PC GAMER REVIEW: BioShock 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Turtlecream
Turtlecream

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Turtlecream
Member since 2009 • 226 Posts

PC Gamer gave BioShock 2 a 90% and labeled it as an Editor's Choice. They wrote, "Similar and slightly improved mechanics make this a worthy sequal, despite a sadly less-memorable story."

Although I thought the original BioShock was amazing, I for whatever reason simply could not get around to finishing it. There was something about it that eventually made it boring to me. Perhaps I found it repetitive, even though it really probably wasn't.

Anyways, it looks like the game is living up to its hype for the most part so far. Thoughts?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Well i thought the story in the first game was pretty meh, therefore i might like the story more. I am pretty hypef for those slightly improve mechanics. Do you have access to the review right now? Can you give me mroe info about the game?
Avatar image for Turtlecream
Turtlecream

226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Turtlecream
Member since 2009 • 226 Posts

Well i thought the story in the first game was pretty meh, therefore i might like the story more. I am pretty hypef for those slightly improve mechanics. Do you have access to the review right now? Can you give me mroe info about the game?dakan45

They wrote a lot, and I wouldn't really know what to write about, although it does say that you play as a Bid Daddy Alpha and that you are chemically bound to a little sister - but that is probably common knowledge at this point.

Subscribe to PC Gamer!

Avatar image for warriorsq
warriorsq

568

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 warriorsq
Member since 2007 • 568 Posts

Although I thought the original BioShock was amazing, I for whatever reason simply could not get around to finishing it. There was something about it that eventually made it boring to me. Perhaps I found it repetitive, even though it really probably wasn't.Turtlecream

Yeah I was the same tbh

Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#5 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts
Loved the first one, this looks to be more of the same, I think it came out too early.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well i thought the story in the first game was pretty meh, therefore i might like the story more. I am pretty hypef for those slightly improve mechanics. Do you have access to the review right now? Can you give me mroe info about the game?Turtlecream

They wrote a lot, and I wouldn't really know what to write about, although it does say that you play as a Bid Daddy Alpha and that you are chemically bound to a little sister - but that is probably common knowledge at this point.

Subscribe to PC Gamer!

Sadly nowadays stuff like that are common knowledge, like the cod mw2 No russian mission, even the non fans of the game new about it thanks to the media. Anyway does it point out any ways on how mechanics are improved or anything cool worth mentioning or how long the game is?
Avatar image for edgewalker16
edgewalker16

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 edgewalker16
Member since 2005 • 2286 Posts
Loved the first one, this looks to be more of the same, I think it came out too early.couly
3 years isn't enough time?
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#8 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

The first one had some of hte best atmosphere around and a fantastic story, but the gameplay and variety could have been slightly better.

Hope part2 improves on Part1 like ME2 did over ME1!

As long as the story is good, the atmosphere is good and there is a little more variety ill be happy.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="couly"]Loved the first one, this looks to be more of the same, I think it came out too early.edgewalker16
3 years isn't enough time?

Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?
Avatar image for Leon2793
Leon2793

241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Leon2793
Member since 2008 • 241 Posts

I was just going to post this in kozzy's discussion, oh well :P. I'm quite hyped for the second, working my way through the first one at the moment and enjoying every minute of it.

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts
[QUOTE="edgewalker16"][QUOTE="couly"]Loved the first one, this looks to be more of the same, I think it came out too early.dakan45
3 years isn't enough time?

Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?

graphics havent improved much since they want it to run on consoles. The poor economy has also stopped alot of people from wanting to upgrade.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="edgewalker16"] 3 years isn't enough time?

Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?

graphics havent improved much since they want it to run on consoles. The poor economy has also stopped alot of people from wanting to upgrade.

Poor excuse, since there sequels that look much better, Eg: assasin creed 2, or bad company 2, or uncharted 2 on the "crappy" ps3 :P, no way x360 cant run uncharted 2 at the same graphics quality. Oh and mass effect 2. But to me bioshock 2 looks alot like the first!
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?

graphics havent improved much since they want it to run on consoles. The poor economy has also stopped alot of people from wanting to upgrade.

Poor excuse, since there sequels that look much better, Eg: assasin creed 2, or bad company 2, or uncharted 2 on the "crappy" ps3 :P, no way x360 cant run uncharted 2 at the same graphics quality. Oh and mass effect 2. But to me bioshock 2 looks alot like the first!

