Pleasantly surprised MW2 Online isn't the poo everyone is making it out to be

  • 72 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Plague27
Plague27

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Plague27
Member since 2005 • 501 Posts
Lol. The heat in this thread is making my sperm die. I didn't tell people to shut up and buy it. I told them that its retarded and silly to bash a game simply because it lacks features, when the point of the game is to play it. Better analogy: You drove a WRX, you loved that WRX, they came out with a new WRX. They announced that the new WRX would have an un-tunable engine with proprietary parts that would make it so you couldn't put a bunch of aftermarket crap in it that most people who buy a WRX wouldn't want anyway. Then, a bunch of angry ex-WRX owners boycott the new WRX because it lacks stuff they *claim* is the point of it in the first place. Really though, it purpose is to satisfy a large market of people who want to drive fast and they want to make more money doing it, and people will still buy it. It is still a WRX, it still drives fast, it just isn't what they had built up in their mind. Yes. I still stand by that everyone is being little spoiled brats. The game is better than Bad Company 2 will be. Did anyone even play BC1? Did they notice how incredibly mediocre it was? Why in the hell is everyone toting a game made by EA? The crown jewel of PC consumer anal rape is being championed as it's savior with a title franchise that is so ridiculously hashed, mashed, and gimmicked that its life span was all of three months. A month from now we will all be playing MW2 and everyone will be happy, and 32 person DLC maps will be released, and probably in house dedicated servers will be supported, and then 3rd party, and then everyone will forget how utterly ****ing retarded they were. I bet you guys are the same people who thought Steam was going to be the end of the world.
Avatar image for PublicNuisance
PublicNuisance

4582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 PublicNuisance
Member since 2009 • 4582 Posts

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"] Shall I continue ?

dakan45

No thanks this is getting random and extremely offtopic. Its funny how people say "nah ill by bad company 2 instead" or something.

Well i dont like vehicles in fps so i wont be playing any mp fps with vehicles,

In Battlefield 2 you could find servers which locked vehicles and therefore was strictly an infantry match. This was possible because of dedicated servers where the host could choose the match settings very freely, something you couldn't do in MW2 I might add.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
[QUOTE="Plague27"]Lol. The heat in this thread is making my sperm die. I didn't tell people to shut up and buy it. I told them that its retarded and silly to bash a game simply because it lacks features, when the point of the game is to play it. Better analogy: You drove a WRX, you loved that WRX, they came out with a new WRX. They announced that the new WRX would have an un-tunable engine with proprietary parts that would make it so you couldn't put a bunch of aftermarket crap in it that most people who buy a WRX wouldn't want anyway. Then, a bunch of angry ex-WRX owners boycott the new WRX because it lacks stuff they *claim* is the point of it in the first place. Really though, it purpose is to satisfy a large market of people who want to drive fast and they want to make more money doing it, and people will still buy it. It is still a WRX, it still drives fast, it just isn't what they had built up in their mind. Yes. I still stand by that everyone is being little spoiled brats. The game is better than Bad Company 2 will be. Did anyone even play BC1? Did they notice how incredibly mediocre it was? Why in the hell is everyone toting a game made by EA? The crown jewel of PC consumer anal rape is being championed as it's savior with a title franchise that is so ridiculously hashed, mashed, and gimmicked that its life span was all of three months. A month from now we will all be playing MW2 and everyone will be happy, and 32 person DLC maps will be released, and probably in house dedicated servers will be supported, and then 3rd party, and then everyone will forget how utterly ****ing retarded they were. I bet you guys are the same people who thought Steam was going to be the end of the world.

I would agree that everyone is acting like a spoil little brat if the game was free, but alas it is not.
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#54 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
there's a reason people play on console sounds like the console experience would be better for you. for me though i thoroughly enjoy the pc gaming experience with dedicated servers, large player counts,custom maps and mods. i really hope this is not a trend that follows in other games.
Avatar image for Plague27
Plague27

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Plague27
Member since 2005 • 501 Posts
If the trend ends up being games that actually get me interested in gaming and keep me up all hours of the night for the first time in years, then yes. I don't care how crippling it is compared to what I was used to. If I enjoy playing it, I think it is money well spent.
Avatar image for djmillard2
djmillard2

1372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 djmillard2
Member since 2005 • 1372 Posts

No Dedicated Servers = a lot of people pissed. Thats the only reason. It is not a bad game by any means it just gets bashed for that reason alone.

