Trine demo - Simply WOW!

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for HOMIE_G64
HOMIE_G64

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#52 HOMIE_G64
Member since 2005 • 1482 Posts
I might pick it up... the $30 price tag is kind of unappealing to me though.
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

I didn't actually say that the game was bad - of course I haven't even played it.

The comment I made was that I'm turned off by side-scrollers in which objects have been placed solely for the purpose of creating an obstacle. The swinging logs, for example. Why are they in the world? Their only purpose, it seems, is to create a swinging object from which the player can launch his character onto a higher platform. Stuff like that really detracts from the atmosphere (for lack of a better word).

In Prince Of Persia, the dungeon seemed to make sense - kind of. It was nowhere near as well thought out as the city from Another World though. And to repeat myself, the developer of Another World completely got it wrong with the next game that they produced - it was exactly the type of thing we're seeing in Trine: far too many objects were placed into the world for no apparent reason, other than to create an obstacle, or to aid the player's character in moving from point A to point B.

Trine might end up being a very good side scrolling game - but I have my doubts, based on what I've seen so far, that it will become a classic, like Another World, or even the very first Prince of Persia.

EDIT: The reason I posted all that, I suppose, was kind of in response to the title of this thread. Trine actually didn't wow me at all - for the reasons I stated. There's no way I'm putting down $30 for this.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"]

I didn't actually say that the game was bad - of course I haven't even played it.

The comment I made was that I'm turned off by side-scrollers in which objects have been placed solely for the purpose of creating an obstacle. The swinging logs, for example. Why are they in the world? Their only purpose, it seems, is to create a swinging object from which the player can launch his character onto a higher platform. Stuff like that really detracts from the atmosphere (for lack of a better word).

In Prince Of Persia, the dungeon seemed to make sense - kind of. It was nowhere near as well thought out as the city from Another World though. And to repeat myself, the developer of Another World completely got it wrong with the next game that they produced - it was exactly the type of thing we're seeing in Trine: far too many objects were placed into the world for no apparent reason, other than to create an obstacle, or to aid the player's character in moving from point A to point B.

Trine might end up being a very good side scrolling game - but I have my doubts, based on what I've seen so far, that it will become a classic, like Another World, or even the very first Prince of Persia.

EDIT: The reason I posted all that, I suppose, was kind of in response to the title of this thread. Trine actually didn't wow me at all - for the reasons I stated. There's no way I'm putting down $30 for this.

Wow. :( I guess every game doesn't gel with everybody, though my suspension of disbelief in this kind of game isn't very important to me. Even in Prince of Persia, I'd wonder why they had spiked traps outside of bedrooms, though the place did make much more sense as an actual 'city' that people lived in.
Avatar image for Bumzur
Bumzur

560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Bumzur
Member since 2009 • 560 Posts
Got it working. I loved it. My brother and I, each using a 360 controller, had a blast playing through the demo on coop.
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#56 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
Pretty good game definitely a fantastic art style, shadowgrounds survivor was just the beginning of great things for these guys.
Avatar image for chandu83
chandu83

4864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#57 chandu83
Member since 2005 • 4864 Posts
Pretty good game definitely a fantastic art style, shadowgrounds survivor was just the beginning of great things for these guys.nutcrackr
Finally tried it, I see.
Avatar image for FelipeInside
FelipeInside

28548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 FelipeInside
Member since 2003 • 28548 Posts

I didn't actually say that the game was bad - of course I haven't even played it.

The comment I made was that I'm turned off by side-scrollers in which objects have been placed solely for the purpose of creating an obstacle. The swinging logs, for example. Why are they in the world? Their only purpose, it seems, is to create a swinging object from which the player can launch his character onto a higher platform. Stuff like that really detracts from the atmosphere (for lack of a better word).

In Prince Of Persia, the dungeon seemed to make sense - kind of. It was nowhere near as well thought out as the city from Another World though. And to repeat myself, the developer of Another World completely got it wrong with the next game that they produced - it was exactly the type of thing we're seeing in Trine: far too many objects were placed into the world for no apparent reason, other than to create an obstacle, or to aid the player's character in moving from point A to point B.

Trine might end up being a very good side scrolling game - but I have my doubts, based on what I've seen so far, that it will become a classic, like Another World, or even the very first Prince of Persia.

