Sooo.. My PC ME2 thinks its the 360 ME2 0_0

How can you talk about how ME1 runs better then ME2 when you have only played the xbox version of ME2 as you said.

You havnt even tried the pc version of ME2 yet... I dont understand how you can talk about how well or bad a game is optimized having not played it?

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

How can you talk about how ME1 runs better then ME2 when you have only played the xbox version of ME2 as you said.

You havnt even tried the pc version of ME2 yet... I dont understand how you can talk about how well or bad a game is optimized having not played it?

dakan45

Well then I guess myself, my friend and all the tons of reviews sure are wrong huh and making things up huh :roll:

ME2 runs much better on my xbox then ME1 did and same goes for PC versions.

We all have played ME2 on PC you have not you have no idea as to how it runs.

This is the last time im ever responding to you, this is just getting ridicolous.

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

How can you talk about how ME1 runs better then ME2 when you have only played the xbox version of ME2 as you said.

You havnt even tried the pc version of ME2 yet... I dont understand how you can talk about how well or bad a game is optimized having not played it?

kozzy1234

Well then I guess myself, my friend and all the tons of reviews sure are wrong huh and making things up huh :roll:

We all have played ME2 on PC you have not you have no idea as to how it runs.

This is the last time im ever responding to you, this is just getting ridicolous.

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"] :( I just explained you how i can know that. Its impossible that me2 will get more fps than the first in any way, unless you have some kinda weird issues with the first which all the people i know didn't!dakan45

Well then I guess myself, my friend and all the tons of reviews sure are wrong huh and making things up huh :roll:

We all have played ME2 on PC you have not you have no idea as to how it runs.

This is the last time im ever responding to you, this is just getting ridicolous.

Also i cant believe people here saying "mass effect 2 is the superior rpg from all rpgs out there" :roll: dakan45

First off, great job ignoring all my future posts. You had a great run there.

Fallout 3 got tons more content than mass effect 2dakan45

I'm sure you will ignore this fact again, but you've only played a few minutes of the 360 version of the game. You have very little first hand experience. How can you possibly compare the amount of content? Maybe you could tell us how you know this for a fact. Perhaps it's just clairvoyance?

if any of those games is a joke that is mass effect 2, i honestly cannot bring myself to underatnd why such a simplistic product is considered such a masterpiece.dakan45

Level of complexity has nothing to do with whether or not something is a masterpiece.

:roll: Its a dumbed down shooter with dialogues and 1% rpg elements in combat.dakan45

Your complete lack of experience makes your point invalid. RPGs are usually about growth over time. How can you claim that there is 1% RPG elements in a game when you haven't even played more than 1% of the game? There are, tons of RPG elements in this game, many of them outside of combat. Choices you make in the game, and the ones you have made in Mass Effect 1 have a profound impact on the overall story.

Sometimes i wonder have guys played kotor? Do you remember how superior the planets were in that game from mass effect? Honestly i cant believe people find those small maps good enough for a "masterpiece"dakan45

Again, size has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not a game is a masterpiece. Just because there are bigger paintings than the Mona Lisa, I shouldn't consider it a masterpiece? And I do remember Kotor, and it's planets. I remember a lot of walking and fighting endless random encounters.

How about you just buy the game, bud? Or borrow it from a friend? Until you play through it, your arguments just won't hold up.

if any of those games is a joke that is mass effect 2, i honestly cannot bring myself to underatnd why such a simplistic product is considered such a masterpiece.dakan45

You know why I don't respond to posts in this thread? Because I have not played the game. Perhaps you should do the same. Play the game, come back and then give your opinion.

Seriously dude, I never saw someone who has so much to complain about, and I believe in complaining about things.

You have outdone yourself this time around by complaining about a game you have not even played. That's a new height (depth?) even for you.

Dakan, I think it's time you stopped assuming things, don't make things worse.

ME 2 is better optimized. I played ME 1 on the same PC, I didn't upgrade a single thing and ME 2 runs with 58 frames and it's far more detailed and complex than ME 1 (reason for higher requirements...ME 1 was a little empty, the levels except the CItadel where there were occasional slowdowns). At the same settings ME 1 ran at a constant 60 frames. What's even better about ME 2 is that it does not have anymore occasional slowdowns and texture pop ins, it's a far better port even tho ME 1 was a pretty great port.

What are you trying to prove? seriously, you took it way too far and it's a fact that you have no idea how it runs on PC, why the requirements are higher, etc. You're assuming things on requirements alone, what are you thinking? requirements aren't reliable most of the time :/.