ClassicRockFTW
Member since 2012 • 1106 Posts

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

Wasdie

 

are the servers full? like what is the online population these days

Avatar image for ClassicRockFTW
ClassicRockFTW

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 ClassicRockFTW
Member since 2012 • 1106 Posts

new posts not bumping threads wtf is goin on with gamespot

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#5 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

ClassicRockFTW

 

are the servers full? like what is the online population these days

Plenty of full servers. Numbers are still high.

Avatar image for SKaREO
SKaREO

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 SKaREO
Member since 2006 • 3161 Posts
No, of course not. It's best played on a Playstation 3. Reason being, you have VoIP on the PS3 version so you can communicate with your team more efficiently, and they have designed the frostbite engine within the limitations inherent with consoles, so it runs very poorly on the PC in general. This is coming from somone who spent over 200 hours on the PC version of Bf3 before I came to this conclusion. This is also coming from somone who is a fan of all Battlefield games since the beginning, except for Bad Company which is shit.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
No, of course not. It's best played on a Playstation 3. Reason being, you have VoIP on the PS3 version so you can communicate with your team more efficiently, and they have designed the frostbite engine within the limitations inherent with consoles, so it runs very poorly on the PC in general. This is coming from somone who spent over 200 hours on the PC version of Bf3 before I came to this conclusion. This is also coming from somone who is a fan of all Battlefield games since the beginning, except for Bad Company which is shit.SKaREO
Good troll post
Avatar image for feverberries
feverberries

281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 feverberries
Member since 2013 • 281 Posts

they have designed the frostbite engine within the limitations inherent with consoles, so it runs very poorly on the PC in general. This is coming from somone who spent over 200 hours on the PC version of Bf3 before I came to this conclusion.SKaREO

it runs fairly well even on my laptop, when other newer titles struggle to keep solid framerate... so i don't know what you spent that 200 hours doing in that game...

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
No, of course not. It's best played on a Playstation 3. Reason being, you have VoIP on the PS3 version so you can communicate with your team more efficiently, and they have designed the frostbite engine within the limitations inherent with consoles, so it runs very poorly on the PC in general. This is coming from somone who spent over 200 hours on the PC version of Bf3 before I came to this conclusion. This is also coming from somone who is a fan of all Battlefield games since the beginning, except for Bad Company which is shit.SKaREO
Runs fine on my PC. Lack of VOIP did ruin it though.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

still fairly populated. in the event you only get the limited edition close quaraters DLC is now freeware which gives you a little more content to play with in MP:

http://www.vg247.com/2013/06/11/battlefield-3-dlc-free-during-e3/

Avatar image for SystemsGO
SystemsGO

1285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 SystemsGO
Member since 2011 • 1285 Posts

My personal opinion: It never was worth getting. I got it at launch and was sorely disappointed. I've always felt that way about Battlefield games though, but this one in particular seems to have too many issues. If you enjoy Battlefield, get it. 

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#12 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I'd say.. only if you could find the Premium Edition (not premium only), for like $15-20. Keep in mind, DICE is no longer updating the game, shifting focus to BF4. So don't complain when things aren't fixed even though DICE doesn't fix things anyways, but end up breaking things more /rant. It's true though. I'd strongly suggest getting it if it's dirt cheap and you will have friends playing with ya. It's quite boring playing alone.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
plsmen no voice chat is cancer and aids You can always find a game of norshar canals TC. About the PS3 version, that isn't even a game. The view distance is set to off, input lag is unimaginble, broken game.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

I'd say.. only if you could find the Premium Edition (not premium only), for like $15-20. Keep in mind, DICE is no longer updating the game, shifting focus to BF4. So don't complain when things aren't fixed even though DICE doesn't fix things anyways, but end up breaking things more /rant. It's true though. I'd strongly suggest getting it if it's dirt cheap and you will have friends playing with ya. It's quite boring playing alone.Elann2008
idk, im enjoying it a lot and im playing it alone

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#15 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

My personal opinion: It never was worth getting. I got it at launch and was sorely disappointed. I've always felt that way about Battlefield games though, but this one in particular seems to have too many issues. If you enjoy Battlefield, get it. 

