Starcraft 2 graphics already outdated

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IvyCassandra
IvyCassandra

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 IvyCassandra
Member since 2008 • 74 Posts

I think that Blizzard totally need to revamp the Starcraft 2 graphics engine. I mean it's coming out later than some other RTS like Dawn of War 2 and End War, yet those games already have better graphics than SC2.

C'mon Blizzard if you want the game to last for 10 years like Starcraft 1 did, at least make the graphics ahead of it's time.

Right now Dawn of War 2 looks better than Starcraft 2, from the world to the units and lighting. What do you think?

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts

Starcraft has never been about the graphics.
I think they're fine.

Avatar image for Sigleaf
Sigleaf

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#3 Sigleaf
Member since 2007 • 219 Posts
Blizzard has always been about making its product accessible to everyone. Secondly, graphics are not the main selling point in an RTS, and the game doesn't even have a release date so how can you be so sure the graphics wont be improved over the next year(s)? Give them time, blizzard has always polished off their products, even though sometimes they come out like crap (WoW).....
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

Starcraft has never been about the graphics.
I think they're fine.

Doom_HellKnight

QFT

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
And that is important because?
Avatar image for promajo
promajo

174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 promajo
Member since 2007 • 174 Posts

you wanne make this game more inaccessible because ...?

don't forget, Starcraft was about mass armies, DoW is not, I'm craving for a game wich may let you control hundreds of units even if it will be only in it's mod, players of the original Starcraft game will know what I'm speaking of

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts
It's artstyle-based, so it doesn't really matter.
Avatar image for mayforcebeyou
mayforcebeyou

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mayforcebeyou
Member since 2007 • 2703 Posts

there good enough and blizzard wants many people to be able to play it

Avatar image for wackys
wackys

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#9 wackys
Member since 2005 • 1315 Posts

Starcraft has never been about the graphics.
I think they're fine.

Doom_HellKnight

QFT

Avatar image for czechgangster44
czechgangster44

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 czechgangster44
Member since 2008 • 419 Posts
look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?
Avatar image for vlin1108
vlin1108

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 vlin1108
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts

look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?czechgangster44

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

Avatar image for wackys
wackys

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#12 wackys
Member since 2005 • 1315 Posts

[QUOTE="czechgangster44"]look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?vlin1108

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

Why fix something which runs perfectly?They already added a bunch of new stuff though.

Avatar image for IvyCassandra
IvyCassandra

74

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 IvyCassandra
Member since 2008 • 74 Posts

Give them time, blizzard has always polished off their products, even though sometimes they come out like crap (WoW).....Sigleaf

WoW is the best PC game.

Avatar image for G013M
G013M

6424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 G013M
Member since 2006 • 6424 Posts

They're a bit late in the development cycle to redo the engine, plus they'd have to redo most of the models, textures etc to take advantage of the new engine.

Besides, Duke Nukem Forever shows what happens when you redo the graphics engine time and time again, to keep up with other games :P.

Avatar image for JnWycliffe
JnWycliffe

769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 JnWycliffe
Member since 2008 • 769 Posts
i think it looks great. i really like blizzard's art style in all their games.
Avatar image for vlin1108
vlin1108

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 vlin1108
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="vlin1108"]

[QUOTE="czechgangster44"]look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?wackys

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

Why fix something which runs perfectly?They already added a bunch of new stuff though.

I'm not asking Blizzard to add patches to the original Starcraft. This is SC 2, however.

Why buy a game that runs exactly the same then?

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
[QUOTE="wackys"][QUOTE="vlin1108"]

[QUOTE="czechgangster44"]look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?vlin1108

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

Why fix something which runs perfectly?They already added a bunch of new stuff though.

I'm not asking Blizzard to add patches to the original Starcraft. This is SC 2, however.

Why buy a game that runs exactly the same then?

Then don't, it's that simple, nobody is making you buy it and they are adding quite a lot of new stuff imo + there is no game that is as balanced as Starcraft, so it's all about fans and competition, if you are not a fan then ok.

Avatar image for wackys
wackys

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#18 wackys
Member since 2005 • 1315 Posts

[QUOTE="Sigleaf"]Give them time, blizzard has always polished off their products, even though sometimes they come out like crap (WoW).....IvyCassandra

WoW is the best PC game.

No it isn't.

Avatar image for ReddestSkies
ReddestSkies

4087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ReddestSkies
Member since 2005 • 4087 Posts
Starcraft 1 still looks fine today.
Avatar image for musclesforcier
musclesforcier

2894

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 musclesforcier
Member since 2004 • 2894 Posts

[QUOTE="czechgangster44"]look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?vlin1108

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

How do you know how much they are adding?