EDIT: The reason I posted all that, I suppose, was kind of in response to the title of this thread. Trine actually didn't wow me at all - for the reasons I stated. There's no way I'm putting down $30 for this.

Charles_Dickens

WoW Charles....I'm amazed....

as I was playing the demo, one thing I thought about was "I'm sure I'll see Charles_Dickens on the board praising this game for such a new idea on controls....graphics....and immersion" Guess not....

Me....I love it...can't wait to buy it.

ADDED: obstacles are part of a platformer...they are there to confuse you sometimes and stir you away from the right path. All Prince of Persia games had them...

Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts
Got it working. I loved it. My brother and I, each using a 360 controller, had a blast playing through the demo on coop.Bumzur
theres a coop option? i didn't even notice
Avatar image for GPAddict
GPAddict

5964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#60 GPAddict
Member since 2005 • 5964 Posts

Its cool how you can interact with most of the game environment. I think I'll add this one to my list.

Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

[QUOTE="Charles_Dickens"]

I didn't actually say that the game was bad - of course I haven't even played it.

The comment I made was that I'm turned off by side-scrollers in which objects have been placed solely for the purpose of creating an obstacle. The swinging logs, for example. Why are they in the world? Their only purpose, it seems, is to create a swinging object from which the player can launch his character onto a higher platform. Stuff like that really detracts from the atmosphere (for lack of a better word).

In Prince Of Persia, the dungeon seemed to make sense - kind of. It was nowhere near as well thought out as the city from Another World though. And to repeat myself, the developer of Another World completely got it wrong with the next game that they produced - it was exactly the type of thing we're seeing in Trine: far too many objects were placed into the world for no apparent reason, other than to create an obstacle, or to aid the player's character in moving from point A to point B.

Trine might end up being a very good side scrolling game - but I have my doubts, based on what I've seen so far, that it will become a classic, like Another World, or even the very first Prince of Persia.

EDIT: The reason I posted all that, I suppose, was kind of in response to the title of this thread. Trine actually didn't wow me at all - for the reasons I stated. There's no way I'm putting down $30 for this.

FelipeInside

WoW Charles....I'm amazed....

as I was playing the demo, one thing I thought about was "I'm sure I'll see Charles_Dickens on the board praising this game for such a new idea on controls....graphics....and immersion" Guess not....

Me....I love it...can't wait to buy it.

ADDED: obstacles are part of a platformer...they are there to confuse you sometimes and stir you away from the right path. All Prince of Persia games had them...

Well, you're right, of course: platformers, or side-scrollers, are nothing but big obstacle courses in which the player must move from point A to point B. I just think that these types of games are much more creative, and enjoyable to play, when the obstacles fit in and are a part of the universe in which the game takes place. And again, I'm not saying that the game will bad - but this demo doesn't make me want to buy the game. It's like that guy above said, The Super Mario games are just beyond me. I don't understand that type of game at all.
Avatar image for gamespotman01
gamespotman01

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 gamespotman01
Member since 2007 • 40 Posts

Yea love it. Ty for the info.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Well, you're right, of course: platformers, or side-scrollers, are nothing but big obstacle courses in which the player must move from point A to point B. I just think that these types of games are much more creative, and enjoyable to play, when the obstacles fit in and are a part of the universe in which the game takes place. Charles_Dickens

Who says Trine's universe follows our logic?

Avatar image for Quintinius
Quintinius

1050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 Quintinius
Member since 2006 • 1050 Posts
I played the game with a buddy on co-op and I had a blast. The controls were mapped to the 360 pads REALLY well (even Valve games don't have as good controller support) and "by my pants" it was a lot of fun. Gonna play though it again using the KB/M and maybe again with 3 people. 30 euro? a bit steep but I'll get it.
Avatar image for Tuzolord
Tuzolord

1409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#65 Tuzolord
Member since 2007 • 1409 Posts

awesome Game! I just think its a bit overpriced.

Avatar image for AmitAmar
AmitAmar

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 AmitAmar
Member since 2009 • 64 Posts

Will it have an Online Co-op on the PC?

Avatar image for duxter1
duxter1

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 87

User Lists: 0

#67 duxter1
Member since 2008 • 409 Posts

Will it have an Online Co-op on the PC?

AmitAmar

its not supposed to when its released but they sai it could be patched in

Avatar image for flclempire
flclempire

4914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#68 flclempire
Member since 2004 • 4914 Posts

If it had internet multiplayer I'd but it.