SystemsGO

Despite putting about 200 hours into the game, there are some disappointments. Mainly with the stupid "effects" in the game... like tactical lighting (blocking bullets), server lag (not client side), suppression effects. I heard that the game wasn't even designed and coded properly for anything more than 18 players (even on PC). So those big 48-64 player maps are going to lag no matter what. Ultra settings causes stuttering for SOME people. Which is also stupid especially if you have a high-end PC.  Two people can't knife at the same time on a map.  DICE recognized it, said they fixed it, but it's still broken.  

No built in VOIP, no Commander.  4-man Squad isn't efficient because with certain number of players on a given map, some are left squad-less because Admin doesn't have a clue how to divide. BF4 going with 5-man squad is more ideal.  People count better in 5's, and 10's.   

I want tracer darts again, like in BC2.  Make the infantry demolition/engineer players viable again.  

Another thing I do not like is EA screwing customers who purchased the game day one, or near day one launch date.  We all ended up having to pay more to get expansion DLCs.  For me, I had to spend $90 for BF3, while people who purchased BF3 a year later only had to pay $50-60, or on sale $20-30 for premium edition.  No matter which way you look at it, that's wrong in many ways.  EA giving the shaft to the customers.  For the most part, I like DICE, they gave us BF2, BC2, which were very good games so it's hard not buying a BF game on day one or near day one.  

This separated the community a good deal.  DICE needs to strengthen the PC community on BF.

Don't get me wrong, those are some gripes, but the game has quite a bit of positives. Love the guns. Huge variety of guns and weapons to unlock. Game runs great performance wise (not including server performance). Gunplay and gun mechanics are excellent. Level of destruction is underrated. It's done in a more detailed way than BC2. With friends, it's a blast. Riding bikes, strapping C4 to demolish tanks is newb-fun. :-P

Client-side hit detection is great.  This is a huge plus.

Pros and cons aside, 200+ hours was worth the $90 I guess.  It's one of those games like Counter-Strike that is highly accessible, and fun to play here and there.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#16 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I'd say.. only if you could find the Premium Edition (not premium only), for like $15-20. Keep in mind, DICE is no longer updating the game, shifting focus to BF4. So don't complain when things aren't fixed even though DICE doesn't fix things anyways, but end up breaking things more /rant. It's true though. I'd strongly suggest getting it if it's dirt cheap and you will have friends playing with ya. It's quite boring playing alone.ionusX

idk, im enjoying it a lot and im playing it alone

You should not always play it alone! Which maps do you usually play? Just curious.
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I'd say.. only if you could find the Premium Edition (not premium only), for like $15-20. Keep in mind, DICE is no longer updating the game, shifting focus to BF4. So don't complain when things aren't fixed even though DICE doesn't fix things anyways, but end up breaking things more /rant. It's true though. I'd strongly suggest getting it if it's dirt cheap and you will have friends playing with ya. It's quite boring playing alone.Elann2008

idk, im enjoying it a lot and im playing it alone

You should not always play it alone! Which maps do you usually play? Just curious.

me mainly conquest and rush maps the map itself doesnt bug me ill play any of them, which is why i love the quickmatch feature :D conquest is literally the reason i fell in love with battlefield in the first place, my 1st game was BF: vietnam, from there i went to 2142 and 2:MC. i then went to BFBC 1 & 2 and i picked up bf2 to experiment a little bit. and now im on bf3

one day ill try 1942 and see if i liek it enough but theres probably no one playing it anymore.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#18 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="ionusX"] idk, im enjoying it a lot and im playing it alone

ionusX

You should not always play it alone! Which maps do you usually play? Just curious.

me mainly conquest and rush maps the map itself doesnt bug me ill play any of them, which is why i love the quickmatch feature :D conquest is literally the reason i fell in love with battlefield in the first place, my 1st game was BF: vietnam, from there i went to 2142 and 2:MC. i then went to BFBC 1 & 2 and i picked up bf2 to experiment a little bit. and now im on bf3

one day ill try 1942 and see if i liek it enough but theres probably no one playing it anymore.

Cool man. My favorite is conquest too. :D
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25780

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25780 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] You should not always play it alone! Which maps do you usually play? Just curious.Elann2008

me mainly conquest and rush maps the map itself doesnt bug me ill play any of them, which is why i love the quickmatch feature :D conquest is literally the reason i fell in love with battlefield in the first place, my 1st game was BF: vietnam, from there i went to 2142 and 2:MC. i then went to BFBC 1 & 2 and i picked up bf2 to experiment a little bit. and now im on bf3

one day ill try 1942 and see if i liek it enough but theres probably no one playing it anymore.

Cool man. My favorite is conquest too. :D

imo dice doesnt ruin battlefield but rather its the playerbase seeking the cheapest ways to win personnaly by getting higher scores or for the whole team. thats my opinion on the matter. and then DICE hands out nerfs which force imbalances and whiners, and dead maps and etc. /rant i could go on. i also blame EA because origin is sh!tty and so is any other attempt they have made to improve the monetization of what is possibly the best franchise they hold dominion over.

i rememebr trying to get bf2142:NS installed, whats a sh!t storm that was!

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="ionusX"] me mainly conquest and rush maps the map itself doesnt bug me ill play any of them, which is why i love the quickmatch feature :D conquest is literally the reason i fell in love with battlefield in the first place, my 1st game was BF: vietnam, from there i went to 2142 and 2:MC. i then went to BFBC 1 & 2 and i picked up bf2 to experiment a little bit. and now im on bf3

one day ill try 1942 and see if i liek it enough but theres probably no one playing it anymore.

ionusX

Cool man. My favorite is conquest too. :D

imo dice doesnt ruin battlefield but rather its the playerbase seeking the cheapest ways to win personnaly by getting higher scores or for the whole team. thats my opinion on the matter. and then DICE hands out nerfs which force imbalances and whienrs, and dead maps and etc.

You're right. I failed to mention that in my earlier post. The boosters, the hackers, subtle or obvious, are out there. Even the ones that are not "technically" cheating, they play for stat-padding which is so dumb. The game is fun, no need for that.
Avatar image for ClassicRockFTW
ClassicRockFTW

1106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 ClassicRockFTW
Member since 2012 • 1106 Posts

I got BF3 last night, runs great on my rig, Ultra on all settings on 1920x1080p, consistent 60+ fps w/ vsync

Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#22 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

Wasdie
I got the bundle for $25 on Amazon. Probably they will have the bundle at the same price on the Summer Sale.
Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#23 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
Game is fun on PC, most of the time, though, sadly it is full of aimbots
Avatar image for Cwagmire21
Cwagmire21

5896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Cwagmire21
Member since 2007 • 5896 Posts

Personally, I'd never buy a MP-focused game at the end of its cycle. BF4 is coming out in a few months and most likely BF3 will be forgotten.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#25 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Personally, I'd never buy a MP-focused game at the end of its cycle. BF4 is coming out in a few months and most likely BF3 will be forgotten.

Cwagmire21
Well.. DICE has forgotten BF3. They are no longer updating the game. Unless you're really itching to play BF3, then go for it. But like I said before, only if you could find the premium edition on sale for $20. I've seen it on Amazon.com during a sale at this price several times.
Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

Not sure if they are still running the promo, but bf4 preorder grants you premium.

If anyone has bf3 alrdy, than we should all squad up.

Avatar image for soolkiki
soolkiki

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#27 soolkiki
Member since 2008 • 1783 Posts

I would love to play with some people. A lot less fun when I'm going blindly from one server to another.

