Is it worth playing on low graphics settings?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for swguy123
swguy123

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 swguy123
Member since 2010 • 401 Posts

My PC isnt very strong and I can play most of this generation games only on low or maybe medium settings. My question is it worth to play on my PC or should I just stick with consoles?

Avatar image for koospetoors
koospetoors

3715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#2 koospetoors
Member since 2004 • 3715 Posts
I guess its up to you, what do you enjoy playing on the most? if you can answer that then you have a pretty good idea of what you should stick to.
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

Well you could always use your PC to play the PC exclusives on low/medium. If you aren't happy with the graphical level play the multiplats on consoles.

Personally i am often suprised how good some games look on low/medium, many are comparable to consoles at these settings anyway

Avatar image for Lox_Cropek
Lox_Cropek

3555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#4 Lox_Cropek
Member since 2008 • 3555 Posts

Medium in most games looks great

Low is usually the simplest and usually looks bad

Medium already looks amazing and runs better than High

High usually looks a lot like medium, but a few more details

Avatar image for madmenno
madmenno

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#5 madmenno
Member since 2004 • 1528 Posts

I play a game for it's gameplay graphics are nice but they don't really add much to my experience. Offcourse if you get a game that mostly fun because of it's eyecandy you will probably be dissapointed.

Avatar image for BLKR4330
BLKR4330

1698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 BLKR4330
Member since 2006 • 1698 Posts

that's really up to you, if you really care about graphics and already own a console you might as well use it.

but if you prefer pc then here some things to consider:

1. added advantages of a pc are mouse and keyboard (i just can't imagine some games without them), mods (add replay value) and generally cheaper games that drop down in price faster most of the time too.

2. for most pc-games there is a lot of tweaking you can do to make it look good and still run well even on lower end systems. a lot of graphics options eat up a lot of performance disproportionately to how much better it makes the game look. so don't go with the preprogrammed low/medium/high options but play around with the settings to see how they affect looks and performance or find some on-line guides to help you if you can't figure it out.

3. what are your specs exactly? you can almost always gain a lot by simply upgrading your graphics card. easy upgrade and doesn't have to cost a lot.

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

I use to play most games at low settings before I upgraded my computer a few years ago...As long as it's playable (35+ fps) then you should be fine.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

You could take either higher-res with less eye candy or lower-res with more eye candy. I chose the latter since I'm gaming on a 32" 720p TV using a PC res of 1280x768.

Avatar image for swguy123
swguy123

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 swguy123
Member since 2010 • 401 Posts

I usually prefer to play with a controller.

My specs are:

CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo CPU E7400 @ 2.80 GHz

CPU Speed: 2.80 GHz Performance Rated at 5.04 GHz

RAM: 3.5 GB

OS: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600)

Video Card: GeForce 9500 GT

DirectX version: 9.0c

Sound Card: Realtek High Definition Audio

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
If you can play current gen games on low/medium its still very likely it looks better than on the console.
Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts
PC on Medium-ish = Console However you get to set a higher resolution so it will look better
Avatar image for bobbyjobby2
bobbyjobby2

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 bobbyjobby2
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

its the gameplay that matters not the grpahics. but mess around with the settings to see whats good and whats bad

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#13 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

You could take either higher-res with less eye candy or lower-res with more eye candy. I chose the latter since I'm gaming on a 32" 720p TV using a PC res of 1280x768.

jun_aka_pekto

try 1366x768, that should be the native res for your tv.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

My PC isnt very strong and I can play most of this generation games only on low or maybe medium settings. My question is it worth to play on my PC or should I just stick with consoles?

swguy123
I would say no, and I always use the movie analogy with this: What's better? 1- See something like INDEPENDENCE DAY at the cinema, HUGE screen with surround sound or 2- See it with low quality rip, on a small 29'' TV and stereo speakers?
Avatar image for desertpython
desertpython

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 desertpython
Member since 2006 • 1277 Posts

[QUOTE="swguy123"]

My PC isnt very strong and I can play most of this generation games only on low or maybe medium settings. My question is it worth to play on my PC or should I just stick with consoles?

