Overclocking a GTX680?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Brean24
Brean24

1659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Brean24
Member since 2007 • 1659 Posts
About a month ago I got me a GTX680. It's not an upgrade in terms of raw performance ,I had two GTX480s in SLI but I got the GTX680 with the intention of getting another one down the line and due to the massively improved cooling system and efficiently in general(higher minimum frame rates) that can be contributed to the 500 and 600 series. I have a EVGA Stock GTX680 2GB. The rest of my specs is in my sig. In terms of overclocking, I have two questions. 1. Is it worth it? 2. If so, where do I start? Also is it worth using one of the 480s for physix?
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Since you are already near the top of the line overclocking wont do much unless your running beyond 1080 resolution.
Avatar image for Brean24
Brean24

1659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Brean24
Member since 2007 • 1659 Posts
I'm running at 1900 by 1200, which is pretty close to 1080p(yes I realize the difference is thousands of pixels). My next monitor will likely be 1440p but that won't be for a while, prob when the 800 series come out.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
I'm running at 1900 by 1200, which is pretty close to 1080p(yes I realize the difference is thousands of pixels). My next monitor will likely be 1440p but that won't be for a while, prob when the 800 series come out.Brean24
Im still packing a GTX 560 OC'ed to 560ti performance, haven't seen a real need to upgrade it yet.
Avatar image for BeerMage
BeerMage

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BeerMage
Member since 2009 • 267 Posts

Are you happy with your framerates? What games are you playing? At 1200p a gtx 680 will max pretty much everything.

Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts
Go for it!
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
I have my GTX 670, which I paid $300 for, overclocked past GTX 680 speeds. If you don't overclock, you're letting people with vastly cheaper cards beat you out. :P
Avatar image for Brean24
Brean24

1659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Brean24
Member since 2007 • 1659 Posts
I can max every game, however some games like Crysis 2, Skyrim with graphics mods, Ghost Recon: Future Soldier and a few other graphically intensive games do dip below 60 frames per seconds from time to time.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
I can max every game, however some games like Crysis 2, Skyrim with graphics mods, Ghost Recon: Future Soldier and a few other graphically intensive games do dip below 60 frames per seconds from time to time.Brean24
Crysis 2 check the tessellation, and download the fix to make it less demanding, Skyrim with alot of graphicsa mod is most likley using up all your video memory,
Avatar image for Yams1980
Yams1980

2866

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#11 Yams1980
Member since 2006 • 2866 Posts

i'll post you my overclocking settings so you can see where to go from. I have the exact same video card as you as well, the evga 680gtx.

First you should download evga precision x, its a tool to overclock your card and it will apply your overclocking settings every time you start your pc up. Other tools can overclock your card as well.

heres my settings:

Power Target: 132%

GPU Clock Offset: +150 mhz

MEM Clock Offset: +385 mhz

Fan Speed Auto

Now you may not be able to go with the same settings, even though we have the same card, they never clock exactly the same, and it depends on available power, motherboard and maybe when your video card was made would be a different stock then mine likely since i got mine at first release. My temps under full stress rarely go above 75c or so... since this cards specs state that it should not run above a temp of 97c, you can rest easy at anything below 80c.

(these are conservative settings, i'm happy with stable settings but im sure you can overclock far beyond this if had better cooling... but i found troubles putting it much higher then this without distortions)

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127731 Posts
In MSI Afterburner these are my settings: Power settings: 115% Core clock: +75MHz Mem Clock: +400MHz. Only apply them when I game though. I've tried with a higher core clock but it doesn't seem stable then. Oh and my card is +50MHz on the core clock from factory.
Avatar image for Bhargav_pvs
Bhargav_pvs

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 Bhargav_pvs
Member since 2007 • 151 Posts

Hi pal...:)

If u r playing with a GTX680, u'll probably have every game maxed out at 1080p without even overclocking it. So until you find this GPU lagging below 60fps at high settings at 1080p, it's always better not to overclock it. U actually own a beast and i guess it won't be necessary to overrun it beyond clock rates.

Happy gaming pal....:)

Avatar image for robertoenrique
robertoenrique

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 robertoenrique
Member since 2004 • 1191 Posts
[QUOTE="horgen123"]In MSI Afterburner these are my settings: Power settings: 115% Core clock: +75MHz Mem Clock: +400MHz. Only apply them when I game though. I've tried with a higher core clock but it doesn't seem stable then. Oh and my card is +50MHz on the core clock from factory.

I have the GTX 680 SC edition, I can only reach +45mhz both core and mem. More than that and 3d Mark11 crashes. Regarding the power settings I've tried everything and still I cant get past that :( . I'm using EVGA precision btw. Any tips???
Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127731 Posts
Well I got another 680, MSI Twin Frozr. Why don't you try with MSI Afterburner? It works on any 680.
Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
If i'm not mistaken, doesn't the GTX600 series have a new feature that dynamically overclocks it?
Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts
If i'm not mistaken, doesn't the GTX600 series have a new feature that dynamically overclocks it?trastamad03
Yeah, but people like us want MOAR!!
Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts
[QUOTE="trastamad03"]If i'm not mistaken, doesn't the GTX600 series have a new feature that dynamically overclocks it?acanofcoke
Yeah, but people like us want MOAR!!

(Looks at his GTX 560Ti SLI setup)... :( Ya... I can see why.
Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts

I overclocked a number of 600 series cards for friends and fam... They tend to get 150 MHz on the core and 400 MHz on the mem.

70c is when it starts to throttle. So your best off getting a custom cooled card that isn't reference, with a slight factory OC because it's binned higher then stock chips. Then work your way from there.

I use EVGA Percision X for overclocking because it's stupid easy. And the EVGA OC scanner is really nice too.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16905 Posts

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

Avatar image for robertoenrique
robertoenrique

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 robertoenrique
Member since 2004 • 1191 Posts

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

blaznwiipspman1
How do you know all this if you dont own a GTX 680?
Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127731 Posts
[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

robertoenrique
How do you know all this if you dont own a GTX 680?

Cause he got the clearly more superior card Radeon 7970.
If i'm not mistaken, doesn't the GTX600 series have a new feature that dynamically overclocks it?trastamad03
Yeah they do. And that one does not follow what nVidia has said. At least not for me. If I am to get stock turbo speed on my card, I have to set it down 75MHz. The factory OC however is only 50MHz. Also my card doesn't stay at 1124 on factory settings like it was supposed to. It likes 1137 and 1152MHz more than 1124.
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16905 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

robertoenrique

How do you know all this if you dont own a GTX 680?

because the 7970 has trouble in these games and I own a 7970 and have played through all of both of these games. Also here is sleeping dogs, the settings for this game aren't even maxed out but all video cards still struggle to pass 60fps.

SleepingDogs_02.png

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="robertoenrique"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

blaznwiipspman1

How do you know all this if you dont own a GTX 680?

because the 7970 has trouble in these games and I own a 7970 and have played through all of both of these games. Also here is sleeping dogs, the settings for this game aren't even maxed out but all video cards still struggle to pass 60fps.

SleepingDogs_02.png

Please..... quit being an AMD lapdog. The performance difference between a 680 and 7970 ghz is within 7%. Also sleeping dogs plays just fine with Nvidia cards AMD cards tend to have lower minimum framerates with the game.

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
Blazn will find any excuse possible to show a chart with AMD ahead in something...
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16905 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="robertoenrique"] How do you know all this if you dont own a GTX 680? 04dcarraher

because the 7970 has trouble in these games and I own a 7970 and have played through all of both of these games. Also here is sleeping dogs, the settings for this game aren't even maxed out but all video cards still struggle to pass 60fps.

SleepingDogs_02.png

Please..... quit being an AMD lapdog. The performance difference between a 680 and 7970 ghz is within 7%. Also sleeping dogs plays just fine with Nvidia cards AMD cards tend to have lower minimum framerates with the game.

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

because the 7970 has trouble in these games and I own a 7970 and have played through all of both of these games. Also here is sleeping dogs, the settings for this game aren't even maxed out but all video cards still struggle to pass 60fps.

SleepingDogs_02.png

blaznwiipspman1

Please..... quit being an AMD lapdog. The performance difference between a 680 and 7970 ghz is within 7%. Also sleeping dogs plays just fine with Nvidia cards AMD cards tend to have lower minimum framerates with the game.

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

The thread was about overclocking a 680, there is no reason at all to post thjis except to try and start a systems was type thread or act like an AMD fanboy, your just making yourself look really stupid.
Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#29 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

V4LENT1NE

The thread was about overclocking a 680, there is no reason at all to post thjis except to try and start a systems was type thread or act like an AMD fanboy, your just making yourself look really stupid.



