Red Orchestra or Call of Duty 2?

Ok, so I've played both these games before and Loved them. I just can't decide between one or the other (for now). So I was wondering which is better by a democratic vote. PLease leave feedback as to why you chose what you chose! If you may have guessed, I am a History buff and love realism, but they both are so darn realistic!!!

Heres the "Rig", not much but it gets the job done :)

2.4Ghz AMD Athlon 64 3400+

1GB RAM

256mb Nvidia 7600 GS

Thanks!

COD2 isnt really that realistic, not on the level of COD1, and certainly not on the level of Red Orchestra.

That said I like both of them, but they are to different to be compared like this. 

I could never get into the CoD games, becuase the action in single-player was just so heavily scripted and the missions were very linear. It honestly felt more like I was just watching a movie instead of actually controlling a character in a game. The multiplayer was good, but I always thought that Day of Defeat and Red Orchestra were better. But outside of the iron sights in CoD, its not a very realistic game.

But I do love Red Orchestra. I play it pretty regularly, and the realism of it is definatly a big draw for me. There's projectile drop, realistic damage (you can shoot the guns out of people's hands, if you're a lucky enough shot), and the weapon and vehicle models are as accurate as they come. Map selection is great, with very wide open and large rural maps, but also some great smaller urban and trench maps.

I guess it's already decided. RO wins. :)

COD2 has a nice singleplayer but that will only last for like 10 hours. RO has an awesome multiplayer which will last MUCH longer. RO wins because it's realistic. The only realistic thing in COD2 is the fact that there are humanoids called Allies and Axis that try to kill each other... Yet, they are not real humans. RO is probably the most realistic game at the moment. It has solid gameplay and there are even vehicles. Plus what everyone else has already said. So RO wins.