FelipeInside

I would say no, and I always use the movie analogy with this: What's better? 1- See something like INDEPENDENCE DAY at the cinema, HUGE screen with surround sound or 2- See it with low quality rip, on a small 29'' TV and stereo speakers?

or 3)

Home built mini-ITX HTPC w/ 65" plasma and 5.1 speakers setup.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

It's really up to the person whether he finds it still worth it. I guess you gotta really enjoy playing with a m/kb much more than a controller.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
Alot of times, games on medium look better than the console versions.
Avatar image for kdawg88
kdawg88

2923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 kdawg88
Member since 2009 • 2923 Posts
It depends on the sort of game you're playing. For instance, I play Quake Live on the lowest texture settings possible because I play it as a sport and the game world tends to be distracting, whereas games that focus on a fictional setting and story are better off being played at their highest video settings. At any rate, if the visuals of a game are its only merits, then it's probably not a very good game.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

You could take either higher-res with less eye candy or lower-res with more eye candy. I chose the latter since I'm gaming on a 32" 720p TV using a PC res of 1280x768.

Lach0121

try 1366x768, that should be the native res for your tv.

My old nVidia 8600GT allowed 1366x768. My current 5770 only allows 1280x768 (standard 16:10). I'm also using the standard 15-pin VGA instead of DVI or HDMI.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11815 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

You could take either higher-res with less eye candy or lower-res with more eye candy. I chose the latter since I'm gaming on a 32" 720p TV using a PC res of 1280x768.

jun_aka_pekto

try 1366x768, that should be the native res for your tv.

My old nVidia 8600GT allowed 1366x768. My current 5770 only allows 1280x768 (standard 16:10). I'm also using the standard 15-pin VGA instead of DVI or HDMI.

Really? have you tried updating the drivers for your 5770?

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]try 1366x768, that should be the native res for your tv.

Lach0121

My old nVidia 8600GT allowed 1366x768. My current 5770 only allows 1280x768 (standard 16:10). I'm also using the standard 15-pin VGA instead of DVI or HDMI.

Really? have you tried updating the drivers for your 5770?

Yup. My TV is 16:10 and 1280x768 is the closest res at that ratio. It'd be nice though if I can jack the res up a bit more. I thought about using a3rd-party utility. But, the image quality at 1280x768 seems fine and is still slightly better than 720p.

I think the nVidia Control Panel allowed custom res to be set up while the Catalyst CCC sticks to standard resolutions.

Avatar image for Avenger1324
Avenger1324

16344

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Avenger1324
Member since 2007 • 16344 Posts
In the past I have deliberately held off from buying some games until I either upgraded or bought/built a new PC to get the most out of it. running games on low settings is one thing, but you still want it to run smoothly, and if you are having to run a game on minimum settings, then chances are it is going to be struggling with performance and maintaining stable fps.
Avatar image for UnknownElement4
UnknownElement4

2603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 UnknownElement4
Member since 2008 • 2603 Posts

If you don't mind playing games on Low/Medium settings then go right ahead and stay with that. I have many times still been able to enjoy a game even when playing on medium settings. It's really up to you.

Avatar image for virus1000
virus1000

10187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 virus1000
Member since 2009 • 10187 Posts

I would say stick with the consoles for now. You should get PC exclusives once you upgrade your PC.

Avatar image for solartiger
solartiger

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 solartiger
Member since 2003 • 235 Posts

My PC isnt very strong and I can play most of this generation games only on low or maybe medium settings. My question is it worth to play on my PC or should I just stick with consoles?

swguy123

On my last PC, I had to play on the lowest settings just so LotR online would stop crashing, which made for faceless boring 'toon-play...gave that up and decided to go quadcore w/ new computer...I know... "it's all about the gameplay", but I can't help feeling the weak graphics (caused by crappy CPU on my part) actually hurt my enjoyment of that game...