Lookin like the first is not a bad thing
Avatar image for Darksonic666
Darksonic666

3482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#14 Darksonic666
Member since 2009 • 3482 Posts

From looking at the pictures it seems that thegraphics have not improved but no matter I am still looking forward to it

Avatar image for kevy619
kevy619

5617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 kevy619
Member since 2004 • 5617 Posts

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="dakan45"] Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?dakan45
graphics havent improved much since they want it to run on consoles. The poor economy has also stopped alot of people from wanting to upgrade.

Poor excuse, since there sequels that look much better, Eg: assasin creed 2, or bad company 2, or uncharted 2 on the "crappy" ps3 :P, no way x360 cant run uncharted 2 at the same graphics quality. Oh and mass effect 2. But to me bioshock 2 looks alot like the first!

do those sequels really look all that much better? I haven't played most of them on a console, and mass effect 2, atleast for me only runs a bit better.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Lookin like the first is not a bad thingmillerlight89

Nope, its actually good since there are no worries that you wont like the game, oh well i was hoping for improved graphics, besides all those "improved sequels" and PC gamer giving it such a high rating, is easilly a reason for the game to have such a high ratings, because i dont know if i have mentioned it, but it also plays alot like the first, there are no "screaming" improvements or new features apart from the fact that you are a big daddy which is something that i dont know if its necessary good or bad, i would prefer to be a normal person instead! But anyway whats the point of defending the game for not having visibly superior graphics than the first? I mean its not a bad thing but its most definetly not a thing to be proud of and thankfull for!!

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#17 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

How about we play the game first before we say it has no improvement in graphics or gameplay. Pictures and online video can only show you so much.

To me it does look very similair to the firs Bioshock, but I havnt played Bioshock2 yet so ill wait till its out to decide.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="kevy619"] graphics havent improved much since they want it to run on consoles. The poor economy has also stopped alot of people from wanting to upgrade.kevy619

Poor excuse, since there sequels that look much better, Eg: assasin creed 2, or bad company 2, or uncharted 2 on the "crappy" ps3 :P, no way x360 cant run uncharted 2 at the same graphics quality. Oh and mass effect 2. But to me bioshock 2 looks alot like the first!

do those sequels really look all that much better? I haven't played most of them on a console, and mass effect 2, atleast for me only runs a bit better.

Assasin creed 2 definetly looks better than the first, same goes for uncharted 2, it takes texture detail into a whole new level. Why you have a ps3 if you have not played uncharted 2? Anyway there are other examples like gears of war 2 but the first game came to early!
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

How about we play the game first before we say it has no improvement in graphics or gameplay.

kozzy1234
Yea I watched a review and they were saying that they improved upon the graphics. I think it is in the eye of the beholder.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#20 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

How about we play the game first before we say it has no improvement in graphics or gameplay. Pictures and online video can only show you so much.

To me it does look very similair to the firs Bioshock, but I havnt played Bioshock2 yet so ill wait till its out to decide.

kozzy1234
A wise statement but:

From looking at the pictures it seems that thegraphics have not improved but no matter I am still looking forward to it

Darksonic666
...i am not the only one who thinks that there is no clear improvement over the graphics in comparison with the first, which came out, when in 2007?
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

How about we play the game first before we say it has no improvement in graphics or gameplay.

millerlight89
Yea I watched a review and they were saying that they improved upon the graphics. I think it is in the eye of the beholder.

Video review? Where give me link !!:D
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#22 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

How about we play the game first before we say it has no improvement in graphics or gameplay. Pictures and online video can only show you so much.

To me it does look very similair to the firs Bioshock, but I havnt played Bioshock2 yet so ill wait till its out to decide.

dakan45

A wise statement but:

From looking at the pictures it seems that thegraphics have not improved but no matter I am still looking forward to it

Darksonic666

...i am not the only one who thinks that there is no clear improvement over the graphics in comparison with the first, which came out, when in 2007?

yes but as i said before.. we have not played the game yet... pictures and videos dont tell the full story.

Uncharted2 and ME2 didnt look that great to me before they came out base don screenshots but after playing the games myself, I was blown away.

playing the game yourself >> pictures and low quality vids imo.

The game might look worse or better when we play it, only time will tell.

Avatar image for enozth
enozth

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 enozth
Member since 2009 • 83 Posts

waiting for play this game ^_^

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Ok never mind it has more atmosphere. Well maybe not, graphics, but better atmosphere than the first? Sign me up.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Uncharted2 and ME2 didnt look that great to me before they came out base don screenshots but after playing the games myself, I was blown away.

playing the game yourself >> pictures and low quality vids imo.

The game might look worse or better when we play it, only time will tell.kozzy1234

Well i have to admit that when i everyone was like "ZOMG uncharted 2 will be graphics king!!"..... i was like "come on, it does not look that much better than the previous" So you migh be right there bud;)

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]Uncharted2 and ME2 didnt look that great to me before they came out base don screenshots but after playing the games myself, I was blown away.

playing the game yourself >> pictures and low quality vids imo.

The game might look worse or better when we play it, only time will tell.dakan45

Well i have to admit that when i everyone was like "ZOMG uncharted 2 will be graphics king!!"..... i was like "come on, it does not look that much better than the previous" So you migh be right there bud;)

Yea Uncharted 2 was a beautiful game. I thought it looked like poop in the screens.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I swear the god, the texture detail on uncharted 2 just did not seem possible in ps3 and was not visible on preview screenshots!
Avatar image for couly
couly

6285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#28 couly
Member since 2004 • 6285 Posts
After I finished Bioshock 1, I remember saying that I hoped the next one will be as big a jump as HL1 to HL2. Sadly it won't happen.
Avatar image for Dante2710
Dante2710

63164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#29 Dante2710
Member since 2005 • 63164 Posts
I loved the first one. I remember beating it more than 4 or 5 times. Still i feel that a game like Bioshock didnt need a sequel, at this point i see no reason to buy it.
Avatar image for Cobretti1818
Cobretti1818

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 Cobretti1818
Member since 2005 • 511 Posts

I am with the OP on this one.

While I did finish the original, it became some what of a chore towards the end. I dunno, great game but just boring at times I guess.

I am happy to have the sequal sit fir a while and go down in price, while I finish:

Dragon Age (hopefully a second play through too) + Expansions

ME2

AvP2

BF:BC2

Avatar image for gamer082009
gamer082009

6679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 gamer082009
Member since 2007 • 6679 Posts

PC Gamer gave BioShock 2 a 90% and labeled it as an Editor's Choice. They wrote, "Similar and slightly improved mechanics make this a worthy sequal, despite a sadly less-memorable story."

Although I thought the original BioShock was amazing, I for whatever reason simply could not get around to finishing it. There was something about it that eventually made it boring to me. Perhaps I found it repetitive, even though it really probably wasn't.

Anyways, it looks like the game is living up to its hype for the most part so far. Thoughts?

Turtlecream
Same here..it got hella boring after the graphics wore off to your eyes. I really don't see the second one improving on much..the game in my opinion is a forgettable one to say the least.
Avatar image for DigiTM73
DigiTM73

801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 DigiTM73
Member since 2009 • 801 Posts

At least you can go through this again without caring about consequence. They once again have chambers that bring you back to life. Although I do hope they do what they did in the PC patch, and that is make them optional.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

PSM gave it 93% and said that it tops "he original in terms of storytelling and combat." so hopefully they're right.

and for people complaining about the graphics, who cares? that is one of the few things that doesnt need to be improved.

Avatar image for Hitman-B1-
Hitman-B1-

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Hitman-B1-
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
The MP addition is what's keeping me hyped :D
Avatar image for Nirkaw
Nirkaw

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Nirkaw
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts

I dont understand you people,why are you so much want to buy it?

I saw alot of previews that sayin the made a btter gameplay and sucks story..

and the multyplayer is broke..no decited servers?!

Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#36 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts

I dont understand you people,why are you so much want to buy it?

I saw alot of previews that sayin the made a btter gameplay and sucks story..

and the multyplayer is broke..no decited servers?!

Nirkaw

Bacause I loved the first and I might have a different opinion about the gameplay and story. It's rare to find a FPS nowadays with exploration, customization and without health regeneration. I'll surely like it. ;)

Avatar image for Lithos_
Lithos_

1017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 Lithos_
Member since 2008 • 1017 Posts

I dont understand you people,why are you so much want to buy it?

I saw alot of previews that sayin the made a btter gameplay and sucks story..

and the multyplayer is broke..no decited servers?!

Nirkaw

Having played the first installment and absolutely loved it like I did, buying this sequel is absolutely mandatory; already pre-ordered on Steam, and got a Bioshock 1 gift to give to someone. Two for the price of one, and with a 10% discount... :P

Oh, BTW: I don't care for MP, I'm a radical SP gamer. In fact, as far as I am concerned the game should have none.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#38 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Ok, bioshock 2 is removing stuff just like mass effect 2 and cod mw2.

No more crafting :cry: I mean come on, it was not great but they could have improved that mechanic and make it much more efficient!

Avatar image for Nirkaw
Nirkaw

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Nirkaw
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts

i dont have any problem with the single,in fact i am sayin te first one have one of the best games story mode.

but in 2..i am not sure they can reboot the succeses..

I am sure that the gameplay will be better,the graphics too as well..but the story? i am not sure.

and the multyplayer...hmm..

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#40 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!
Avatar image for Nirkaw
Nirkaw

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Nirkaw
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts

Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!dakan45

Okay,but most of people going to buy this game for the Multyplayer and i am just try to warn them..that 2k dosent make the MP! only th Single..

you ever saw a single made by 2k and the multy by another one?

You cant say to yourself "if the single good,the multy must be good..."

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
Sounds nice, i might get it.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#43 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!Nirkaw

Okay,but most of people going to buy this game for the Multyplayer and i am just try to warn them..that 2k dosent make the MP! only th Single..

you ever saw a single made by 2k and the multy by another one?

You cant say to yourself "if the single good,the multy must be good..."

Really? From what i know most people are gonna buy the game for sp. Seriously whats with the multiplayer games people? No one plays singleplayer anymore?
Avatar image for Nirkaw
Nirkaw

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Nirkaw
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="Nirkaw"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!dakan45

Okay,but most of people going to buy this game for the Multyplayer and i am just try to warn them..that 2k dosent make the MP! only th Single..

you ever saw a single made by 2k and the multy by another one?

You cant say to yourself "if the single good,the multy must be good..."

Really? From what i know most people are gonna buy the game for sp. Seriously whats with the multiplayer games people? No one plays singleplayer anymore?

i am,but..without multy..the game will dievery closeto his relese.

Avatar image for Lithos_
Lithos_

1017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#45 Lithos_
Member since 2008 • 1017 Posts

i am,but..without multy..the game will dievery closeto his relese.

Nirkaw

I don't get it. Why? Had the first one died for the lack of multiplayer? No, on the exact contrary...

Avatar image for edgewalker16
edgewalker16

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 edgewalker16
Member since 2005 • 2286 Posts
[QUOTE="edgewalker16"][QUOTE="couly"]Loved the first one, this looks to be more of the same, I think it came out too early.dakan45
3 years isn't enough time?

Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?

Don't fix what isn't broken.
Avatar image for edgewalker16
edgewalker16

2286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 edgewalker16
Member since 2005 • 2286 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!Nirkaw

Okay,but most of people going to buy this game for the Multyplayer and i am just try to warn them..that 2k dosent make the MP! only th Single..

you ever saw a single made by 2k and the multy by another one?

You cant say to yourself "if the single good,the multy must be good..."

The multiplayer was developed by the same people that did Counterstrike. I don't think there's anything to worry about.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#48 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="edgewalker16"] 3 years isn't enough time?edgewalker16
Well 3 years is enough time to do "something" but if they have taken more time it could have been more. Eg: as couly said it looks to be more of the same, why the graphics are not visibly improved?

Don't fix what isn't broken.

Nice, they could might as well release the same game while they are at it and ask us for full price!!
Avatar image for Nirkaw
Nirkaw

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Nirkaw
Member since 2009 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="Nirkaw"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Well they add more splicer types, that alone is good for me!edgewalker16

Okay,but most of people going to buy this game for the Multyplayer and i am just try to warn them..that 2k dosent make the MP! only th Single..

you ever saw a single made by 2k and the multy by another one?

You cant say to yourself "if the single good,the multy must be good..."

The multiplayer was developed by the same people that did Counterstrike. I don't think there's anything to worry about.

Sure? beacuse the people that made CS...in valave..or you mean the MOD CS..BTW..cs sucks ass

Avatar image for aura_enchanted
aura_enchanted

7942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#50 aura_enchanted
Member since 2006 • 7942 Posts

my friends the days of companies making really huge leaps and bounds with sequels is long dead.. small improvements should be celebrated really. because those who only make those leaps n bounds are those still behind the rest of the world..

like city interactive