ASRCSR
you are ignorant and are making me rage
Avatar image for k0r3aN_pR1d3
k0r3aN_pR1d3

2148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 k0r3aN_pR1d3
Member since 2005 • 2148 Posts
[QUOTE="Plague27"]Lol. The heat in this thread is making my sperm die. I didn't tell people to shut up and buy it. I told them that its retarded and silly to bash a game simply because it lacks features, when the point of the game is to play it. Better analogy: You drove a WRX, you loved that WRX, they came out with a new WRX. They announced that the new WRX would have an un-tunable engine with proprietary parts that would make it so you couldn't put a bunch of aftermarket crap in it that most people who buy a WRX wouldn't want anyway. Then, a bunch of angry ex-WRX owners boycott the new WRX because it lacks stuff they *claim* is the point of it in the first place. Really though, it purpose is to satisfy a large market of people who want to drive fast and they want to make more money doing it, and people will still buy it. It is still a WRX, it still drives fast, it just isn't what they had built up in their mind. Yes. I still stand by that everyone is being little spoiled brats. The game is better than Bad Company 2 will be. Did anyone even play BC1? Did they notice how incredibly mediocre it was? Why in the hell is everyone toting a game made by EA? The crown jewel of PC consumer anal rape is being championed as it's savior with a title franchise that is so ridiculously hashed, mashed, and gimmicked that its life span was all of three months. A month from now we will all be playing MW2 and everyone will be happy, and 32 person DLC maps will be released, and probably in house dedicated servers will be supported, and then 3rd party, and then everyone will forget how utterly ****ing retarded they were. I bet you guys are the same people who thought Steam was going to be the end of the world.

Sure, enjoy your $10 DLC. Sure, enjoy the numerous amount of hackers who plague MP now. Sure, enjoy Infinity Ward's mute response to the thousands of complaints they have released. Sure, enjoy how Infinity Ward's CSR doesn't respond and communicate with the community. Not everyone has $60 flowing out of their pockets like you to guy buy a game with less features just because you are hooked to it. A smart consumer is one who shops with his mind, not with his heart. In response to your WRX comment, such things are avoided when Subaru listens to consumer needs and provides for them. A good company is not one that goes hush hush and suddenly brings a list of new changes without warning. A good company actively takes data, studies it, takes polls, sees market trends, quietly working on their product while releasing updates. And in the car world, these updates are called prototypes and auto shows and previews by car sites. Infinity Ward hasn't done a single one of the above. The IWnet plan crudely came out from a Twitter feed and the 9v9 multiplayer came from a Best Buy transcript. Hardly any warning, and less than a month before release. I guess you can like whatever floats your boat, but I prefer spending my money on products that come from companies and people who have some decency and willing to participate instead of giving the cold shoulder and sending out data via Best Buy transcripts. And I doubt that they will bring in such a drastic update as dedicated servers. If they did, 402 would have given word by now to calm the fires going on.
Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
If the trend ends up being games that actually get me interested in gaming and keep me up all hours of the night for the first time in years, then yes. I don't care how crippling it is compared to what I was used to. If I enjoy playing it, I think it is money well spent. Plague27
Since traditional PC gaming doesn't interest you but a direct console port does, it sounds to me like you would be better off with a console. There is nothing wrong with that -- consoles are all about ease of use and convenience. PCs, however, take work. You need to update drivers, keep your OS up to date, know how to problem solve, and find your own game server. The PC is all about power, both hardware and customizability (is that a word?). It's about being able to tweak to your hearts content, and should be used by those who enjoy tweaking just as much as gaming (well, the tweaking might be more important). People who build PCs as a hobby do not want dumbed down games. If anything, they want more complicated.
Avatar image for blade55555
blade55555