Avatar image for vlin1108
vlin1108

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 vlin1108
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts
[QUOTE="vlin1108"][QUOTE="wackys"][QUOTE="vlin1108"]

[QUOTE="czechgangster44"]look at the game by itself. not comparing it too, lets say DoW 2. what do you see? beautiful graphics, fun new units, over all? potential to be a really awesome game. so what is there to complain about now?DanielDust

Blizzard not adding enough new stuff?

Why fix something which runs perfectly?They already added a bunch of new stuff though.

I'm not asking Blizzard to add patches to the original Starcraft. This is SC 2, however.

Why buy a game that runs exactly the same then?

Then don't, it's that simple, nobody is making you buy it and they are adding quite a lot of new stuff imo + there is no game that is as balanced as Starcraft, so it's all about fans and competition, if you are not a fan then ok.

The question was whether a complain could be brought up against Starcraft 2; I mentioned one possibility. I did not say I believed it was true.

Avatar image for Archon_
Archon_

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Archon_
Member since 2003 • 110 Posts

imo as far as RTS go SC is the best. the graphics are good enough even today because of the gameplay, esp online.

Im sure the graphics will not be an issue. And I dunno if you have seen the high definition gameplay videos on Blizzards website, but i think the game looks pretty sweet. for me, Blizzard have really got to make the gameplay near perfect to live up to the original.

Avatar image for Lonelynight
Lonelynight

30051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Lonelynight
Member since 2006 • 30051 Posts
And this is important why?
Avatar image for deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4

10077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
Member since 2007 • 10077 Posts
Indeed, they do seem a bit outdated.
Avatar image for Artosa
Artosa

5063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Artosa
Member since 2005 • 5063 Posts

WHO CARES

graphics whores really get on my nerves

Avatar image for Zillaschool
Zillaschool

1610

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Zillaschool
Member since 2004 • 1610 Posts

WHO CARES

graphics whores really get on my nerves

Artosa
Mine too.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
It's too bad you never played the original StarCraft when it came out.
Avatar image for Old_Gooseberry
Old_Gooseberry

3958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#28 Old_Gooseberry
Member since 2002 • 3958 Posts
I'm actually really into great graphics and I really hate bad looking games... and I thought what i've seen in the screenshots look great. I prefer sharp graphics to blurry "next gen" graphics. For an RTS game especially, you have to be able to tell what things are, and if the graphics are too flashy, it makes the game frustrating.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

I'm actually really into great graphics and I really hate bad looking games... and I thought what i've seen in the screenshots look great. I prefer sharp graphics to blurry "next gen" graphics. For an RTS game especially, you have to be able to tell what things are, and if the graphics are too flashy, it makes the game frustrating.Old_Gooseberry

Same I actually think the game looks great.. It has its own feel and style..

Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#30 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
Its supposed to be playable by everyone ... it was never supposed to have super awesome cool killer graphics. And in defense of it THEY ARE VERY GOOD, the game is going to run crisp ... cant say that about most other graphically demanding RTS's these days which chug on anything but the top tier PCs ...
Avatar image for Maverin1
Maverin1

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Maverin1
Member since 2008 • 54 Posts
you obviously don't play many blizz games. none of there games have up to date graphics. they want accesibility and fun...almost every mmo after WoW has better graphics and guess which MMO is on top...
Avatar image for crazymaghie123
crazymaghie123

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 crazymaghie123
Member since 2004 • 1209 Posts
When you're playing Starcraft 2 I can tell you first hand that the graphics look fine
Avatar image for Archon_
Archon_

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Archon_
Member since 2003 • 110 Posts

http://www.starcraft2.com/movies.xml

HD gameplay vids on official site tell me that the graphics will be satisfactory

Avatar image for SamiRDuran
SamiRDuran

2758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#35 SamiRDuran
Member since 2005 • 2758 Posts
I dont think i like blizzard's approach to diablo 3 and starcraft 2. i'm way more excited for empire total war, dawn of war 2 and dragon age.
Avatar image for vlin1108
vlin1108

1908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 vlin1108
Member since 2007 • 1908 Posts

you obviously don't play many blizz games. none of there games have up to date graphics. they want accesibility and fun...almost every mmo after WoW has better graphics and guess which MMO is on top...Maverin1

I thought that WoW's graphics were gorgeus even about 1 year after the game was released.

Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#37 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts

[QUOTE="Maverin1"]you obviously don't play many blizz games. none of there games have up to date graphics. they want accesibility and fun...almost every mmo after WoW has better graphics and guess which MMO is on top...vlin1108

I thought that WoW's graphics were gorgeus even about 1 year after the game was released.

I thought WoW's graphics were ugly even at launch. I loved EQ2's graphics though. :P