Post your System specs and BF3 BETA performance

[QUOTE="theshadowhunter"]Yeah I'm sure that they will optimize it better, my friend has a laptop that dips down to 30fps and he has a 6990 and a 2nd gen i7 in it (6990 is like a 6950 desktop card) you might be able to overclock your cpu more if you think its that, It might be, I had my old 1090t run at 4.15ghz with 3ghz NB (think it was at 1.425v)Elann2008

I have between 70-80 fps with ups and downs...lowest i saw was 50..

Iam running the game @1920x1080 everything on "Ultra" no AA

[QUOTE="blangenakker"]meh, everything on low, resolution 1024x768. probably get between 10-15 FPS. specs are in sigFelipeInside

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="blangenakker"]meh, everything on low, resolution 1024x768. probably get between 10-15 FPS. specs are in sigblangenakker

I get around 60-70 fps on metro with dips into 50's thats on high since ultra doesn't work

60 fps on caspin

Everything but shadows and textures on High, those on medium, cannot raise shadows for some reason... Low post process AA and no msaa, I've not fiddled with the settings since before I updated my drivers, which was a huge boost in fps, 30 on 11.8 and 60-85 on 11.9 @ ~1700x900 (windowed)

Hd 5850, i7920, 6gb ram.

Resolution: 1366x768.

All settings: High

Anti-Aliasing: None

Antistropic-Filtering: NA

Motion Blur: Set to off but is clearly enabled.

SSAO Disabled

Frames Per Second: 50-60.

Processor: AMD Quad Core Black Edition 3.3GHz

Memory 8GB DDR3 1600mhz.

Graphics: ATI HD6770 1GB Video Memory OC'd to 900/1200 (HUGE improvment, when from 40-45 FPS to 50 - 60 after bump, card runs stable at 55c highest temp)

Operating System: Windows 7 64-bit.


Not bad really for the lower end card.

1920x1080, Ultra settings 4xAA,

Lowest was 43 FPS, averaging in the upper 60s/lower 70s, tons of screen tearing though.

Running C2Q Q9550, at 3,8

4gb ddr2 ram

GTX580 running at 860/2100

Windows 7 Ultimate 64

This game has stopped me ditching my Phenom X6 for now at least. I'm so glad that the beta came out this week as I was going to upgrade it in the very near future. Just waiting for Bulldozer so I can see what's happening.

My cpu is a 1055t @ 3.6ghz and a gtx 580. Two of the cpu cores was approx 80% with the other four at approx 50%. This is the highest cpu usage I have seen so far. Also the weather here in the UK is very warm at the moment so my temps on the cpu was 57c. I have never seen it that high before.

I was going to swap the Coolermaster V8 for a Corsair H100 or Noctua D14 but I can't decide.

On the Metro map, my fps was averaging 47 with ultra setting and 2msaa at 1080p. Inside the tunnel I was averaging 57 sometimes 61.

On the Caspian border I was averaging 45-57. Overall I was very pleased with my setup.

Caspian border makes me want to spend some more money on upgrades, it's that good.

Intel i7 930 @ 2.8ghz
6 gigs DDR3 1333 RAM
EVGA GTX 470 1.2 gb at stock speeds
Windows 7 64 bit
Slow ass hardrive.

I get about 30-40 frames on Metro outside and about 40-60 inside. I got 40+ at all times at Caspian Border. Caspian Border looks 100x better than Operation Metro.

1080p, specs in sig, medium settings with 2xAA and 16xAF.

30-45 outside on metro, but drops to like 25 with the fire effects underground.

I have a GTX 570, Phenom 2 quad at 3.5gzh and 4 gigs of ram. So far at 1920x1080 default settings (ultra which is apparently actually high) and AA/AF I haven't seen any less than 32fps. Its usually in the high 30s to 40s. In doors its constantly 50+.

This makes me wonder that on big maps and ultra I'll struggle to get 30fps :( Might have to tone down the res and AA. Depends on how big of a difference ultra is.