PC vs. Mac, Which one is better? and why?

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bronco777
bronco777

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 bronco777
Member since 2008 • 62 Posts
This is what i'm guessing is that pcs r better for programming and that route and macs r better for garage band etc. correct me if i'm wrong :)
Avatar image for psychoman0056
psychoman0056

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 psychoman0056
Member since 2003 • 47 Posts
build a pc, you get more performance for the money, and then get one of those programs to allow installation of mac osx on it, best of both worlds :D
Avatar image for Penguin_dragon
Penguin_dragon

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Penguin_dragon
Member since 2005 • 1516 Posts
PCs are better for everything, you just gotta know what you need. For example, if you need a gaming PC, you would want to get/make a PC with a good GPU. Macs are only good for people who don't want to learn how to use a PC, but technically, a PC can do ALOT more.
Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts
PC /thread
Avatar image for Infinite-Zr0
Infinite-Zr0

13284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Infinite-Zr0
Member since 2003 • 13284 Posts
If you don't know you need a Mac, then you don't need one.
Avatar image for ISuperGamerI
ISuperGamerI

3292

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 ISuperGamerI
Member since 2006 • 3292 Posts

build a pc, you get more performance for the money, and then get one of those programs to allow installation of mac osx on it, best of both worlds :Dpsychoman0056

Would you mind explaining further about a program that allows you to do that? Thanks.

Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

OP, you brought a knife to a gun fight.

These are PC forums so just about eveyone will tell you that Macs are good at two things; being no good and good for nothing.

Honestly both PCs and Macs have their pros and cons, however, being that these are PC forums you will only hear PC pros and Mac cons.

Don't ask me what the pros and cons are, I realy don't feel like maintaining a flame shield tonight.

Avatar image for PyroPice
PyroPice

443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 PyroPice
Member since 2007 • 443 Posts
most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real option
Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optionPyroPice

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts
yea pay for overpriced under powered hardware to run windows... Isn't the whole point of the almighty mac to use OSX? Don't feel bad I wouldn't want to use OSX either. Just get build your own PC that half the price of a Mac and twice as powerful and dual boot windows and linux.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optiontequilasunriser

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Thats pretty inconvenient, and if the user will primarily run Windows, then there isnt any point in paying the Mac hardware premium.

Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts
[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optionXaosII

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Thats pretty inconvenient, and if the user will primarily run Windows, then there isnt any point in paying the Mac hardware premium.

Inconvenient? Do you even know what Bootcamp is? Lol, and windows would NOT be the primary OS, it would only be used for gaming.

Avatar image for TJ_22_TJ
TJ_22_TJ

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TJ_22_TJ
Member since 2003 • 80 Posts
PC FTW
Avatar image for psychoman0056
psychoman0056

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 psychoman0056
Member since 2003 • 47 Posts

[QUOTE="psychoman0056"]build a pc, you get more performance for the money, and then get one of those programs to allow installation of mac osx on it, best of both worlds :DISuperGamerI

Would you mind explaining further about a program that allows you to do that? Thanks.

google EFI v8 emulator

it fools osx into thinking the special mac chip on the mobo is there, allowing an install

Avatar image for nightwraith40k
nightwraith40k

475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 nightwraith40k
Member since 2008 • 475 Posts

Macs are even more overpriced that retail PC and your money doesn't go as far. Barely any games for it and Mac fanboys get on my nerves (cause they know nothing about computers and think they know everything cause they have a Mac)

PC FTW

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Neither, they both have their own strengths and weaknesses.
Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts

I will give someone the benefit of the doubt if they go to apple.com and show me one computer is worth the money they charge. Oh and dont give me "they have a monitor" Cr@p. I dont care if they have a 100 inch monitor it doesnt justify why most everything else is 2-3 years outdated. For sakes they have a 2400XT in a $1000 dollar computer. They are the worlds best con artist I ever seen. NOW If those pc's were like $200-$500 maby.

Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts

As far as I know macs are more useful from a production standpoint; Visual and audio media production and creation. Ofcourse you can do the same with a pc, but there are certain programs that are only for mac which are very popular. They also seem to be a bit more user friendly than a pc.