LOL couldn't agree more what the point to show the 7970 might be slightly higher FPS in some game if he already owe a GTX 680 way pass the allowed return day for a used product (14 day) is not looking at return the gpu and get something better he want to know if he can oc it a bit further and get more FPS

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16905 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Please..... quit being an AMD lapdog. The performance difference between a 680 and 7970 ghz is within 7%. Also sleeping dogs plays just fine with Nvidia cards AMD cards tend to have lower minimum framerates with the game.

V4LENT1NE

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

The thread was about overclocking a 680, there is no reason at all to post thjis except to try and start a systems was type thread or act like an AMD fanboy, your just making yourself look really stupid.

im a fanboy because the 7970 is faster? You're the fanboy,everytime something AMD is posted showing better fps you get your panties in a bunch. With the latest AMD drivers I can't find a game that DOESNT have AMD on top in every single time. You can post older benchmarks from 7 months ago like most other nvidia fanboys, but your credibility goes out the window. Just like superclock3d, 04cadharrher, yourself, and a few others who are hardcore nvidia fanboys.

I chose sleeping dogs because it proved my point that even the highest end card can't max out every game. Overclocking a 680 won't help it get from 36fps to 60 fps in this game. The best you can hope for is 40-45fps with the best overclocks.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

blaznwiipspman1

The thread was about overclocking a 680, there is no reason at all to post thjis except to try and start a systems was type thread or act like an AMD fanboy, your just making yourself look really stupid.

im a fanboy because the 7970 is faster? You're the fanboy,everytime something AMD is posted showing better fps you get your panties in a bunch. With the latest AMD drivers I can't find a game that DOESNT have AMD on top in every single time. You can post older benchmarks from 7 months ago like most other nvidia fanboys, but your credibility goes out the window. Just like superclock3d, 04cadharrher, yourself, and a few others who are hardcore nvidia fanboys.

I chose sleeping dogs because it proved my point that even the highest end card can't max out every game. Overclocking a 680 won't help it get from 36fps to 60 fps in this game. The best you can hope for is 40-45fps with the best overclocks.

:lol: your so full of yourself with AMD its not even funny and you give opinions as facts. Which is why no one takes you seriously. My poor GTX 560 with Sleeping dogs at 1680x1050 with all settings maxed besides AA its on normal, minimum 34 fps, averages 55 FPS, maxes at 66.

Fact is that the 7970ghz and GTX 680(stock) performance is close enough that 5% difference on average means little to nothing at all.

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

My main point isn't that the 7970 is faster (although it is), it is that this chart shows that a high end card can not max out every game at 1080p and 60 fps. The chart shows average frame rates not minimum frame rates.

blaznwiipspman1

The thread was about overclocking a 680, there is no reason at all to post thjis except to try and start a systems was type thread or act like an AMD fanboy, your just making yourself look really stupid.

im a fanboy because the 7970 is faster? You're the fanboy,everytime something AMD is posted showing better fps you get your panties in a bunch. With the latest AMD drivers I can't find a game that DOESNT have AMD on top in every single time. You can post older benchmarks from 7 months ago like most other nvidia fanboys, but your credibility goes out the window. Just like superclock3d, 04cadharrher, yourself, and a few others who are hardcore nvidia fanboys.

I chose sleeping dogs because it proved my point that even the highest end card can't max out every game. Overclocking a 680 won't help it get from 36fps to 60 fps in this game. The best you can hope for is 40-45fps with the best overclocks.

No you just wanted an excuse to post the benchmarks. He mentions overclocking a 680 and you run your mouth for no reason how the 7970 is better out of nowhere, sad...really...
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

the 680 will not max every game at 1080p. Even my 7970 has trouble getting sleeping dogs past 45 fps, and thats with some settings like AA brought down to high instead of extreme. Crysis 2, same story only 45 fps all settings completely maxed out at 1080p. A 680 does worse than a 7970, so I dont understand how you can max all games. Definitely set an overclock profile for your games, or be prepared to tone down the settings.

blaznwiipspman1
Eh? I get much more than 45 FPS with Crysis 2 maxed at 1200P. I don't think I'd a problem with Sleeping Dogs either.