The Elder Scrolls Online, what does everyone think?

  • 83 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25331 Posts

MMOs can still have monthly fees. The monthly fee wasn't what killed SWTOR, the fact they never justified the fee was the issue. The game had enough content for 1-2 months. When you pay a monthly fee, you expect a constant flow of content updates that keep you busy. Look at Rift. Every 2-3 month the game has a big patch that adds a lot of stuff. There are constant world events and pretty much a constant stream of changes and little content updates. Now they have an expansion that nearly tripled the content.

People were happy to buy SWTOR knowing it was going to cost them monthly. The game just was not the greatest and once you beat your character's story, there wasn't much to do.

Guild Wars 2 suffers from that too (in my opinion) but since I'm not paying each month I can hardly knock that. I've gotten nearly 100 hours out of the game (which is quite a bit for me).

It will definitely be more difficult to sell a subscription based MMO, but it's not impossible.

The real thing you have to ask is, will this new combat system work and not turn into some dumb grindfest. The combat in the Elder Scrolls series has never been the deepest, and they are trying to model the MMO's combat off of the game. Their lasest reveals show some promising content. It looks like Guild Wars 2 in a lot of ways, a lot of good ways, but with the radical combat system they are proposing, will it be any good? Only time will tell.

Wasdie

Yeah, the problem is not subscription fees. The problem is in the games themselves. Afterall, RIFT is quite successful, is it not?

Of course, it is more than just lack of content that killed SWTOR. SWTOR was also mechanically broken and poorly executed. It simply put was a bad game. I couldnt even force myself to get much farther than level 30.

Guild Wars 2's biggest issue imo is how dumbed down it is compared to its predecessor. It has nifty ideas, but I feel it fell flat on its face when it came to execution, as a result we see all this zerging.

Avatar image for Kh1ndjal
Kh1ndjal

2788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Kh1ndjal
Member since 2003 • 2788 Posts

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"][QUOTE="BSC14"]

Heck yeah....everything should be measured by a MMO that has nothing to do at max level.

I'm sorry....I had to say that. It's just the truth.....imo it's not woth calling it an MMO is there isn't any endgame. But hey that's just my opinion.

Elann2008

the whole game is the endgame. it's been said countless times, pvp, wvw, questing, dungeons, and just about everything else except perhaps fractals of the mists can be done without reaching max level. why do you want your mind to be blown at "MAX LEVEL"? what if you could do all those things at *gasp* not max level? i've played 200+ hours and i'm still seeing new things in the game. cool things like giant monster events. if you want a grind, just say so.

That's false. The whole game isn't endgame. There really isn't an endgame in GW2. They say that, and people say that just to come up with an excuse. Endgame by definition of MMO's has always been what it was and is, like in World of Warcraft. WoW has endgame. GW2 simply doesn't and never had it in GW1 either. This is Arena.net we're talking about. Every MMO has a grind. I played over 400 hours in GW2, and a good portion of that felt like a grind.

For instance, earning tokens for VANITY gear from the dungeons at lvl 80. They are pointless for anything but aesthetics which is crap and felt like a terrible grind and wasted time.

that's because the prerequisite for endgame is grind. gw2 isn't a conventional mmo and it doesn't have a conventional grind. take lol for example. it's got levels and runes, but there's no grind or endgame. The endgame is the light at the end of the grind tunnel. If there's no tunnel and you're already in the light, you won't notice the benefit.
Avatar image for deactivated-601cef9eca9e5
deactivated-601cef9eca9e5

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-601cef9eca9e5
Member since 2007 • 3296 Posts

After watching the lastest Gameplay video with developer commentary, I'm really looking forward to it. As long as it uses the same model as Guild Wars (pay for the game once, no fee's) then i'm all over it.

This is the video that changed my view on the game:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlEipFtHw7o

HyperWarlock
I have to really agree here. This game looks like an Elder Scrolls game. It looks like it has a similar UI to Skyrim and for all of you who claim this is just another WoW clone you are very wrong. For starters, this game will have real time combat (just like games from the Elder Scrolls series) and unlike any MMO I have ever played. In addition they are going to have 1 mega server which sounds pretty awesome. Also, to whoever said every MMO that gets released fails if it is not WoW is completely wrong. The Old Republic and Guild Wars 2 were very successful. Both sold millions of units and both were award winning games.
Avatar image for BSC14
BSC14

4187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 BSC14
Member since 2002 • 4187 Posts

[QUOTE="BSC14"]

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"] guild wars 2 is my new MMO yardstick.Kh1ndjal

Heck yeah....everything should be measured by a MMO that has nothing to do at max level.

I'm sorry....I had to say that. It's just the truth.....imo it's not woth calling it an MMO is there isn't any endgame. But hey that's just my opinion.

the whole game is the endgame. it's been said countless times, pvp, wvw, questing, dungeons, and just about everything else except perhaps fractals of the mists can be done without reaching max level. why do you want your mind to be blown at "MAX LEVEL"? what if you could do all those things at *gasp* not max level? i've played 200+ hours and i'm still seeing new things in the game. cool things like giant monster events. if you want a grind, just say so.

I dont expect to have my mind blown at max level but to me pvp, repeating old dynamic quest and a handful of dungeons is not my idea of things to do at max lvl. Besides the dynamic events feel completely artificial and staged so I dont find grinding crappy dynamic events to be all that much fun.

Most people I have talked to say they quit playing GW2 within a few weeks.I wish I could have even gotten that much fun out of it.

SWTOR > GW2....it's true...it's almost science.

Avatar image for HyperWarlock
HyperWarlock

3295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 HyperWarlock
Member since 2011 • 3295 Posts

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"][QUOTE="BSC14"]

Heck yeah....everything should be measured by a MMO that has nothing to do at max level.

I'm sorry....I had to say that. It's just the truth.....imo it's not woth calling it an MMO is there isn't any endgame. But hey that's just my opinion.

BSC14

the whole game is the endgame. it's been said countless times, pvp, wvw, questing, dungeons, and just about everything else except perhaps fractals of the mists can be done without reaching max level. why do you want your mind to be blown at "MAX LEVEL"? what if you could do all those things at *gasp* not max level? i've played 200+ hours and i'm still seeing new things in the game. cool things like giant monster events. if you want a grind, just say so.

I dont expect to have my mind blown at max level but to me pvp, repeating old dynamic quest and a handful of dungeons is not my idea of things to do at max lvl. Besides the dynamic events feel completely artificial and staged so I dont find grinding crappy dynamic events to be all that much fun.

Most people I have talked to say they quit playing GW2 within a few weeks.I wish I could have even gotten that much fun out of it.

SWTOR > GW2....it's true...it's almost science.

I agree, while SWTOR is far from perfect, I had a lot more fun with it than GW2. I played GW2 for a total of 6 hours before giving up, I got about 150 hours out of SWTOR.

Avatar image for bonafidetk
bonafidetk

3911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 bonafidetk
Member since 2004 • 3911 Posts
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"] the whole game is the endgame. it's been said countless times, pvp, wvw, questing, dungeons, and just about everything else except perhaps fractals of the mists can be done without reaching max level. why do you want your mind to be blown at "MAX LEVEL"? what if you could do all those things at *gasp* not max level? i've played 200+ hours and i'm still seeing new things in the game. cool things like giant monster events. if you want a grind, just say so.Kh1ndjal

That's false. The whole game isn't endgame. There really isn't an endgame in GW2. They say that, and people say that just to come up with an excuse. Endgame by definition of MMO's has always been what it was and is, like in World of Warcraft. WoW has endgame. GW2 simply doesn't and never had it in GW1 either. This is Arena.net we're talking about. Every MMO has a grind. I played over 400 hours in GW2, and a good portion of that felt like a grind.

For instance, earning tokens for VANITY gear from the dungeons at lvl 80. They are pointless for anything but aesthetics which is crap and felt like a terrible grind and wasted time.

that's because the prerequisite for endgame is grind. gw2 isn't a conventional mmo and it doesn't have a conventional grind. take lol for example. it's got levels and runes, but there's no grind or endgame. The endgame is the light at the end of the grind tunnel. If there's no tunnel and you're already in the light, you won't notice the benefit.

I played GW2 on the free weekend. There was a very obvious and conventional grind. Or did I miss something? Not really complaining, it was quite pleasant but I'm not spending $60 on it. I'll pick it up later, cheaper. I dont really have time to invest in an MMO anyways.
Avatar image for Kh1ndjal
Kh1ndjal

2788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Kh1ndjal
Member since 2003 • 2788 Posts

SWTOR > GW2....it's true...it's almost science.

BSC14
Really? because after playing both games, reading the metacritic critic and user reviews, not to mention SWTOR came earlier so it set the bar for future MMOs, everything points the other way... perhaps you gentlemen just have different expectations from mmos than me.
Avatar image for deactivated-601cef9eca9e5
deactivated-601cef9eca9e5

3296

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-601cef9eca9e5
Member since 2007 • 3296 Posts

[QUOTE="BSC14"]

SWTOR > GW2....it's true...it's almost science.

Kh1ndjal

Really? because after playing both games, reading the metacritic critic and user reviews, not to mention SWTOR came earlier so it set the bar for future MMOs, everything points the other way... perhaps you gentlemen just have different expectations from mmos than me.

I haven't played Guild Wars 2 so I can't speak for it. I have played Guild Wars, City of Heroes, WoW, Star Wars Galaxies and ToR. Out of the mix the most boring is WoW in my opinion. Starting playing it again about 6 months ago and I stopped because of how dated it was. Star Wars Galaxies still goes down as one of my favorites because probably the most unique MMO I have played (Pre CU) and even though ToR wasn't what I expected it is still a great game and great for any fan of the previous games.

The thing that will set ESO apart of other MMOs of its genre (WoW, Guild Wars 2) is the real time combat. Being a 3rd person MMO with real time combat like that in Skyrim we could see a pretty awesome game. I love MMOs, but I usually hate the combat :(

Avatar image for pl4yer_f0und
pl4yer_f0und

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 pl4yer_f0und
Member since 2009 • 990 Posts

I probably won't play it, I try to avoid MMOs, but it looks great, and is starting to feel like like the Elder Scrolls universe, which is I think the most important aspect the devs need to nail in order for this to be successful.

Avatar image for blueJupiterJazz
blueJupiterJazz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 blueJupiterJazz
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
I don't care if it's good or not, as long as it doesn't have negative percussions on the next games. I don't like the art style. It looks generic and stupid. Sure, maybe kind of smooth and nice to look at but not interesting. Another thing, the creatures/enemies/character design. Some of what I've seen looks alright and if they remade those creatures without the cartoony proportins I've seen so far they could probably be kind of cool, but things like the big skeleton dude just look outrageous and out of place in a TES game. Other things that bug are the fact the Argonians are my favorite race and their design looks like it's been raped. They're even more goofy looking then the damn skeleton. Their facial structure and tails look ripped out of f*cking Mickey Mouse. Aside from all this, I expect it to be an average game. Nothing special, and definately not worth a monthly fee if they do that. It looks uninspired and meh. Maybe fun as long as the surface features appear kind of new, but the core game looks like something we've all done before. I don't see any lasting appeal. All in all, if it has no effect on the aesthetic of the next game and whatever location they make it in, I could care less about this game unless it turns out to be exceptionaly good, which I'm highly skeptical of. In fact, I call it. Average game, short live-span for most gamers, waste of money and hopefully they realise how stupid this was. Whatever. GTAV should hopefully out in the next few months and Fallout 4 . . . some time in the near future. Here's what I just remembered thinking earlier, I think the most damage it can do is ruin the mystery and creative options for of the next TES if it's somewhere we haven't really beem. I didn't play anything before Morrowind so I don't ecactly where we've been, but since I was like 80 hours into Skyrim I kept wondering what the other provinces would look like. Looking at Morrowind and Skyrim, I'm sure they could do all kinds of cool things with a place like Elsweyr or Valenwood if they spent enough time on it. Right now I see most locations in the new provinces looking very similar. Look at how different Riften and Markarth are. I don't think they'll do something like that in the new provinces in TESO. I expect a lot of cities with similar buildings and a generic setup. Imagine if Skyrim was nothing but Dawnstars. That's what I dread the most for the game, them killing ideas for new areas and enemies before they exist.
Avatar image for Assimilat0r
Assimilat0r

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#61 Assimilat0r
Member since 2011 • 767 Posts

I was so bad trolling tESO , and over hypering GW2. But now i am in tottal missunderstanding. After finding GW2 very disappointing. I am now hooked to ESO got same old feeling for game of a generation same as i had at 2004 when WoW realised.

Avatar image for Assimilat0r
Assimilat0r

767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#62 Assimilat0r
Member since 2011 • 767 Posts

[QUOTE="BSC14"]

[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"] guild wars 2 is my new MMO yardstick.HyperWarlock

Heck yeah....everything should be measured by a MMO that has nothing to do at max level.

I'm sorry....I had to say that. It's just the truth.....imo it's not woth calling it an MMO is there isn't any endgame. But hey that's just my opinion.

Yeah, I found Guild Wars 2 to be really boring.

You must remember how bad i was trolling this forum and hyping GW2 aroud, i am pritty much disappointed how bad that game is at end lvl game content for hard core players and how much it really lacks of RPG.

Avatar image for Ricardomz
Ricardomz

2715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Ricardomz
Member since 2012 • 2715 Posts

Another MMO to bite the dust imo.

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

I don't see it succeeding.

MMO's are very very difficult to maintain and the chance of it declining after the first year or even six months is large.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#65 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

After watching the lastest Gameplay video with developer commentary, I'm really looking forward to it. As long as it uses the same model as Guild Wars (pay for the game once, no fee's) then i'm all over it.

This is the video that changed my view on the game:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlEipFtHw7o

HyperWarlock

I came here to say that it looked quite underwhelming, and I didn't like the idea.

Watched that video.

I'm sold, as long as it's not a subscription model.

Have never, and will never, pay a monthly fee to play a game.

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts
I can't wait. I think it'll be a great game.
Avatar image for geitenvla
geitenvla

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#67 geitenvla
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

To be honest, for me TES games are singleplayer games. I'm not really interested in a TES online. I'll wait for TES VI and in the meantime I keep myself occupied with Skyrim.

Avatar image for Rattlesnake_8
Rattlesnake_8

18452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#68 Rattlesnake_8
Member since 2004 • 18452 Posts
It's an MMO so i'll pass.. looking forward to the next single player Elder Scrolls.
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Looks better than i thought it would. Ill wait for reviews before i buy it though.

Avatar image for dracolich55
dracolich55

2343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 dracolich55
Member since 2010 • 2343 Posts
WoW killer #3987......
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

I'm predicting a mild to moderate flop

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Looks utterly uninteresting. Could be cool, but it can't shake that, to me, atm. I imagine Zenimax / Bethesda are worried about the overwhelmingly mute reception of it's announcement.
Avatar image for Led_poison
Led_poison

10146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Led_poison
Member since 2004 • 10146 Posts
Looks terrible, Skyrim did not have good combat system, and it wasn't particularly deep either, the animations seem off, specially those with other people but at least they have time so they can improve it.
Avatar image for mirgamer
mirgamer

2489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 mirgamer
Member since 2003 • 2489 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"]Looks utterly uninteresting. Could be cool, but it can't shake that, to me, atm. I imagine Zenimax / Bethesda are worried about the overwhelmingly mute reception of it's announcement.

Actually TESO has been voted as the most anticipated MMO on several popular MMO-centric websites along with nominations on many others. http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2013/01/09/the-elder-scrolls-online-voted-most-anticipated-mmog-of-2013 But obviously, if anyone is anticipating a total revolution of the MMO formula/WoW killer, they will just end up disappointed.
Avatar image for James00715
James00715

2484

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 James00715
Member since 2003 • 2484 Posts

I'm watching it but don't have any expectations. I probably won't touch it if it requires subscription. The best option I think is B2P like Guild Wars 2. It seems to have a lot of similar features to GW2, such as 3 pvp factions, questing through exploration, etc. Well, if it's far above WoW, maybe a subscription would be worth it. It just seems impossible for a new game to compete with WoW's polished state.

Avatar image for Kh1ndjal
Kh1ndjal

2788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Kh1ndjal
Member since 2003 • 2788 Posts
[QUOTE="mirgamer"] Actually TESO has been voted as the most anticipated MMO on several popular MMO-centric websites along with nominations on many others. http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2013/01/09/the-elder-scrolls-online-voted-most-anticipated-mmog-of-2013 But obviously, if anyone is anticipating a total revolution of the MMO formula/WoW killer, they will just end up disappointed.

Guild Wars 2 has been named game of the year by a few publications, with PC gamer giving it MMO of the year, Gamespot giving it PC game of the year, and the general feeling on these forums is that it sucks. but now that the elder scrolls online has been voted most anticipated game, THAT should be a reason to be excited? if anything, we should wait for the 9/10 and game of the year awards before bashing it.
Avatar image for Hate_Squad
Hate_Squad

1357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Hate_Squad
Member since 2007 • 1357 Posts

the game will be a success,at least initially,elder scrolls is a casual series now,tons of bro-gamers and girls play it,and thats what worries me,it will have a bad community.well as long at the game itself is good and had a steady flow of content i may try to overlook it.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="mirgamer"][QUOTE="skrat_01"]Looks utterly uninteresting. Could be cool, but it can't shake that, to me, atm. I imagine Zenimax / Bethesda are worried about the overwhelmingly mute reception of it's announcement.

Actually TESO has been voted as the most anticipated MMO on several popular MMO-centric websites along with nominations on many others. http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2013/01/09/the-elder-scrolls-online-voted-most-anticipated-mmog-of-2013 But obviously, if anyone is anticipating a total revolution of the MMO formula/WoW killer, they will just end up disappointed.

Really? interesting. From all the major gaming outlets, not the MMO focused ones at least, the response was extremely muted, have to say. To the extent that the developers have been responding to the press feedback, or so the press updates seem to indicate. Which is interesting in itself.
Avatar image for -Origin-
-Origin-

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#79 -Origin-
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

I'm willing to give it a try once it comes out. However, it better be heavy on TES lore because that's a large aspect of the game I'm looking forward to. I'm not one to read up on every game's lore but TES lore is by far my favorite of any video game. If TESO manages to immerse enough in the universe instead of the traditional MMO design where it feels like a game, then perhaps this could be a real outstanding MMO.

Avatar image for mirgamer
mirgamer

2489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 mirgamer
Member since 2003 • 2489 Posts
[QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"][QUOTE="mirgamer"] Actually TESO has been voted as the most anticipated MMO on several popular MMO-centric websites along with nominations on many others. http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2013/01/09/the-elder-scrolls-online-voted-most-anticipated-mmog-of-2013 But obviously, if anyone is anticipating a total revolution of the MMO formula/WoW killer, they will just end up disappointed.

Guild Wars 2 has been named game of the year by a few publications, with PC gamer giving it MMO of the year, Gamespot giving it PC game of the year, and the general feeling on these forums is that it sucks. but now that the elder scrolls online has been voted most anticipated game, THAT should be a reason to be excited? if anything, we should wait for the 9/10 and game of the year awards before bashing it.

And what is so wrong with folks getting excited over it? Coz apparently alot of them already are, going by the awards that it received. Player votes, mind you. So general feelings in forums are perfect indicators for everything? Since when? And which forums would that be? This one, which is rabidly anti-MMO everything? If forums are to be taken seriously, WoW would be the most hated game on Earth. Its still the number 1 MMO, however, so much for that. I don't see the relevance of Guild Wars 2 in this anyway, skrat_01 specifically stated that there is a mute reception to TESO and I'm simply pointing out the exact opposite to his inaccurate statement. Personally, I'm on the fence on this one. It definitely has the potential to be the real DAOC 2.0 (GW2 has nice WVW but its no DAOC RVR since every side is actually the same) so I"m looking at it with a healthy amount of interest.
Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#81 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts
going to stand by and wait for release to actually give an opinion. i need to see what the end game is like
Avatar image for geitenvla
geitenvla

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#82 geitenvla
Member since 2006 • 960 Posts

I'm willing to give it a try once it comes out. However, it better be heavy on TES lore because that's a large aspect of the game I'm looking forward to. I'm not one to read up on every game's lore but TES lore is by far my favorite of any video game. If TESO manages to immerse enough in the universe instead of the traditional MMO design where it feels like a game, then perhaps this could be a real outstanding MMO.

-Origin-
As important as the LORE may be, I think Skyrim's prerogative is the modabilty. With mods and the creator, I created my own world just the way I like it. I don't see that happening in a TES MMO.
Avatar image for Kh1ndjal
Kh1ndjal

2788

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Kh1ndjal
Member since 2003 • 2788 Posts
[QUOTE="mirgamer"][QUOTE="Kh1ndjal"][QUOTE="mirgamer"] Actually TESO has been voted as the most anticipated MMO on several popular MMO-centric websites along with nominations on many others. http://elderscrollsonline.com/en/news/post/2013/01/09/the-elder-scrolls-online-voted-most-anticipated-mmog-of-2013 But obviously, if anyone is anticipating a total revolution of the MMO formula/WoW killer, they will just end up disappointed.

Guild Wars 2 has been named game of the year by a few publications, with PC gamer giving it MMO of the year, Gamespot giving it PC game of the year, and the general feeling on these forums is that it sucks. but now that the elder scrolls online has been voted most anticipated game, THAT should be a reason to be excited? if anything, we should wait for the 9/10 and game of the year awards before bashing it.

And what is so wrong with folks getting excited over it? Coz apparently alot of them already are, going by the awards that it received. Player votes, mind you. So general feelings in forums are perfect indicators for everything? Since when? And which forums would that be? This one, which is rabidly anti-MMO everything? If forums are to be taken seriously, WoW would be the most hated game on Earth. Its still the number 1 MMO, however, so much for that. I don't see the relevance of Guild Wars 2 in this anyway, skrat_01 specifically stated that there is a mute reception to TESO and I'm simply pointing out the exact opposite to his inaccurate statement. Personally, I'm on the fence on this one. It definitely has the potential to be the real DAOC 2.0 (GW2 has nice WVW but its no DAOC RVR since every side is actually the same) so I"m looking at it with a healthy amount of interest.

sorry, it appears that your point is pretty much what i was trying to say, but i had lost it in the context. i was also trying to point out how difficult it is to judge an mmo before its release, specifically mmos, because history has not been too kind to the vast majority of them.