just cause 2 on win xp

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dragonballz4
dragonballz4

645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 dragonballz4
Member since 2008 • 645 Posts

i heard many people got just cause 2 working on xp using:

THIS!

so will it work???????????????????????????????????????????????????

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Don't do it, there is no DX 10 for XP, all these "fan made" DX 10s are failures that most of the time corrupt your OS and you need to format.
Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.
Avatar image for guildclaws
guildclaws

7921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 guildclaws
Member since 2009 • 7921 Posts
Don't do it, there is no DX 10 for XP, all these "fan made" DX 10s are failures that most of the time corrupt your OS and you need to format.DanielDust
i agree, don't do it, if you want to play Just Cause 2, buy windows 7 or vista
Avatar image for guildclaws
guildclaws

7921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 guildclaws
Member since 2009 • 7921 Posts
If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.Crimsader
lol, it'll corrupt your OS
Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts
[QUOTE="Crimsader"]If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.guildclaws
lol, it'll corrupt your OS

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P
Avatar image for w00tcolors169
w00tcolors169

100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 w00tcolors169
Member since 2010 • 100 Posts

Its not hard to get a student license for Windows 7, and those are usually ridiculously cheap. If you have a computer capable of playing games like JC2, there is no reason why you shouldn't be running Vista or 7.

The third party DX10 for XP might work, but you run a significant risk and it will probably result in a buggy game experience.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Why bother with hacks when Windows XP is obsolete? Windows 7 is better in every way now.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#9 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="guildclaws"][QUOTE="Crimsader"]If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.Crimsader
lol, it'll corrupt your OS

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P

This proves you wrong.

Also if you corrupt yor OS you won't beable to boot your computer.

Avatar image for ventnor
ventnor

1061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ventnor
Member since 2010 • 1061 Posts

Don't do it, just don't. I tried it about half a year ago to see if I could run Crysis in DX10 mode, I could not, the only thing it really does is telling your dxdiag that your version of directx is 10.00 it also rendered me unable to play alot of games

Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

[QUOTE="guildclaws"][QUOTE="Crimsader"]If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.Crimsader
lol, it'll corrupt your OS

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P

Where do you live ? I can get Windows 7 Home Premium full 64 for $141 after taxes here in Ontario, Canada.

Avatar image for Suffca
Suffca

666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Suffca
Member since 2008 • 666 Posts

[QUOTE="Crimsader"][QUOTE="guildclaws"]lol, it'll corrupt your OSWasdie

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P

This proves you wrong.

Also if you corrupt yor OS you won't beable to boot your computer.

That's the system builders version. It can only be used once.

Not worth it.

I'll stick with XP for a bit longer, will switch over to W7 eventually.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Crimsader"] Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :PSuffca

This proves you wrong.

Also if you corrupt yor OS you won't beable to boot your computer.

That's the system builders version. It can only be used once.

Not worth it.

I'll stick with XP for a bit longer, will switch over to W7 eventually.

Don't you only ever use it once? I mean I reinstalled my system builder copy of Windows Vista to my old PC like 5 times... cause it was Vista :(.

Avatar image for Suffca
Suffca

666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Suffca
Member since 2008 • 666 Posts

[QUOTE="Suffca"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

This proves you wrong.

Also if you corrupt yor OS you won't beable to boot your computer.

Wasdie

That's the system builders version. It can only be used once.

Not worth it.

I'll stick with XP for a bit longer, will switch over to W7 eventually.

Don't you only ever use it once? I mean I reinstalled my system builder copy of Windows Vista to my old PC like 5 times... cause it was Vista :(.

Well I would have to share with my family and then maybe if I want to build another machine?

If you just built a rig, the system builder's version is the way to go though.

Avatar image for Crimsader
Crimsader

11672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Crimsader
Member since 2008 • 11672 Posts

[QUOTE="Crimsader"][QUOTE="guildclaws"]lol, it'll corrupt your OSWasdie

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P

This proves you wrong.

Also if you corrupt yor OS you won't beable to boot your computer.

Oh, thanks for link. It was way more expensive on Microsoft's website. I might actually get it until the end of the year :P So yeah, then I guess the risk doesn't worth it. I also doubt that DirectX 10 will run on XP, but... I don't know how these guys managed to run it.
Avatar image for Buttons1990
Buttons1990

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Buttons1990
Member since 2009 • 3167 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="Suffca"]

That's the system builders version. It can only be used once.

Not worth it.

I'll stick with XP for a bit longer, will switch over to W7 eventually.

Suffca

Don't you only ever use it once? I mean I reinstalled my system builder copy of Windows Vista to my old PC like 5 times... cause it was Vista :(.

Well I would have to share with my family and then maybe if I want to build another machine?

If you just built a rig, the system builder's version is the way to go though.

You can't do that with a retail version either? The key activates one system at a time... The system builder pack is just an OEM disc... A retail box of Windows 7 comes with like 8 different manuals in every language on Earth and a plethora of other items which is why it cost $200, the system builder pack is just a disc and a key, because those people don't need a manual and simply want the disc...

Also if you are student, you could just get it for $30 or even free in some cases...

Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts

Just goes to show DX10 and 11 is a marketing scam. Still waiting on the jump we saw from dx8 to 9.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#18 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Just goes to show DX10 and 11 is a marketing scam. Still waiting on the jump we saw from dx8 to 9.

BDK-Soft

You serious?

Sure DX10 didn't have a lot of new features, but it implemented some new rendering techniques that DX 11 expanded on.

DX 11 is a massive jump from DX 9. You'll never see a jump like the one from DX8 to DX9 ever again. Now it's all about the fine details. Hammering out surfaces to look amazingly realistic, cloth to move correctly in the wind, shadows to properly be shaded depending on the light sources and ambiant light around it... tons of little things that don't make massive differences.

Also DX 11 allows for tesselations which will improve models to be even more realistic without a huge performance hit. Some of the stuff that DX 11 does is excellent and in the coming years we will see the crazy kind of lighting and textureing that DX11 allows.

DX10 and DX11 aren't marketing scams at all. The real marketing scam was to not support DX10 or DX11 with Windows XP. This is a hack to make that work, a dangerous one on that.

Avatar image for BDK-Soft
BDK-Soft

795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 BDK-Soft
Member since 2009 • 795 Posts

[QUOTE="BDK-Soft"]

Just goes to show DX10 and 11 is a marketing scam. Still waiting on the jump we saw from dx8 to 9.

Wasdie

You serious?

Why yes I am.

Avatar image for Suffca
Suffca

666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Suffca
Member since 2008 • 666 Posts

[QUOTE="Suffca"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Don't you only ever use it once? I mean I reinstalled my system builder copy of Windows Vista to my old PC like 5 times... cause it was Vista :(.

Buttons1990

Well I would have to share with my family and then maybe if I want to build another machine?

If you just built a rig, the system builder's version is the way to go though.

You can't do that with a retail version either? The key activates one system at a time... The system builder pack is just an OEM disc... A retail box of Windows 7 comes with like 8 different manuals in every language on Earth and a plethora of other items which is why it cost $200, the system builder pack is just a disc and a key, because those people don't need a manual and simply want the disc...

Also if you are student, you could just get it for $30 or even free in some cases...

Shows how much I know. :P

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="guildclaws"][QUOTE="Crimsader"]If many got it working, then you should get it too. A try doesn't hurt. See for yourself.Crimsader
lol, it'll corrupt your OS

Even then I'd prefer playing with corrupted OS than to pay 200 bux for Windows 7 :P

Thats just your crazy side speaking... Windows 7 costs around 90 bux by the way.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#22 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="BDK-Soft"]

Just goes to show DX10 and 11 is a marketing scam. Still waiting on the jump we saw from dx8 to 9.

BDK-Soft

You serious?

Why yes I am.

Enjoy sticking with really outdated OSs and graphics cards then. You'll be waiting for years.

Avatar image for ZimpanX
ZimpanX

12636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#23 ZimpanX
Member since 2005 • 12636 Posts

Windows 7 is better in every way now.

Wasdie



For the most part I agree, but there is some small annoyances like the old school print screen in-game function barely works, the default image viewer can't show can't show animated gifs (thankfully there is 3rd party software), and it can be a chore to get some of those old nice c-lassics to run properly. There are probably some other small things I have yet to encounter but apart from that it is a really sweet OS.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60837 Posts

Why bother with hacks when Windows XP is obsolete? Windows 7 is better in every way now.

Wasdie

I see your point, but c'mon. Windows XP is not broken, nor obsolete. It seems like 95% of software runs on it, if not more.

Calling Windows XP obsolete is like calling my 15 year old Jeep obsolete; its not, it is just old :) It gets me from point A to point B, and if the only alternative is to dump a bunch of money (and to many, 100+ dollars for an OS is expensive) into something new but unnecessary, than it is better to stick with the old.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

With that said, I made the switch to Windows 7 four months ago and it is fan-friggin'-tastic :D Highly recommended, but onlyif you got 100+ dollars to burn. I bought mine with a percentage of my tax return

Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

My PC died a couple of days ago and I'm using a computer running XP while my new PC is being built and it's soooo bad, just so slow and annoying. I want my PC with Vista back!!! :cry:

Seriously going back to this ugly dinosaur of an OS has opened my eyes even more of just how much better the new operating systems are. If you can't afford Seven then at least pick up Vista at a bargain price.

