This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for bolt2448
bolt2448

1152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 bolt2448
Member since 2006 • 1152 Posts
not a real rts buff, and never get into them that much but was thinkin of trying em both out, which i can considering there are free downloads of em. just wanted to kno which u thought was better
Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

Warcraft 3.

Avatar image for bolt2448
bolt2448

1152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 bolt2448
Member since 2006 • 1152 Posts
thats out of the question, im not buying it if i may not like it which of these two should i try out?
Avatar image for starwarsgeek112
starwarsgeek112

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 starwarsgeek112
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts

Well I havn't played either, but I'd assume Warcraft 2 would be the best choice.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60828 Posts
Warcraft 2 definately.  Even like eight years ago, the first Warcraft still sucked.  Blizzard was still trying to get things right  back then.
Avatar image for sj420
sj420

626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 sj420
Member since 2003 • 626 Posts
wc2, but if you can, play both.
Avatar image for bolt2448
bolt2448

1152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 bolt2448
Member since 2006 • 1152 Posts
yea i played both and noticed 1 was kinda choppy and overall not too good, 2 is amazing tho, im not a rts fan but i like it
Avatar image for retro82
retro82

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 retro82
Member since 2007 • 660 Posts
i like wc3
Avatar image for 404-not-found
404-not-found

1050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 404-not-found
Member since 2009 • 1050 Posts
WC2, the first is practically unplayable, and WC2 is one of my favorite games of all time, maybe my first RTS.
Avatar image for jjtiebuckle
jjtiebuckle

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#10 jjtiebuckle
Member since 2008 • 1856 Posts
Even though you've played both, I'll chime in - Warcraft is EXTREMELY slow. It's like an turn-based RPG with non-stop random battles. I would say the hardest of the three, just because the few missing links (like Diablo and Diablo 2).
Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#11 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts
not a real rts buff, and never get into them that much but was thinkin of trying em both out, which i can considering there are free downloads of em. just wanted to kno which u thought was betterbolt2448
Played them both extensively. WC2 is 100% better than 1. WC1, once you would summon your demon/elemental, the game was over... and the environment was pretty generic. WC2 had such a great environment and was my first real game addiction.