What is better Crysis or Far Cry 2

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
Crysis easily, I would prefer banging my head against the wall over playing 5 hours of Far cry 2 --- yup I consider it that crappy
Avatar image for shalashaska88
shalashaska88

3198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#52 shalashaska88
Member since 2005 • 3198 Posts

[QUOTE="SgtMoreless"]

Crysis by far. A game that makes you sleep is not a game. period.

dakan45

Funny because i was deathbored in warhead and when i finished far cry 2 i wanted more:(...no sarcasm, i meant what i just typed, its kinda funny but thats what happened to me.

What is it that you don't like about Crysis really?
Avatar image for Macutchi
Macutchi

11195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 Macutchi
Member since 2007 • 11195 Posts

It always makes me laugh when people think you have to fight at every guard post - figuring out how to get past them with minimal fighting is part of what makes the game fun. If you can't figure it out - that's not the game's fault.

Born_Lucky

can you share these fun ways of dealing with the respawning guard posts? for me the missions should be the fun part, travelling to and from them should usually be as quick and hassle free as possible

and how did it not annoy you that everyone in the game wants to kill you and will open fire immediately upon sight and then chase you to the death? did it not affect the atmosphere or immersion having such an unrealistic and extreme npc reaction to your presence? did you ever think it was unnecessary and counter productive to actually having fun?

Avatar image for MrWednesday14
MrWednesday14

386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 MrWednesday14
Member since 2009 • 386 Posts

[QUOTE="Born_Lucky"]

It always makes me laugh when people think you have to fight at every guard post - figuring out how to get past them with minimal fighting is part of what makes the game fun. If you can't figure it out - that's not the game's fault.

Macutchi

can you share these fun ways of dealing with the respawning guard posts? for me the missions should be the fun part, travelling to and from them should usually be as quick and hassle free as possible

and how did it not annoy you that everyone in the game wants to kill you and will open fire immediately upon sight and then chase you to the death? did it not affect the atmosphere or immersion having such an unrealistic and extreme npc reaction to your presence? did you ever think it was unnecessary and counter productive to actually having fun?

Hear, hear!

I too fail to see how bad design choices are the player's fault.

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

I enjoyed both games. However I have issues with both for very diffrent reasons.

Both games are great looking with a solid shooter core. But both have issues.

Crysis.. The game is all bling and very little content. It's a very generic shooter that does little that hasent been done before. Nothing wrong with that and it's an enjoyable handful of hours.There's no sense of ambition or wanting to do something new and cool beyond the graphics.. it's another shooter with another series of vehicles with poor handling with another generic story set in a generic series of linear levels.. it all ends in another generic boss fight at the end

Far Cry 2 is not just a shooter.. I love that they tried to do so much more with the game. The day and night cycles, the openended world, the African setting which is both well suited for the theme and very unique in the industry. The real frustration with far Cry 2 is that it could have been so much more.. it almost is so much more but a couple of glaring design issues keep holding it back from being all it could be. The checkpoints, the constant kamikaze soldiers who'll try to ram your Jeep even if they are driving a bloody ford pinto. In an openworld game like this you obviously send a lot of time traveling around. If the traveling ends up becoming frustrating, tiresom or borring it will spoil the rest of the game regardless of how interesting or good it might be.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#56 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

crysis is much better, mainly because of the nano suit.

farcry 2 could have been an absolutely amazing fps apart from a few things. wasted opportunity.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#57 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

I enjoyed both games. However I have issues with both for very diffrent reasons.

Both games are great looking with a solid shooter core. But both have issues.

