This topic is locked from further discussion.
Instead of coming up with a new OS every 2 years (more like 5-10 years) Microsilly should concentrate on Vista and improving it.Gimli64Um... The point of the extra 3 years with Longhorn was that it would be improved and working perfect... Unfortunately... If MS can't fix this in 3 years... well nevermind....
Interesting explanation, Vista and Vienna have been in the plans since before XP came out –
"Microsoft started work on their plans for "Longhorn" in May 2001,[7] prior to the release of Windows XP. It was originally expected to ship sometime late in 2003 as a minor step between Windows XP (codenamed "Whistler") and "Blackcomb" (now known as Windows "Vienna"). Gradually, "Longhorn" assimilated many of the important new features and technologies slated for "Blackcomb," resulting in the release date being pushed back a few times. Many of Microsoft's developers were also re-tasked with improving the security of Windows XP.[6] Faced with ongoing delays and concerns about feature creep, Microsoft announced on August 27, 2004 that it was making significant changes. "Longhorn" development basically started afresh, building on the Windows Server 2003 codebase, and re-incorporating only the features that would be intended for an actual operating system release. Some previously announced features, such as WinFS and NGSCB, were dropped or postponed, and a new software development methodology called the "Security Development Lifecycle" was incorporated in an effort to address concerns with the security of the Windows codebase.[8]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment