[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="DanielDust"]Try with Red Alert 3. From what I remember RA 1 got me into RTSs when I was about the same age but that one's way too old and Red Alert 3 is more appealing for kids and people that don't take their games extremely "seriously".DanielDust
RA3 is garbage; if youre going to get your son started on RTSs, get him started on the classics. I recommend Starcraft, Age of Empires, and the entire Command and Conquer series (C&C: THe First Decade is an excellent deal)
What exactly is garbage about it? other than the "not so serious" theme and story?oh, nothing...i was exagerating. Truth be told I enjoyed RA3 a little bit.
it just, idunno...didnt feel like a C&C game. Ive loved every C&C game up until Red Alert 3. First, they got rid of the whole idea of harvesting and ore fields.
Second, the "not so serious" tone of the game came off like the franchise was making fun of itself. Corny videos are a hallmark of the C&C series, but you always cared what happened...until RA3. In RA3 it just comes off as stupid and, to fans like myself, a bit insulting.
Third, I just feel it is wrong to recommend the worst installment in the franchise to a budding RTS gamer. No, I dont think you need to go back and play the first C&C game, but Red Alert 2 and C&C 3 are miles above Red Alert 3 imo, and the original Red Alert is a timeless classic.
Red Alert 3 isnt a horrible game, I just think there are a lot better and more appealing games for achild to play. I understand why you recommended it; it is a corny, cartoonish, light-hearted game full of amusing stereotypes of Russians and Japanese a child might find entertaining.
Log in to comment