New Crysis footage.

  • 97 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="DrDoomed"]

Is that screen shot an unedited image from ingame? Because those ppl start to get blurry at a distance of what seems less than 10 paces and even more so further into the distance.

Maybe the hev ..err..nano suit has a dirty visor

DrDoomed

I already explained that it is a depth of field effect. Your focus is on your weapon and things get blurred out because of it... try it in real life, you should be able to see what its all about.

Yes i watched the movie and have seen it. It isn't based on realism though.

Not all games are, last time I checked there are no aliens or frozen jungles.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

beckoflight
The rocket luncher ideea is stolen from HL2 ... in fact from HL1 in 1998 ... those laser guided missles is old but first seen in 1one of the greatest fathers of the FPS genre ... & the modifiable weapons ideea was used first in STALKER .... & the nano suit ideea was first used in Project Snowblind ( only in snowblind you were a cyborg urself) ... so far Crysis has only gorgeaous graphics & i will play it just to test may new RADEON 2900 XT & may new computer ... but in the rest its just your standard shooter nothing innovative when it comes to terms of gameplay & story ( bleah Alien Invasion ... how many times i've heard that before ) !!!

Modifiable weapons were not first used in stalker, the nano-suit kind of idea was not used first in Project Snowblind, and quite frankly I could care less about every other similarity it shares with other games. I never said that it was innovative nor did I say the story was original. But plenty of people will argue that this game is in fact innovative and the story is good enough for a shooter.
Avatar image for LfunkeyA
LfunkeyA

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LfunkeyA
Member since 2006 • 301 Posts
Hey I'm not saying Source sucks, it looks sweet and has awesome optimisation (besides Postal III will be using it, which is awesome :D), but Cryengine 2 is more advanced technically. Still, Source gets updated pretty quickly.
Avatar image for Altair90
Altair90

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Altair90
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
That's just because In the videos they always have God mode on, if you watch the health bar closely you'll see they would have died a couple of times. so the real gameplay won't be as super-heroic
Avatar image for Precyse
Precyse

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Precyse
Member since 2007 • 487 Posts

Wow any better graphics and the game wouldn't be just a game it'd be real life. Second gameplay looks great,and sure the ai will be better if not just put the difficulty on max to make up for the ai and theres always mp (actual skilled or somewhat skilled humans). Third thenanosuit and nano tech like stuff from mgs(god bless that pimp ass creative gamesuch as nano suit andstealth suit as wellis being implemented in dod r&d(http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn2043, http://www.memagazine.org/backissues/membersonly/dec04/departments/input_output/input_out.htmlhttp://web.mit.edu/ISN/ who knows probably being used by some unknown nonexistent group more secretive than devgru(seal team 6 which was disbanded for unknown reasons but still secretly exists as devgru)and deltathats so muchmore skilled than the two that they make themlook like boyscouts which is hard to comptemplate. Yeah this game is gonna be nominee if not winner for game of the year. As for why devs aren't using the cryengine2 could be because its so advanced or something idk,though when crysis releases on 9/11 look for the fish to bite(fish the devs and the bite cryengine2= more devs using cryengine 2 for their games).

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
For those doubting Crysis' gameplay I am seriously dissappointed. Far Cry had excellent gameplay and I know for a fact that it won't be worse than that. If anything it will take Far Cry's gameplay to new heights. Doubt Crysis all you want. I am pretty much 100% positive that it will be awesome, and at the moment has the best chance of any game coming out this year to get Game of the Year. Crysis will be a powerhouse of a game. It will raise the bar in every category.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

By the way according to recent reports this footage is in DX9.

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php/topic,5593.80.html

Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#60 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts

By the way according to recent reports this footage is in DX9.

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php/topic,5593.80.html

smokeydabear076

which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

By the way according to recent reports this footage is in DX9.

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php/topic,5593.80.html

couly

which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.
Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts
[QUOTE="couly"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

By the way according to recent reports this footage is in DX9.

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php/topic,5593.80.html

smokeydabear076

which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: editted for spacing.

Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

cobrax25

There's almost no imagination / creativity behind those graphics. The trend towards realism will be the death of vidoe games for me. If I want to look at real grass, I'll walk outside.

right....cause Im sure you live in the middle of a tropical jungle, right next to a north korean military base.....

And I need to live next to a North Korean military base to know what grass looks like why??... idiot.

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="couly"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

By the way according to recent reports this footage is in DX9.

http://www.crysis-online.com/forum/index.php/topic,5593.80.html

sircyrus

which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: editted for spacing.

Ah and you know this because you have seen some new DX10 gameplay videos. Correct?
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

trix5817

There's almost no imagination / creativity behind those graphics. The trend towards realism will be the death of vidoe games for me. If I want to look at real grass, I'll walk outside.

right....cause Im sure you live in the middle of a tropical jungle, right next to a north korean military base.....

And he can jump 20 feet in the air, and sprint faster than anyone else. He can also shoot or blowup whatever he wants!

Which has exactly what to do with the graphics.... ?

Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts
[QUOTE="sircyrus"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="couly"]which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

smokeydabear076

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: edited for spacing.

Ah and you know this because you have seen some new DX10 gameplay videos. Correct?

I know this based on the gamer reactions I've read/seen in response to screens and videos like this.

A lot of gamers are already going to have to upgrade their hardware to run this game under the DX9 settings. Throw in $500+ for a DX10 video card, plus $150+ for a copy of Vista and you're looking at $650 to have access to being able to run a single game at it's highest settings. That's not counting any necessary RAM/CPU/etc upgrades.

At this point if someone doesn't have Vista it's because they don't want it yet. If they can run Crysis on DX9 graphics that are wowing people they can save themselves a whole lot of money and keep the O/S they prefer.

That's why I say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out the cash in order to run it onDX10. There's going to be a lot who do upgrade for it (regardless of the difference they just want "THE BEST GRAPHICS EVAR") but the majority will not. That kind of cost cannot be justified for a single game when it would run with great graphics on their machine already.

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="sircyrus"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="couly"]which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

sircyrus

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: edited for spacing.

Ah and you know this because you have seen some new DX10 gameplay videos. Correct?

I know this based on the gamer reactions I've read/seen in response to screens and videos like this.

A lot of gamers are already going to have to upgrade their hardware to run this game under the DX9 settings. Throw in $500+ for a DX10 video card, plus $150+ for a copy of Vista and you're looking at $650 to have access to being able to run a single game at it's highest settings. That's not counting any necessary RAM/CPU/etc upgrades.

At this point if someone doesn't have Vista it's because they don't want it yet. If they can run Crysis on DX9 graphics that are wowing people they can save themselves a whole lot of money and keep the O/S they prefer.

That's why I say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out the cash in order to run it onDX10. There's going to be a lot who do upgrade for it (regardless of the difference they just want "THE BEST GRAPHICS EVAR") but the majority will not. That kind of cost cannot be justified for a single game when it would run with great graphics on their machine already.

You sir are wrong.

Avatar image for Manly-manly-man
Manly-manly-man

3477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Manly-manly-man
Member since 2006 • 3477 Posts
$500 for a DX10 card? Way to have no idea what you are talking about.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#69 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="sircyrus"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="couly"]which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

sircyrus

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: edited for spacing.

Ah and you know this because you have seen some new DX10 gameplay videos. Correct?

I know this based on the gamer reactions I've read/seen in response to screens and videos like this.

A lot of gamers are already going to have to upgrade their hardware to run this game under the DX9 settings. Throw in $500+ for a DX10 video card, plus $150+ for a copy of Vista and you're looking at $650 to have access to being able to run a single game at it's highest settings. That's not counting any necessary RAM/CPU/etc upgrades.

At this point if someone doesn't have Vista it's because they don't want it yet. If they can run Crysis on DX9 graphics that are wowing people they can save themselves a whole lot of money and keep the O/S they prefer.

That's why I say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out the cash in order to run it onDX10. There's going to be a lot who do upgrade for it (regardless of the difference they just want "THE BEST GRAPHICS EVAR") but the majority will not. That kind of cost cannot be justified for a single game when it would run with great graphics on their machine already.

If you see the reactions of a lot of people this game makes them want to upgrade even console players are purchasing new PCs or upgrading their current rigs for Crysis, but your probably right it won't be enough to convince the majority of people to go DX10 and get Vista and all of that stuff. The game looks fantastic in DX9 so I think that it is fair to say that it is a win/win situation.
Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts

$500 for a DX10 card? Way to have no idea what you are talking about.Manly-manly-man
Really?

Top 10 DirectX 10 Video & Graphics Cards

1. XFX 8800 GTX XXX Graphics Card: $570-$635
2. XFX GeForce 8800 GTX Video Card: $580 (approx)
3. Foxconn 8800 GTX Graphics Card: $550-$700
4. XFX NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Graphics Card: $300-$420
5. XFX 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Graphics Card: $300
6. BFG 8800 GTS OC 320MB Graphics Card: $320-$400
7. XFX 8600 GTS XXX Video Card: $210 (approx)
8. PNY Verto 8600 GTS Graphics Card: $200-$250
9. EVGA 8600 GT Superclocked Graphics Card: $115-$160
10. XFX 8600 GT XXX Graphics Card: $130-$150

Cards #8-10 failed to achieve a 40fps average in benchmarks using F.E.A.R and BF2142. Cards #5-7 only surpassed a 40fps average in one of those titles.

Cards #1-4 all performed far better than the other 6 in benchmarks using current generation games. Just because a card has DX10 capabilities doesn't mean it's going to be able to run them without issues. You're going to need to drop a fair amount of cash for that. 3 of the 4 cards cost over $500. Check prices and benchmarks next time.

Avatar image for Bulldog19892
Bulldog19892

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#71 Bulldog19892
Member since 2005 • 3520 Posts
This game looks awesome. I can't wait. Also, is it coming out for any of the consoles? My PC sucks.
Avatar image for VfighterX
VfighterX

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 VfighterX
Member since 2005 • 256 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny_Rock"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

Einhanderkiller

There's almost no imagination / creativity behind those graphics. The trend towards realism will be the death of vidoe games for me. If I want to look at real grass, I'll walk outside.

Then the graphics in this game obviously aren't for you. Some people appreciate realistic graphics; others, like you, appreciate artistic and creative graphics; and then, people, like me, appreciate both types.

Realistic or not, this game looks awesome.

Avatar image for mrarmagedon
mrarmagedon

2345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#73 mrarmagedon
Member since 2003 • 2345 Posts
I wish I had a nano suit.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
This game looks awesome. I can't wait. Also, is it coming out for any of the consoles? My PC sucks.Bulldog19892
No it is not, but the Crytek 2 engine is.
Avatar image for Manly-manly-man
Manly-manly-man

3477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Manly-manly-man
Member since 2006 • 3477 Posts
In short, you can get 8800GTXs for under $500 with rebates, and at 1600x1200 an 8800GTS 320MB can run any game completely maxed out above 40fps except for FEAR, but not even an 8800GTX can do it above 40fps, and an 8800GTS 320MB isn't as good as a GTX obviously, but should run Crysis fine. Delete the long argument.
Avatar image for K_r_a_u_s_e_r
K_r_a_u_s_e_r

775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 K_r_a_u_s_e_r
Member since 2007 • 775 Posts
I'm a crazy Source fanboy and let me say that Crysis blows it away, by a pretty fair margin.

When it comes to the 8800 GTX/GTS it really doesn't matter which company you buy from, performance wise they're all ALMOST identical.

Also, does anyone have an Insider account for HD vids!
Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#78 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="sircyrus"][QUOTE="smokeydabear076"][QUOTE="couly"]which amazes me even more, imagine dx10 !!

sircyrus

I wonder how big the difference is going to be.

Well, if that's DX9 footage I'd say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out out the hundreds of dollars for a new DX10 video card and a copy of Vista.

edit: edited for spacing.

Ah and you know this because you have seen some new DX10 gameplay videos. Correct?

I know this based on the gamer reactions I've read/seen in response to screens and videos like this.

A lot of gamers are already going to have to upgrade their hardware to run this game under the DX9 settings. Throw in $500+ for a DX10 video card, plus $150+ for a copy of Vista and you're looking at $650 to have access to being able to run a single game at it's highest settings. That's not counting any necessary RAM/CPU/etc upgrades.

At this point if someone doesn't have Vista it's because they don't want it yet. If they can run Crysis on DX9 graphics that are wowing people they can save themselves a whole lot of money and keep the O/S they prefer.

That's why I say the difference wont be enough to convince gamers to dish out the cash in order to run it onDX10. There's going to be a lot who do upgrade for it (regardless of the difference they just want "THE BEST GRAPHICS EVAR") but the majority will not. That kind of cost cannot be justified for a single game when it would run with great graphics on their machine already.

I needed to upgrade from a 7600GT anyway, and my copy of vista was free, so I only spent the equivalent of around $300 for a DX10 experience.

Avatar image for sircyrus
sircyrus

6358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 sircyrus
Member since 2003 • 6358 Posts
The 8800GTS gets far and away more then 40fps in any game there is.

One source:

http://anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2953&p=8

And another:

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/video/display/msi8800gts-640_9.html#sect0 (Note how this one has BF2142 as a benchmark, and completely proves you have BS benchmarks)

Don't try to talk tech with someone who is obviously right.Manly-manly-man

In that case I can still talk with you. The benchmarks are using F.E.A.R. 1920x1200 4x AA 16xAF max settings, and BF2142 1600x1200 4xAA medium settings. In hindsight I should have included the test stats in my original post but I was not intending on going into depth about the video cards since A) this isn't the hardware forum, and B) I was illustrating the difference in performance vs price, not promoting any specific card.

On your xbitlabs.com benchmarks the 8800GTS 320mb cards performed at 35.7fps for BF2142. That is under 40, which is what I stated. In F.E.A.R. Extraction Point, the 8800GTS 320mb cards performed at 28fps. Hmm... interesting, no? Now let's take a look at the actual cards I mentioned in my post.

5. XFX 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Graphics Card: $300
6. BFG 8800 GTS OC 320MB Graphics Card: $320-$400
7. XFX 8600 GTS XXX Video Card: $210 (approx)
8. PNY Verto 8600 GTS Graphics Card: $200-$250
9. EVGA 8600 GT Superclocked Graphics Card: $115-$160
10. XFX 8600 GT XXX Graphics Card: $130-$150

Cards #8-10 failed to achieve a 40fps average in benchmarks using F.E.A.R and BF2142. Cards #5-7 only surpassed a 40fps average in one of those titles.original

Card #10 results -BF2142: 28.9fps, F.E.A.R.: 35fps.
Card #9 results - BF2142: 28.5fps, F.E.A.R.: 32fps.
Card #8 results - BF2142: 31.7fps, F.E.A.R.: 38fps.
Card #7 results - BF2142: 32.7fps, F.E.A.R.: 40fps.
Card #6 results -BF2142: 76.5fps, F.E.A.R.: 34fps.
Card #5 results - BF2142: 36fps, F.E.A.R.: 72fps.

Cards #8-10 failing to achieve 40fps average, #5-7 only surpassing 40fps in one of those titles. Just like I said.

Tell me, how does it feel to be completely and utterly destroyed in an argument?Manly-manly-man
Well if I had an ego the apparent size of yours (judging by how you posed the question, no offense) I'd say it would have been devastating. Unfortunately, you didn't succeed in "completely and utterly" destroying anything.

You found an XFX card $30 cheaper than the one I listed, that's great. Unfortunately the benchmarks still stand therefore the price difference is a moot point. Not to mention the fact that if someone was to really search I'm sure they could find one even cheaper than $270.

But let's not forget that the part of the discussion where the DX10 cards entered the equation was when the question of if most gamers would upgrade over the difference in the DX9 vs DX10 version of Crysis. Since we're talking about "most gamers" then we will have to take the average price, rather than just taking the best price I could find. "Most gamers" aren't going to scour the internet for the best deal on a video card. Many wouldn't even know how to install it themselves.

Anyways, you may want to dash a bit of salt on that hat. You might find it easier to choke down.

Also, here is an 8800GTX for under $500.Manly-manly-man

Uhh... it's $510 before rebate. They're offering a $20 rebate for several online sites because online sales cut their costs. Even after that rebate it's still only 10bucks under $500. You're seriously going to quibble over that because an online place offes a $20 rebate?

If you want to debate this further feel free to PM me. We've provided benchmarks for anyone who cares so further discussion about these cards isn't necessary in this thread.

Avatar image for TacticalElefant
TacticalElefant

900

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#81 TacticalElefant
Member since 2007 • 900 Posts
It may not be a super high resolution, but my 8800GTS 320 MB tears FEAR and BF2142 apart, with everything set on maximums. At this resolution, which is my monitors native, I expect such good performance when running Crysis or close to it.

Remember: Crytek is the king of optimization, and they seem to squeeze every last bit of theoretical capabilitiy out of a GPU (no matter what graphics card you use) with the pure efficiency of their programming and optimization standards, which is sadly rarely seen in PC games these days. Besides, 320 MB is almost a perfect texture/frame buffer for my resolution settings.
Avatar image for Tonttu86
Tonttu86

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Tonttu86
Member since 2005 • 108 Posts

*wipes the drool off his chin*

I'm not expecting anything from Crysis, but it sure looks pretty. :)

Avatar image for prowler666
prowler666

860

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 prowler666
Member since 2003 • 860 Posts

this is great. can't wait to try out the multiplayer mode. i hope it has something for battlefield-fan like me. well at least it has large maps and vehicles, so it can't be very disappointing, unless the code sucks.

singleplayer looks kickass though.

Avatar image for Philmon
Philmon

1454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Philmon
Member since 2003 • 1454 Posts

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

smokeydabear076

Wow.... its amazing that you can actually read the serial no on the weapon :shock:..... Now can you read what is written above that if you have a PC powerful enough and a screen big enough to display the game at its highest resolution with everything maxed? :D

Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts
[QUOTE="smokeydabear076"]

This video (weapons of Crysis) demonstrates the weapons in the game. The rocket launcher is by far the most impressive, but everything else is awesome too.:D

and here is a new screenshot. I am sure that you guys are capable of finding the other new ones.

Philmon

Wow.... its amazing that you can actually read the serial no on the weapon :shock:..... Now can you read what is written above that if you have a PC powerful enough and a screen big enough to display the game at its highest resolution with everything maxed? :D

Probably.:P
Avatar image for 123monkey
123monkey

254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 123monkey
Member since 2004 • 254 Posts
I am loving crysis, it is going to be a brilliant game, lets hope that it doesn't disappoint much :)
Avatar image for mismajor99
mismajor99

5676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#87 mismajor99
Member since 2003 • 5676 Posts

I'm a crazy Source fanboy and let me say that Crysis blows it away, by a pretty fair margin.

When it comes to the 8800 GTX/GTS it really doesn't matter which company you buy from, performance wise they're all ALMOST identical.

Also, does anyone have an Insider account for HD vids!K_r_a_u_s_e_r

Yeah, I'm a huge source lover too, but there's no denying Crytek 2.

Head on over to gametrailers.com and they have HD videos for free.

Avatar image for Wartzay
Wartzay

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Wartzay
Member since 2006 • 2036 Posts

[QUOTE="Manly-manly-man"]$500 for a DX10 card? Way to have no idea what you are talking about.sircyrus

Really?

Top 10 DirectX 10 Video & Graphics Cards

1. XFX 8800 GTX XXX Graphics Card: $570-$635
2. XFX GeForce 8800 GTX Video Card: $580 (approx)
3. Foxconn 8800 GTX Graphics Card: $550-$700
4. XFX NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Graphics Card: $300-$420
5. XFX 8800 GTS 320MB XXX Graphics Card: $300
6. BFG 8800 GTS OC 320MB Graphics Card: $320-$400
7. XFX 8600 GTS XXX Video Card: $210 (approx)
8. PNY Verto 8600 GTS Graphics Card: $200-$250
9. EVGA 8600 GT Superclocked Graphics Card: $115-$160
10. XFX 8600 GT XXX Graphics Card: $130-$150

Cards #8-10 failed to achieve a 40fps average in benchmarks using F.E.A.R and BF2142. Cards #5-7 only surpassed a 40fps average in one of those titles.

Cards #1-4 all performed far better than the other 6 in benchmarks using current generation games. Just because a card has DX10 capabilities doesn't mean it's going to be able to run them without issues. You're going to need to drop a fair amount of cash for that. 3 of the 4 cards cost over $500. Check prices and benchmarks next time.

Um... wtf? I maintain 50-60fps at 1440x900 on max (except for soft shadows) in FEAR on my x1950pro... where are you getting those numbers from? My sister has a 8800gts 640 meg and it beats up my card in every game we own.

EDIT: ok you posted the specs, now post where you got them from.

You still need SLI/crossfire to run at 1920x res at really high fps dude, I bet if you dropped that to 1600x1200 in FEAR it would run as smooth as butter. And BF2142 is a terribly optimized game.

Avatar image for -notdie-
-notdie-

473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 -notdie-
Member since 2005 • 473 Posts
I hate these new gimmicks the dev are using. HDR, Bloom and DOF are this eras lense flare. I hate it, subtely is the key and these devs, so in love with those 'neat' new tricks the programmed crank those effects up to eleven. It's so irritating seeing the devs use the effects that overtly. The DOF in the screen is all wrong, who in their right mind would think it's a good idea to focus on the foreground. If you are going to use DOF, the only thing that should be out of foocus is the gun and other objects right in you face. If the in game camera was a real camera, it should be set in infinite focus all the time. And really, there is no benifit to even using it, in a non DOF game, our eyes already focus on just one aspect of the screen, we don't need the game to dictate what we are looking at and focusing on. Game are not movies, and it seems devs are getting all their insiration from a medium nothing like their own.
Avatar image for Wartzay
Wartzay

2036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Wartzay
Member since 2006 • 2036 Posts
You only get that sort of DOF when you are concentrating on your gun while customizing it on the fly. Geeez
Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#91 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts

You only get that sort of DOF when you are concentrating on your gun while customizing it on the fly. GeeezWartzay

well when you use ironsight also, but I like DOF. It is great in Call of Juarez.

Avatar image for cobrax25
cobrax25

9649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 cobrax25
Member since 2006 • 9649 Posts

you can see the DOF really well in this trailer...

go to about 1:56

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/18588.html

Avatar image for BaldursGate18
BaldursGate18

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 BaldursGate18
Member since 2006 • 73 Posts
agreed
Avatar image for Precyse
Precyse

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Precyse
Member since 2007 • 487 Posts

You only get that sort of DOF when you are concentrating on your gun while customizing it on the fly. GeeezWartzay

Yep thats tru just while customizing it which adds the feel that your really concentrating on the gun and equipping it with scopes, grenade launchers silencers and such. Just look at that dgs1 it looks f*%@ing real and the video they released at ign i'd tip my hat off to them if i was wearing one right now!!! Fantastic job crytek!!!

Avatar image for FragMonkey09
FragMonkey09

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 FragMonkey09
Member since 2005 • 1543 Posts

The graphics look like a beefed up version of Source to me, i do think however it'll be a disappointment. Purely on the fact people are hyping it up to be the 2nd coming of christ and no game could live upto that tbh. Terrorantula

LOL You read my mind!

Avatar image for MondoCool
MondoCool

866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#96 MondoCool
Member since 2007 • 866 Posts
One more thing, I don't like "the real time weapon changing" I want to see you put that iron sight on. (with your screw driver, and dropping the screws)... Lol, but I mean i actually wawnt to see you attach a scope. but still sexy game :)
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#97 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

There is another new video at Ign and a few new screenshots here is one of them.

Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#98 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts
^ savage
Avatar image for wiigamin_com
wiigamin_com

291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#99 wiigamin_com
Member since 2007 • 291 Posts
It's funny, when a game has good graphics people automatically assume it's crap, and if a game is ugly they say it's the gameplay that matters. Crysis is a beautiful game and has not received any critcisim thus far, so I expect great things from it.
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#100 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts

Seems to me, at least from the initial part of the vid that the gameplay is very much an enhanced version of Far Cry. I got that feeling when the person was sneaking through the hut, and it's just a similar setup - various outposts with multiple attack points and multiple ways of attacking.

Now instead of ignoring that or just leaving as is, they said lets enhane those differences, lets make playing stealth more fun - how? cloak. What about brute force hmm up the strength? What about run and hide approach? speed. Now how can we incorporate all that - suit with powers. The lack of health packs I think I can see past. I mean there is a great satisfaction getting to health packs in far cry, but at the same time there were key points where I'd have to play near perfectly just to get past it.

It still looks difficult, even the recent video you could see they had god mode on and he died.When I saw one of the other vehicle movies I was convinced the game would be fun to play. I hope it doesn't become like other games with regen health - shoot hide, shoot hide.