[QUOTE="JohnF111"] I understand what you are saying but you can't seem to see past the fact they brought the game to the 21st centuray, I wish it did have a single player option even if it was a market place controled by scripted and terrible AI... I do want single player but man you really can't expect a billion dollar company to keep the game stuck in 2003, everything is cloud this and cloud that so it's a huge step forward(or was supposed to be) for Sim City, maybe the next game will have single player thanks to the terrible launch of this one.MirkoS77
I don't mean to hijack this thread but feel the need to respond to this.
What they are doing is not bringing this game into the 21st century. Â If anything, what is happening is a regression and de-evolution in gaming; a loss of rights, features, and freedoms. Â If cloud gaming is the future, then it needs to be better done than what it is now. Â This is how I see it:
Before:
- Freedom to buy initially and play it anytime and anyplace you wanted without the Internet.
- Local HDD saves.
- Being able to reinstall and play ten or twenty years from now.
- Being able to resell.
Now:
- Games that are designed from the ground up to be multiplayer experiences. Â Sure, you can make a private game but by its inherent design it feels enforced to play with others, often compromising the "singleplayer" mode to shoehorn someone into playing with others.
- Cloud saves, meaning not able to load previous saves to experiment or fix something if a mistake is made.
- Servers inevitably taken down for EA to be able to force people to keep buying their new versions over and over again. Â I think it largely grates on EA's nerves that people are still playing Simcity 4. Â They want to trasition to a "service" ASAP so in the future people will no longer have this freedom, and from what I'm seeing from all these buying they'll have no trouble.Â
Personally I hate the multiplayer centric focus. Â Many want to chill out with their own city and not have to worry about dealing with a rude neighbor or having to worry about starting another village to maintain infrastructure that is not possible in one's own city due to it's limited scope. Â There should be a single player mode, as all of the multiplayer crap could be completely separate if one wishes to go that route. Â This whole social aspect is nothing more than a mask for DRM anyway.
I will always be labeled entitled for feeling this way. Â Losing rights, complain, BAM you're entitled. Â The way I see it, entitlement by its very definition demands more. Â I'm not demanding more, what I am demanding is not to be given less than what has been offered in the past, which is what is happening. Â If an innocent person was thrown in a cell whereas before they were free, and they then protested, is that entitlement? Â I don't think so. Â We're rapidly losing rights and features, it's as clear as day. Â Wanting those back and to maintain those is not entitlement, but apparently it is to people who don't mind those rights they had previously to be continually stripped away.
I would be PERFECTLY fine with always online DRM and cloud gaming if it was done right. Â If they could make a game work as they did 10-15 years ago, the same structure (single and multiplayer completely removed from one another), with local saves and guarantee to me that server dropouts would be very, very minimal, I could bite the bullet. Â I have a steady connection, and if this is the way gaming is headed then I have no choice. Â But the game has to be indiscernible from the past when none of this existed. Â It has to be so flawless that I don't even know I'm connected to the net, just like when I watch Satellite TV it never even enters my mind what's going on up there in space.
If they can get it to that point and also start treating people with respect instead of like criminals, while keeping the DLC somewhat reasonable, then I'm open arms. Â But what you're advocating is not progression, at least not at this point.
All I heard reading that was "It's broken and I don't like the way they created it". We know this already, way to draw it out into a multiple paragraph post. Also in the "Before" section you never really were allowed to resell the game, it is against the EULA and TOS and TOU of every game on Earth to resell or let someone else play the game, the only difference in now there is a way to enforce that restriction and not have a 300 year old law interfere with it. Video Games ARE a service and always have been, you only buy a license to use the game, you do not own the game itself.
Log in to comment