Logitech Z-5500 vs Z-5300e

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for colonel55
colonel55

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 colonel55
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
I've been thinking of getting new speakers lately, and i've been looking at the Logitech Z-5300e and the Z-5500. I've read reviews and both look really good, however the Z-5500 appears to be better, but it is also $100 more expensive. I'm wondering if the Z-5500 is worth it, or is the Z-5300e a better performer for the price?
Avatar image for DGFreak
DGFreak

2234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DGFreak
Member since 2003 • 2234 Posts
If you don't plan on trying to deafen your next-door neighboor while still retaining good sound quality, you don't need the 5500 speakers.
Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#3 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts

I have a set of z-5300e's, and my friend has a set of z-5500's. The z-5500's are definitely better; they can go about 1/3 louder and have digital input (although you need a soundcard that supports 5.1 digital). The build quality of the speakers is a little better.

However, unless you are an audiophile or have the luxury of being able to blast your speakers loud I would just settle for the z-5300e. On my z-5300e's, it becomes painful to turn the volume past 2/3, but it annoys the neighbors at like 1/3 :-S (damn neighbors).

Avatar image for colonel55
colonel55

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 colonel55
Member since 2003 • 25 Posts
heh sounds like i'll go with the 5300e's then
Avatar image for mAD-mAN-
mAD-mAN-

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mAD-mAN-
Member since 2007 • 124 Posts

if i could afford it, id go for the Z5500 just for the digital input...itll bypass the onboard's crappy DAC and use its own internal DAC which should result in a much cleaner sound...i say should because i dont know how good is the internal DAC of the z5500...but im pretty sure its better than the crappy on board audio which would also pick up hell of alot of noise from the other PC components...

however, this depends on ur audio priorities... music, gaming, movies? if music has highest priority then a real good 2.1 speaker should be ur choice as music sounds better on stereo rather than 5.1 (unless ur listening to DVD-A).... why? coz music is recorded in stereo. movies and gaming is where 5.1 is there way to go.

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts

if i could afford it, id go for the Z5500 just for the digital input...itll bypass the onboard's crappy DAC and use its own internal DAC which should result in a much cleaner sound...i say should because i dont know how good is the internal DAC of the z5500...but im pretty sure its better than the crappy on board audio which would also pick up hell of alot of noise from the other PC components...

however, this depends on ur audio priorities... music, gaming, movies? if music has highest priority then a real good 2.1 speaker should be ur choice as music sounds better on stereo rather than 5.1 (unless ur listening to DVD-A).... why? coz music is recorded in stereo. movies and gaming is where 5.1 is there way to go.

mAD-mAN-

Errr so do you mean that music on a 2.1 would sound better than a 5.1 of similar quality?:?

Cant you just enable 2.1 mode on your 5.1 and that be the same thing and why do you have to do that anyways?

Avatar image for mAD-mAN-
mAD-mAN-

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mAD-mAN-
Member since 2007 • 124 Posts

yeah stereo is almost always better for music (unless its DVD-A as mentioned above). like when u encode ur MP3s etc...notice how the encoding option is mostly on stereo? ive personally never seen an option to encode MP3s to 5.1 on any software ive tried.

u COULD enable it to 2.1...ive tested it with my edifier 5.1 speakers and yeah it sounded better in 2.1 mode.. in 5.1 the sound was really off...soundstage and imaging went haywire...worst part is i listen to metal and there isnt much soundstage in metal to begin with!

but im not too sure if a dedicated 2.1 speaker of $XXX would be better than a 5.1 (in 2.1 mode) speaker of the same $XXX value. but i do believe in dedicated items... like a dedicated 2.1 would be better... or a company dedicated in audio would be better than a gaming company doing audio (i.e audiophile headphones vs gaming headphones).

simple logic also tells me that when u pay the same amount or more for less... there should be a reason to it. that "less" would usually be better :P

EDIT: forgot to mention that my 5.1 speakers is purely for gaming and movies.... for music i only use my headphones which are the Beyerdynamic DT990 '05 and a self modded headphone using KSC-75 drivers (the Franken PhilKoss)

Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#8 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts
You do realize that if you play a stereo audio signal, it won't come out of 5 speakers (unless you have some upmixing feature on your soundcard enabled)
Avatar image for mAD-mAN-
mAD-mAN-

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 mAD-mAN-
Member since 2007 • 124 Posts
oh yeah...forgot about the upmixing part... thats one of the main reasons why music sounds like crap on 5.1 LOL
Avatar image for wurn
wurn

2258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 wurn
Member since 2004 • 2258 Posts

These three things is waht you should be going for:

THX, DTS, EAX

which ever one supports it gets my vote. Assuming your audio card can utilize the above mentioned three.

Its about sound quality and not volume. If you want volume put earphones on and kill your eardrums

Avatar image for musclesforcier
musclesforcier

2894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 musclesforcier
Member since 2004 • 2894 Posts
I have the Z-5500's and can't recommend them enough, and yes you can use 2.1 stereo mode with the push of a buton. I have it hooked up to my PC via toslink and it sounds amazing.
Avatar image for superchronik
superchronik

783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 superchronik
Member since 2003 • 783 Posts
I have the 5500's and they are bloody brilliant!!! I run everything through mine (PC, 360, HD DVD player etc) and they all sound awesome. They don't support the new Dolby Digital Plus standard but do support DTS and they sound so good anyway you won't care. You won't find better speakers for the price.
Avatar image for Baselerd
Baselerd

5104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 Baselerd
Member since 2003 • 5104 Posts

These three things is waht you should be going for:

THX, DTS, EAX

which ever one supports it gets my vote. Assuming your audio card can utilize the above mentioned three.

Its about sound quality and not volume. If you want volume put earphones on and kill your eardrums

wurn

EAX is a sound card feature, not a speaker feature. I would agree on THX, except their standards have fallen and now it seems to be available to any speaker manufacturer if they pay the license fees. I mean, there's a car with THX certified audio, and now there's 2.1 speakers with THX certification. The whole point of THX is to have the superior cinemata presentation. The main thing was that when it came out long ago, it was the new standard for ultimate surround sound...

DTS is really nice, but only needed if you have a sound card that supports it (like an x-fi).

Avatar image for Thinker_145
Thinker_145

2546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Thinker_145
Member since 2007 • 2546 Posts
LOL music does seem to be better in 2.1 mode or atleast feels different.LOL i never knew about this.:lol:
Avatar image for wurn
wurn

2258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#15 wurn
Member since 2004 • 2258 Posts

DUDE, some speakers dont support EAX, trust me on this. As for soundcard supporting all three mentioned, Audigy 4 does and is cheaper i am sure than the X-Fi thingy

[QUOTE="wurn"]

These three things is waht you should be going for:

THX, DTS, EAX

which ever one supports it gets my vote. Assuming your audio card can utilize the above mentioned three.

Its about sound quality and not volume. If you want volume put earphones on and kill your eardrums

Baselerd

EAX is a sound card feature, not a speaker feature. I would agree on THX, except their standards have fallen and now it seems to be available to any speaker manufacturer if they pay the license fees. I mean, there's a car with THX certified audio, and now there's 2.1 speakers with THX certification. The whole point of THX is to have the superior cinemata presentation. The main thing was that when it came out long ago, it was the new standard for ultimate surround sound...

DTS is really nice, but only needed if you have a sound card that supports it (like an x-fi).

Avatar image for metal_4_life
metal_4_life

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 metal_4_life
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
For some reason idky im a messed up person, but i think i liked the 5300e better. Im comparing this listening to children of bodom on an xfi card with bass and treble full. eq on with 31hz full and 62hz at like 2. The bass drums seemed a lot better on the 5300e's. Idk. If anyone could listen to them (i recommend the hatecrew deathroll cd) and compare the 2 systems than cool.