Linux: 2 years later.

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

@AlexKidd5000 said:
@FelipeInside said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:

The 2 hours is pretty much correct if you're on ADSL2. All the updates together are about 2GB for Win7 and WIn8.

It's a good thing my copy is 8.1, and not just 8, or else it would have taken a lot longer.

If your internet is really slow, you can always install Windows, install all the updates and then make a clone of the HDD.

That way if something wrong happens, you just restore the image.

I never understood why people need to reformat so often though. Once I install Windows, it lasts for me for years till my next build (Windows XP onwards.... the prior Windows were very unstable)

I hadn't done anything on my Windows HDD aside from playing the occasional game on Steam, and thats it. Then yesterday, I booted it up, and it froze on the boot screen, and had to do a hard reboot, and the boot sector was toast. No clue what caused that. And my internet is 30mbits/s down and 6mbits/s up.

Could be a hardware fault (HDD?). Careful cause it might happen again.

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@FelipeInside said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:
@FelipeInside said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:

The 2 hours is pretty much correct if you're on ADSL2. All the updates together are about 2GB for Win7 and WIn8.

It's a good thing my copy is 8.1, and not just 8, or else it would have taken a lot longer.

If your internet is really slow, you can always install Windows, install all the updates and then make a clone of the HDD.

That way if something wrong happens, you just restore the image.

I never understood why people need to reformat so often though. Once I install Windows, it lasts for me for years till my next build (Windows XP onwards.... the prior Windows were very unstable)

I hadn't done anything on my Windows HDD aside from playing the occasional game on Steam, and thats it. Then yesterday, I booted it up, and it froze on the boot screen, and had to do a hard reboot, and the boot sector was toast. No clue what caused that. And my internet is 30mbits/s down and 6mbits/s up.

Could be a hardware fault (HDD?). Careful cause it might happen again.

Well if it does, I'll just replace the HDD lol.

Avatar image for pimphand_gamer
PimpHand_Gamer

3048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#53 PimpHand_Gamer
Member since 2014 • 3048 Posts

@AlexKidd5000 said:
@pimphand_gamer said:

^Depends what you do. Some people reformat often because they are always tinkering with various, if not registry heavy software, everything from UI hacks/theme alterations to gaming mod software or even add-on's to things like File Explorer. If 2 different applications are creating new registry keys that do the same thing essentially you are creating potential problems that never get uninstalled and restored correctly. I've seen software create dozens upon dozens of registry keys and then on top of that they will use various Windows services to communicate or perform some function or schedule or they'll run their own service....it doesn't take long and Windows will literally slow down to various extents, even to a point where copy/paste in Explorer has been unable to function as intended. Poorly coded drivers also play similar roles in causing performance or OS system issues and is not always easy to diagnose. This is where cloning software is nice but not everyone may want to go back to a backup that uses old software or settings that user doesn't want anymore. Even Windows updates may cause a problem with something that a software or driver uses so it can go wrong just like that. Some people are pretty hard on their OS's and if they want to do something they'll download it regardless because all they want is for their PC to just work and it's nothing for even a simple printer setup to suddenly stop working like it did yesterday and instead of spending a couple hours or more diagnosing, sometimes it just works to reformat....my wireless printer always has some kind of issue for example, even at one point where it wouldn't allow me to uninstall/reinstall the driver anymore......reformat.

That's why many computer shops would rather just backup your stuff and reinstall because it saves a lot of time and headaches. That's what I do, clone, reformat and put all their stuff back minus the junk perhaps.

@bigfootpart2 said:

As a desktop OS for end users, Linux is complete garbage. Even as an OS for people with no budget, I've never really seen the point. I have a bajillion Windows keys I'm not doing anything with. It's good for servers though.

I view OS's as a platform for which to launch applications on. Typically software is what most people deal with and often that's 3rd party since Most OS's come installed with very limited and bland stuff anyway. Linux offers little in the way of commercial software so certainly Windows or even OSX will provide that. Open source has it's advantages but most Linux distro's require quite a bit of setup and often a lot of Terminal usage, requiring many to google every single Sudo Apt this and that there is which I find to do little more than waste time.

Which is why I use Manjaro, it's just like Windows in that you never have to use the terminal, and everything is configured automatically. The only thing you have to do after installing it, is update the OS, and install whatever apps you need. Just like Windows. The terminal is completely optional. Just that I developed an appreciation for the terminal.

Who are you trying to sell the idea of Linux to? Me or yourself?

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@pimphand_gamer said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:
@pimphand_gamer said:

^Depends what you do. Some people reformat often because they are always tinkering with various, if not registry heavy software, everything from UI hacks/theme alterations to gaming mod software or even add-on's to things like File Explorer. If 2 different applications are creating new registry keys that do the same thing essentially you are creating potential problems that never get uninstalled and restored correctly. I've seen software create dozens upon dozens of registry keys and then on top of that they will use various Windows services to communicate or perform some function or schedule or they'll run their own service....it doesn't take long and Windows will literally slow down to various extents, even to a point where copy/paste in Explorer has been unable to function as intended. Poorly coded drivers also play similar roles in causing performance or OS system issues and is not always easy to diagnose. This is where cloning software is nice but not everyone may want to go back to a backup that uses old software or settings that user doesn't want anymore. Even Windows updates may cause a problem with something that a software or driver uses so it can go wrong just like that. Some people are pretty hard on their OS's and if they want to do something they'll download it regardless because all they want is for their PC to just work and it's nothing for even a simple printer setup to suddenly stop working like it did yesterday and instead of spending a couple hours or more diagnosing, sometimes it just works to reformat....my wireless printer always has some kind of issue for example, even at one point where it wouldn't allow me to uninstall/reinstall the driver anymore......reformat.

That's why many computer shops would rather just backup your stuff and reinstall because it saves a lot of time and headaches. That's what I do, clone, reformat and put all their stuff back minus the junk perhaps.

@bigfootpart2 said:

As a desktop OS for end users, Linux is complete garbage. Even as an OS for people with no budget, I've never really seen the point. I have a bajillion Windows keys I'm not doing anything with. It's good for servers though.

I view OS's as a platform for which to launch applications on. Typically software is what most people deal with and often that's 3rd party since Most OS's come installed with very limited and bland stuff anyway. Linux offers little in the way of commercial software so certainly Windows or even OSX will provide that. Open source has it's advantages but most Linux distro's require quite a bit of setup and often a lot of Terminal usage, requiring many to google every single Sudo Apt this and that there is which I find to do little more than waste time.

Which is why I use Manjaro, it's just like Windows in that you never have to use the terminal, and everything is configured automatically. The only thing you have to do after installing it, is update the OS, and install whatever apps you need. Just like Windows. The terminal is completely optional. Just that I developed an appreciation for the terminal.

Who are you trying to sell the idea of Linux to? Me or yourself?

I was mainly replying to your second quote. Was just pointing out that Manjaro doesn't really require you to go into the terminal to do everything. You are right in your first paragraph, no OS is break proof. I have had to reinstall linux a few times because I ended up breaking something :P

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

@FelipeInside said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:
@jun_aka_pekto said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:

It's good that you can use linux without a GUI if you so choose though.

I've already seen GUI-less computing back in the MS-DOS days.Sticking with a command line is fine if I'm writing scrips or batch files for server functions.

A command line isn't exactly the best way to create a spreadsheet or a database. I can create a database using a Linux terminal (on an Ubuntu GUI-less database server) and run it off Oracle MySQL. But, it's still a royal pain in the butt.

Obviously gummi uses Linux for things that don't need GUI's, or because that is what works best for him. I prefer having both, I use KDE, and I like having easy access to the terminal, as even in this day and age, a command terminal/console still comes in handy.

Well technically you can do basic stuff in Windows using the command prompt, my point is WHY?

