Intel released Pentium E6500K which has an unlocked multi to compete against AMD X2 550. Pentium E6500K runs at 2.93Ghz stock with 2MB L2 Cache.
Currently it only has been released in China but will probably release in Europe & US.
New Ocing Champ?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Intel released Pentium E6500K which has an unlocked multi to compete against AMD X2 550. Pentium E6500K runs at 2.93Ghz stock with 2MB L2 Cache.
Currently it only has been released in China but will probably release in Europe & US.
New Ocing Champ?
Nope, will not be released here...
Even though I am guessing...it really doesn't seem likely to sell well with the i5's around the corner.
The Pentium name has been around before with the E21x0's.Bringing back the Pentium name?
swazidoughman
Bringing back the Pentium name?
The Pentium name has been around before with the E21x0's. This is a good upgrade for users looking for some cheap bang for their buck (wouldn't recommend building a new system around this though). I wonder if it'll work with the old 945 chipset, I read it only had a FSB of 1066.Bringing back the Pentium name?
The Pentium name has been around before with the E21x0's. This is a good upgrade for users looking for some cheap bang for their buck (wouldn't recommend building a new system around this though). I wonder if it'll work with the old 945 chipset, I read it only had a FSB of 1066. So is it socket 775 then?[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] The Pentium name has been around before with the E21x0's.Daytona_178This is a good upgrade for users looking for some cheap bang for their buck (wouldn't recommend building a new system around this though). I wonder if it'll work with the old 945 chipset, I read it only had a FSB of 1066. So is it socket 775 then? Should be.
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] This is a good upgrade for users looking for some cheap bang for their buck (wouldn't recommend building a new system around this though). I wonder if it'll work with the old 945 chipset, I read it only had a FSB of 1066.MarfooSo is it socket 775 then? Should be. Ugh, Intel is really starting to annoy me with their "easy to understand" naming scheme, also all the different sockets they will be supporting is a complete Joke!
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] So is it socket 775 then?Daytona_178Should be. Ugh, Intel is really starting to annoy me with their "easy to understand" naming scheme, also all the different sockets they will be supporting is a complete Joke! No kidding, I bet if they hired any one of us on this forum familiar with their lineup we could come up with something better. Although the EXXX QXXXX number scheme wasn't too bad with Core 2, but now they're inconsistent making an E6XXX a Pentium, and having 2 new sockets on top of that, just ridiculous. They must have the same marketing division Nvidia has.
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] Should be.MarfooUgh, Intel is really starting to annoy me with their "easy to understand" naming scheme, also all the different sockets they will be supporting is a complete Joke! No kidding, I bet if they hired any one of us on this forum familiar with their lineup we could come up with something better. Although the EXXX QXXXX number scheme wasn't too bad with Core 2, but now they're inconsistent making an E6XXX a Pentium, and having 2 new sockets on top of that, just ridiculous. They must have the same marketing division Nvidia has. And now we have to juggle the i5 name on 2 different sockets, 775 & 1156....wtf?
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] Ugh, Intel is really starting to annoy me with their "easy to understand" naming scheme, also all the different sockets they will be supporting is a complete Joke!Daytona_178No kidding, I bet if they hired any one of us on this forum familiar with their lineup we could come up with something better. Although the EXXX QXXXX number scheme wasn't too bad with Core 2, but now they're inconsistent making an E6XXX a Pentium, and having 2 new sockets on top of that, just ridiculous. They must have the same marketing division Nvidia has. And now we have to juggle the i5 name on 2 different sockets, 775 & 1156....wtf? Wait, are they recycling Wolfdale and Yorkfield on the i5 name, or are they whole new dies on 755?
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] No kidding, I bet if they hired any one of us on this forum familiar with their lineup we could come up with something better. Although the EXXX QXXXX number scheme wasn't too bad with Core 2, but now they're inconsistent making an E6XXX a Pentium, and having 2 new sockets on top of that, just ridiculous. They must have the same marketing division Nvidia has.MarfooAnd now we have to juggle the i5 name on 2 different sockets, 775 & 1156....wtf? Wait, are they recycling Wolfdale and Yorkfield on the i5 name, or are they whole new dies on 755? From what i recall they will be shoehorning them both into the i5 category.
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] And now we have to juggle the i5 name on 2 different sockets, 775 & 1156....wtf?Daytona_178Wait, are they recycling Wolfdale and Yorkfield on the i5 name, or are they whole new dies on 755? From what i recall they will be shoehorning them both into the i5 category. Wow that's terrible. You'd think Intel would do surveys of what people thought of their naming scheme. Just because they think it's a good idea doesn't mean it is. They need to take a page from ATI (not AMD, lol they had quite a shuffle with socket 939, 940, AM2, AM2+, that confused a lot of people).
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] Wait, are they recycling Wolfdale and Yorkfield on the i5 name, or are they whole new dies on 755?MarfooFrom what i recall they will be shoehorning them both into the i5 category. Wow that's terrible. You'd think Intel would do surveys of what people thought of their naming scheme. Just because they think it's a good idea doesn't mean it is. They need to take a page from ATI (not AMD, lol they had quite a shuffle with socket 939, 940, AM2, AM2+, that confused a lot of people). Exactly! Just a rock solid method that everyone can understand and most importantly they carry it over the generations so that its ****'ing consistent! I think you and me should storm Intel and sort their damn marketing team out...hihihi
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] From what i recall they will be shoehorning them both into the i5 category.Daytona_178Wow that's terrible. You'd think Intel would do surveys of what people thought of their naming scheme. Just because they think it's a good idea doesn't mean it is. They need to take a page from ATI (not AMD, lol they had quite a shuffle with socket 939, 940, AM2, AM2+, that confused a lot of people). Exactly! Just a rock solid method that everyone can understand and most importantly they carry it over the generations so that its ****'ing consistent! I think you and me should storm Intel and sort their damn marketing team out...hihihi Lol, yeah Nvidia marketing HQ too.
[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] Wow that's terrible. You'd think Intel would do surveys of what people thought of their naming scheme. Just because they think it's a good idea doesn't mean it is. They need to take a page from ATI (not AMD, lol they had quite a shuffle with socket 939, 940, AM2, AM2+, that confused a lot of people).MarfooExactly! Just a rock solid method that everyone can understand and most importantly they carry it over the generations so that its ****'ing consistent! I think you and me should storm Intel and sort their damn marketing team out...hihihi Lol, yeah Nvidia marketing HQ too. Good point.
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="Daytona_178"] And now we have to juggle the i5 name on 2 different sockets, 775 & 1156....wtf?Daytona_178Wait, are they recycling Wolfdale and Yorkfield on the i5 name, or are they whole new dies on 755? From what i recall they will be shoehorning them both into the i5 category. god dam, nvida's stupid re branding is now catching on in the cpu world, now you really have to read every little thing about chips before you buy. gt240 sounds better than a 8800gt but it's the god dam same thing. so the i5 is basically core 2s re branded?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment