[QUOTE="Iron_will"][QUOTE="bignice12"] [QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]"Around 3 years ago Far Cry was launched by the same developers behind Crysis: Germany based Crytek. The Game was an average FPS that didn't bring anything new to the genre, but was still a pleasant game, playable at least one time."
I stopped reading right there.WckdJuggalotus
Truth here.
What he said.
1) Not the point of the interview you ignorant wastes of matter.
2) You're all idiots for that.
Doesn't matter if it wasn't the focus, that game still kicked ass and was very unique. On top of that, Crysis is actually one of the most optimized game engines I've ever seen. Just as optimized as the Source Engine FOR WHAT IT DOES.
Think about it, if you tried to play a HL2 level that was the size of a Crysis level on the Source engine, how do you think it would run? Would the Source Engine be able to handle all the AI, physics, and graphics done on the CryEngine? The same goes for COD4 for anyone that wants to compare that POS to this game. The levels are so small and linear, OF COURSE it runs more smoothly than Crysis.
I'm so sick of people telling me that Crysis is poorly optimized. This is truly a next generation game, and people expect it to run on hardware from two years ago?
BTW, I run this game on low - medium at 1024 x 768 and it looks better than Far Cry on max, so I don't know why people say the game looks bad on low settings.
Log in to comment