Can you download and write emails using the command line in Linux? Can you create a powerpoint presentation using a command line? etc? I understand for some advanced scripting or network configurations it's the way to go... but my point was always about general use for the masses, not specific operations.

Uh, on linux you can easily send e-mails using command line, you can browse web pages also.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

@FelipeInside said:
@GummiRaccoon said:

Neither OS costs me any money (work pays for my windows). My desktop is windows because muh games. And honestly I couldn't even tell you what a linux gui looks like, everything I do on linux is through SSH.

That being said, writing my scripts is a better experience using VIM than anything windows side and grep alone makes linux better for doing anything actually important.

But you're taking it from your personal side which requires writing of scripts.

My point is about the general use of an OS.

What do you mean personal side? I write scripts for work.

Avatar image for RushKing
RushKing

1785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 RushKing
Member since 2009 • 1785 Posts

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

CS:GO LInux performance is bad compared to Windows.

Nope

Loading Video...

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
@GummiRaccoon said:
@FelipeInside said:
@GummiRaccoon said:

Neither OS costs me any money (work pays for my windows). My desktop is windows because muh games. And honestly I couldn't even tell you what a linux gui looks like, everything I do on linux is through SSH.

That being said, writing my scripts is a better experience using VIM than anything windows side and grep alone makes linux better for doing anything actually important.

But you're taking it from your personal side which requires writing of scripts.

My point is about the general use of an OS.

What do you mean personal side? I write scripts for work.

Personal side as from your point of view.

My point is about the general use of an OS across the spectrum. The majority wouldn't be writing scripts at home or work.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

@RushKing said:
@JigglyWiggly_ said:

CS:GO LInux performance is bad compared to Windows.

Nope

Loading Video...

EDIT: Oh that's a different video than what I saw before. That's pretty cool actually that they fixed the performance. Well there's still the issue of playing the game at the moment. There tend to be a lot more bugs in Mac/Linux in the game. For something like two months, a map(I think it was cache) caused both Linux/Mac users to crash and Valve was just sleeping. Then there was the microphone pitch change which took them like a month to fix. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZvOIGn7R1s

All you get is matchmaking in Linux. I'm already global elite, there is nowhere for me to go. It's also flooded with spinbotters/obvious wall hackers. You need a third party system if you want to play against people who don't hack. Unfortunately Cevo/ESEA have lower skill levels than globals/smfc in MM, but at least they have a decent anti cheat system. Neither system can come to Linux since they require kernel level access and look for very specific things.

Avatar image for gmak2442
gmak2442

1093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#60 gmak2442
Member since 2015 • 1093 Posts

I was interested in Linux 10 years ago because of what I heard of it on tv and web. It never really worked for me until I found out Ubuntu that worked well without any thing to install such as drivers. But I never really understood how linux work. For me it just does not make any sense. The file system make no sense to me. Installing programs in command line is pure joke. But for the rest, it was same as Windows to me. Now I doubt I'd say it's the same or as good as Windows because I'm more aware of what I can do with Windows now. The thing I really liked but I do not need anymore and I could need in the future is the mutli desktop.

Also, software is easy to find with Windows. And the collection is large. I doubt it's the case with Linux. Linux user can't even make a exe like to install a software, what a joke.

And also, no point to use an OS that has only 20% of the games Windows have. This got to be a joke.

The major problem I have with Windows is about security. In my book Windows is a joke about security. So if Linux someday offer me security, I could move. But I hope it will install... Otherwise I'll need a tech.

Btw, if you're happy with your Linux distro, than good for you. I'd say even, keep it.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61  Edited By GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

@gmak2442 said:

I was interested in Linux 10 years ago because of what I heard of it on tv and web. It never really worked for me until I found out Ubuntu that worked well without any thing to install such as drivers. But I never really understood how linux work. For me it just does not make any sense. The file system make no sense to me. Installing programs in command line is pure joke. But for the rest, it was same as Windows to me. Now I doubt I'd say it's the same or as good as Windows because I'm more aware of what I can do with Windows now. The thing I really liked but I do not need anymore and I could need in the future is the mutli desktop.

Also, software is easy to find with Windows. And the collection is large. I doubt it's the case with Linux. Linux user can't even make a exe like to install a software, what a joke.

And also, no point to use an OS that has only 20% of the games Windows have. This got to be a joke.

The major problem I have with Windows is about security. In my book Windows is a joke about security. So if Linux someday offer me security, I could move. But I hope it will install... Otherwise I'll need a tech.

Btw, if you're happy with your Linux distro, than good for you. I'd say even, keep it.

Windows:

find out about a program

google it

download it from cnet or sourceforge

open downloads folder

double click to install

click yes in administrative prompt

click next next next in wizard

accidentally install browser addon like ask.

Linux

find out about a program

google it

type apt-get install "program name" (yum, pacman etc depending on distro)

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62  Edited By AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@gmak2442 said:

I was interested in Linux 10 years ago because of what I heard of it on tv and web. It never really worked for me until I found out Ubuntu that worked well without any thing to install such as drivers. But I never really understood how linux work. For me it just does not make any sense. The file system make no sense to me. Installing programs in command line is pure joke. But for the rest, it was same as Windows to me. Now I doubt I'd say it's the same or as good as Windows because I'm more aware of what I can do with Windows now. The thing I really liked but I do not need anymore and I could need in the future is the mutli desktop.

Also, software is easy to find with Windows. And the collection is large. I doubt it's the case with Linux. Linux user can't even make a exe like to install a software, what a joke.

And also, no point to use an OS that has only 20% of the games Windows have. This got to be a joke.

The major problem I have with Windows is about security. In my book Windows is a joke about security. So if Linux someday offer me security, I could move. But I hope it will install... Otherwise I'll need a tech.

Btw, if you're happy with your Linux distro, than good for you. I'd say even, keep it.

As much as I hate to say it, Ubuntu, and many of it's derivatives are the real jokes of the linux world. Ubuntu is the big player of linux, yet you STILL have to **** around with PPA's if you want a version of ANY app that is less than 6+ months old. and installing crap through the command line is often mandatory. It's no where near as easy to use as people claim. Mint and Ubuntu were not kind to me when I first used linux. **** Ubuntu until they make it good enough to compete with Windows, and Mac.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

I can't be bothered with reading all the posts in this thread, but 1 239 games for Linux on Steam, woooo. That is more than the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 combined, and that is exactly the market that Valve is going for with SteamOS and Steam Machines. I already can't keep up!

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@Hexagon_777 said:

I can't be bothered with reading all the posts in this thread, but 1 239 games for Linux on Steam, woooo. That is more than the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 combined, and that is exactly the market that Valve is going for with SteamOS and Steam Machines. I already can't keep up!

Agreed. I love how everyone is just arrogantly dismissing the Steam Machines, saying it has no games, and that they should just use Windows, maybe because that would make them WAY more expensive?. Um, you guys realize Linux now has over 1200 games (up from like 150 when Steam first came to Linux), and still increasing rapidly. Sorry, but competition is a good thing weather the nay-sayers like it or not, and Windows, as well as the consoles simply don't have enough of it.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#65  Edited By JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

@AlexKidd5000 said:
@Hexagon_777 said:

I can't be bothered with reading all the posts in this thread, but 1 239 games for Linux on Steam, woooo. That is more than the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 combined, and that is exactly the market that Valve is going for with SteamOS and Steam Machines. I already can't keep up!

Agreed. I love how everyone is just arrogantly dismissing the Steam Machines, saying it has no games, and that they should just use Windows, maybe because that would make them WAY more expensive?. Um, you guys realize Linux now has over 1200 games (up from like 150 when Steam first came to Linux), and still increasing rapidly. Sorry, but competition is a good thing weather the nay-sayers like it or not, and Windows, as well as the consoles simply don't have enough of it.

What's funny is that Quake Live was for Linux, Mac, and WIndows. About a year ago they removed support for Mac and Linux. Quake is one of the few games where a good number of people played on Linux(it attracts neckbeards).

Id leading the future as usual, along with 60fps caps on pc games(wolfenstein, rage), and a soon to be dead company.

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@JigglyWiggly_ said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:
@Hexagon_777 said:

I can't be bothered with reading all the posts in this thread, but 1 239 games for Linux on Steam, woooo. That is more than the Xbox One and the PlayStation 4 combined, and that is exactly the market that Valve is going for with SteamOS and Steam Machines. I already can't keep up!

Agreed. I love how everyone is just arrogantly dismissing the Steam Machines, saying it has no games, and that they should just use Windows, maybe because that would make them WAY more expensive?. Um, you guys realize Linux now has over 1200 games (up from like 150 when Steam first came to Linux), and still increasing rapidly. Sorry, but competition is a good thing weather the nay-sayers like it or not, and Windows, as well as the consoles simply don't have enough of it.

What's funny is that Quake Live was for Linux, Mac, and WIndows. About a year ago they removed support for Mac and Linux. Quake is one of the few games where a good number of people played on Linux(it attracts neckbeards).

Id leading the future as usual, along with 60fps caps on pc games(wolfenstein, rage), and a soon to be dead company.

Because id/John Carmack knows everything :)

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67  Edited By AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

Bought Shadow Warrior for Linux today, performance is really good on the open source AMD drivers, could be better, but it's far better than what I was expecting, they are really coming along.

http://distrochooser.de/?l=2

Also found this. This may help people choose a distro that is right for them.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
@AlexKidd5000 said:

Bought Shadow Warrior for Linux today, performance is really good on the open source AMD drivers, could be better, but it's far better than what I was expecting, they are really coming along.

Here is a nice video review of Shadow Warrior by a Linux gamer:

Loading Video...

Also, make sure you have the latest version of Linux and Mesa when using AMD's open source driver.

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

Awesome review. Manjaro always keeps Mesa, and drivers up-to-date.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#74  Edited By JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Well I just put Debian 8 on the pc next to mine, and I have some good and bad things to say. WIth the Mate desktop it is very fast. It uses substantially less memory than WIndows 7, 8, and 10.

Unrelated: I tried WIndows 10 on this pc and it was a miserable experience. Windows 7 was fine, windows 8 was eh.

This system has an e3200 at 3.5ghz, 2 gigs of ram, and a 120gb ssd.

Debian uses around 400-500 megs of ram. Windows 10 ran so horrendously and ate all the ram doing nothing. Windows 10 is a garbage OS so far based on what I've used. It does so many processes in the background without telling you anything. It was running Windows update in the background but there were no notifications in the taskbar, it was also doing an av scan at the same time without letting me know. There is nothing in the taskbar. The startmenu is horrendous, I removed all the tiles so I could try to get it as small as possible but even when I tried to drag it all the way it wouldn't go all the way. I just had a bunch of empty gray space.

Virtualbox couldn't be installed either, and the spartan web browser doesn't show how fast you're downloading a file.

I am getting off track, but I felt like I needed to mention that.

Performance with Debian and Mate desktop is great. I even got the nvidia drivers installed with no issues by adding the non-free repo and just ran a command to create a new xorg file with the nvidia drivers instead of noveau. Rebooted and all went well. (The system has a gtx 670).

However some downsides. I wanted to create a raid 5 array with mdadm. However I wanted to avoid using the command line as much as possible for this. Gnome-disk-utility has been totally ruined in the latest version. It cannot do anything anymore. https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/1lgxya/what_happened_to_raid_configuration_in_gnome_disks/

So I couldn't do it through gnome-disk-utility anymore. So I tried to install the old versions and of course I ran into dependency hell. Luckily I found this post here http://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/1228

His suggestions almost worked till the very end when I tried installing it and I got a problem where my nautilus version was too new for the program to be installed. I could not find a deb of the older nautilus libraries. I was getting really pissed, so I just tried to force install it, by doing this

dpkg --install --force-depends --recursive /home/administrator/Downloads

And it worked.

The reason I am using Linux is because Windows software raid 5 is not possible in WIndows 7 and WIndows 8. And the avermedia program I want to use does not work in Windows server 2008 r2 and 2012. I tried storage spaces in WIndows 8 and I got a laughable 25 MB/s for write speeds.

To sum it all up, I hate every os.

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75  Edited By AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

@JigglyWiggly_ said:

Well I just put Debian 8 on the pc next to mine, and I have some good and bad things to say. WIth the Mate desktop it is very fast. It uses substantially less memory than WIndows 7, 8, and 10.

Unrelated: I tried WIndows 10 on this pc and it was a miserable experience. Windows 7 was fine, windows 8 was eh.

This system has an e3200 at 3.5ghz, 2 gigs of ram, and a 120gb ssd.

Debian uses around 400-500 megs of ram. Windows 10 ran so horrendously and ate all the ram doing nothing. Windows 10 is a garbage OS so far based on what I've used. It does so many processes in the background without telling you anything. It was running Windows update in the background but there were no notifications in the taskbar, it was also doing an av scan at the same time without letting me know. There is nothing in the taskbar. The startmenu is horrendous, I removed all the tiles so I could try to get it as small as possible but even when I tried to drag it all the way it wouldn't go all the way. I just had a bunch of empty gray space.

Virtualbox couldn't be installed either, and the spartan web browser doesn't show how fast you're downloading a file.

I am getting off track, but I felt like I needed to mention that.

Performance with Debian and Mate desktop is great. I even got the nvidia drivers installed with no issues by adding the non-free repo and just ran a command to create a new xorg file with the nvidia drivers instead of noveau. Rebooted and all went well. (The system has a gtx 670).

However some downsides. I wanted to create a raid 5 array with mdadm. However I wanted to avoid using the command line as much as possible for this. Gnome-disk-utility has been totally ruined in the latest version. It cannot do anything anymore. https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/1lgxya/what_happened_to_raid_configuration_in_gnome_disks/

So I couldn't do it through gnome-disk-utility anymore. So I tried to install the old versions and of course I ran into dependency hell. Luckily I found this post here http://community.linuxmint.com/tutorial/view/1228

His suggestions almost worked till the very end when I tried installing it and I got a problem where my nautilus version was too new for the program to be installed. I could not find a deb of the older nautilus libraries. I was getting really pissed, so I just tried to force install it, by doing this

dpkg --install --force-depends --recursive /home/administrator/Downloads

And it worked.

The reason I am using Linux is because Windows software raid 5 is not possible in WIndows 7 and WIndows 8. And the avermedia program I want to use does not work in Windows server 2008 r2 and 2012. I tried storage spaces in WIndows 8 and I got a laughable 25 MB/s for write speeds.

To sum it all up, I hate every os.

Every OS is icky poo poo!

I felt the same way about Windows 8. Which is why I don't give a shit about 10.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76  Edited By FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

@AlexKidd5000 said:
@JigglyWiggly_ said:

To sum it all up, I hate every os.

No, you just always look at the negative things of each OS instead of the positive things (which are more than the negative). No wonder you don't enjoy them.

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

gog.com's linux game library has become fairly sizable. Love that you don't NEED to be using Mint or Ubuntu to play the games, they come in tar balls, you extract them, and click the "start" file, and the game starts up no problem.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
@AlexKidd5000 said:

gog.com's linux game library has become fairly sizable. Love that you don't NEED to be using Mint or Ubuntu to play the games, they come in tar balls, you extract them, and click the "start" file, and the game starts up no problem.

GOG is getting better, but still...

Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts
@Hexagon_777 said:
@AlexKidd5000 said:

gog.com's linux game library has become fairly sizable. Love that you don't NEED to be using Mint or Ubuntu to play the games, they come in tar balls, you extract them, and click the "start" file, and the game starts up no problem.

GOG is getting better, but still...

Yeah, could be better. GoG has some catching up to do with Steam.