@FelipeInside said:
@wis3boi said:
i guess in the sense that chivalry and diablo are similar because they both have swords.....maybe
Dude honestly, if you're going to post dumb things just to have a say or keep your post count up, restrain yourself. You know what I meant, and if not then I can't help you.
Watch a video of Chivalry Gameplay against Diablo Gameplay without titles on each one.
Now go watch a video of Skyrim Gameplay and then ESO Gameplay with no titles.
I bet you won't, but if you did you would see my point.
I'm not defending it, I'm saying that it's not an Elder Scrolls Single Player game... it's an MMO, so some things need to be different and more limited (ie, exploration, linearity etc). I haven't played enough of ESO to make an honest review of it yet, but if you take it for what it is... then it's a fun game. Same thing happened with SWTOR, if you take it like a co-op KOTOR game, then it's fine.
I think people just expect things that can't be done sometimes. You just can't do with an MMO what you can do with a SP game, and vice-versa (or they haven't figured out how to do it yet). Saying that, lots of people say the exploration in ESO opens up a lot more and feels better once you pass level 15.
I'm guessing you are ESL given your total lack of sarcasm detection. And the fact that you take joy in contradicting literally anything anyone says ever, for all time.
The fact remains that ESO is overhyped midware. Yes, actually, I have played it and was left totally unimpressed. If it didn't have the Elder Scrolls logo, a massive marketing budget, and the general, vague setting of Tamriel, it would be forgotten in a few months. It's about the quality of one of those f2p MMOs on Steam that pay out the ass to appear on the front page and yet have nothing but negative reviews. It's an insult to the series, a slap in the face of the fans, and a blatant cash grab. It's crap. Utter shit.
As for "taking it for what it is," that's the dumbest defence of a game I've ever heard after "durrrrrr" followed by a series of mumbles and a fart. It's not supposed to be the same as Skyrim, it's supposed to be light years beyond in quality. It's been in dev (supposedly) for seven years. SEVEN YEARS. It shouldn't be "like Skyrim, if you deactivate the HUD, turn off the markers, turn off your monitor, and gouge your eyes out with a fork." To justify a subscription, it should be a hundred times better than Skyrim. It should blow your face off with amazeballs quality, and make you never want to leave your grungy basement again. It should be the best MMO ever created. It should be the best GAME ever created. Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim changed the gaming landscape permanently. ESO changes nothing. It's generic, boring, and embarrassing.
"Expect things that can't be done." Are you actually joking? I'm assuming at this point you're trolling, although you're not doing a very good job. ESO should not only meet and fulfil our expectations, it should make our heads explode into diamonds. But it doesn't. It's average. Completely, utterly average.
Which would be fine, if it weren't an Elder Scrolls game. That would be like making a $300 million movie, but only hiring "fine" actors, a "fine" director, and building "fine" sets. It's not good enough. It's not even close to being good enough. ESO should be the crown jewel of gaming, an entity everyone could hold up and say "this, this right here: this is art."
But they can't, because ESO isn't that. It's not even in the ballpark. Not even in this galaxy. It might as well not exist.
Log in to comment