Skip Vista for Vienna in the end of 2009?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GamingMonkeyPC
GamingMonkeyPC

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#1 GamingMonkeyPC
Member since 2005 • 3576 Posts
Apparently, Microsoft's Corporate VP of Windows division says that the next Windows will be coming at the end of 2009!

Check it out here: http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/09/HNvistafollowup_1.html
Avatar image for TheLiberal
TheLiberal

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 TheLiberal
Member since 2007 • 294 Posts
End of 2009, eh?
When did they originally say Vista would be out? :P
Don't get your hopes up for them to deliver then.  They're a monopoly, people will continue buying their old OS, they have no impetus to release new operating systems often.  It costs a lot of money to develop them.
:x
Avatar image for matinog
matinog

794

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 matinog
Member since 2004 • 794 Posts
wont happen. at all. Maybe they will announce it by that day. Like officially announce. like from longhorn to vista announce.
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts
Vienna, also known as Service Pack 3!  LOL
Avatar image for cloud8900
cloud8900

1896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 cloud8900
Member since 2004 • 1896 Posts
lmao
Avatar image for Gimli64
Gimli64

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Gimli64
Member since 2002 • 865 Posts
Instead of coming up with a new OS every 2 years (more like 5-10 years) Microsilly should concentrate on Vista and improving it.
Avatar image for habitat
habitat

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 habitat
Member since 2003 • 260 Posts
Instead of coming up with a new OS every 2 years (more like 5-10 years) Microsilly should concentrate on Vista and improving it.Gimli64
agreed, they need to make things more stable and compatible!
Avatar image for KSlater85
KSlater85

19738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#8 KSlater85
Member since 2003 • 19738 Posts
Instead of coming up with a new OS every 2 years (more like 5-10 years) Microsilly should concentrate on Vista and improving it.Gimli64
Um... The point of the extra 3 years with Longhorn was that it would be improved and working perfect... Unfortunately... If MS can't fix this in 3 years... well nevermind....
Avatar image for basersx
basersx

6222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 basersx
Member since 2005 • 6222 Posts

Interesting explanation, Vista and Vienna have been in the plans since before XP came out –

"Microsoft started work on their plans for "Longhorn" in May 2001,[7] prior to the release of Windows XP. It was originally expected to ship sometime late in 2003 as a minor step between Windows XP (codenamed "Whistler") and "Blackcomb" (now known as Windows "Vienna"). Gradually, "Longhorn" assimilated many of the important new features and technologies slated for "Blackcomb," resulting in the release date being pushed back a few times. Many of Microsoft's developers were also re-tasked with improving the security of Windows XP.[6] Faced with ongoing delays and concerns about feature creep, Microsoft announced on August 27, 2004 that it was making significant changes. "Longhorn" development basically started afresh, building on the Windows Server 2003 codebase, and re-incorporating only the features that would be intended for an actual operating system release. Some previously announced features, such as WinFS and NGSCB, were dropped or postponed, and a new software development methodology called the "Security Development Lifecycle" was incorporated in an effort to address concerns with the security of the Windows codebase.[8]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista