I am glad SCII won't have any heroes. WCIII is fun and all and I still play it online, but
it's totally different game from SC, because of heroes. 2 level 10 heroes can easily
destroy whole army of high-end units, with right micro and items on heroes and it
happened to me few times, but does not happen that often.
Anyway, SCII looks amazing, but from what I've seen it looks like SC with revamped
graphics and few new units. After trying COH and liking it, I don't know if better graphics
will cut it for SCII to be a hit.
I hope they will introduce some new and exciting elements to it, we've
never seen before. After all, it was blizzard who came up with concept of heroes
and aura and things of that nature. Give us something new.
Creative
I get what your saying now but please leave Starcraft out of it. Starcraft will be a hit regardless because its one or is the most recognizable RTS in the world and hit the spot for one of the best games of all time from many gaming publications so Blizzard has the game's sale already in the bag, just like Bungie had Halo 2-3 in the bag.
Now as for your "add some spice into this game", well what kind of changes? Anything "dramatic" will probably scar the Starcraft name IMO. Starcraft, without a DOUBT is the MOST competitive game in the world (A whole nation is behind that, you cant say the same with Quake and Counterstrike). Second, why is there a need for a change? There has only been 2 other games with the name Starcraft (Broodwar included which is an expansion pack), and as far as I can see it ALL the RTS's that tried imitating Starcraft failed. There is no other Blizzard game that is remotely close to how Starcraft plays, so I dont see why Blizzard should change up the Starcraft formula.
BTW, really sorry for being aggressive but Starcraft is one of my favorite games. I cant help but defend it without showing my fanboyism :(
Log in to comment