StarCraft 2 wins PC GOTY on IGN!

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rawtheory333
Rawtheory333

474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Rawtheory333
Member since 2005 • 474 Posts

And it completely deserved it. Read it and weep ME2 fanboys. Looking forward to reading the ragers comments. :P

http://bestof.ign.com/2010/pc/pc-game-of-the-year.html

Avatar image for Lord_DoDo56
Lord_DoDo56

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#2 Lord_DoDo56
Member since 2005 • 960 Posts
Although I admit the game was great and the story was amazing, I hardly played any matches online and it's replay value for me was low. I liked Mass Effect 2 a bit more because of the replay value I found in wanting to make paragon and renegade characters.
Avatar image for deactivated-5fae21e61a964
deactivated-5fae21e61a964

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5fae21e61a964
Member since 2005 • 765 Posts

Although I admit the game was great and the story was amazing, I hardly played any matches online and it's replay value for me was low. I liked Mass Effect 2 a bit more because of the replay value I found in wanting to make paragon and renegade characters.Lord_DoDo56

This exactly. It should've gone to ME2, even though it was a port.

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts
Of course, only most posters on GS would think otherwise. SC 2 can't possibly get a single PC GOTY award.
Avatar image for deactivated-5fae21e61a964
deactivated-5fae21e61a964

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5fae21e61a964
Member since 2005 • 765 Posts

Of course, only most posters on GS would think otherwise. SC 2 can't possibly get a single PC GOTY award.DanielDust

Why should it win a GOTY?

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts

Well atleast IGN had a brain for once :D thats not every day.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
They gave almost every award out to ME2... I mean it's their to give, but... "Most Innovative Game-play" "Best Visuals" Really now, this is damnright embarrassing.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#8 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
Well deserved.
Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts

They gave almost every award out to ME2... I mean it's their to give, but... "Most Innovative Game-play" "Best Visuals" Really now, this is damnright embarrassing. GeneralShowzer

Where can i see the awards list :D?

Lol nevermind im blind :D

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Of course, only most posters on GS would think otherwise. SC 2 can't possibly get a single PC GOTY award.Sheppard212

Why should it win a GOTY?

Why shouldn't it? Do you really consider that these kind of questions deserve an answer? it will always go into "OMG "game X" (SC 2) is bad, nothing new, the game I like is way better than that because I like that genre more/it's innovative and changes my perspective on the whole genre". Just because you like a game that didn't get GOTY on a website, doesn't mean another can't...
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#11 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]They gave almost every award out to ME2... I mean it's their to give, but... "Most Innovative Game-play" "Best Visuals" Really now, this is damnright embarrassing. KalDurenik

Where can i see the awards list :D?

It's on the link TC gave. Here http://bestof.ign.com/2010/pc/
Avatar image for NeuroToxino
NeuroToxino

313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 NeuroToxino
Member since 2010 • 313 Posts
Well deserved award.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#13 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Its a great game, congrats (:
Definatly between SC2 and ME2 imo for GOTY for pc

Avatar image for grafficsak
grafficsak

304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#14 grafficsak
Member since 2009 • 304 Posts

Both are outstanding games, but I honestly feel ME2 should have been awarded that title.

Avatar image for Barbariser
Barbariser

6785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 Barbariser
Member since 2009 • 6785 Posts

It's not like it had a lot of competition. The only game this year which is on its level of quality is New Vegas.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#16 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
ME2 is very very good for the most part. I just felt that the party aspects could have been improved upon: I think they're a lot stronger in Dragon Age as you can see how things affect your relationship with your party. I didn't think the sex scene should have been done the way it was. And I thought the final boss was far too easy.
Avatar image for deactivated-5fae21e61a964
deactivated-5fae21e61a964

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-5fae21e61a964
Member since 2005 • 765 Posts

[QUOTE="Sheppard212"]

[QUOTE="DanielDust"]Of course, only most posters on GS would think otherwise. SC 2 can't possibly get a single PC GOTY award.DanielDust

Why should it win a GOTY?

Why shouldn't it? Do you really consider that these kind of questions deserve an answer? it will always go into "OMG "game X" (SC 2) is bad, nothing new, the game I like is way better than that because I like that genre more/it's innovative and changes my perspective on the whole genre". Just because you like a game that didn't get GOTY on a website, doesn't mean another can't...

Congratulations on assuming a flawed position. Originality is irrelavent, but how you present a product is what matters. Personally, I can't say I was impressed with the campaign, but the gameplay was solid. Per usual, your views differ wildly from mine. My apparent confusion stems from how this game trumped another, but if we argue that, the cows will both come home AND be sent to the slaughter house before an acceptable agreement is reached.

I merely asked you for YOUR opinion on why SCII is superior. Who knows? I could actually AGREE with you and raise the game up on my list a few notches. Ball's in your court.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#18 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
You weren't impressed with the campaign but the game play was solid? I don't understand the separation.
Avatar image for RyuRanVII
RyuRanVII

4257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 RyuRanVII
Member since 2006 • 4257 Posts

IGN gave Mass Effect 2 the best story, best visuals and most innovative game awards. Hehe, IGN is still IGN.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="Lord_DoDo56"]Although I admit the game was great and the story was amazing, I hardly played any matches online and it's replay value for me was low. I liked Mass Effect 2 a bit more because of the replay value I found in wanting to make paragon and renegade characters.Sheppard212

This exactly. It should've gone to ME2, even though it was a port.

The online IS the replay value when it comes to StarCraft... It's like saying Call of Duty has no replay value....
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#21 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="Sheppard212"]

[QUOTE="Lord_DoDo56"]Although I admit the game was great and the story was amazing, I hardly played any matches online and it's replay value for me was low. I liked Mass Effect 2 a bit more because of the replay value I found in wanting to make paragon and renegade characters.FelipeInside

This exactly. It should've gone to ME2, even though it was a port.

The online IS the replay value when it comes to StarCraft... It's like saying Call of Duty has no replay value....

Not unless you're playing the illegal version ;)

That's the only way i can explain why someone would say SCII has no replay value.

Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="Sheppard212"]

This exactly. It should've gone to ME2, even though it was a port.

GeneralShowzer

The online IS the replay value when it comes to StarCraft... It's like saying Call of Duty has no replay value....

Not unless you're playing the illegal version ;)

That's the only way i can explain why someone would say SCII has no replay value.

I see your point, but doesn't have to be necessary a pirated version. Take for example me, I bought SC2 (loved the first one), finished the campaign but never played online.... (I just suck at RTS online, I barely made it on easy on the campaign, lol...)
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#23 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] The online IS the replay value when it comes to StarCraft... It's like saying Call of Duty has no replay value....FelipeInside

Not unless you're playing the illegal version ;)

That's the only way i can explain why someone would say SCII has no replay value.

I see your point, but doesn't have to be necessary a pirated version. Take for example me, I bought SC2 (loved the first one), finished the campaign but never played online.... (I just suck at RTS online, I barely made it on easy on the campaign, lol...)

There's a great matchmaking system to find people on your level, no matter how bad you are. You should try it and get some experience.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#24 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord_DoDo56"]Although I admit the game was great and the story was amazing, I hardly played any matches online and it's replay value for me was low. I liked Mass Effect 2 a bit more because of the replay value I found in wanting to make paragon and renegade characters.

That is quite subjective. I say the story of SC2 was bad but the diversity of missions in singleplayer and the multiplayer gives a lot of replay value to SC2. ME2 meanwhile had a good story (although it wasn't compared to ME1) and had a cool gameplay but replay value here isn't compared to SC2, it is good but not compared.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

Not unless you're playing the illegal version ;)

That's the only way i can explain why someone would say SCII has no replay value.

GeneralShowzer

I see your point, but doesn't have to be necessary a pirated version. Take for example me, I bought SC2 (loved the first one), finished the campaign but never played online.... (I just suck at RTS online, I barely made it on easy on the campaign, lol...)

There's a great matchmaking system to find people on your level, no matter how bad you are. You should try it and get some experience.

Yeah I've heard, but I would probably loose more games than I win.... if it comes to online, I would rather play WoW or CoD where I am actually decent-to-good at....

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#26 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
I thought the single player in SC2 was very good, I played some multiplayer but it wasn't really my thing. I wouldn't give SC2 GOTY for 2010 but I wouldn't say its a horrible choice. It may have got the edge because it is a PC exclusive.
Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts

While SC2 was a great game, but I wouldn't have given it GOTY. My personal GOTY is STALKER Call of Pripyat. $40 for a game that is full of awesome. Only big blockebuster games Win GOTY on review sites though....

Avatar image for SerOlmy
SerOlmy

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#28 SerOlmy
Member since 2003 • 2369 Posts
Well Blizzard has it in their marketing contract that they have to get welfare awards form at least 10% of online publication or Bobby Kotich will "receive the first born of of all associated editors and an assortment of various artisan breads". Starcraft 2, deserves very few awards IMO. Certainly not innovation, nor graphics, nor story, nor gameplay, maybe in polish, and arguably competitive multiplayer. Certainly not GotY in my opinion.
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#29 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
[QUOTE="SerOlmy"]Well Blizzard has it in their marketing contract that they have to get welfare awards form at least 10% of online publication or Bobby Kotich will "receive the first born of of all associated editors and an assortment of various artisan breads". Starcraft 2, deserves very few awards IMO. Certainly not innovation, nor graphics, nor story, nor gameplay, maybe in polish, and arguably competitive multiplayer. Certainly not GotY in my opinion.

What was your choice?
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

While SC2 was a great game, but I wouldn't have given it GOTY. My personal GOTY is STALKER Call of Pripyat. $40 for a game that is full of awesome. Only big blockebuster games Win GOTY on review sites though....

SF_KiLLaMaN
[QUOTE="SerOlmy"]Well Blizzard has it in their marketing contract that they have to get welfare awards form at least 10% of online publication or Bobby Kotich will "receive the first born of of all associated editors and an assortment of various artisan breads". Starcraft 2, deserves very few awards IMO. Certainly not innovation, nor graphics, nor story, nor gameplay, maybe in polish, and arguably competitive multiplayer. Certainly not GotY in my opinion.

I think it has to do with the whole package and the improvement, and how polished it is in every single aspect (SP, MP, CutScenes, Voice Acting, Graphics, Story etc...) Not many games can polish themselves like Blizzard titles do.....
Avatar image for Drazule
Drazule

8693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Drazule
Member since 2007 • 8693 Posts

Great, the Genre deserves this. Hell, the platform deserves an exclusive to win.

Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#32 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="SerOlmy"]Well Blizzard has it in their marketing contract that they have to get welfare awards form at least 10% of online publication or Bobby Kotich will "receive the first born of of all associated editors and an assortment of various artisan breads". Starcraft 2, deserves very few awards IMO. Certainly not innovation, nor graphics, nor story, nor gameplay, maybe in polish, and arguably competitive multiplayer. Certainly not GotY in my opinion.biggest_loser
What was your choice?

ME2 i think is his favorite game of the year.

Because that had innovation, graphics, and game-play right?

At least SC II didn't dumb down it's predecessor to appeal to the COD audience. I would take SC II Epic so bad it's good storyline, over ME2, which was almost non existant.

All you did in that game was wonder aimlessly, fixing the family dramas of your teammates which didn't have any connection with the main storyline. And the ending twist and boss was really bad.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#33 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
I don't know if SC2's story was bad. I mean, compared to what? A movie? I haven't played through the whole thing yet but so far it seems to be at that standard game level of storytelling. Its not terrible, just serviceable I think. At least the characters are fun. I'm not particularly critical of the story because it seems so secondary to the game play and never interrupts how complete those mechanics are.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#34 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
I don't know if SC2's story was bad. I mean, compared to what? A movie? I haven't played through the whole thing yet but so far it seems to be at that standard game level of storytelling. Its not terrible, just serviceable I think. At least the characters are fun. I'm not particularly critical of the story because it seems so secondary to the game play and never interrupts how complete those mechanics are. biggest_loser
It's very cheesy but in a good way. And the cinematics are really amazing.
Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts

I say it's well deserved. Besides the P.O.S. story, Starcraft II has great multiplayer and phenomenal mission variety. After this release, I hope to see more mission variety for other RTS games beyond the oft repeated bog standard thinly veiled "multiplayer" match against horrendous AI with bad cutscenese attached. It's a great game (although, my personal Game of the Year would probably be Amnesia).

Avatar image for Roland123_basic
Roland123_basic

3841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 Roland123_basic
Member since 2002 • 3841 Posts
meh... SC2 wasnt that great IMO. campaign was good but not amazing.... multiplayer is slightly different than old school SC but not enough to make it "revolutionary".... ME2 was by far the superior game for me.
Avatar image for SerOlmy
SerOlmy

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#37 SerOlmy
Member since 2003 • 2369 Posts

I think it has to do with the whole package and the improvement, and how polished it is in every single aspect (SP, MP, CutScenes, Voice Acting, Graphics, Story etc...)

Not many games can polish themselves like Blizzard titles do.....FelipeInside

I would argue that. And also the fact that polish is no excuse for doing absolutely nothing new or interesting. SC2 was SC1 with a graphic overhaul and race balance improvements. Not worth the 10 year wait by a long shot IMO, certainly not for GotY.

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]I don't know if SC2's story was bad. I mean, compared to what? A movie? I haven't played through the whole thing yet but so far it seems to be at that standard game level of storytelling. Its not terrible, just serviceable I think. At least the characters are fun. I'm not particularly critical of the story because it seems so secondary to the game play and never interrupts how complete those mechanics are. GeneralShowzer
It's very cheesy but in a good way. And the cinematics are really amazing.

People say that the cinematics are so impressive. Ok, the high end ones are good, but the ones that are done in-engine are complete garbage IMO. At least other games the do in-engine cutsceens actually have the graphical detail to make them look better than an 80's cartoon.

Avatar image for Solid_Sterb
Solid_Sterb

1703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Solid_Sterb
Member since 2010 • 1703 Posts

Congrats to Blizzard for making an awesome game.

Avatar image for MadCat46
MadCat46

1494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MadCat46
Member since 2004 • 1494 Posts
Has it been so weak a year that a rehash of a decade old game with slightly beefed up visuals, simplistic design, and no real gameplay changes or innovations from it's predecessor can be deemed the best game of the year.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#40 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

I would argue that. And also the fact that polish is no excuse for doing absolutely nothing new or interesting. SC2 was SC1 with a graphic overhaul and race balance improvements. Not worth the 10 year wait by a long shot IMO, certainly not for GotY.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]I don't know if SC2's story was bad. I mean, compared to what? A movie? I haven't played through the whole thing yet but so far it seems to be at that standard game level of storytelling. Its not terrible, just serviceable I think. At least the characters are fun. I'm not particularly critical of the story because it seems so secondary to the game play and never interrupts how complete those mechanics are. SerOlmy

It's very cheesy but in a good way. And the cinematics are really amazing.

People say that the cinematics are so impressive. Ok, the high end ones are good, but the ones that are done in-engine are complete garbage IMO. At least other games the do in-engine cutsceens actually have the graphical detail to make them look better than an 80's cartoon.

Interacting with stuff on your ship was great fun though, and the attention to detail was amazing. Also tell me, what exactly do you want changed in SC II? It's a perfectly good formula that doesn't need much changing, do you know how much i want a Deus Ex with the same mechanics as the first one only with todays graphics? Or Thief with todays graphics. Games of today always look to dumb stuff further, that's not evolution, rather devolution. I can't believe Fable III passes for an RPG these days...
Avatar image for saruman354
saruman354

10776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#41 saruman354
Member since 2004 • 10776 Posts

RTS isn't my thing, and I was rooting for ME2 but I understand that SC2 is a terrific game so I'm not complaining. I just hope ME2 gets overall GotY. At least it won 360 GotY :)

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#42 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"]

I would argue that. And also the fact that polish is no excuse for doing absolutely nothing new or interesting. SC2 was SC1 with a graphic overhaul and race balance improvements. Not worth the 10 year wait by a long shot IMO, certainly not for GotY.

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]I don't know if SC2's story was bad. I mean, compared to what? A movie? I haven't played through the whole thing yet but so far it seems to be at that standard game level of storytelling. Its not terrible, just serviceable I think. At least the characters are fun. I'm not particularly critical of the story because it seems so secondary to the game play and never interrupts how complete those mechanics are. SerOlmy

It's very cheesy but in a good way. And the cinematics are really amazing.

People say that the cinematics are so impressive. Ok, the high end ones are good, but the ones that are done in-engine are complete garbage IMO. At least other games the do in-engine cutsceens actually have the graphical detail to make them look better than an 80's cartoon.

Honestly, if thats what SC1 was like I wouldn't want those mechanics changed. The different between SC2 and other RTS titles is the amount of variety in the game. This leaves all the C&C games etc for dead. I think the emphasis on micro management is incredibly clever.
Avatar image for flipin_jackass
flipin_jackass

9772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 flipin_jackass
Member since 2004 • 9772 Posts
Never heard of it.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
[QUOTE="SerOlmy"]

[QUOTE="FelipeInside"] It's very cheesy but in a good way. And the cinematics are really amazing.biggest_loser

People say that the cinematics are so impressive. Ok, the high end ones are good, but the ones that are done in-engine are complete garbage IMO. At least other games the do in-engine cutsceens actually have the graphical detail to make them look better than an 80's cartoon.

Honestly, if thats what SC1 was like I wouldn't want those mechanics changed. The different between SC2 and other RTS titles is the amount of variety in the game. This leaves all the C&C games etc for dead. I think the emphasis on micro management is incredibly clever.

Hahahaha, in-game cutscenes look like garbage hey....? Maybe you can do better with Microsoft Paint...? stop trolling.....
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Never heard of it.flipin_jackass
You should really try it, it's a great game.... has a character that looks like the one you have on your profile pic....
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#46 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
Never heard of it.flipin_jackass
Ha-ha! I Get it! See he has an SC2 avatar! But he says, get-this! He hasn't heard of it! Who-who, look out Bob Hope and BL!
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#47 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
Why is everyone on this forum rooting for the non PC game here ?
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts
Why is everyone on this forum rooting for the non PC game here ?GeneralShowzer
It's not that (and not everyone is).... just that there are a lot of Mass Effect fanboys around, and they think SC2 is just SC1 with added graphics (which is way off). Mass Effect 1 + 2 are AMAZING games (and they deserve lots of prizes), but in the end, SC2 not only has an improved, perfectly polished SP Campaign, but also an improved and polished online experience...
Avatar image for flipin_jackass
flipin_jackass

9772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 flipin_jackass
Member since 2004 • 9772 Posts

You should really try it, it's a great game.... has a character that looks like the one you have on your profile pic....FelipeInside
Ha-ha! I Get it! See he has an SC2 avatar! But he says, get-this! He hasn't heard of it! Who-who, look out Bob Hope and BL! biggest_loser
It's Christmas, i get playful around this time of the year :P

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#50 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Why is everyone on this forum rooting for the non PC game here ?GeneralShowzer

Just because it isn't exclusive doesn't mean that it can't be a great game.