Avatar image for Ghty82
Ghty82

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Ghty82
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
Just use Windows 7. If you have at least 1GB of RAM (Which you should considering you want to play Just Cause 2) and are bothered to do it (took about a day hours for me to transfer my files, settings and programs. Windows 7 is blazingly fast and has loads of new features. In the future all games will require it.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#27 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why bother with hacks when Windows XP is obsolete? Windows 7 is better in every way now.

mrbojangles25

I see your point, but c'mon. Windows XP is not broken, nor obsolete. It seems like 95% of software runs on it, if not more.

Calling Windows XP obsolete is like calling my 15 year old Jeep obsolete; its not, it is just old :) It gets me from point A to point B, and if the only alternative is to dump a bunch of money (and to many, 100+ dollars for an OS is expensive) into something new but unnecessary, than it is better to stick with the old.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

With that said, I made the switch to Windows 7 four months ago and it is fan-friggin'-tastic :D Highly recommended, but onlyif you got 100+ dollars to burn. I bought mine with a percentage of my tax return

No it isn't broken, but it doesn't use any sort of threading and current generation UI and mulitasking useability. Thus it is obsolete.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#28 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts
And at the same time, I still get better performance in my games on XP nlited compared to my 7. Now once I update my computer some more, 7 will shine but for me, XP is still amazing. No its not obsolete until you everything is moved to a new OS which it hasn't. Game wise, we have 2 games that don't work on XP with a couple that add nice graphical increases in the form of dx10 and 11. Ironically, till we see new consoles, XP will still be going nicely.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#29 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Seriously the replies here are weird.... win7 or vista for that matter are not better than xp, they are slower, many devs develop on xp for that same reason. The point of the thread is wherever there is a way to play just cause 2 on xp not buying vista or win7. I dont understand what exactly the developers were doing before the release the pc version that made them not to make it available on xp since its a dx9 console game and there is no justification for no xp version. To be honest i dont think that dx10 xp will work because its more than having dx10 in order to play the game, you need vista or win7.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why bother with hacks when Windows XP is obsolete? Windows 7 is better in every way now.

Wasdie

I see your point, but c'mon. Windows XP is not broken, nor obsolete. It seems like 95% of software runs on it, if not more.

Calling Windows XP obsolete is like calling my 15 year old Jeep obsolete; its not, it is just old :) It gets me from point A to point B, and if the only alternative is to dump a bunch of money (and to many, 100+ dollars for an OS is expensive) into something new but unnecessary, than it is better to stick with the old.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

With that said, I made the switch to Windows 7 four months ago and it is fan-friggin'-tastic :D Highly recommended, but onlyif you got 100+ dollars to burn. I bought mine with a percentage of my tax return

No it isn't broken, but it doesn't use any sort of threading and current generation UI and mulitasking useability. Thus it is obsolete.

Current Gen UI isn't all that its cracked up to be... I have been using Windows 7 for about a month now and still prefer the UI in Windows XP.
Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

Seriously the replies here are weird.... win7 or vista for that matter are not better than xp, they are slower, dakan45

That's funny I went from XP to Vista SP1 on the same system and it was like getting out of a Datsun and jumping into a brand new Lamborghini. Navagation, UI etc are just so much faster and it looks so much better.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#32 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Seriously the replies here are weird.... win7 or vista for that matter are not better than xp, they are slower, the_mitch28

That's funny I went from XP to Vista SP1 on the same system and it was like getting out of a Datsun and jumping into a brand new Lamborghini. Navagation, UI etc are just so much faster and it looks so much better.

The exact opposite here an not just for me but many people, infact i find very weird that you had such a fast navigation, vista sp1 was slow as hell, especially on laptops. As for the UI? It was terrible, confusive and much slower than xp, Everytime i want to perfom an action such as moving files, photographs or scripts and models that i hav make, it takes bouble the amount of time it takes to xp thanks to all those pop ups asking me if i am sure i want to do this and that and if i got the right, multitasking my ass. Now i understand why most gamedeveloeprs use xp, you can do things faster.
Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Vista/7 confusing? what kind of argument is that? they're identical to XP except the "Users" folder, it's not Documents and Settings anymore. Doing basic stuff was faster on Vista but it had the same problem as XP over time it started to get slower, and this was finally fixed in 7, it's as fast as it was last year when I first installed it and sorry to say this but you're not fooling anyone you didn't have an extensive experience with Vista if it gave you "pop ups", any mediocre PC user would remove those inconveniences day 1, you either didn't know what it was so it's doubtful Vista really was as bad as you're explaining or you never really used it much at all.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#34 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60837 Posts

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Why bother with hacks when Windows XP is obsolete? Windows 7 is better in every way now.

Wasdie

I see your point, but c'mon. Windows XP is not broken, nor obsolete. It seems like 95% of software runs on it, if not more.

