My GTX 460 feels like it isnt running as good as it should.

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for andy1992uk
andy1992uk

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 andy1992uk
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

Ah, so if I disabled it, my GPU would be running at 100% ? & What does the Quake engine have to do with MW2 ?

Sorry I meant the IW engine which is based on the quake 3 engine, I was in a rush when i wrote it. In all cod games, i beleive they cap at 91 fps, to keep online gameplay equal. These caps effectively work on the same principles of vsync, as in they cap the fps.

Both vsync and engine fps caps are software botlenecks.

So yeah, if your gpu can run cod at maximum above 91fps (you will need vsync off ofcource), you will still not have 100% (or 99% how software records it). As your gpu will stop working once it hits the fps designated same with vysnc.

Avatar image for andy1992uk
andy1992uk

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 andy1992uk
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts
Sorry last time I checked: "most" does not equal "all". You fail, end of. If your gpu usage is only 60-80% (as you suggest), without any software bottlenecks then your cpu is the bottleneck. ( I cant believe I am saying this for the fourth, im going crazy now.)
Avatar image for 6pag6azu6
6pag6azu6

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 6pag6azu6
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
Just OC the card and it will perform fine. Im running an MSI 460GTX 768MB OC @ 900/1800/2000, i5 760 @ 4ghz with 4GB corsair dominator GT ram and it eats games. Plays practically everything at ultra! Even Crysis with a few tweeks in the options. Id also force VSync in the Nvidia control panel options as before i got some lines across some games and after i done that all runs perfectly
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

Sorry last time I checked: "most" does not equal "all". You fail, end of. If your gpu usage is only 60-80% (as you suggest), without any software bottlenecks then your cpu is the bottleneck. ( I cant believe I am saying this for the fourth, im going crazy now.)andy1992uk
not true, at all... you fail, end of.

and as to your previous comment:

"Congratulations on your bachelors but honestly couldnt care less, just as you dont care less. In all honesty, IT is such a broad subject that it could have little or nothing to do with computer hardware. Fixing a telephone box in considered IT."

i suppose you think working in a computer store for 2 years makes you more qualified to give computer advice? ROFL, dont make me laugh. if you think fixing a telephone box falls under what you learn in an information technology degree program, you really shouldnt even be on this forum.

Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#55 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#56 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

Yeah Arto.. you have ALOT of headroom to go.. Pretty much all gtx 460's can go to 800+ core clock with the ut-most ease. My 768mb is at 800 core clock, 1600 shader and 1925 memory clock and i idle at 29C in a 76F room. Max temp is 58C using 75% fan speed (i made my own fan profiles). Max I actually went with my 768mb was 834 core clock whatever shader number it scalled to and a memory speed of 2010. It ran stable but i like to have my card run under 60C at all times regardless how demanding the game is and at that speed it ran at 63C. (furmark stability test.16AA 800x600 for 5 hrs) Thats still 40-50C below the max temp of the card but ws just a preference for me.

Furmark + evga precision tools and tinker a little arto..

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#57 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

arto1223

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

Avatar image for andy1992uk
andy1992uk

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 andy1992uk
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

Not true hey?

I said: "Did I ever say that GPUs should run 100% in every game? Please qoute me."

You said(qouting me):"""" ""???? Most games should indeed push the gpu to the limit if the fps is uncapped. You have just proved my point........ if the gpu is running at 100% , the gpu is RUNNING AS IT SHOULD!!"

"So infact it should be hovering around 100%"

ask and ye shall receive.... you have indeed said multiple times that his GPU should always be at 100% unless there is a bottleneck.""""""

Bit in blue: This is so true, how can you even argue against this? Lets say I have the fastest components in the world, with a gtx 460. Give me any game with no software bottleneck. The system will attempt to produce as many fps as possible and the gpu usage will be 100% because it is the slowest component.

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

Not true hey?

I said: "Did I ever say that GPUs should run 100% in every game? Please qoute me."

You said(qouting me):"""" ""???? Most games should indeed push the gpu to the limit if the fps is uncapped. You have just proved my point........ if the gpu is running at 100% , the gpu is RUNNING AS IT SHOULD!!"

"So infact it should be hovering around 100%"

ask and ye shall receive.... you have indeed said multiple times that his GPU should always be at 100% unless there is a bottleneck.""""""

Bit in blue: This is so true, how can you even argue against this? Lets say I have the fastest components in the world, with a gtx 460. Give me any game with no software bottleneck. The system will attempt to produce as many fps as possible and the gpu usage will be 100% because it is the slowest component.

andy1992uk

it is NOT true, not even close... how can i argue against it? BECAUSE IT ISNT TRUE... that is how. you are saying that a GPU should ALWAYS run at 100% unless there is a bottleneck.... that SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE. as i said before, many games are CPU intense, placing a large load on the CPU and a medium load on the GPU. THIS IS RESULT IN A LOW % OF GPU USAGE AND HIGH % OF CPU USAGE..... it is NOT caused by a bottleneck, it is caused by PROGRAMMING. there is also not necessarily a problem with this, it is just how the developer chooses to handle resource management....

you keep arguing that a GPU should always be at 100% unless there is a bottleneck. i keep telling you that is a complete FALLACY. you insist on pushing your false agenda.... how many people have to tell you that you are wrong?

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

Elann2008

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#61 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I wouldnt neccesarily say an upgraded q3 engine more like their own propiertary engine with some whacked online coding just b.c of all lag/inconsistent performance during multiplayer. I wonder how long will they stick with that ancient engine!

Bikouchu35

All COD games run on a heavily modified version of ID Tech 3, which is the Quake 3 engine. The biggest jump in the series IMO was from COD to COD2. Since then I've only seen small improvements, but obviously the same engine.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#62 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

Roland123_basic

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#63 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

jedikevin2

not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

Very true. I had a Vanilla EVGA GTX 460 1GB OC'd to 911 core and something quite high on the memory, overvolted to 1075mV. I left the fan at stock settings, and it never hit over 73 degrees C under full load. It idled at 31 C or below.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#64 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

Roland123_basic

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

I'm using Gigabyte GTX 460 1GB. They are designed with dual fans and an open design. I think they highest I ever reached was 55* but that's probably due to ambient temps (hot weather).
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="jedikevin2"]

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

hartsickdiscipl

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

Very true. I had a Vanilla EVGA GTX 460 1GB OC'd to 911 core and something quite high on the memory, overvolted to 1075mV. I left the fan at stock settings, and it never hit over 73 degrees C under full load. It idled at 31 C or below.

you also werent running it on dual monitors, which DOES make a difference in terms of temps. the idle temp will be much higher due to dual monitors preventing the GPU from downclocking to 2D. load temps *shrugs* i dunno what to tell ya about that.... it has always run that hot since day one.

Avatar image for ZimpanX
ZimpanX

12636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#66 ZimpanX
Member since 2005 • 12636 Posts

Your Dawn of War 2 performance sounds a little bit low but could be the CPU holding you back. Is CE1 and EIST disabled in BIOS? Did you do a full driver sweep of the old drivers before installing the new ones?

Avatar image for andy1992uk
andy1992uk

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 andy1992uk
Member since 2009 • 89 Posts

[QUOTE="andy1992uk"]

Not true hey?

I said: "Did I ever say that GPUs should run 100% in every game? Please qoute me."

You said(qouting me):"""" ""???? Most games should indeed push the gpu to the limit if the fps is uncapped. You have just proved my point........ if the gpu is running at 100% , the gpu is RUNNING AS IT SHOULD!!"

"So infact it should be hovering around 100%"

ask and ye shall receive.... you have indeed said multiple times that his GPU should always be at 100% unless there is a bottleneck.""""""

Bit in blue: This is so true, how can you even argue against this? Lets say I have the fastest components in the world, with a gtx 460. Give me any game with no software bottleneck. The system will attempt to produce as many fps as possible and the gpu usage will be 100% because it is the slowest component.

Roland123_basic

it is NOT true, not even close... how can i argue against it? BECAUSE IT ISNT TRUE... that is how. you are saying that a GPU should ALWAYS run at 100% unless there is a bottleneck.... that SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE. as i said before, many games are CPU intense, placing a large load on the CPU and a medium load on the GPU. THIS IS RESULT IN A LOW % OF GPU USAGE AND HIGH % OF CPU USAGE..... it is NOT caused by a bottleneck, it is caused by PROGRAMMING. there is also not necessarily a problem with this, it is just how the developer chooses to handle resource management....

you keep arguing that a GPU should always be at 100% unless there is a bottleneck. i keep telling you that is a complete FALLACY. you insist on pushing your false agenda.... how many people have to tell you that you are wrong?

Alright using your way. If a game is using 80% cpu and 60% gpu, with no software bottleneck. what is stopping the system from producing more frames?

