LCDs and CRTs...what's the major differences?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IMaBIOHAZARD
IMaBIOHAZARD

1464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 IMaBIOHAZARD
Member since 2008 • 1464 Posts

I still use an older CRT monitor for games (if you can believe that). I've been looking to get a decent LCD monitor (the biggest I could probably fit in the space i've got is only around 22" though), but I just don't know what to look for in terms of specs.

And what's up with Native Resolutions, and how is it going to affect my gaming?

Avatar image for kaitanuvax
kaitanuvax

3814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kaitanuvax
Member since 2007 • 3814 Posts

I still use an older CRT monitor for games (if you can believe that). I've been looking to get a decent LCD monitor (the biggest I could probably fit in the space i've got is only around 22" though), but I just don't know what to look for in terms of specs.

And what's up with Native Resolutions, and how is it going to affect my gaming?

IMaBIOHAZARD

CRT has more color and depth, but is so much harder to manufacture, thus more expensive.

Here's a good list of what each has and doesn't have over the other:

http://www.pcreview.co.uk/articles/Consumer-Advice/LCD_vs_CRT/

Avatar image for kilerchese
kilerchese

831

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kilerchese
Member since 2008 • 831 Posts

CRT has more color and depth, but is so much harder to manufacture, thus more expensive.

Here's a good list of what each has and doesn't have over the other:

http://www.pcreview.co.uk/articles/Consumer-Advice/LCD_vs_CRT/

kaitanuvax

Remember that this article was made in 2004 so some of what it is talking about doesn't hold true anymore.

Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

I still use an older CRT monitor for games (if you can believe that). I've been looking to get a decent LCD monitor (the biggest I could probably fit in the space i've got is only around 22" though), but I just don't know what to look for in terms of specs.

And what's up with Native Resolutions, and how is it going to affect my gaming?

IMaBIOHAZARD
Alright my friend here's the low down: CRTS: 1. Can easily scale to different resolutions without losing sharpness or image quality. 2. CRT monitors have higher refresh rates than LCDs 3.CRT monitors emit very small amounts of radiation 4.CRTs consume more power and produce more heat 5.CRTS are very heavy and take up quite a bit of space 6.CRTS can only display an analog image and not a digital image (VGA only) 7.CRTs are harder and harder to find and will eventually be 100% replaced by LCDs LCDs: 1. Have a native resolution that is recommended for the best image quality and video quality. They also don't scale well to lower resolutions without losing some visual quality. 2. They have lower refresh rates than CRTS. 3.They are environmentally friendly and emit no radiation. 4.LCDs consume little power and produce little heat. 5.LCDs are light weight and also take up little space. 6.LCDs can display both analog and digital images/video. 7.LCDs are sharper, brighter, and have better contrast. 8.Many different size LCDs are available and there is an LCD that will fit every budget.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
Hey UltimateGamer. That's a very good list, and I agree with most of what you said. But there are couple of changes that I would make. First, my CRT has digital inputs, as do alot of late model CRT's. Also, CRT's have better contrast, since there is no backlight involved. But that being said, the contrast is excellent on new LCD's, so the difference really is minimal. Otherwise, great list. Keep up the good work ;)
Avatar image for KreepLX
KreepLX

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#6 KreepLX
Member since 2004 • 313 Posts

All monitors have controller boards that either have analog to digital converters or they can accept digital inputs. I am a big fan of DLP technology because the millions of mirros can change resolutions easily without and quality loss.

Avatar image for eddy96_1
eddy96_1

1388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 eddy96_1
Member since 2003 • 1388 Posts
get the dell 24" 2408 WFP... awesome LCD monitor
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="IMaBIOHAZARD"]

I still use an older CRT monitor for games (if you can believe that). I've been looking to get a decent LCD monitor (the biggest I could probably fit in the space i've got is only around 22" though), but I just don't know what to look for in terms of specs.

And what's up with Native Resolutions, and how is it going to affect my gaming?

UltimateGamer95
Alright my friend here's the low down: CRTS: 1. Can easily scale to different resolutions without losing sharpness or image quality. 2. CRT monitors have higher refresh rates than LCDs 3.CRT monitors emit very small amounts of radiation 4.CRTs consume more power and produce more heat 5.CRTS are very heavy and take up quite a bit of space 6.CRTS can only display an analog image and not a digital image (VGA only) 7.CRTs are harder and harder to find and will eventually be 100% replaced by LCDs LCDs: 1. Have a native resolution that is recommended for the best image quality and video quality. They also don't scale well to lower resolutions without losing some visual quality. 2. They have lower refresh rates than CRTS. 3.They are environmentally friendly and emit no radiation. 4.LCDs consume little power and produce little heat. 5.LCDs are light weight and also take up little space. 6.LCDs can display both analog and digital images/video. 7.LCDs are sharper, brighter, and have better contrast. 8.Many different size LCDs are available and there is an LCD that will fit every budget.

That's close.. only a couple things. CRT's have better contrast than LCD's for the same reason plasma screens do - when they display 'black,' there is simply nothing there. When an LCD displays black, it's generally a full white backlight that's being 'covered' by the pixel attempting to display black. In the real world, the better LCD screens now can more or less match what a CRT would do, but LCD manufacturers are prone to inflate the hell out of their numbers, since nobody's really keeping count. Also, LCD's don't have refresh rates in the same way a CRT does. CRT's actually refresh the image completely, while an LCD just turns the pixels on and changes them as needed without ever actually shutting the backlight off. :D
Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts
[QUOTE="Makari"] That's close.. only a couple things. CRT's have better contrast than LCD's for the same reason plasma screens do - when they display 'black,' there is simply nothing there. When an LCD displays black, it's generally a full white backlight that's being 'covered' by the pixel attempting to display black. In the real world, the better LCD screens now can more or less match what a CRT would do, but LCD manufacturers are prone to inflate the hell out of their numbers, since nobody's really keeping count. Also, LCD's don't have refresh rates in the same way a CRT does. CRT's actually refresh the image completely, while an LCD just turns the pixels on and changes them as needed without ever actually shutting the backlight off. :D

True however a CRT has a higher refresh rate. My CRT can go up to 75Hz and Most LCDs can only refresh at 60Hz. Hey I wouldn't mind having a nice flat-screen CRT but the one I'm using to view this is from 1997! CRTs sure do last longer though.
Avatar image for halokillerz
halokillerz

3406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 halokillerz
Member since 2004 • 3406 Posts

quite a few LCDs can go up to 120 Hz i believe.

Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
The Difference is SIZE!! If you save up just enough you can get a Hannsg 28 inch LCD monitor from Newegg. I'm one along with my future 4890.
Avatar image for UltimateGamer95
UltimateGamer95

4720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 UltimateGamer95
Member since 2006 • 4720 Posts

quite a few LCDs can go up to 120 Hz i believe.

halokillerz
True some of the new ones can.
Avatar image for k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

2148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#13 k0r3aN_pR1d3
Member since 2005 • 2148 Posts
If you get a LCD IPS based panel, it is one up on the CRT and much better than the CRT in almost 95% of the time. The contrast is wonderful, with very enhanced darks, rivaling plasma technology, and the angle view is incredible. TN panels, which most LCD monitors use, are cheaper and give out the flaws that was mentioned above. Also, TN panels are 6 bit, and fake 8 bit color but most people are unable to tell unless they compare.
Avatar image for sihunt
sihunt

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 sihunt
Member since 2007 • 1116 Posts

If you get a LCD IPS based panel, it is one up on the CRT and much better than the CRT in almost 95% of the time. The contrast is wonderful, with very enhanced darks, rivaling plasma technology, and the angle view is incredible. TN panels, which most LCD monitors use, are cheaper and give out the flaws that was mentioned above. Also, TN panels are 6 bit, and fake 8 bit color but most people are unable to tell unless they compare.k0r3aN_pR1d3
Hi I have a Samsung 22" TN panel and I am very happy with it. For games the colors seem accurate but when you play a DVD sometimes you can see where they don't seem to blend together quite right. Seems like the shade of color isn't quite right. It really isn't bad but you would never see that on a CRT. Also as stated before the picture is best at 1680X1050 for my monitor. There is a very slight blur factor at lower resolutions but you really have to look for it. I don't think it is very critical. As k0r3aN said above you can get better quality panels like s-IPS and m-PVA but these cost a lot more. But the biggest advantage with LCD displays is the screen size. Very nice jump up to a wide screen.

Avatar image for WWII_Warrior
WWII_Warrior

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 WWII_Warrior
Member since 2003 • 197 Posts
If you get a LCD IPS based panel, it is one up on the CRT and much better than the CRT in almost 95% of the time. The contrast is wonderful, with very enhanced darks, rivaling plasma technology, and the angle view is incredible. TN panels, which most LCD monitors use, are cheaper and give out the flaws that was mentioned above. Also, TN panels are 6 bit, and fake 8 bit color but most people are unable to tell unless they compare.k0r3aN_pR1d3
Thats not true, they can't match the blacks of crts or even s-PVA, nor do they match response time/refresh rate. Most IPS need a atw polarizer to get rid of graininess and help whites. I can't stand TN panels any more, but since the market is filled with them and probably will remain that way even though newer panel types like e-IPS and c-PVA which are cheap and offer better color and viewing angles are being made. CRT's still also won't have any input lag like most LCD's. If you want a good, moderately priced monitor the Dell 2209Wa offers a e-IPS panel, awesome colors, 178/178 viewing angle.
Avatar image for george_hopkins
george_hopkins

1397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 george_hopkins
Member since 2005 • 1397 Posts
I used to use a relatively decent Dell 21" Trinitron monitor and then in March 08 I bought a 22" Samsung LCD and I thought the LCD would be worse but when I put the two side by side, the LCD was worlds better in terms or brightness and pretty much everything else. LCDs have gotten so good now there's no reason not to get one.
Avatar image for sihunt
sihunt

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 sihunt
Member since 2007 • 1116 Posts

I used to use a relatively decent Dell 21" Trinitron monitor and then in March 08 I bought a 22" Samsung LCD and I thought the LCD would be worse but when I put the two side by side, the LCD was worlds better in terms or brightness and pretty much everything else. LCDs have gotten so good now there's no reason not to get one.george_hopkins
Oh yes this is very true!!! I forgot to mention that. The brightness and vivid colors are very impressive on an LCD. My monitor has push button settings for different user modes. One is a game mode that really brings out colors and shadows in a game. I made my own custom setting for reading on the internet as the other stock settings were too bright.

Avatar image for WWII_Warrior
WWII_Warrior

197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 WWII_Warrior
Member since 2003 • 197 Posts
If you wanna calibrate your monitor, lagom.com has an LCD test that helps some what in getting a slightly better than out of box monitor.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
one flickers one doesn't, one radiates at you the other doesn't, one take up most of your desk the other doesn't. The main things to look for when buying a lcd is the lowest response time and biggest contrast ratio. response under 5ms is fine and contrast over 8000:1