Calling Windows XP obsolete is like calling my 15 year old Jeep obsolete; its not, it is just old :) It gets me from point A to point B, and if the only alternative is to dump a bunch of money (and to many, 100+ dollars for an OS is expensive) into something new but unnecessary, than it is better to stick with the old.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

With that said, I made the switch to Windows 7 four months ago and it is fan-friggin'-tastic :D Highly recommended, but onlyif you got 100+ dollars to burn. I bought mine with a percentage of my tax return

No it isn't broken, but it doesn't use any sort of threading and current generation UI and mulitasking useability. Thus it is obsolete.

Hmmm I suppose you are technically correct, but in a more practical sense its tough to call it obsolete.

Anyway, whatever.

On a separate note, I am assuming that is ArmA II in your sig. Is that modded or a custom map? I am looking into getting into multiplayer ArmA and would like some pointers.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Vista/7 confusing? what kind of argument is that? they're identical to XP except the "Users" folder, it's not Documents and Settings anymore. Doing basic stuff was faster on Vista but it had the same problem as XP over time it started to get slower, and this was finally fixed in 7, it's as fast as it was last year when I first installed it and sorry to say this but you're not fooling anyone you didn't have an extensive experience with Vista if it gave you "pop ups", any mediocre PC user would remove those inconveniences day 1, you either didn't know what it was so it's doubtful Vista really was as bad as you're explaining or you never really used it much at all.DanielDust
That is a post that collapses on its own argument. Seriously identical to xp? Hell no, everything is a mess and in a completly diffirent location. I must be a mediocre user if i have to take more than a day to figure out all the changes they made and where they put them. No wait, i am aslo using various versions of Linux and they are both easier and faster to learn when they are nothing like Xp. So no thanks vista/7 is the problem not xp or any other Os. MS better step their game up and make a good Os rather patching up Win7 to what vista should have beeen.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#36 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Vista/7 confusing? what kind of argument is that? they're identical to XP except the "Users" folder, it's not Documents and Settings anymore. Doing basic stuff was faster on Vista but it had the same problem as XP over time it started to get slower, and this was finally fixed in 7, it's as fast as it was last year when I first installed it and sorry to say this but you're not fooling anyone you didn't have an extensive experience with Vista if it gave you "pop ups", any mediocre PC user would remove those inconveniences day 1, you either didn't know what it was so it's doubtful Vista really was as bad as you're explaining or you never really used it much at all.dakan45

That is a post that collapses on its own argument. Seriously identical to xp? Hell no, everything is a mess and in a completly diffirent location. I must be a mediocre user if i have to take more than a day to figure out all the changes they made and where they put them. No wait, i am aslo using various versions of Linux and they are both easier and faster to learn when they are nothing like Xp. So no thanks vista/7 is the problem not xp or any other Os. MS better step their game up and make a good Os rather patching up Win7 to what vista should have beeen.

Have you even tried windows 7? Its amazing, the best windwos versino ever.

I to wasnt a fan of Vista at all, I ended up going back to XP. But after trying Windows7 I was hooked. Its like Windows XP except improved.

W7>XP>VISTA

from my personal experience.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#37 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Vista/7 confusing? what kind of argument is that? they're identical to XP except the "Users" folder, it's not Documents and Settings anymore. Doing basic stuff was faster on Vista but it had the same problem as XP over time it started to get slower, and this was finally fixed in 7, it's as fast as it was last year when I first installed it and sorry to say this but you're not fooling anyone you didn't have an extensive experience with Vista if it gave you "pop ups", any mediocre PC user would remove those inconveniences day 1, you either didn't know what it was so it's doubtful Vista really was as bad as you're explaining or you never really used it much at all.kozzy1234

That is a post that collapses on its own argument. Seriously identical to xp? Hell no, everything is a mess and in a completly diffirent location. I must be a mediocre user if i have to take more than a day to figure out all the changes they made and where they put them. No wait, i am aslo using various versions of Linux and they are both easier and faster to learn when they are nothing like Xp. So no thanks vista/7 is the problem not xp or any other Os. MS better step their game up and make a good Os rather patching up Win7 to what vista should have beeen.

Have you even tried windows 7? Its amazing, the best windwos versino ever.

I to wasnt a fan of Vista at all, I ended up going back to XP. But after trying Windows7 I was hooked. Its like Windows XP except improved.

W7>XP>VISTA

from my personal experience.

"Have you even tried windows 7" :roll: aghh, it really pisses me off when people act like that, not in the whole xp vista thingy just when they say "have you even tried" like you have not. So explain me exactly what gave you the impression i have not because windows 7 are polished vista and nothing else.win7 look exactly like vista but it has less issues and thats al lthere is to it. So i dont see where from where you pull the "its like windows xp expect improved" sinde they look exactly like vista. If anything its like vista but improved.