Avatar image for Bikouchu35
Bikouchu35

8344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Bikouchu35
Member since 2009 • 8344 Posts

I would love to play with some people. A lot less fun when I'm going blindly from one server to another.

soolkiki

Add my origin id: KoreanAssault. Actually my friends bf3 account, but he doesn't play the game lol.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Wait till BF4. BF3 is a messy game by design, and still flakey in terms of network stability when I last played it. BF4 hopefully should fix those issues, and they're adding commander back which is inherently a massive plus over BF3's organised VOIPless soldier rabble.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Game is fun on PC, most of the time, though, sadly it is full of aimbots Chris_53
Dat Punkbuster. I don't think it has ever been good.
Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

ClassicRockFTW

 

are the servers full? like what is the online population these days

Usually there are around 50-60k players at peak, PS3 had 60-70k, xbox 60-70k to this day. So its very sustainable. Its the divinity experiance on PC, 64 players, better graphics/FPS
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#32 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]Wait till BF4. BF3 is a messy game by design, and still flakey in terms of network stability when I last played it. BF4 hopefully should fix those issues, and they're adding commander back which is inherently a massive plus over BF3's organised VOIPless soldier rabble.

If you said this to me a month or so ago, I'd partially disagree. As of right now, I agree with you 100%. And I can see why some people who purchased BF3 and put in some good hours in it are not happy with the way the game turned out. I totally understand them now. So far, BF4 is look really good, and it's what BF3 should have been.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#33 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Chris_53"]Game is fun on PC, most of the time, though, sadly it is full of aimbots skrat_01
Dat Punkbuster. I don't think it has ever been good.

PB is useless. And I don't throw that word around easily. Hackers, aimbots, you name it. And EA doesn't enforce their rules. Reporting cheaters is pointless.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"] If you said this to me a month or so ago, I'd partially disagree. As of right now, I agree with you 100%. And I can see why some people who purchased BF3 and put in some good hours in it are not happy with the way the game turned out. I totally understand them now. So far, BF4 is look really good, and it's what BF3 should have been.

Yeah BF4 looks alright to me. A bit to similar to BF3 and the HUD still looks ugly as hell (ugh blue miniradar in the corner) - it seems like an extremely iterative sequel compared to older BF games, but I imagine it'll be an overall improvement on 3. [QUOTE="Elann2008"] PB is useless. And I don't throw that word around easily. Hackers, aimbots, you name it. And EA doesn't enforce their rules. Reporting cheaters is pointless.

Yeah I can't remember a time when PunkBuster was actually good; generally speaking servers needed decent admins kicking hackers if memory serves me correct. No idea how things are these days with BF3 since I stopped playing it.
Avatar image for soolkiki
soolkiki

1783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 soolkiki
Member since 2008 • 1783 Posts

[QUOTE="soolkiki"]

I would love to play with some people. A lot less fun when I'm going blindly from one server to another.

Bikouchu35

Add my origin id: KoreanAssault. Actually my friends bf3 account, but he doesn't play the game lol.

Okay, will do!

Avatar image for ZionismFTW
ZionismFTW

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 ZionismFTW
Member since 2013 • 316 Posts

I think you can find a BF3 + Premium bundle for $60 somewhere. I think that is worth it until BF4 comes out. 64 player games will really change how you play it.

Wasdie
More like $25. It's always going on sale somewhere, both the base game and the "premium" package.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

if anyone still cares, it's double XP weekend

Avatar image for Sweetbackhair
Sweetbackhair

2959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 Sweetbackhair
Member since 2007 • 2959 Posts
It's also $5 (US dollars) on Origin right now.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Add me on origin, kraken2109

Avatar image for Sweetbackhair
Sweetbackhair

2959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 Sweetbackhair
Member since 2007 • 2959 Posts

Add me on origin, kraken2109

kraken2109
Same goes it for me mine is xkaboskyx.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#41 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

It is not perfect but there is some good fun to be had.

Especially if you get the END GAME DLC.

Think its $5 on origin right now (or will be in a few days) as they had a vote for which game would be on sale for $5.