Something has to stop it (ie a bottleneck). If there was no bottleneck (software or hardware) on the above example the cpu will be at 100% and is the bottleneck. (5th time ive said).

You are so fixated that you are right that you are neglecting simple logic.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#68 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"] I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

jedikevin2

not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

I run 875 and 2200 at mem Max volts that default bios lets me is 1087 mv. Would do more, I'm plenty happy though.
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#69 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="jedikevin2"]

[QUOTE="Roland123_basic"] not sure how you get such low temps.... im running at 840/2050 as well and mine idles at around 50C. i am, however, running dual monitors which prevents the card from downclocking to 2D rates.... which probably keeps it running hotter than a single monitor. load temps are usually around 75-78C.... which isnt sooooo bad. 60-70% fan speed as well.

JigglyWiggly_

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

I run 875 and 2200 at mem Max volts that default bios lets me is 1087 mv. Would do more, I'm plenty happy though.

875 with voltage? Damn, that's beast. I've never see one at those clocks. Which GPU is it comparable to?
Avatar image for 6pag6azu6
6pag6azu6

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 6pag6azu6
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
You can OC the life out of these cards seriously. All the newer fermi chips are designed to run at 100 Deg max load before they burn out. I bought mine from OCUK and had a long chat with the tech guys about getting the OC done right. If you want proper advice on how to do this properly just go post on there forums instead of listening to half the noobs on this
Avatar image for duderino_23
duderino_23

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 duderino_23
Member since 2008 • 337 Posts

OCUK are cowboys, wouldn't accept any advice from them if my life depended on it.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#72 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="jedikevin2"]

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

Roland123_basic

Very true. I had a Vanilla EVGA GTX 460 1GB OC'd to 911 core and something quite high on the memory, overvolted to 1075mV. I left the fan at stock settings, and it never hit over 73 degrees C under full load. It idled at 31 C or below.

you also werent running it on dual monitors, which DOES make a difference in terms of temps. the idle temp will be much higher due to dual monitors preventing the GPU from downclocking to 2D. load temps *shrugs* i dunno what to tell ya about that.... it has always run that hot since day one.

Very true about the idle temps and dual monitors. Something we can agree on :P My 560 idles at about the same temps as my 460 did, but my load temps are quite a bit higher. Makes me wish I'd gone for a non-reference fan design card.. Oh well. As long as it doesn't die on me in the next couple of years I'll be happy.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#73 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

Elann2008

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

I should try that.
Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Well this thread became a little off topic. I have the 460 1GB version and it is currently 763/1526/1900. I will try it at what some posted that his was at, which was 800/1600/2000. Mine Idles at 26-27 so I should be good on temp. Also, I'll just use EVGA Precision to OC.

mitu123

I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

I should try that.

everyone with a 1gb gtx 460 should be running the card around 830-840core 2050 mem. it overclocks to atleast that with NO PROBLEMS at all. the 850/2100 mark seems to be the hard barrier. i havent been able to get it beyond that without atifacting.... maybe with voltage adjustments but im not willing to mess with that. MSI Afterburner basic features only for "safe" overclocking.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#75 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] I've been able to crank mine up to 840/2050. Around 60-70% fan on load, I never go above 51*. This thing can handle it. Great overclocker.

Roland123_basic

I should try that.

everyone with a 1gb gtx 460 should be running the card around 830-840core 2050 mem. it overclocks to atleast that with NO PROBLEMS at all. the 850/2100 mark seems to be the hard barrier. i havent been able to get it beyond that without atifacting.... maybe with voltage adjustments but im not willing to mess with that. MSI Afterburner basic features only for "safe" overclocking.

For me, the difference between, say 815 and 840 isn't much. In games like Crysis, I see maybe 2-3 fps bump. It's hardly worth straining your GPU, if you ask me. I kept it at 815 when I had a single gpu setup. Results vary, I suppose.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="jedikevin2"]

Thats actually really high roland123. Not so much that you will have a problem but you really running a bit hotter then it should unless you OCED to something crazy and added a volt mod to it.

Elann2008

I run 875 and 2200 at mem Max volts that default bios lets me is 1087 mv. Would do more, I'm plenty happy though.

875 with voltage? Damn, that's beast. I've never see one at those clocks. Which GPU is it comparable to?

Iuno, but it sure is fast, specially when I have 2 in sli :P

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

I guess i may try overclocking my 460's a bit more, but it depends on the temps and if i need it, no reason to waste power or stress out the card for no reason.