L.A. Noire & Red Dead Redemption. and PC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kingeliran
kingeliran

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kingeliran
Member since 2005 • 1069 Posts

ok then, i just wanted to ask something i know they arent coming to pc but, is rockstar are intersting in making money or watch it goes away?

i mean look at this. they made millions from red dead redemption on consoles, if they port it to pc in a few working months, they will make millions. sooo...? what is 6 months of porting it to pc? 1 mil? lets say it is 1 million expense... with that you make millions! if you release iton pc. so why the hell not?

please help me understand why not?.

after a while i said what the hell got over it. but now they do it again with L.A. Noire... so i came to realize that the guy that is incharge of rockstar must be a complete douchbag\retard.

the funny part is, pc market made rockstar what it is today, and it is a fact that pc market is the biggest of them all.

i still didnt lose hope since every game rockstar made came to pc eventully (Bully, even Manhunt 2).

so why not port the games even a lousy buggy port will make them alot of money.

WHY NOT?

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Wasn't Rockstar looking for dx10 and dx11 developers not too long ago? Not sure if that was true or not. I have come to the point where I really don't care anymore. I'm not going to get a console just to play a couple of games I like.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts
After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chugg
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#4 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chuggJames161324
I'm sure GTA4 does just that :P
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chuggmillerlight89
I'm sure GTA4 does just that :P

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="James161324"]After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chuggJames161324

I'm sure GTA4 does just that :P

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

Very true. However, Just Cause 2 has terrible performance in the city areas. Not sure how well it would perform if they made the whole game based in a city.
Avatar image for Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Ikuto_Tsukiyomi

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Member since 2010 • 822 Posts

Rockstar: L.A Noire won't come to PC cause teh PC can't emulate the Physics hur dur.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="James161324"]After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chuggJames161324

I'm sure GTA4 does just that :P

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

Just Cause 2, Mafia II, and I am going to assume Assassins Creed II (even AC1) run better and look better than GTA IV. I know there is a lot going on, but come on! The game is just awfuly coded.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] I'm sure GTA4 does just that :PNaveedLife

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

Just Cause 2, Mafia II, and I am going to assume Assassins Creed II (even AC1) run better and look better than GTA IV. I know there is a lot going on, but come on! The game is just awfuly coded.

Rockstar Toronto is horrible with ports.
Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12810 Posts
They'll bring Red Dead Redemption to the PC eventually maybe at the end of this year or somewhere close to it's half. Don't forget that by shipping a PC version they'll need somewhat to improve the game (graphics, content etc)
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#11 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="James161324"]After gta iv i don't care, i'm sure rockstar could make a game that made an i5 2500k chuggJames161324

I'm sure GTA4 does just that :P

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

JC2 looks WAY better. You're right about that.
Avatar image for avatarcj
avatarcj

105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#12 avatarcj
Member since 2008 • 105 Posts

They won't do that . Just like Fable 3 , it won't appear on the PC . Why ? Because of "Robin Hoods" like Skidrow , Fairlight , Reloaded , Razor1911 and others . What about Red Dead Revolver , it was only for Xbox and Playstation 2 .

Avatar image for SkyWard20
SkyWard20

4509

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 SkyWard20
Member since 2009 • 4509 Posts

They won't do that . Just like Fable 3 , it won't appear on the PC . Why ? Because of "Robin Hoods" like Skidrow , Fairlight , Reloaded , Razor1911 and others . What about Red Dead Revolver , it was only for Xbox and Playstation 2 .

avatarcj

Funny to see that I'm not the only one using that term. But I think Fable 3 will come to the PC. They've already shown some screens and stuff, I think.

And I'd love to see RDR on the PC. I liked GTA IV a lot, even if it lacked some of the features present in San Andreas, it still had characters and a story that were a lot more likeable than the whole 'ghetto' vibe SA gave off.

Ugh, no racism intended.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I don't know about Fable 3 any more. Already 2011 and no news on it. I think they're trying to sweep the PC version under the rug.
Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts
Wasn't Rockstar looking for dx10 and dx11 developers not too long ago? Not sure if that was true or not. I have come to the point where I really don't care anymore. I'm not going to get a console just to play a couple of games I like. millerlight89
wasn't blizzard looking for console programmers ? :P ON TOPIC : La noire is looking fantastic i hope they will port it to PC
Avatar image for Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Ikuto_Tsukiyomi

822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Member since 2010 • 822 Posts

Do we know what Engine it's using? if its using R.A.G.E (Rockstar Advance Gaming Engine) then the port won't exist/will be a copy pasta like GTA IV, It would be nice to see it. If I remember I think Team Bondi did confirm a PC port a few months ago going back into 2010, but if Rockstar told them not too is beyond me.

Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
I don't know about Fable 3 any more. Already 2011 and no news on it. I think they're trying to sweep the PC version under the rug.Elann2008
I remember hearing at a podcast (giant bomb I think) that they were showing off the PC version at CES 2011
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#18 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]I don't know about Fable 3 any more. Already 2011 and no news on it. I think they're trying to sweep the PC version under the rug.Evz0rz
I remember hearing at a podcast (giant bomb I think) that they were showing off the PC version at CES 2011

Really??? That's good news.
Avatar image for BLKR4330
BLKR4330

1698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 BLKR4330
Member since 2006 • 1698 Posts

like you said, all previous games made it to pc even when it was denied time and time again beforehand. it really doesn't make sense to have a finished product lying around and not do a relatively small porting job to grab some extra revenues (unless there is an exclusivity contract in place with a greater value). console versions bring in a lot more money so they don't want a pc version to be released simultaneously to interfere with that unfortunately.

so just be patient it's not like there isn't enough games to keep us busy without la noire and red dead ;)

Avatar image for charmingcharlie
charmingcharlie

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 charmingcharlie
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts

The problem with Rockstars games on the PC isn't that they don't make money or turn a profit on the PC, I know for a fact GTA 4 sold a fair few million and cost the price of a can of coke to port. The problem is that in Rockstars eyes the PC does not make them ENOUGH profit. Why should they "waste" resources bringing their products to the PC when those same resources can be used to bring products to the consoles and they can milk the console crowd for every penny.

Now aside from them thinking they can make more money on the consoles you have both Sony and Microsoft falling over themselves to write cheques to Rockstar to ensure their respective console gets favourable treatment. So with no one offereing Rockstar big cheques to do PC versions and a possibly lower return on their investment on the PC is it any wonder that they don't bother with the PC version.

Personally after the appallingly awful GTA 4 I don't think Rockstar should be allowed anywhere near a PC until they pass a basic college course on programming.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

[QUOTE="James161324"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] I'm sure GTA4 does just that :Pmillerlight89

Mostlikely, Just cause 2 which imo looks much nicer, runs at a nice fps. Just makes me sad

Very true. However, Just Cause 2 has terrible performance in the city areas. Not sure how well it would perform if they made the whole game based in a city.

I didn't notice that, maybe becuase i was only playing on 1440 by 900, but i never saw the fps drop below 30 on high if i rember correctly.