Moar Skyrim screenies

  • 165 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

It looks good, up to standards. Why do people expect any better while we're still in this generation?

cyborg100000

You're right. With all our DX 10 and 11 we won't seen any major improvement in games on PC till next gen arrives.

Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

11241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 11241 Posts

looks like oblivion modded. not that bothered though, as long as they've improved the animation

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#53 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="Baranga"]

Why? Do you think that Carmack suddenly decided to remove the one aspect of the engine he wanted to show off? I believe we can safely talk about what Rage is doing and nothing else is. They sacrificed fidelity on the altar of unlimited variety. Is there anything wrong with that?

dakan45

Actually.... its more like they sacrificed texture quality along with other things like prebaked shadows in order to achieve 60 fps on consoles. Also Yes carmack suddenly decided to remove alot from the game in order to fit to x360 disk. So the game is now smaller. But he says not smaller, they just managed to make it fit in the disk. I wonder how they did that...... :D Yeah thats how. Anyway that was not my point. My point is that we shouldnt discuss the amount of textures when we have not seen the game yet. Personally, its just making the disk size bigger rather improving the actual graphics. Still better than things like say fear that have the same stuff all over.

You tell someone to "Why Dont we play the game first"and then you go off about Rage like you have played it, come on Dakan :lol:

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#54 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I don't care about the graphic, I just want better animation, better immersion and better combat. Franko_3

Same with me.. better immersion, better animation, better combat and fix the dang leveling :P

Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#55 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts
If you want a game which has good graphics but you arnt fussed about gameplay, FarCry 2 is the option for you
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts

Would it kill Bethesda to use high res textures for once? I get that they want their games to work on the ancient hardware of consoles, but come on, just make a low res version of the textures for consoles and a high res version for PC. I'm tired of looking at 800x800 res textures in their games when others are giving me glorious 4096x4096.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#57 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Would it kill Bethesda to use high res textures for once? I get that they want their games to work on the ancient hardware of consoles, but come on, just make a low res version of the textures for consoles and a high res version for PC. I'm tired of looking at 800x800 res textures in their games when others are giving me glorious 4096x4096.

gameguy6700

Well they actually promised higher resolution textures for PC.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
Character models looks much better though! No more frogchildren...
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

What a lot of people seem to forget is that this game is many months away from release, and these are some of the earliest screenshots we are getting. That being said, I have no complaints with the graphics thus far. I do however hope that the animations are leaps and bounds better than oblivion. For me, good animation means much deeper immersion. The opposite hold true for clunky, unrealistic animation(oblivion, fallout 3, etc.).

TL;DR - Months away from release, graphics look good, hope animation quality isn't terrible like Oblivion.

Revolution_DDM

graphics are rarely improved at this stage of development. Oblivion in fact had a graphics downgrade around this stage

Avatar image for Chris_53
Chris_53

5513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#60 Chris_53
Member since 2004 • 5513 Posts

[QUOTE="gameguy6700"]

Would it kill Bethesda to use high res textures for once? I get that they want their games to work on the ancient hardware of consoles, but come on, just make a low res version of the textures for consoles and a high res version for PC. I'm tired of looking at 800x800 res textures in their games when others are giving me glorious 4096x4096.

Baranga

Well they actually promised higher resolution textures for PC.

Plus somebody will probably make some sort of graphics enhancement mod anyway
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#61 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

You tell someone to "Why Dont we play the game first"and then you go off about Rage like you have played it, come on Dakan :lol:kozzy1234

Allow me to laugh too since we laugh for no reason. :lol: :lol:....because there nothing funny or illogical with what I SAID. Which is not what you posted. You cant judge rage's entire texture loadout with a couple of screenshots. It might turn out to see them more often than expected. They even cut the game in half for consoles. But if both games look weak from those screenshots, thats how pretty much the full game is gonna be.

Also my point was the weak texture quality and that more texture variety does not mean better graphics. So how about we wait and see how much variety of textures is there when they cut the game in half to fit on the x360 disk.

But why the hell do i reply to your quotes? Seriously, you avoided yet again to discuss dragon age. I remember being one of the first who actually commented on the low quality textures before the game actually comes out. Yet most people choose to ignore it, even when the game was out, it took about a month for people to actually start noticing. My guess is biased praising of a game they had not played and when they actually played the game and took off their fanboy googles, they saw the game's graphics for what they really were and not for what they hoped.

So lets pick this up in one month after the release of rage and one month after skyrim. Notice how i dont even mention how you choose to ignore that all those people agree with me that it looks weak, yet did not bother to quote like you quote me.

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up.:roll:

Would it kill Bethesda to use high res textures for once? I get that they want their games to work on the ancient hardware of consoles, but come on, just make a low res version of the textures for consoles and a high res version for PC. I'm tired of looking at 800x800 res textures in their games when others are giving me glorious 4096x4096.

gameguy6700

Yet another one who agrees with me. if it was the previous engine, i could understand, i am afraid gamebryo cant take much. When those HD packs were released, the game suffered heavy increase in stutter. (even the creators warned about that) Now this new engine might do the thing but it looks alot like gamebryo so i wouldnt bet on it.

For the record, fallout 3 had some higher res textures than the console version. But i dont think it made that much of a diffirence. We are looking for drastic improvements and they aint gona give em to us.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#62 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
That looks like Oblivion with mods :(. However, graphics are the last think I am worries about. Bethesda never fails to disappoint, so I am still a bit worried. The only the aesthetically I could wish for is better animations. God, Gamebyro has some of the worst animations I have ever seen. I also want a deeper game ( I won't get that, I am well aware), livelier cities, more interesting country/mountain areas, and just better gameplay mechanics overall.
Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

Calm down dude!:P What do you expect, they are just too lazy. I don't think they will bother to make it look much better compared to consoles anyway. At least it looks better than Oblivion.

Same with Rage, after the latest screens, that game looks like a totally different game.:(

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#65 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Same with Rage, after the latest screens, that game looks like a totally different game.:(not_wanted

Same here :cry: Still looking forward to it, but damn, graphics king just got thrown out of the window for an average looking game :( if not dated (techical wise) and everyone acts like nothing happened :roll:

I am just gonna say it agan for some people that like to quote me :evi:: TECHNICAL wise.

So there goes rage and there goes skyrim and the actual graphically impressive looking games that remain in 2011 are: brink, crysis 2 and wticher 2. Rage sure as hell aint gonna be graphics king....oh wait, GS gave an award to MGS4 when they were clearly better looking games outhere. :roll:

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#66 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="not_wanted"]Same with Rage, after the latest screens, that game looks like a totally different game.:(dakan45

Same here :cry: Still looking forward to it, but damn, graphics king just got thrown out of the window for an average looking game :( if not dated (techicalwise) and everyone acts like nothign happened :roll:

I am just gonna say it agan for some people that like to quote me :evi:: TECHNICAL wise.

So there goes rage and there goes skyrim and the actual graphically impressive looking games that remain in 2011 are: brink, crysis 2 and wticher 2. Rage sure as hell aint gonna be graphics king....oh wait, GS gave an award to MGS4 when they were clearly better looking games outhere. :roll:

I think Rage looks "good." However I will agree, it looks nothing like I once expected. If it had come out earlier it would be quite impressive. I remember seeing screens all the way back in '07 and I was blown away. Now that is 2011, it doesn't look anywhere near as impressive. I think we all need to quit worrying about the graphics for Skyrim and start pondering on the gameplay and the other important stuff. I personally don't think Crysis 2 is going to be all that draw dropping either.
Avatar image for saruman354
saruman354

10776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#67 saruman354
Member since 2004 • 10776 Posts

