I am looking to buy new speakers, what should I look for in the specs?
Like, is a Frequency Response of 35Hz - 20kHz better then 45Hz - 20kHz?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I am looking to buy new speakers, what should I look for in the specs?
Like, is a Frequency Response of 35Hz - 20kHz better then 45Hz - 20kHz?
Duh look for reviews.What is your budget and what configuration do you want like 2.1 or 5.1?Spybot_9
Either would be good, good speakers for less then $120. I was looking at the e2300s. I currently have x-530s.
True, I have the z-2300s they are awesome for 2.1. I wouldn't recommend getting a 5.1 unless you can actually put them in 5.1 surround placement, as the 2.1s will offer more power for virtually the same effect.MarfooHows the sound quality compared to X-530s and x-540s?
The X-530's and X-540's aren't meant to compete with the Z-series in quality. Although it's 5.1, the X-530's and X-540's only have 70W rated power, whereas with the Z-2300's you have 200W rated power with a 400W peak. More power for speakers usually means bigger drivers, and big drivers usually translate to better sound. Not to mention the Z-2300's are THX certified, if that means anything to you. The Z-2300's also have a better frequency response.
The 5.1 variant of in the Z-series is the Z-5500, it's 3 times the price, but it would the equal experience in a 5.1 arrangement. I would recommend the X-530's and X-540's if you want the surround experience and can place them accordingly, otherwise you'll get much more power and quality from the Z-2300 in a 2.1 config.
I currently own X-530's, would it be worth upgrading to Z-2300s?The X-530's and X-540's aren't meant to compete with the Z-series in quality. Although it's 5.1, the X-530's and X-540's only have 70W rated power, whereas with the Z-2300's you have 200W rated power with a 400W peak. More power for speakers usually means bigger drivers, and big drivers usually translate to better sound. Not to mention the Z-2300's are THX certified, if that means anything to you. The Z-2300's also have a better frequency response.
The 5.1 variant of in the Z-series is the Z-5500, it's 3 times the price, but it would the equal experience in a 5.1 arrangement. I would recommend the X-530's and X-540's if you want the surround experience and can place them accordingly, otherwise you'll get much more power and quality from the Z-2300 in a 2.1 config.
Marfoo
[QUOTE="Marfoo"]I currently own X-530's, would it be worth upgrading to Z-2300s?The X-530's and X-540's aren't meant to compete with the Z-series in quality. Although it's 5.1, the X-530's and X-540's only have 70W rated power, whereas with the Z-2300's you have 200W rated power with a 400W peak. More power for speakers usually means bigger drivers, and big drivers usually translate to better sound. Not to mention the Z-2300's are THX certified, if that means anything to you. The Z-2300's also have a better frequency response.
The 5.1 variant of in the Z-series is the Z-5500, it's 3 times the price, but it would the equal experience in a 5.1 arrangement. I would recommend the X-530's and X-540's if you want the surround experience and can place them accordingly, otherwise you'll get much more power and quality from the Z-2300 in a 2.1 config.
Jamiemydearx3
I personally would keep my money for something else.
[QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"][QUOTE="Marfoo"]I currently own X-530's, would it be worth upgrading to Z-2300s?The X-530's and X-540's aren't meant to compete with the Z-series in quality. Although it's 5.1, the X-530's and X-540's only have 70W rated power, whereas with the Z-2300's you have 200W rated power with a 400W peak. More power for speakers usually means bigger drivers, and big drivers usually translate to better sound. Not to mention the Z-2300's are THX certified, if that means anything to you. The Z-2300's also have a better frequency response.
The 5.1 variant of in the Z-series is the Z-5500, it's 3 times the price, but it would the equal experience in a 5.1 arrangement. I would recommend the X-530's and X-540's if you want the surround experience and can place them accordingly, otherwise you'll get much more power and quality from the Z-2300 in a 2.1 config.
musclesforcier
I personally would keep my money for something else.
If your willing to spend a little more, the Z-5500s are on sale at Dell for $210.
http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/products/Video_Conferencing/productdetail.aspx?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&sku=A0405790
Hmm..Whats a really good set of headphones? lol, I need some new ones... :xJamiemydearx3
My brother has the Sen 555's, they are really nice.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826106392&Tpk=hd%2b555
[QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"]Hmm..Whats a really good set of headphones? lol, I need some new ones... :xmusclesforcier
My brother has the Sen 555's, they are really nice.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826106392&Tpk=hd%2b555
Thanks. ;)[QUOTE="musclesforcier"][QUOTE="Jamiemydearx3"]Hmm..Whats a really good set of headphones? lol, I need some new ones... :xJamiemydearx3
My brother has the Sen 555's, they are really nice.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826106392&Tpk=hd%2b555
Thanks. ;)But take note that those are open ear, if you prefer closed ear check these out.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16826106328
Computer speakers blow. They all sound tin-foily and cheap to me, even the "good" ones from Logitech and Klipsch. I think your money would be better spent on a good pair of headphones (eg Sennheisers) and maybe a headphone amp depending on the impedance of the headphones. I would suggest Sennheiser HD 600s, or if you have the money, the 650s. They will sound better than any computer speakers.
I have a set of Sennheiser HD 570s and a Zero DAC/Amp with upgraded opamp chips, and I think it's a setup that blows computer speakers out of the water, and sounds as good or better than most home theater setups I've listened to. I've owned Klipsch Promedia Ultras and GMXs (generally considered to be the best computer audio) and these sound much better.
The other argument in favor of headphones is that if you are in a typical living situation (like an apartment), you probably can't crank a set of speakers up to full volume and really enjoy them without really pissing someone off (roommate, neighbor, etc).
But headphones is something you have to wear and it's certainly noway near as comfortable as listening through speakers.:|Computer speakers blow. They all sound tin-foily and cheap to me, even the "good" ones from Logitech and Klipsch. I think your money would be better spent on a good pair of headphones (eg Sennheisers) and maybe a headphone amp depending on the impedance of the headphones. I would suggest Sennheiser HD 600s, or if you have the money, the 650s. They will sound better than any computer speakers.
I have a set of Sennheiser HD 570s and a Zero DAC/Amp with upgraded opamp chips, and I think it's a setup that blows computer speakers out of the water, and sounds as good or better than most home theater setups I've listened to. I've owned Klipsch Promedia Ultras and GMXs (generally considered to be the best computer audio) and these sound much better.
The other argument in favor of headphones is that if you are in a typical living situation (like an apartment), you probably can't crank a set of speakers up to full volume and really enjoy them without really pissing someone off (roommate, neighbor, etc).
cmdrmonkey
And you just cant compare sound quality between speakers and headphones.It just doesnt work.Both are "different" experiences.
And ya you obviously arent going to get the best by having small satellite speakers.You pay the price of them being small enough to fit on a computer desk.
the Logitech z 5500's are the best for under $1000, i got mine for mid 300 range 4 years ago and its literally the best single thing ive bought for my entertainment setup, absolutley GREATrikjiallen$1000? Thats a bit much just for speakers. I am persoanlly happy with my klipsh 2.1s. I woulnt spend more thant $200 for any speaker setup, thats just to much in my opinion. Then again, I dont build/want a htpc. I prefer pc's for gaming.
LMAO there are speakers under $1000 that would absolutely destroy the Z-5500.:|
The Z-5500 are pretty much the best satelite desk speakers you can buy but full tower speakers within $700-800 would be in a league of their own.The problem with any desk speakers is that they dont have their own bass thus relieing on the sub all the time.You gotta listen to some music through quality full range speakers with the sub-woofer turned off to know what you are missing out.
And another huge issue with desk speakers is their poor sound stage.As long as you are sitting facing them then it's fine but when you are not,then you would know what I am saying.
$1000? Thats a bit much just for speakers. I am persoanlly happy with my klipsh 2.1s. I woulnt spend more thant $200 for any speaker setup, thats just to much in my opinion. Then again, I dont build/want a htpc. I prefer pc's for gaming. Ya and it's worth spending $500 on a graphics card which may get outclassed within 6 months??[QUOTE="rikjiallen"]the Logitech z 5500's are the best for under $1000, i got mine for mid 300 range 4 years ago and its literally the best single thing ive bought for my entertainment setup, absolutley GREATgp556by45
Buying speakers is a one time cost and your speakers are always with you in your gaming experience no matter what game you maybe playing.Regardless of whether you are an audiophile or not,better sound will always make your gaming experience better and it's gonna last you as long as the speakers dont malfunction which under most cases would be 5+ years.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment