Just installed HD6950, and I am disappoint

  • 61 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bigfoot2045
bigfoot2045

732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 bigfoot2045
Member since 2012 • 732 Posts

You went from an nVidia card to an AMD card without reinstalling Windows. That's your issue right there.

I looked through three pages and can't believe none of the other clowns here caught on to that. I've never seen a card swap going between companies go smoothly. Even driver cleaners usually don't work. You absolutely have to reinstall windows or you will have bizarre performance problems. I've seen this exact issue many times before.

An i5, even a dual core i5 probably isn't going to be the bottleneck people here are thinking it is.

Avatar image for yonyz
yonyz

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 yonyz
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts
My CPU temps are 55 at Idle. Sucks, so I'm getting an Hyper 212 Evo tomorrow. I'll go as much as to format my PC and reinstall Windows and all the games. I did clean the NVIDIA driver remnants with Driver Sweeper though, but what the hell, one night and my PC will download all the games.
Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#53 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

You went from an nVidia card to an AMD card without reinstalling Windows. That's your issue right there.

I looked through three pages and can't believe none of the other clowns here caught on to that. I've never seen a card swap going between companies go smoothly. Even driver cleaners usually don't work. You absolutely have to reinstall windows or you will have bizarre performance problems. I've seen this exact issue many times before.

An i5, even a dual core i5 probably isn't going to be the bottleneck people here are thinking it is.

bigfoot2045

Hah? I went from an 8800gt to a 4850 then to a gtx460 and now to a 6850 ( after my gtx 460 died ) and i never reinstalled Windows and i have no problems with the usual method of uninstall nvidia driver, reboot to safe mode run driver sweeper, clean nvidia remains, remove nvidia card, install AMD card, boot into safe mode and install new drivers Now if you need to reinstall Windows every time then you are doing something terribly wrong

As for BF3 all those CPU benchmarks you see are for single player. Try running a 64 player MP map with a dual core and see how big the difference is from a quad core. Infact BF3 scales well up to 8cores in MP

Avatar image for Grey_Eyed_Elf
Grey_Eyed_Elf

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Grey_Eyed_Elf
Member since 2011 • 7971 Posts
[QUOTE="bigfoot2045"]

You went from an nVidia card to an AMD card without reinstalling Windows. That's your issue right there.

I looked through three pages and can't believe none of the other clowns here caught on to that. I've never seen a card swap going between companies go smoothly. Even driver cleaners usually don't work. You absolutely have to reinstall windows or you will have bizarre performance problems. I've seen this exact issue many times before.

An i5, even a dual core i5 probably isn't going to be the bottleneck people here are thinking it is.

adamosmaki
Hah? I went from an 8800gt to a 4850 then to a gtx460 and now to a 6850 ( after my gtx 460 died ) and i never reinstalled Windows and i have no problems with the usual method of uninstall nvidia driver, reboot to safe mode run driver sweeper, clean nvidia remains, remove nvidia card, install AMD card, boot into safe mode and install new drivers Now if you need to reinstall Windows every time then you are doing something terribly wrong

I went from a 8800GTS to a HD 4890 with no issues... I also went from a two HD 6950's to a GTX 680 but that PC was stolen, then I built a new PC and used a HD 6870 I had and then went to GTX 670 with no issues what so ever. Not sure what bigfoot is on about to be honest.
Avatar image for yonyz
yonyz

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 yonyz
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts
Well here's some news. I bought a Scythe Mugen 3, temps lowered from 55C idle to 30 Idle, and now 55 on 4 threads torture test on Prime 95 - 100% load. I think those are great temps, no air conditioning and only one 120mm fan in the case. As for the performance with the new temps I can't test it now because I sold the HD6950 and am getting a 7950 tomorrow, for an additional $80 compared to what I paid for the 6950. As for the CPU itself, three more days for the i5 2500k eBay auction and I'm leading for now. Do you think there's a point in getting an Ivy Bridge CPU instead for the sole purpose of gaming? I also got a new Thermaltake TR2 800W CPU, certified 80 plus and all that fancy stuff. Peaks at 857 so I'm good for years to come as far as PSUs go.
Avatar image for Ben-Buja
Ben-Buja

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Ben-Buja
Member since 2011 • 2809 Posts

Look at the graph here, it shows similar performance with many different CPUs, including a dual core Athlon 2 CPU and a dual core i3 2120: http://www.techspot.com/review/458-battlefield-3-performance/page7.html Explanation? :Dyonyz

This comparison is useless, they tested the game in SP which is only demanding on the GPU.

The game will run much smoother for you with a better CPU. I know how annoying it can be to have 20 fps looking in one direction and 70 looking in the other.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#57 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="yonyz"]Look at the graph here, it shows similar performance with many different CPUs, including a dual core Athlon 2 CPU and a dual core i3 2120: http://www.techspot.com/review/458-battlefield-3-performance/page7.html Explanation? :DBen-Buja

This comparison is useless, they tested the game in SP which is only demanding on the GPU.

The game will run much smoother for you with a better CPU. I know how annoying it can be to have 20 fps looking in one direction and 70 looking in the other.

exactly . All the Cpu benchmarks for BF3 are useless since all they do is SP. Try running a 64 player map on a dual core
Avatar image for yonyz
yonyz

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 yonyz
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts
Very good news, guys. So with the new 800W PSU and the monstrous Mugen 3 CPU cooler, I'm playing BF3 with my old GTX 260 (sold the HD6950 with the intention to buy an HD7950 instead) and the same dual core i5 661 (didn't overclock), and guess what changed? The FPS DOUBLED. I'm playing Caspian Border, 64 players (server full), High Texture, everything else on Medium, HBAO ON, Post AA on Medium - 44 FPS minimum - average I'd say 50-something. On smaller maps, like Deathmatch maps, it reaches 70 FPS (peaks though), and is the lowest at 50 FPS. It's incredible how much the new PSU and CPU cooler improved my FPS. Hell, even ACB, which ran poorly with the HD6950 now runs perfectly smooth on highest settings, Vsync and multisampling off. I don't know if I'm gonna buy this hD7950 after all...
Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts

Something is wrong with my system. Metro map, Rush mode, 20/32 players, both underground and outside, Medium settings and below (Shadows at Low, everything else Off or 1x), game runs terribly slow, maybe even slower than before, I don't know... Absolutely unplayable at these Medium to Low settings, with a GPU that I think should do more. I'm gonna try a complete reinstall of the driver as adamosmaki suggested.

Update:

Driver cleaning and reinstallation complete.

I noticed the game runs pretty much the same on Auto, High, Medium and Low. All slow at times, and all smooth at times. I also noticed the graphics doesn't really change, textures still look sharp despite being on Low.

I'm gonna go back to Win 7 64 Bit.

These ATI drivers are beta, and the game doesn't officially support Win 8. This is too important. :D

yonyz
Definitely sounds like a problem, I was able to get ~30fps with an Intel Dual Core E8400 and a GTX 460 1GB at High settings at 1080p.
Avatar image for yonyz
yonyz

651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 yonyz
Member since 2008 • 651 Posts
Well I'm getting 42 FPS and up to 60 now with a GTX 260. :D Read my last two posts above...
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
[QUOTE="yonyz"]Very good news, guys. So with the new 800W PSU and the monstrous Mugen 3 CPU cooler, I'm playing BF3 with my old GTX 260 (sold the HD6950 with the intention to buy an HD7950 instead) and the same dual core i5 661 (didn't overclock), and guess what changed? The FPS DOUBLED. I'm playing Caspian Border, 64 players (server full), High Texture, everything else on Medium, HBAO ON, Post AA on Medium - 44 FPS minimum - average I'd say 50-something. On smaller maps, like Deathmatch maps, it reaches 70 FPS (peaks though), and is the lowest at 50 FPS. It's incredible how much the new PSU and CPU cooler improved my FPS. Hell, even ACB, which ran poorly with the HD6950 now runs perfectly smooth on highest settings, Vsync and multisampling off. I don't know if I'm gonna buy this hD7950 after all...

Looks like your cpu was overheating and slowing down