Let's all wait until the game actually comes out before judge, ok? How's that sound? I mean, it's still nine months away. They have plenty of time to make improvements.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

hopefully those are console shots & the PC version will look 20x better

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts


I think Rage looks "good." However I will agree, it looks nothing like I once expected. If it had come out earlier it would be quite impressive. I remember seeing screens all the way back in '07 and I was blown away. Now that is 2011, it doesn't look anywhere near as impressive. I think we all need to quit worrying about the graphics for Skyrim and start pondering on the gameplay and the other important stuff. I personally don't think Crysis 2 is going to be all that draw dropping either. millerlight89

I congratulate you for the excellent way you made your post. Seriously, that was great i am not joking. I kinda agree with rage but you'd expect that after all that time, they would increase the graphics, not leave them be for 60 fps. I mean it makes no sense. Most devs try stuff to improve the quality.

As for crysis 2? If it looks as good as the multiplayer trailer. I will be 100% satisfied. Its still better than any upcoming fps right now. Perhaps brink looks a bit better.

Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

[QUOTE="not_wanted"]Same with Rage, after the latest screens, that game looks like a totally different game.:(dakan45

Same here :cry: Still looking forward to it, but damn, graphics king just got thrown out of the window for an average looking game :( if not dated (techical wise) and everyone acts like nothing happened :roll:

I am just gonna say it agan for some people that like to quote me :evi:: TECHNICAL wise.

So there goes rage and there goes skyrim and the actual graphically impressive looking games that remain in 2011 are: brink, crysis 2 and wticher 2. Rage sure as hell aint gonna be graphics king....oh wait, GS gave an award to MGS4 when they were clearly better looking games outhere. :roll:

Well Brink uses idTech 4 and looks better than Rage (from latest screens). And don't know what to say about Crysis 2. They say it will have DX 11 features and again, I doubt it will look much better than the console version or Crysis. We'll just have to wait and see.

I guess it's easier for the devs to blame it on console limitations and not bother to make a proper PC version of the game. And it's funny how they're beginning to charge $60 for a PC game.:(

Avatar image for StrawberryHill
StrawberryHill

5321

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 StrawberryHill
Member since 2008 • 5321 Posts

Okay, now I'm actually getting a little more enthused about Skyrim. These screenshots are way better than those crappy scans that were posted a week or two ago. It's looking pretty good in my opinion. Let's just hope the main quest for Skyrim doesn't pull similar b.s. to what Oblivion did; "So, I have to fight through several more copypasta areas and close Oblivion gates in each of them?"

Avatar image for hotsoup26
hotsoup26

135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 hotsoup26
Member since 2011 • 135 Posts
omg, looks great.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="not_wanted"]Same with Rage, after the latest screens, that game looks like a totally different game.:(not_wanted

Same here :cry: Still looking forward to it, but damn, graphics king just got thrown out of the window for an average looking game :( if not dated (techical wise) and everyone acts like nothing happened :roll:

I am just gonna say it agan for some people that like to quote me :evi:: TECHNICAL wise.

So there goes rage and there goes skyrim and the actual graphically impressive looking games that remain in 2011 are: brink, crysis 2 and wticher 2. Rage sure as hell aint gonna be graphics king....oh wait, GS gave an award to MGS4 when they were clearly better looking games outhere. :roll:

Well Brink uses idTech 4 and looks better than Rage (from latest screens). And don't know what to say about Crysis 2. They say it will have DX 11 features and again, I doubt it will look much better than the console version or Crysis. We'll just have to wait and see.

