Exscuse me if i sound to harsh when i say this, but come on, look at the leap from sims 2 to sims 3...COMPARE THE DIFFRENCE, ITS HUGE!!!
And whilst we are on the discustion of graphics i would just like to say that the dircetors of the game dident go all out on the game vbecause they wabted it to run well. Im more happy with a well running game than with a little bit more realisim. Ths sims is what it is, so what if its not like call of duty or anytning that looks realistic, its just more fun than real.
People have to stop nagging about graphics because it's driving me round the bend...
sim, ugh....
sim_2008
The Sims 3, if the game lives up to expectations, will be a huge leap forward for the series - not a baby step.
The Sims 2, which I loved for the first week, in the end felt too confined - I really wanted to get away from my lot and go explore the world and interact with other sims. And it was extremely odd that my own sims were growing older, and advancing, but all the other sims were not. So the two big issues I had with The Sims 2 seem to have been addressed.
My hope is that The Sims 3 will really be the beginning of the series, and that I'll spend more than just a week playing it. I have my fingers crossed on this one.
But about the graphics. Honestly, I am disappointed. I understand that E.A. has created a cash cow here, and would clearly be shooting themselves in the foot if they were to have created a robust engine, which would've worked on only state of the art hardware. But man, if they had created an engine for the Enthusiast market, this game could've been through the roof. Imagine a Sims game with a city on par with that of Liberty City in GTA 4. That would have been my dream game realized.
Log in to comment