FYI: Putting a mac os on a pc is illegal, and not easy to do in the first place.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"][QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optiontequilasunriser

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Thats pretty inconvenient, and if the user will primarily run Windows, then there isnt any point in paying the Mac hardware premium.

Inconvenient? Do you even know what Bootcamp is? Lol, and windows would NOT be the primary OS, it would only be used for gaming.

Im failing to see what is convenient about bootcamp since it requires a restart each time you want to switch.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

As far as I know macs are more useful from a production standpoint; Visual and audio media production and creation. Ofcourse you can do the same with a pc, but there are certain programs that are only for mac which are very popular. They also seem to be a bit more user friendly than a pc.

FYI: Putting a mac os on a pc is illegal, and not easy to do in the first place.muirplayer

Its interesting you say that. Final Cut Pro is a fairly popular vidoe editing tool, but it is developed by Apple. It has nothing to really do with the Mac hardware; just a false exclusitivity because Apple prefers to keep it only on their platform.

I've heard several people make the claims you have about Macs are better for video/audio/graphic design, yet i havent found one preson that would actually provide proof to those claims.

If its just a matter of Final Cut Pro, then i'm failing to see that as a bonus since thats just Apple being cheap. FCP would be just as capable on a Windows machine.

Avatar image for yoyo462001
yoyo462001

7535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 yoyo462001
Member since 2005 • 7535 Posts
Macs these days are basically PC's with the introduction of Intel cpu's, apart from the OS what pice of hardware isn't similar to a normal PC.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
macs are great but way over priced. if they let osx run and any hardware then i'd buy it. pcs tend to run better though and I'm talking about the mac pros. ilustrator and swod happens all the time on macs when doing many things. the os might hardly ever crash but that doesn't mean programs don't
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optiontequilasunriser

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

so why buy a mac for 2-5x the price and run windows?

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

As far as I know macs are more useful from a production standpoint; Visual and audio media production and creation. Ofcourse you can do the same with a pc, but there are certain programs that are only for mac which are very popular. They also seem to be a bit more user friendly than a pc.

FYI: Putting a mac os on a pc is illegal, and not easy to do in the first place.muirplayer

true macs are used for video/audio but once 3d animation is concerned its all pc based

Avatar image for superkoolstud
superkoolstud

2800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 superkoolstud
Member since 2004 • 2800 Posts
Macs are only good for Graphics Design.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="muirplayer"]

As far as I know macs are more useful from a production standpoint; Visual and audio media production and creation. Ofcourse you can do the same with a pc, but there are certain programs that are only for mac which are very popular. They also seem to be a bit more user friendly than a pc.

FYI: Putting a mac os on a pc is illegal, and not easy to do in the first place.XaosII

Its interesting you say that. Final Cut Pro is a fairly popular vidoe editing tool, but it is developed by Apple. It has nothing to really do with the Mac hardware; just a false exclusitivity because Apple prefers to keep it only on their platform.

I've heard several people make the claims you have about Macs are better for video/audio/graphic design, yet i havent found one preson that would actually provide proof to those claims.

If its just a matter of Final Cut Pro, then i'm failing to see that as a bonus since thats just Apple being cheap. FCP would be just as capable on a Windows machine.

exactly, for the extra price of the mac you could buy the adobe complete suit which has everything you will ever need in the creative world and you will still have $$ left over. final cut pro is just like premere pro, and funny how photoshop cs3 opens faster and runs better on a dual core pc than a dual dual core mac pro

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

Macs are only good for Graphics Design.superkoolstud

but illustrator, photshop, dreamweaver, flash are the industry standard and are all on pc and will mostly run better since pc hardware tends to be better

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
Macs are good for laptops where performance isn't usualy the reason you bought it also you want easy interfaces due to the touch pad you're forced to use. PCs are good for gaming and pretty much anything it depends on the software and hardware you choose to what you end up with, the only reason macs make good laptops is 'cause you have so little flexibility with windows laptops that you might as well get one where you know all the software has boptimized for it.
Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts

Yea, final cut pro would be just as capable on a windows machine. That's just the thing though; it would be, but it isn't. Mac keeps it's programs for itself. They use their software to sell their hardware. Suppose I should have said that they're actually better, but used more by for their programs rather than their look or power.

It's not just a claim either, each time I see graphic design or some type of video editing being done in person it's usually on a mac, wether I see it on tv, in online tutorials or whatnot, and the designers that I know myself, use macs for designing. I don't know why they use them, they just do.

Avatar image for achilles614
achilles614

5310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 achilles614
Member since 2005 • 5310 Posts

lawl macs suck pcs pwn macs lawl...come on guys that's what some people sound like...

Macs are alright, but I would only get one for a laptop.

Avatar image for tequilasunriser
tequilasunriser

6379

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 tequilasunriser
Member since 2004 • 6379 Posts

[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"][QUOTE="XaosII"][QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optionXaosII

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Thats pretty inconvenient, and if the user will primarily run Windows, then there isnt any point in paying the Mac hardware premium.

Inconvenient? Do you even know what Bootcamp is? Lol, and windows would NOT be the primary OS, it would only be used for gaming.

Im failing to see what is convenient about bootcamp since it requires a restart each time you want to switch.

Do you plan to switch between the two every minute? Whats so hard about turning your machine off to switch to the gaming OS? You must one lazy sob.

You'd only use it to game and its not like you couldn't use it for anyting else.

You people are so short minded. Obtuse...

[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optionimprezawrx500

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

so why buy a mac for 2-5x the price and run windows?

Its all the little things, have you actually sat down with a Mac and actually got to use all of its features? Sure there is a lot of extra stuff that you don't need but thats what you are paying for Plus only Macs can run their OS (obviously). That emulated Mac crap is exactly that, crap.

Ever see someone build a 4k gaming rig that is pimped out with neon lights that make it look like something out of The Fast and the Furious when they could have spend 3k less for nearly the same performance with a different component set up? I see it here all the time and while some DO chastise those people for over spending, many applaud the rig.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

so why buy a mac for 2-5x the price and run windows?

imprezawrx500
2-5x the price? Oh, I've got to see this. I'll bet you can't show me an Apple computer that is even just twice the price of a comparative PC, let alone three, four, or even five times the price. Remember, comparative. Don't post a bunch of Newegg parts and link me to the iMac, unless you can install all those components inside the monitor.
Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts
pc's are better. you can customize them, the OS isn't crippled, they cost a lot less.
Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

Do you plan to switch between the two every minute? Whats so hard about turning your machine off to switch to the gaming OS? You must one lazy sob.

You'd only use it to game and its not like you couldn't use it for anyting else.

You people are so short minded. Obtuse...

tequilasunriser

You failed to describe what part of Bootcamp was convinient at all. All you did was resort to personal attacks. That does not counter may claim of it being inconvenient. Maybe you can try again.

Its all the little things, have you actually sat down with a Mac and actually got to use all of its features? Sure there is a lot of extra stuff that you don't need but thats what you are paying for Plus only Macs can run their OS (obviously). That emulated Mac crap is exactly that, crap.

Ever see someone build a 4k gaming rig that is pimped out with neon lights that make it look like something out of The Fast and the Furious when they could have spend 3k less for nearly the same performance with a different component set up? I see it here all the time and while some DO chastise those people for over spending, many applaud the rig.

tequilasunriser

Do you make it a point to not actually refute anyone points and just say what you want to say regardless of whatever someone has asked?

How does "all the little things" have anything to do with proving Macs are better than PC, especially after mentioning that macs do, in fact, have extraneous features.

And your second point is irrelevant. How other people frivolously spend their money has no bearing on what makes a Mac better than a PC. If anything all you are proving is that the PC provides a greater range of price points. :?

Avatar image for muirplayer
muirplayer

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 muirplayer
Member since 2004 • 406 Posts

pc's are better. you can customize them, the OS isn't crippled, they cost a lot less.shoeman12

Explain how the mac OS is crippled.

Avatar image for Protoford
Protoford

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Protoford
Member since 2007 • 372 Posts

Buy the one that has the games that you want to play.

It's all about the games.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
I love to make fun of Apple and their fanboys, but there is ignorance here by all the Apple haters. Apple is great because it's a closed environment, it has professional software that works and it wouldn't if it was in the Windows environment. Windows is many years of clutter on top of each other with uninspired software creators. Yes they are overpriced, but you're paying more for Mac OSX, the looks, the name. more than you are for the hardware. It's Linux with a standard.
Avatar image for shoeman12
shoeman12

8744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 shoeman12
Member since 2005 • 8744 Posts

[QUOTE="shoeman12"]pc's are better. you can customize them, the OS isn't crippled, they cost a lot less.muirplayer

Explain how the mac OS is crippled.

can it run many games? can it run 95% of all programs?

Avatar image for xfactor19990
xfactor19990

10917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 xfactor19990
Member since 2004 • 10917 Posts
Mac is like ewwww PC is amazing
Avatar image for McJugga
McJugga

9453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 McJugga
Member since 2007 • 9453 Posts

Ever see someone build a 4k gaming rig that is pimped out with neon lights that make it look like something out of The Fast and the Furious when they could have spend 3k less for nearly the same performance with a different component set up? I see it here all the time and while some DO chastise those people for over spending, many applaud the rig.

tequilasunriser

What does saying some people spend $4000 for a PC prove? They have the option to spend that much, and they also have he option to spend less. With a mac, you don't have the option, you have to spend more.

One more point. The Macs will charge 200 dollars for 2 gigs of ram.

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/9574002/wo/9H1ntt8loHhL2eNpsGS1BsT1EHV/2.?p=0

Avatar image for the_hsoj
the_hsoj

1289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 the_hsoj
Member since 2006 • 1289 Posts

build a pc, you get more performance for the money, and then get one of those programs to allow installation of mac osx on it, best of both worlds :Dpsychoman0056

although I beleive that is illegal and running windows on a mac is not.

Its really about personal prefrence and whaat your going to use the computer for though

Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts
[QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

Ever see someone build a 4k gaming rig that is pimped out with neon lights that make it look like something out of The Fast and the Furious when they could have spend 3k less for nearly the same performance with a different component set up? I see it here all the time and while some DO chastise those people for over spending, many applaud the rig.

McJugga

What does saying some people spend $4000 for a PC prove? They have the option to spend that much, and they also have he option to spend less. With a mac, you don't have the option, you have to spend more.

One more point. The Macs will charge 200 dollars for 2 gigs of ram.

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/AppleStore.woa/9574002/wo/9H1ntt8loHhL2eNpsGS1BsT1EHV/2.?p=0

Their desktops are more expensive then pc dektops. Thought I should point that out. Yes they have a monitor built in but everything else is crippled.
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

Their desktops are more expensive then pc dektops. Thought I should point that out. Yes they have a monitor built in but everything else is crippled.TrooperManaic

The iMac uses laptop components in a desktop monitor. You can't properly compare a desktop PC to an iMac because you're not comparing the same hardware - it's the same reason you can't compare a laptop to a desktop machine. And I really hope you're not stupid enough to try and compare a desktop PC to the Mac Pro.

Yes, some of the hardware is overpriced. But given how easy it is to change out RAM in an iMac, I don't see why anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense wouldn't change the RAM out themself.

I've got a mission for you. Find me a comparable Windows machine to the iMac (ie: Gateway One, Dell XPS One) and see how "overpriced" the iMac is. Make sure you do an accurate comparison now, no undercutting. Have fun!

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"]

so why buy a mac for 2-5x the price and run windows?

RayvinAzn

2-5x the price? Oh, I've got to see this. I'll bet you can't show me an Apple computer that is even just twice the price of a comparative PC, let alone three, four, or even five times the price. Remember, comparative. Don't post a bunch of Newegg parts and link me to the iMac, unless you can install all those components inside the monitor.

well what I mean is way more.

mac book pro base model = $3200nz

dell xps 1530 = $1900nz

they are pretty similar, mac has faster cpu, dell has more ram and hdd

http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/xpsnb_m1530?c=nz&l=en&s=dhs&cs=nzdhs1

http://store.apple.com/0800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/nzstore.woa/91114024/wo/ac1YD2vFDPwI27Jik6GRoVCoKuE/2.?p=0

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

The Dell at stock also has a lower monitor resolution. If you kick them both up about as equal as they can get (2.4GHz processors, 14x9 res screens, Vista Ultimate, 4GB RAM, 250GB hard drives) then the Dell is around $2330NZD, while the Macbook Pro is around $3650NZD. Certainly more expensive (and there are a few features still not exact), but not twice the price.

I wouldn't jump on people about this, but a lot of the same users that will nitpick about a graphic card price down to $10 for price-performance ratios will make blatant exaggerations when the word "Apple" is used in a thread. Yes, their high-end models can be rather pricey, especially once you start adding more Apple components. But they're nowhere near as bad as some users seem to make them out to be.

Avatar image for sammysalsa
sammysalsa

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 sammysalsa
Member since 2004 • 1832 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"][QUOTE="tequilasunriser"]

[QUOTE="PyroPice"]most every game i snot compatible wih mac, so if games are a route you wanna take pcs are your only real optiontequilasunriser

Bootcamp to Windows XP or Vista. Problem solved.

Thats pretty inconvenient, and if the user will primarily run Windows, then there isnt any point in paying the Mac hardware premium.

Inconvenient? Do you even know what Bootcamp is? Lol, and windows would NOT be the primary OS, it would only be used for gaming.

lol how would you even game when at best a standard mac has like a 2600 pro or less

Avatar image for leonhead
leonhead

1524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 leonhead
Member since 2007 • 1524 Posts
For me = PC, its all about gaming :P
Avatar image for SinfulPotato
SinfulPotato

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 SinfulPotato
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts

This is always a stupid argument.

Mac fanboys will never back down, no matter how wrong they are they try to sound right.

And PC fanboys will never us another argument other then macs being overpriced.

While I do think Macs are overpriced... I also think EVERY prbuilt PC is overpriced too.

And once and for all...

Anything mac can do.. PC can do... THE SAME..

Avatar image for rob1101
rob1101

3435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 rob1101
Member since 2004 • 3435 Posts

I love to make fun of Apple and their fanboys, but there is ignorance here by all the Apple haters. Apple is great because it's a closed environment, it has professional software that works and it wouldn't if it was in the Windows environment. Windows is many years of clutter on top of each other with uninspired software creators. Yes they are overpriced, but you're paying more for Mac OSX, the looks, the name. more than you are for the hardware. It's Linux with a standard. X360PS3AMD05

its UNIX not linux. Mac is the complete opposite of what linx, open source initiative, foss, ect... stand for

Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts

[QUOTE="TrooperManaic"]Their desktops are more expensive then pc dektops. Thought I should point that out. Yes they have a monitor built in but everything else is crippled.RayvinAzn

The iMac uses laptop components in a desktop monitor. You can't properly compare a desktop PC to an iMac because you're not comparing the same hardware - it's the same reason you can't compare a laptop to a desktop machine. And I really hope you're not stupid enough to try and compare a desktop PC to the Mac Pro.

Yes, some of the hardware is overpriced. But given how easy it is to change out RAM in an iMac, I don't see why anyone with a reasonable amount of common sense wouldn't change the RAM out themself.

I've got a mission for you. Find me a comparable Windows machine to the iMac (ie: Gateway One, Dell XPS One) and see how "overpriced" the iMac is. Make sure you do an accurate comparison now, no undercutting. Have fun!

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=999990500050001&type=product&id=pcmprd90600050001
This pc is cheaper then macs cheapest imac, and its from best buy "rip off capitol of the world". BTW I know they use laptop parts, that is their major fault right there. If they are too lazy to come up with desktops then they shouldn't make them. My 2 cents. Also its just as easy to change ram in a pc as it is in a mac, you cant compare the mac pro its in a catagory of its own "Server" But if you built one of course it would be cheaper then that mac and most likely better.