I guess it's easier for the devs to blame it on console limitations and not bother to make a proper PC version of the game. And it's funny how they're beginning to charge $60 for a PC game.:(

Yup agree 100% but admitedly both brink and crysis 2 are impressive looking games. Skyrim and rage, meh not really. As for 60 bucks, ea joined ubisoft and activision a while ago.
Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

I think Rage looks "good." However I will agree, it looks nothing like I once expected. If it had come out earlier it would be quite impressive. I remember seeing screens all the way back in '07 and I was blown away. Now that is 2011, it doesn't look anywhere near as impressive. I think we all need to quit worrying about the graphics for Skyrim and start pondering on the gameplay and the other important stuff. I personally don't think Crysis 2 is going to be all that draw dropping either. millerlight89
The problem is not that after 4 years is not as impressive as was in 2007, the problem is that after 4 years it looks worse.:?

Avatar image for Pvt_r3d
Pvt_r3d

7901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Pvt_r3d
Member since 2006 • 7901 Posts
[QUOTE="dos4gw82"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]

No, not really, sorry. Very dissapointing.

:(

(watch the full sized images if you dissagree)

dakan45

I did "watch" them and I still disagree. Not disappointed at all. Very cool environments with a unique flavor.

"unique flavor"? Those pic to me look like an updated version of oblivion. So much for the new engine. Textures and vegetation look extremely similar. I am dissapointed, i expected for better graphics.

I would have to actually agree with Dakan. When you look at the enlarged pictures, you can see alot of Oblivion-like grass, tree and foliage. The gameplay elements still excite me though. I just hope all the dungeons are truly different.
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#76 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] I think Rage looks "good." However I will agree, it looks nothing like I once expected. If it had come out earlier it would be quite impressive. I remember seeing screens all the way back in '07 and I was blown away. Now that is 2011, it doesn't look anywhere near as impressive. I think we all need to quit worrying about the graphics for Skyrim and start pondering on the gameplay and the other important stuff. I personally don't think Crysis 2 is going to be all that draw dropping either. not_wanted

The problem is not that after 4 years is not as impressive as was in 2007, the problem is that after 4 years it looks worse.:?

I don't think it really looks worse man :P. I think it is just the fact that now that it has been almost 4 years, we have seen much more impressive stuff.
Avatar image for Darksonic666
Darksonic666

3482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#77 Darksonic666
Member since 2009 • 3482 Posts

Looks like a great game !!!! can't wait to play it

Avatar image for not_wanted
not_wanted

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 not_wanted
Member since 2008 • 1990 Posts

[QUOTE="not_wanted"]

[QUOTE="millerlight89"] I think Rage looks "good." However I will agree, it looks nothing like I once expected. If it had come out earlier it would be quite impressive. I remember seeing screens all the way back in '07 and I was blown away. Now that is 2011, it doesn't look anywhere near as impressive. I think we all need to quit worrying about the graphics for Skyrim and start pondering on the gameplay and the other important stuff. I personally don't think Crysis 2 is going to be all that draw dropping either. millerlight89

The problem is not that after 4 years is not as impressive as was in 2007, the problem is that after 4 years it looks worse.:?

I don't think it really looks worse man :P. I think it is just the fact that now that it has been almost 4 years, we have seen much more impressive stuff.

Maybe.

first screenshot

latest

Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts
Geez some people are so freaking picky.
Avatar image for ChampionoChumps
ChampionoChumps

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 ChampionoChumps
Member since 2008 • 2381 Posts

hopefully those are console shots & the PC version will look 20x better

painguy1
I'm sure they are, and even if they aren't it's not that big of a deal, they don't look to bad to me.
Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

If it isn't then I'm waiting for some texture packs.

Avatar image for KillerJuan77
KillerJuan77

3823

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#82 KillerJuan77
Member since 2007 • 3823 Posts

If those are console screenshots then all I can say is Holy ****! It looks fantastic.

Avatar image for mhofever
mhofever

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#83 mhofever
Member since 2008 • 3960 Posts

Yay, at least it's got real time shadow (for that indoor picture though.)

And the character faces don't look so dumb anymore.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

that water looks terrible, same for the trees. Nothing mods can't fix, though I wish we would stop needing to fix everything bethesda puts out with mods....but hey at least they let us make mods.

Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Looks like an updated Oblivion Engine - the textures looks like they've just popped out of Morrowind.
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

At least the women look like women now.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
It's not as shockingly beautiful as Oblivion was when it released, but it looks nice and I'll just get a texture pack if I'm not satisfied.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
It's not as shockingly beautiful as Oblivion was when it released, but it looks nice and I'll just get a texture pack if I'm not satisfied.shakmaster13
Oblivion was shockingly beautiful when it released? :P
Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

It might not looks "next gen" but I'm sorta glad. I'm glad because I remember Oblivion releasing and obliterating my GF 6800GS. Besides, as long as the artwork is good, the animations are improved, the combat is more engaging, and the graphics aren't terrible (which they aren't) then it should be immersive enough.

Maybe this time around I won't have to wait two years before I can max out the graphics settings.

Avatar image for fatherofsol
fatherofsol

72

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 fatherofsol
Member since 2011 • 72 Posts
Sure, if you look at the graphics from a purely technical side they aren't "amazing" but try looking at the artistic side of it. they are very beautiful and inspired.
Avatar image for epac_shred90
epac_shred90

177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 epac_shred90
Member since 2009 • 177 Posts

is it not possible that these are console shots??? or maybe pc on medium settings?? we dont know if this is the best it has to offer guys, lets just wait until we get some more info and some confirmed PC shots b4 we start jumping the gun....

Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="dos4gw82"]

I did "watch" them and I still disagree. Not disappointed at all. Very cool environments with a unique flavor.

"unique flavor"? Those pic to me look like an updated version of oblivion. So much for the new engine. Textures and vegetation look extremely similar. I am dissapointed, i expected for better graphics.

ditto

this is incredibly disappointing, at least from a technical level. Looks like a modded Oblivion engine.

I'm with you guys. Artistically uninspired as well. With this much time between games, I expected more from Bethesda. People will say we're nitpicking, but this is their bread and butter series...the bar should be set higher.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#94 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

hopefully those are console shots & the PC version will look 20x better

painguy1
I said the same thing in my post earlier. I'm almost sure these are console shots.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#95 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

Let that be console shots

If it isn't then I'm waiting for some texture packs.

ChubbyGuy40

:lol: I'm 99.9% sure they are.

Avatar image for deactivated-60f7582dcaa79
deactivated-60f7582dcaa79

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 deactivated-60f7582dcaa79
Member since 2004 • 510 Posts

Lol... Sometimes I wonder why I keep coming back to check this website... Anyone that gave a hoot about video games must have left years ago... Its a bunch of spoiled kids and rich scumbags with a XBox, PS3, Wii, iPhone, Mac, and PC all with the latest hardware... And none of you care about gameplay at all... Everyone in this thread is just downplaying this game because of the screenshots. For what? Because they "look like oblivion"? Well I gotta tell ya, you people need to get your eyes checked. Go to Google Images and look at some oblivion screen shots. You all arn't remembering correctly. Here is one I found in 3 or 4 seconds.  Or see some others here

Now go look at the OP again.................. LOL

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
The post above mine doesn't take into account that the screenshots in the OP aren't gameplay nor that Skyrim doesn't look four years newer than Oblivion. Looks one year newer if anything. But of course this is due to the console's graphical limitations.
Avatar image for hurtix
hurtix

112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 hurtix
Member since 2009 • 112 Posts
the graphic looks so realistic.. I wanna buy this game and my pc is really crappy D:
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

I hope the sound, animations and combat got an update... Maybe even hair, really hate seeing that rock hard long hair look, even some animation w/o physics to make it move would be better than what it was...

Also, really hope PC Rage looks as good as the old screenshots, sure would be a shame to see it dumbed down to make them all look equal.. and fairly unimaginable coming from id.

Avatar image for kokororo09
kokororo09

158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#100 kokororo09
Member since 2008 • 158 Posts

Looks amazing! when will it be released?