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 blade55555
Member since 2005 • 1116 Posts
[QUOTE="Plague27"]Lol. The heat in this thread is making my sperm die. I didn't tell people to shut up and buy it. I told them that its retarded and silly to bash a game simply because it lacks features, when the point of the game is to play it. Better analogy: You drove a WRX, you loved that WRX, they came out with a new WRX. They announced that the new WRX would have an un-tunable engine with proprietary parts that would make it so you couldn't put a bunch of aftermarket crap in it that most people who buy a WRX wouldn't want anyway. Then, a bunch of angry ex-WRX owners boycott the new WRX because it lacks stuff they *claim* is the point of it in the first place. Really though, it purpose is to satisfy a large market of people who want to drive fast and they want to make more money doing it, and people will still buy it. It is still a WRX, it still drives fast, it just isn't what they had built up in their mind. Yes. I still stand by that everyone is being little spoiled brats. The game is better than Bad Company 2 will be. Did anyone even play BC1? Did they notice how incredibly mediocre it was? Why in the hell is everyone toting a game made by EA? The crown jewel of PC consumer anal rape is being championed as it's savior with a title franchise that is so ridiculously hashed, mashed, and gimmicked that its life span was all of three months. A month from now we will all be playing MW2 and everyone will be happy, and 32 person DLC maps will be released, and probably in house dedicated servers will be supported, and then 3rd party, and then everyone will forget how utterly ****ing retarded they were. I bet you guys are the same people who thought Steam was going to be the end of the world.

You seam like a spoiled little brat to me tbh. And sorry any battlefield game > mw2. Stop being so ignorant -_-.
Avatar image for Penguin_dragon
Penguin_dragon

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#61 Penguin_dragon
Member since 2005 • 1516 Posts

And the most stupidest post of the day goes too...

I told them that its retarded and silly to bash a game simply because it lacks features.Plague27

Predicting tommorrows quote:

Hey let's all go buy "Big Rigs". Sure it lacks some features, but it's a great game once you get past all it's downfalls!Plague27

Avatar image for clixshper
clixshper

545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 clixshper
Member since 2005 • 545 Posts

I had a little laugh about this. I just got the game because im bored as and well needed something to bum around for abit inbetween Borderlands and Dragonage lol.

Source: Digg.com

I laughed

Avatar image for Penguin_dragon
Penguin_dragon

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 Penguin_dragon
Member since 2005 • 1516 Posts
^ Funny, but taken completely out of context. There's a total of 1500 people in the boycott group. Around 500 people were online. About 50 players in that page. Around 15 are playing MW2. This in no way, shape, or form, makes the boycott a failure by any means. All that it demonstrates is that there's a small amount of idiots who don't know how to drop out of group. Of course, I would expect no less from the people who are playing MW2.
Avatar image for Swiftstrike5
Swiftstrike5

6950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#64 Swiftstrike5
Member since 2005 • 6950 Posts
[QUOTE="Penguin_dragon"]^ Funny, but taken completely out of context. There's a total of 1500 people in the boycott group. Around 500 people were online. About 50 players in that page. Around 15 are playing MW2. This in no way, shape, or form, makes the boycott a failure by any means. All that it demonstrates is that there's a small amount of idiots who don't know how to drop out of group. Of course, I would expect no less from the people who are playing MW2.

People who purchased MW2 and weren't part of the boycott joined the group anyways to piss them off.
Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#65 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
If you hate server browsers and other PC features you should just quit PC gaming and buy a console. I have no interest in trying my luck with the game unless there's a demo. MW2 sets a bad precedent, it's more expensive and has less, actually no PC specific features at all, I don't understand any PC gamer who supports it.
Avatar image for psychobrew
psychobrew

8888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#66 psychobrew
Member since 2008 • 8888 Posts
If you hate server browsers and other PC features you should just quit PC gaming and buy a console. I have no interest in trying my luck with the game unless there's a demo. MW2 sets a bad precedent, it's more expensive and has less, actually no PC specific features at all, I don't understand any PC gamer who supports it.ManicAce
They aren't PC gamers. They are console gamers that want to think they are enlightened.
Avatar image for Plague27
Plague27

