This topic is locked from further discussion.
Did anyone out there find the StarCraft 2 solo campagin (not all the extra unlockables but the actual campaign) to be a little short this time around? Or, was it too long? Or, was it just right? Let me know. I'm curious what you all think. Thanks, hngryGenghis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ***Genghis Khan*** The mightiest conqueror the world has ever known. (And not too shabby of a gamer as well.) Join me online and share in the spoils of victory: http://facebook.com/hngryGenghis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------hngryGenghis
turn up the difficulty to make it longer, some levels can get tough
I still haven't finished it and I bought it on launch day. However I take forever to complete games.skrat_01
Haha, I havn't even touched it since the week after it's release.... I really need to start playing it again.
I'm playing on brutal and because of this + my "take it slow" gameplay style some maps take over an hour to beat. I think the lenght is OK. Could be longer, but it's good.
26 missions isn't short, on normal they are pretty easy, hard is just takes longer and brutal is pretty tough but I've done around 5 or 6 on that level, increasing the difficultly greatly increased the time and fun for me at least
It took me about 20 hours to beat on Normal taking my time with everything, so it's a little short. However, when I beat it on hard, there were about 5 missions where I had to restart a few times to complete them. There's a lot of achievements too, which I always like. I know some people don't like. The single player probably doesn't live up to the hype, but the multiplayer mostly does.
I played it on normal, took me like 15 hours. Going through it on Hard and all i have to say is....unless you want to have a headache Hard can be a pain on some lvls :(
[QUOTE="Creigz"]They are doing it in 3 installments, so the games are gonna be 3 longer games.N30F3N1X
Fixed.
No, not really "too short" for today's standards. Especially considering it has Lost Viking in it.
It's not short by todays standards, but in comparison to Starcraft 1 and Brood War it is.[QUOTE="N30F3N1X"][QUOTE="Creigz"]They are doing it in 3 installments, so the games are gonna be 3 longer games.Creigz
Fixed.
No, not really "too short" for today's standards. Especially considering it has Lost Viking in it.
It's not short by todays standards, but in comparison to Starcraft 1 and Brood War it is. Well not really fair to compare two games to one if you mean sc1 + BW is longer than SC2.on normal you can blow through the campaign pretty quick, but on higher difficulties it will take much longer. especially if you are trying for the achievementscapthavicNot me.... on normal some levels are hard (I suck at RTS by the way). The level where you gotta destroy the 3 towers before Kerrigan gets to them, took me about 6 tries....
[QUOTE="Creigz"][QUOTE="N30F3N1X"]It's not short by todays standards, but in comparison to Starcraft 1 and Brood War it is. Well not really fair to compare two games to one if you mean sc1 + BW is longer than SC2. Well I'm not comparing two games, but I know people who have timed both SC1 and Wings of Liberty and WoL is shorter than the original Starcraft excluding Brood War.Fixed.
No, not really "too short" for today's standards. Especially considering it has Lost Viking in it.
Captain__Tripps
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment