I can not freaken believe those numbers. :shock:
http://www.bootdaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=460&Item%20%20id=56%3E%20&task=view&id=460&Itemid=56
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Those are some sad numbers...
Terrible, terrible scaling performance-wise.
An E6600 @ 3.6ghz easily reaches 3k. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1708300
A C2Q @ 3.33ghz reaches 5.1k. http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=1603480
Two quads at 3ghz should be close to 9k, but yet it is only at 6.5k.
it's called a memory bottleneck, and quite frankly, while the 5000x had no problem feeding four cores, it doesn't have enough to keep 8 cores happy.codezer0
Each actual die, 4 die in total, is only getting 333.3mhz of the FSB, correct?
No wonder Intel is putting an IMC on the server Nehalems.
use for us gamers i mean who's gonna game on mac???r3351925You can get an X1900 XT on a Mac currently.
Not to mention, the kind of person buying an 8-way system like this is likely going to be doing some hardcore multithreaded apps, like rendering HD video.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment