I will also say Bioshock. Mainly because once you finished the game, there is no point in playing it again. It was to linear and once you know the story the best thing about the game is over.
I found crysis to be an awesome game, but could have used about half a more year in development for overall better design to the gameplay and world. I was hyped for bio shock and the reviews were great but in all honesty, I thought it wasnt near AAA, never even finished it.
World in Conflict or Bioshock. Bioshock is the worstthough and maybe I don't like WiC because I'm a CoH fanboy but seriously, do you think WiC is better than CoH putting multiplayer aside?
Definitely World in Conflict. Sorry but that game is a TERRIBLE real-time strategy game. I mean using the WSAD keys to move the camera? What the hell? ;)
Seriously, the game is simply not fun and does not have any of the depth of a true real-time strategy game.
I would say Crysis was a little disappointing gameplay wise. Yes you do have a lot of options when it comes to approaching each fight due to your nano suit, but I've found that I don't really have incentive necessarily to play the game differently than I would play any other FPS game. That IS disappointing.
truthfully, I don't understand where all these Crysis haters are coming from. I absolutely loved the game and the sandbox editor is perhaps one of the best things to happen to gaming in a long while.
Bioshock, Painkiller is a masterpiece compared to; at least the core gun play in games like Pinkiller or Doom 3 are satisfactory, even the boring combat mechanics in a rpg as Oblivion are better than in "love your stillson clank" Bioshock.
truthfully, I don't understand where all these Crysis haters are coming from. I absolutely loved the game and the sandbox editor is perhaps one of the best things to happen to gaming in a long while. _Pedro_
Well a lot of them probably can't run it lol. I agree with you though, it's one of the greatest games of all time for me.
truthfully, I don't understand where all these Crysis haters are coming from. I absolutely loved the game and the sandbox editor is perhaps one of the best things to happen to gaming in a long while. _Pedro_
Agree 100%...most Crysis haters haven't played it and if they have the PC they are using wasn't up to the challenge.
Crysis was the major one i was looking forward to that didnt deliver like i thought it would. i enjoyed playing it none the less just didnt live up to the hype (imo).
1. Crysis (not only most overreated this year, but also "in years"; its snobbish fanboia helps its popularity a ton in this kind of contest)
2. World in Conflict (while Company of heroes and Dawn of War games were getting lower scores...that's a joke)
3. Bioshock (only because System Shock 2 was getting lower score way back...it's almost like Torment, BGs, and Fallouts got lower scores than Oblivion; only that, Bioshock is more RPG-ish than Oblivion and overall a better game)
I will also say Bioshock. Mainly because once you finished the game, there is no point in playing it again. It was to linear and once you know the story the best thing about the game is over.Mike1234234
Log in to comment