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Plague27
Member since 2005 • 501 Posts
I don't know about me being destined for consoles. I have a PS3 but find it merely okay as a system. The 360 is pretty boring and the Wii is.... well. It may as well not exist. I have been keeping my rig up to date since about 1995. In that time, I think I have played everything. My favorite game I have right now is ARMA2. It may not be OFP, but it tries in all the right ways. Is it complex? Yes. Does it appeal to PC gamer's on the level of infinite possibilities? Yes. Did it sell? No. So then I ask, how much longer will the series be around? The most complex games ever to hit the pc were all of my favorite space sims- Freespace, independence war, and the X series. What has happened to the space genre? It died. My true love is the deep and satisfying experiences that have been the hallmark of the PC platform for ages (although Grim Fandango wasn't complex and still seems to be adored by most of us). However, just because a game doesn't fit in to the common mold, it doesn't mean I won't touch it. Whether that means features, content, or gameplay- I will try anything. Take, for instance, shattered horizon. It lacks a TON of content and is very, very basic. Just like modern warfare 2, however, it delivers incredibly engaging gameplay that is unique to its own title and both fun and fulfilling. I seriously think everyone is just finding a title to sacrifice and it happens to be MW2. There is no rage like a nerd rage and game developers know that gamers cry the loudest and still play their games. All I have been saying since the beginning was that the game is excellent- despite its seemingly endless platform shortfalls. Yet, when you play it, you don't notice any of it and enjoy the game on its own merit. So, without further ado, I am going to hit up some more MW2 multiplayer before I settle down with Stalker Shadow of Oblivion for the rest of the day.
Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts

If you hate server browsers and other PC features you should just quit PC gaming and buy a console. I have no interest in trying my luck with the game unless there's a demo. MW2 sets a bad precedent, it's more expensive and has less, actually no PC specific features at all, I don't understand any PC gamer who supports it.ManicAce

They are usually multi platform players. I cant get my head around any long time PC gamer disliking server browsers. Community and mod support are the reason games stick around so long on the PC.

Avatar image for TerroRizing
TerroRizing

3210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 TerroRizing
Member since 2007 • 3210 Posts

[QUOTE="Plague27"] 9v9 is a large group. IPublicNuisance

Yeah it is so freaking large. 32v32 or 75v75 has nothing on 9x9.

75 vs 75 in cod? madness!
Avatar image for TerroRizing
TerroRizing

3210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 TerroRizing
Member since 2007 • 3210 Posts
[QUOTE="ManicAce"]If you hate server browsers and other PC features you should just quit PC gaming and buy a console. I have no interest in trying my luck with the game unless there's a demo. MW2 sets a bad precedent, it's more expensive and has less, actually no PC specific features at all, I don't understand any PC gamer who supports it.psychobrew
They aren't PC gamers. They are console gamers that want to think they are enlightened.

Some ppl like some console features... cod is still best played on a pc period.
Avatar image for TerroRizing
TerroRizing

3210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 TerroRizing
Member since 2007 • 3210 Posts
I don't know about me being destined for consoles. I have a PS3 but find it merely okay as a system. The 360 is pretty boring and the Wii is.... well. It may as well not exist. I have been keeping my rig up to date since about 1995. In that time, I think I have played everything. My favorite game I have right now is ARMA2. It may not be OFP, but it tries in all the right ways. Is it complex? Yes. Does it appeal to PC gamer's on the level of infinite possibilities? Yes. Did it sell? No. So then I ask, how much longer will the series be around? The most complex games ever to hit the pc were all of my favorite space sims- Freespace, independence war, and the X series. What has happened to the space genre? It died. My true love is the deep and satisfying experiences that have been the hallmark of the PC platform for ages (although Grim Fandango wasn't complex and still seems to be adored by most of us). However, just because a game doesn't fit in to the common mold, it doesn't mean I won't touch it. Whether that means features, content, or gameplay- I will try anything. Take, for instance, shattered horizon. It lacks a TON of content and is very, very basic. Just like modern warfare 2, however, it delivers incredibly engaging gameplay that is unique to its own title and both fun and fulfilling. I seriously think everyone is just finding a title to sacrifice and it happens to be MW2. There is no rage like a nerd rage and game developers know that gamers cry the loudest and still play their games. All I have been saying since the beginning was that the game is excellent- despite its seemingly endless platform shortfalls. Yet, when you play it, you don't notice any of it and enjoy the game on its own merit. So, without further ado, I am going to hit up some more MW2 multiplayer before I settle down with Stalker Shadow of Oblivion for the rest of the day.Plague27
How dfo you know arma 2 didnt sell? It seems like it has a healthy community to me.
Avatar image for digitalman42
digitalman42

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 digitalman42
Member since 2007 • 888 Posts

I hear theres alot more cheaters on the PC they play with cheats and hacks, vs the ps3 and 360 ver is this true??? because I would rather get it for pc due to the better graphics, but I dont want to if it's full of cheaters. Can anyone give me anymore info on this??