• 80 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Crocodile_Key
Crocodile_Key

224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#1 Crocodile_Key
Member since 2003 • 224 Posts

I have an older laptop that my wife used running windows 7. It ran terrible with windows 7 so I bought my wife a new laptop. I have windows 7 on my gaming computer and think it is a good OS, so this is not a windows bashing session.

I took my wifes old laptop (Dell Inspiron E1505 Core 2 Duo 1.4 ghz 4gb ram) and reformated the harddrive, then installed Ubuntu Linux. This laptop now runs just as fast as my wifes new laptop running windows 7. Linux is awesome. I wish there was more support for gaming on Linux. It is a great OS.

Come on developers, show linux some love too.

Avatar image for General_X
General_X

9137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 General_X
Member since 2003 • 9137 Posts
I would like to think I clean install of Windows 7 without the bloatware that comes preinstalled on almost all prebuilts would run just as well. Could be wrong but I've seen bloat do terrible terrible things to laptops.
Avatar image for DevilishFalcon
DevilishFalcon

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DevilishFalcon
Member since 2012 • 121 Posts

I am also a ubuntu linux user. I just love the OS badly. I have a PS3 so I don't worry much about the gaming drawback of the OS.

Rather than seeing the negative aspects of this OS we should see the positive ones. I wish Ubuntu was as much popular as Windows

Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 msfan1289
Member since 2011 • 1044 Posts

I have an older laptop that my wife used running windows 7. It ran terrible with windows 7 so I bought my wife a new laptop. I have windows 7 on my gaming computer and think it is a good OS, so this is not a windows bashing session.

I took my wifes old laptop (Dell Inspiron E1505 Core 2 Duo 1.4 ghz 4gb ram) and reformated the harddrive, then installed Ubuntu Linux. This laptop now runs just as fast as my wifes new laptop running windows 7. Linux is awesome. I wish there was more support for gaming on Linux. It is a great OS.

Come on developers, show linux some love too.

Crocodile_Key

i wonder if UDK supports Linux. if so ill see as a indie game dev. make games for Lunux, ill talk to my coders and see if thast something we can do, for the reason they know a lot about UDK.

but real quick im getting this problem when trying to install Ubuntu, im trying to install the windows installer version of Ubuntu, when it is about to finish the install i get a error saying "Permission denied" see the log for detail and only thing i can do is click ok and it closes everything. any way to fix this?

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

I would like to think I clean install of Windows 7 without the bloatware that comes preinstalled on almost all prebuilts would run just as well. Could be wrong but I've seen bloat do terrible terrible things to laptops.General_X

linux requires much less horsepower to run, regardless of how "clean" the windows 7 install works.

My ubuntu on my flash drive runs very nicely on an old 1.3Ghz single core celeron laptop.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Ubuntu is about as bloated in a fully functional state as Windows 7 bare (aka not functional).

That being said, Ubuntu is more bloated and resource intense than many other Linux distributions out there. Of course, this is because it is designed in such a way that it can be installed easily and is compatible with most hardware immediately.

An installation of Arch Linux, while much more involved than that of Ubuntu, will run even faster than Ubuntu ever could.

Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

Ubuntu is about as bloated in a fully functional state as Windows 7 bare (aka not functional).

That being said, Ubuntu is more bloated and resource intense than many other Linux distributions out there. Of course, this is because it is designed in such a way that it can be installed easily and is compatible with most hardware immediately.

An installation of Arch Linux, while much more involved than that of Ubuntu, will run even faster than Ubuntu ever could.

Tezcatlipoca666

and then we have stuff like DSL

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="Tezcatlipoca666"]

Ubuntu is about as bloated in a fully functional state as Windows 7 bare (aka not functional).

That being said, Ubuntu is more bloated and resource intense than many other Linux distributions out there. Of course, this is because it is designed in such a way that it can be installed easily and is compatible with most hardware immediately.

An installation of Arch Linux, while much more involved than that of Ubuntu, will run even faster than Ubuntu ever could.

GummiRaccoon

and then we have stuff like DSL

hahaha. yeah DSL is VERY light. It will run on really obsolete hardware if you want to. It's one of those distros that loads 100% into RAM (if you have enough) which makes it extremely snappy.

Avatar image for i_am_the_slime
i_am_the_slime

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 i_am_the_slime
Member since 2009 • 317 Posts

I've heard multiple times over the last year or two that Steam is coming to linux. I'm still skeptical, but it would be great if it happened.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

I've heard multiple times over the last year or two that Steam is coming to linux. I'm still skeptical, but it would be great if it happened.

i_am_the_slime

I think is because they were looking for people with Linux experience and credentials but honestly, it probably has to do with something else.

I love Linux but I don't think that it will ever seen Steam. Not any time soon for sure.

Avatar image for EliteM0nk3y
EliteM0nk3y

3382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 EliteM0nk3y
Member since 2010 • 3382 Posts

Wish I could say I had the experience with Ubuntu as you. I had many minor problems that just made it a headache to use. It was about as fast Windows 7 on my laptop(yay?), it made the fan always go full blast and caused a lot of heat, battery life went completely down hill, and I couldn't run any of my movies/tv show properly (either I didn't have the proper codec or there was a s*** load of tearing).

So after a month or so of that I simply reinstalled Windows 7 and have been perfectly happy since.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

Wish I could say I had the experience with Ubuntu as you. I had many minor problems that just made it a headache to use. It was about as fast Windows 7 on my laptop(yay?), it made the fan always go full blast and caused a lot of heat, battery life went completely down hill, and I couldn't run any of my movies/tv show properly (either I didn't have the proper codec or there was a s*** load of tearing).

So after a month or so of that I simply reinstalled Windows 7 and have been perfectly happy since.

EliteM0nk3y

Sounds like you were having ACPI issues or maybe a video driver issue.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Too bad video performance is crap in Lunix. Stuff like touchpad support in Linux is also not as good as Windows, and I don't like it too much on laptops.

I prefer it for servers or work compooters.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

This is almost certainly driver related but my Asus G74SX actually performs better under Windows 7 than with Linux Ubuntu/Mint.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Yeah linux tries to keep things simple, Windows tries to keep things a secret. I prefer Fedora over Ubuntu but Ubuntu has so much more support and many more GUI tools so it's better for beginners or people interested in learning about linux.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Yeah linux tries to keep things simple, Windows tries to keep things a secret. I prefer Fedora over Ubuntu but Ubuntu has so much more support and many more GUI tools so it's better for beginners or people interested in learning about linux.JohnF111
lunix tries to keep thigns simple? ahahahaha
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#17 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]Yeah linux tries to keep things simple, Windows tries to keep things a secret. I prefer Fedora over Ubuntu but Ubuntu has so much more support and many more GUI tools so it's better for beginners or people interested in learning about linux.JigglyWiggly_
lunix tries to keep thigns simple? ahahahaha

It does, and succeeds from what I've seen. Boot process is simple as hell, the commands work at a very simple level and do very basic things, what isn't simple about that?

It may not be easy but it's simple.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

Avatar image for msfan1289
msfan1289

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 msfan1289
Member since 2011 • 1044 Posts

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

gmaster456

which is teh best versiont o get the 32 bit or 64 biit?

my PC

8GB RAM 1600

Phenom II X4 955

GTX 570

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="gmaster456"]

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

msfan1289

which is teh best versiont o get the 32 bit or 64 biit?

my PC

8GB RAM 1600

Phenom II X4 955

GTX 570

Derp 64 bit like your 64 bit windows.

I remember running Xubuntu on an old laptop. 700mhz pentium 3, 128mb ram, 10GB HDD. It booted in less than 10 seconds.

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="JohnF111"]Yeah linux tries to keep things simple, Windows tries to keep things a secret. I prefer Fedora over Ubuntu but Ubuntu has so much more support and many more GUI tools so it's better for beginners or people interested in learning about linux.JohnF111

lunix tries to keep thigns simple? ahahahaha

It does, and succeeds from what I've seen. Boot process is simple as hell, the commands work at a very simple level and do very basic things, what isn't simple about that?

It may not be easy but it's simple.

I don't think you are using the term simple correctly.

as jiggles pointed out.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] lunix tries to keep thigns simple? ahahahahaNailedGR

It does, and succeeds from what I've seen. Boot process is simple as hell, the commands work at a very simple level and do very basic things, what isn't simple about that?

It may not be easy but it's simple.

I don't think you are using the term simple correctly.

as jiggles pointed out.

So how should I use it? To me it means "not elaborate". Not sure how else it could be used in this case.
Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

I use Ubuntu its a amazing os i like it way better then windows 7. runs way faster on any pc not just older ones. I remember in one of my theards a win fan boy kept screaming at me to prove ubuntu was faster. I posted video about how it boots up faster and loads apps faster but he said " that does not prove its faster"

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

I use Ubuntu its a amazing os i like it way better then windows 7. runs way faster on any pc not just older ones. I remember in one of my theards a win fan boy kept screaming at me to prove ubuntu was faster. I posted video about how it boots up faster and loads apps faster but he said " that does not prove its faster"

dontshackzmii
he's right he prolly means cpu perf
Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

I use Ubuntu its a amazing os i like it way better then windows 7. runs way faster on any pc not just older ones. I remember in one of my theards a win fan boy kept screaming at me to prove ubuntu was faster. I posted video about how it boots up faster and loads apps faster but he said " that does not prove its faster"

dontshackzmii

He's technically right. There still isn't any proof for all he knew the Ubuntu machine was on an SSD. Unless you have it in a dual boot, or two separate but identical machines there is know way of being 100% sure. You have to eliminate all variables. Both machines have a clean install etc.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="General_X"]I would like to think I clean install of Windows 7 without the bloatware that comes preinstalled on almost all prebuilts would run just as well. Could be wrong but I've seen bloat do terrible terrible things to laptops.GummiRaccoon

linux requires much less horsepower to run, regardless of how "clean" the windows 7 install works.

My ubuntu on my flash drive runs very nicely on an old 1.3Ghz single core celeron laptop.

Not necessarily. Windows 7 starter runs better on my netbook than xubuntu.
Avatar image for rolltide101x
rolltide101x

580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 rolltide101x
Member since 2007 • 580 Posts

Ubuntu isnt much faster than Windows 7 (if your cpu has the proper resources to run it) Ubuntu is very bloated. Debian takes away this bloat and the crappy Unity interface so it is much faster than either

Avatar image for dontshackzmii
dontshackzmii

6026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 dontshackzmii
Member since 2009 • 6026 Posts

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

I use Ubuntu its a amazing os i like it way better then windows 7. runs way faster on any pc not just older ones. I remember in one of my theards a win fan boy kept screaming at me to prove ubuntu was faster. I posted video about how it boots up faster and loads apps faster but he said " that does not prove its faster"

gmaster456

He's technically right. There still isn't any proof for all he knew the Ubuntu machine was on an SSD. Unless you have it in a dual boot, or two separate but identical machines there is know way of being 100% sure. You have to eliminate all variables. Both machines have a clean install etc.

you dont need an ssd Ubuntu boots up with in under 20 seconds on most machines with a slow hard drive. He was getting all but hurt cus i would not sure him benchmarks. Even tho real world performence was faster. All videos on youtube ubuntu will be faster on the same machine.

Avatar image for Tezcatlipoca666
Tezcatlipoca666

7241

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Tezcatlipoca666
Member since 2006 • 7241 Posts

[QUOTE="gmaster456"]

[QUOTE="dontshackzmii"]

I use Ubuntu its a amazing os i like it way better then windows 7. runs way faster on any pc not just older ones. I remember in one of my theards a win fan boy kept screaming at me to prove ubuntu was faster. I posted video about how it boots up faster and loads apps faster but he said " that does not prove its faster"

dontshackzmii

He's technically right. There still isn't any proof for all he knew the Ubuntu machine was on an SSD. Unless you have it in a dual boot, or two separate but identical machines there is know way of being 100% sure. You have to eliminate all variables. Both machines have a clean install etc.

you dont need an ssd Ubuntu boots up with in under 20 seconds on most machines with a slow hard drive. He was getting all but hurt cus i would not sure him benchmarks. Even tho real world performence was faster. All videos on youtube ubuntu will be faster on the same machine.

No. Flash performance is WAY better under Windows... especially with hardware acceleration.

Avatar image for Solid_Tango
Solid_Tango

8609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Solid_Tango
Member since 2009 • 8609 Posts
If there was gaming support for linux( and i mean real games like mass effect, skyrim, cod, assains creed you know the big boys not the that indie cr@p) i would abandon WIndows in a heart beat.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
If there was gaming support for linux( and i mean real games like mass effect, skyrim, cod, assains creed you know the big boys not the that indie cr@p) i would abandon WIndows in a heart beat.Solid_Tango
dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix master
Avatar image for DevilishFalcon
DevilishFalcon

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DevilishFalcon
Member since 2012 • 121 Posts
[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]If there was gaming support for linux( and i mean real games like mass effect, skyrim, cod, assains creed you know the big boys not the that indie cr@p) i would abandon WIndows in a heart beat.JigglyWiggly_
dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix master

lunix master? in what sense?
Avatar image for DevilishFalcon
DevilishFalcon

121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 DevilishFalcon
Member since 2012 • 121 Posts
[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]If there was gaming support for linux( and i mean real games like mass effect, skyrim, cod, assains creed you know the big boys not the that indie cr@p) i would abandon WIndows in a heart beat.JigglyWiggly_
dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix master

lunix master? in what sense?
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

Linux is okay. I've installed Linux on and off since the first very shaky days with Slackware 3.4 back in 1995. Although, most distros are usable enough at their current state nowadays, I see little in it that would make me want to switch from Windows or OSX aside from the price.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
[QUOTE="Crocodile_Key"] I have an older laptop that my wife used running windows 7. It ran terrible with windows 7 so I bought my wife a new laptop. I have windows 7 on my gaming computer and think it is a good OS, so this is not a windows bashing session. I took my wifes old laptop (Dell Inspiron E1505 Core 2 Duo 1.4 ghz 4gb ram) and reformated the harddrive, then installed Ubuntu Linux. This laptop now runs just as fast as my wifes new laptop running windows 7. Linux is awesome. I wish there was more support for gaming on Linux. It is a great OS. Come on developers, show linux some love too.

Don't we all wish that? A less hardware intensive operating system that is truly open and free to boot, allowing us to put the money towards games or better hardware instead?
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

I've heard multiple times over the last year or two that Steam is coming to linux. I'm still skeptical, but it would be great if it happened.

i_am_the_slime
I've read stuff about that as well and yet every time I hope that it's true. Steam on Linux would be amazing! It would take some years but others will follow surely.
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

gmaster456
I spy Steam. But how?
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

gmaster456
Is he for real?
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#40 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]If there was gaming support for linux( and i mean real games like mass effect, skyrim, cod, assains creed you know the big boys not the that indie cr@p) i would abandon WIndows in a heart beat.DevilishFalcon
dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix master

lunix master? in what sense?

i can rm -rfv /*
Avatar image for GummiRaccoon
GummiRaccoon

13799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 GummiRaccoon
Member since 2003 • 13799 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilishFalcon"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix masterJigglyWiggly_
lunix master? in what sense?

i can rm -rfv /*

sudo mkfs.ext3 /dev/sda1

Avatar image for amirzaim
amirzaim

1720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 amirzaim
Member since 2007 • 1720 Posts
I'm had been using Ubuntu Linux since I'm using 10.04 as the first distro and when someone need help on how to fix viruses issues, rather from using crap antivirus software, i'm just simply boot it Linux live usb and then just deleted it with easy! Now i'm currently using ubuntu 11.10 64-bit versions, boots alongside with windows 8 (i have no idea on how to simply install alongside with it!) and what i need after install this is to update that ubuntu immediately and also updating the kernel to the next level. LinuxMint 12 is a distro modification of ubuntu that fixes a lot of bugs and have a better desktop interfaces, but i'm see that it is typically boring because the apps were too few. Later when ubuntu 12.04 will released, what will be expected for LinuxMint 13? What does the codename should be given? Maybe the codename is based from female names and it is better to start the codename with the initial "M" on it.
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="NailedGR"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] It does, and succeeds from what I've seen. Boot process is simple as hell, the commands work at a very simple level and do very basic things, what isn't simple about that?

It may not be easy but it's simple.

JohnF111

I don't think you are using the term simple correctly.

as jiggles pointed out.

So how should I use it? To me it means "not elaborate". Not sure how else it could be used in this case.

It's simple / or Somewhat Easy, if you already have Linux experience..
OR
Are used to Diversity among different OS's . . For a New user , theres No Way I'd recommend Linux.

I've previously installed "Zorin" on my Wife's Laptop as a Dual Boot . . She About killed me when I asked her how she liked it?? :shock:

IMO, Zorin has got to be the most User Friendly Linux OS's out there? Wine already Prebuilt in to the OS, making MS progs Available. But none of it for a Non Avid PC user is either "Simple nor Easy" . .

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="JohnF111"][QUOTE="NailedGR"]

I don't think you are using the term simple correctly.

as jiggles pointed out.

Xsan3

So how should I use it? To me it means "not elaborate". Not sure how else it could be used in this case.

It's simple / or Somewhat Easy, if you already have Linux experience..
OR
Are used to Diversity among different OS's . . For a New user , theres No Way I'd recommend Linux.

I've previously installed "Zorin" on my Wife's Laptop as a Dual Boot . . She About killed me when I asked her how she liked it?? :shock:

IMO, Zorin has got to be the most User Friendly Linux OS's out there? Wine already Prebuilt in to the OS, making MS progs Available. But none of it for a Non Avid PC user is either "Simple nor Easy" . .

So would pretty much anything work in Zorin?
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"] So how should I use it? To me it means "not elaborate". Not sure how else it could be used in this case.Hexagon_777

It's simple / or Somewhat Easy, if you already have Linux experience..
OR
Are used to Diversity among different OS's . . For a New user , theres No Way I'd recommend Linux.

I've previously installed "Zorin" on my Wife's Laptop as a Dual Boot . . She About killed me when I asked her how she liked it?? :shock:

IMO, Zorin has got to be the most User Friendly Linux OS's out there? Wine already Prebuilt in to the OS, making MS progs Available. But none of it for a Non Avid PC user is either "Simple nor Easy" . .

So would pretty much anything work in Zorin?

From what I was messing around with, Zorin was working pretty well. Was able to install Steam, and MW3...I didnt really play MW3 because the Laptop wouldnt really play it anyay, but it seemed to load it ok..
Very much worth the go if you're interested in crossing over to Linux for the first time.

*edit* I did however have some trouble Playing Netflix . . Theres some niggling you have to do with it, and it's supposed to work. Although I got bored with it and gave up. Its worked well with Ubuntu and Mint though...

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"][QUOTE="Xsan3"]It's simple / or Somewhat Easy, if you already have Linux experience..
OR
Are used to Diversity among different OS's . . For a New user , theres No Way I'd recommend Linux.

I've previously installed "Zorin" on my Wife's Laptop as a Dual Boot . . She About killed me when I asked her how she liked it?? :shock:

IMO, Zorin has got to be the most User Friendly Linux OS's out there? Wine already Prebuilt in to the OS, making MS progs Available. But none of it for a Non Avid PC user is either "Simple nor Easy" . .

Xsan3

So would pretty much anything work in Zorin?

From what I was messing around with, Zorin was working pretty well. Was able to install Steam, and MW3...I didnt really play MW3 because the Laptop wouldnt really play it anyay, but it seemed to load it ok..
Very much worth the go if you're interested in crossing over to Linux for the first time.

*edit* I did however have some trouble Playing Netflix . . Theres some niggling you have to do with it, and it's supposed to work. Although I got bored with it and gave up. Its worked well with Ubuntu and Mint though...

I have played around with Ubuntu, Mint, and Jolicloud although I am a total newb when it comes to all that command line stuff. Zorin sounds interesting. I have a friend who has never used Linux before and he owns an ancient machine that runs Windows 7 very badly (he upgraded it from Windows XP) so any Linux variation sounds like an option.
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#47 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]So would pretty much anything work in Zorin?Hexagon_777

From what I was messing around with, Zorin was working pretty well. Was able to install Steam, and MW3...I didnt really play MW3 because the Laptop wouldnt really play it anyay, but it seemed to load it ok..
Very much worth the go if you're interested in crossing over to Linux for the first time.

*edit* I did however have some trouble Playing Netflix . . Theres some niggling you have to do with it, and it's supposed to work. Although I got bored with it and gave up. Its worked well with Ubuntu and Mint though...

I have played around with Ubuntu, Mint, and Jolicloud although I am a total newb when it comes to all that command line stuff. Zorin sounds interesting. I have a friend who has never used Linux before and he owns an ancient machine that runs Windows 7 very badly (he upgraded it from Windows XP) so any Linux variation sounds like an option.

I cant speak how it may run on an older machine, but as far as ease of use, I've messed with Linux since Redhat 6.1
Zorin seems to be a Sketched copy of how Win7 works. I know that sort of defeats the purpose is a lot of ways, but for a Free OS - that you want to work like Windows, Zorin appears to do the trick.

Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

I dual-boot between Linux and Windows (and use Linux 90% of the time). Is this thinly-veiled advertisement really necessary?

Furthermore, I disagree that Ubuntu should be the flagbearer at this time. They introduce too many half-baked (unstable) features and the GUI has just gone downhill over the last couple of years, which outweighs any of the niceties they've added. By comparison I've found even independent distros (i.e. Fuduntu which I currently run), to be much more usable and stable.

Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

[QUOTE="DevilishFalcon"][QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] dats wut everyone says until they run into hell with some Lunix problems. Luckily I am lunix masterJigglyWiggly_
lunix master? in what sense?

i can rm -rfv /*

Well at least you had the courtesy to make it verbose. For the uninformed, don't run this. In fact, don't run any command you aren't familiar with (googling is your friend).

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
[QUOTE="gmaster456"]

Ubuntu has become a heavy OS. The last reletively light version of it I remember was 8.04. Windows 7 actually ran better for me than 10.04 on one of my other machines. If you want a good, light Windows alternative, I would take a look at Zoron OS 5. Its essentially a windows clone and you can set it to work like any MS OS from Windows 2000 up to Windows 7 and even Mac OSX

http://zorin-os.com/index.html

Hexagon_777
Is he for real?

Yes he is.