Crysis.. The game is all bling and very little content. It's a very generic shooter that does little that hasent been done before. Nothing wrong with that and it's an enjoyable handful of hours.There's no sense of ambition or wanting to do something new and cool beyond the graphics.. it's another shooter with another series of vehicles with poor handling with another generic story set in a generic series of linear levels.. it all ends in another generic boss fight at the end

Far Cry 2 is not just a shooter.. I love that they tried to do so much more with the game. The day and night cycles, the openended world, the African setting which is both well suited for the theme and very unique in the industry. The real frustration with far Cry 2 is that it could have been so much more.. it almost is so much more but a couple of glaring design issues keep holding it back from being all it could be. The checkpoints, the constant kamikaze soldiers who'll try to ram your Jeep even if they are driving a bloody ford pinto. In an openworld game like this you obviously send a lot of time traveling around. If the traveling ends up becoming frustrating, tiresom or borring it will spoil the rest of the game regardless of how interesting or good it might be.

Mazoch

im 100% with you on fc2.

however you seem to have forgotten the 2 things (imo) which made crysis excellent, the nanosuit and the moddable weapons.

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

I enjoyed both games. However I have issues with both for very diffrent reasons.

Both games are great looking with a solid shooter core. But both have issues.

Crysis.. The game is all bling and very little content. It's a very generic shooter that does little that hasent been done before. Nothing wrong with that and it's an enjoyable handful of hours.There's no sense of ambition or wanting to do something new and cool beyond the graphics.. it's another shooter with another series of vehicles with poor handling with another generic story set in a generic series of linear levels.. it all ends in another generic boss fight at the end

Far Cry 2 is not just a shooter.. I love that they tried to do so much more with the game. The day and night cycles, the openended world, the African setting which is both well suited for the theme and very unique in the industry. The real frustration with far Cry 2 is that it could have been so much more.. it almost is so much more but a couple of glaring design issues keep holding it back from being all it could be. The checkpoints, the constant kamikaze soldiers who'll try to ram your Jeep even if they are driving a bloody ford pinto. In an openworld game like this you obviously send a lot of time traveling around. If the traveling ends up becoming frustrating, tiresom or borring it will spoil the rest of the game regardless of how interesting or good it might be.

jpph

im 100% with you on fc2.

however you seem to have forgotten the 2 things (imo) which made crysis excellent, the nanosuit and the moddable weapons.

True I did exaggerate in making the point about Crysis being generic :) It did have some new elements, in all fairness it also used physics in a way few (if any) shooters have really done before, in addition to the elements you mention. However I still felt that it played largely like 'just another shooter with really really good graphics', especially in contrast to FC2 which tried so hard to break the formula.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#59 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="dakan45"]

[QUOTE="SgtMoreless"]

Crysis by far. A game that makes you sleep is not a game. period.

shalashaska88

Funny because i was deathbored in warhead and when i finished far cry 2 i wanted more:(...no sarcasm, i meant what i just typed, its kinda funny but thats what happened to me.

What is it that you don't like about Crysis really?

I like the first one alot, i just found warhead borring due to the time i spended in the first. (Also hapend in clear sky...too similar with the first) There is not something that i dont like i just didnt have that much fun overall, i had more fun with cod4,stalker,rainbow six vegas 2 or arma 2 . I dont really like extra features in the game like the nanosuit, i just couldnt get immersed by the nanosuit gameplay, it just didnt get into me:( As i stated above i like more generic fps, thats all. In other words, its kinda ironic and funny that i did not find crysis revolutionary like most people do just because it was not generic and i dont really care for cutting edge graphics. Still its a great game and i give it 8.5/10
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Crysis is much better than Fry Cry 2...
Avatar image for Vital93
Vital93

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Vital93
Member since 2009 • 59 Posts
I think Crysis is better. Far Cry 2 is boring...
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Far Cry 2 is a bit of a guilty pleasure of mine... but overall I enjoy Crysis more.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

[QUOTE="jpph"]

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

I enjoyed both games. However I have issues with both for very diffrent reasons.

Both games are great looking with a solid shooter core. But both have issues.

Crysis.. The game is all bling and very little content. It's a very generic shooter that does little that hasent been done before. Nothing wrong with that and it's an enjoyable handful of hours.There's no sense of ambition or wanting to do something new and cool beyond the graphics.. it's another shooter with another series of vehicles with poor handling with another generic story set in a generic series of linear levels.. it all ends in another generic boss fight at the end

Far Cry 2 is not just a shooter.. I love that they tried to do so much more with the game. The day and night cycles, the openended world, the African setting which is both well suited for the theme and very unique in the industry. The real frustration with far Cry 2 is that it could have been so much more.. it almost is so much more but a couple of glaring design issues keep holding it back from being all it could be. The checkpoints, the constant kamikaze soldiers who'll try to ram your Jeep even if they are driving a bloody ford pinto. In an openworld game like this you obviously send a lot of time traveling around. If the traveling ends up becoming frustrating, tiresom or borring it will spoil the rest of the game regardless of how interesting or good it might be.

Mazoch

im 100% with you on fc2.

however you seem to have forgotten the 2 things (imo) which made crysis excellent, the nanosuit and the moddable weapons.

True I did exaggerate in making the point about Crysis being generic :) It did have some new elements, in all fairness it also used physics in a way few (if any) shooters have really done before, in addition to the elements you mention. However I still felt that it played largely like 'just another shooter with really really good graphics', especially in contrast to FC2 which tried so hard to break the formula.

yes, fc2 deserves marks for effort. but i dont think it succeeded.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#66 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
I didn't have the courage to spend my roubles on Far Cry 2. I still think Crysis is a solid 9/10 - despite some of its shortcomings.. I think Crytek could be a little smarter in the design of the game world next time. Although many will outcry the shrinkage of the game world, you have to question like how much space in those open world sections is redundant and just adding to the poor performance of the game. Something to think about I guess.
Avatar image for 2uneek4u
2uneek4u

2548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 2uneek4u
Member since 2006 • 2548 Posts

the respawn time in farcry 2 really turned me off. whats the point of killing those guard post if theyre just going to respawn in a min or 2. this forces you to go stealthy around the guard post everytime and can get really annoying

crysis is at its best, farcry 2 could have been a better game or better than crysis

Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
While I don't like Crysis, it is better then Far Cry 2.
Avatar image for deactivated-64b76bd048860
deactivated-64b76bd048860

4363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 deactivated-64b76bd048860
Member since 2007 • 4363 Posts
Crysis.
Avatar image for mimic-Denmark
mimic-Denmark

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#70 mimic-Denmark
Member since 2006 • 4382 Posts

Far Cry 2.

Because of the Zebras! :P

Avatar image for JetB1ackNewYear
JetB1ackNewYear

2931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 JetB1ackNewYear
Member since 2007 • 2931 Posts
i love crysis! far cry 2 i barley could play it was boring to me! sadly i think half life is completely boring to :(
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

Far Cry 2.

Avatar image for biswajit90210
biswajit90210

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 biswajit90210
Member since 2006 • 511 Posts

crysis man play CRYSIS!!far cry 2 is ok nothing great just plain ok..

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

Crysis, by far.

Far Cry 2 is fun for a few hours, and then you realise that once again, Ubisoft have made 10% of a game and then pressed Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V. On paper it should be incredible, but it's just unbearably repetitive. I reached the second act thinking "okay, they'll mix it up now", but of course they didn't do that, and I was doing exactly the same thing I was before. There was no point in carrying on, I had already seen everything the game had to offer.

Avatar image for blade55555
blade55555

1116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#75 blade55555
Member since 2005 • 1116 Posts
Crysis for sure. Crysis was soo fun good story, good graphics, fun to mess around and be witht he suit. Far cry 2 was fun for awhile but got boring after a few hours.
Avatar image for -clippa-
-clippa-

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 -clippa-
Member since 2008 • 596 Posts

Far Cry 2.

Because of the Zebras! :P

mimic-Denmark

I remember hitting a zebra in a jeep and it groaned like a man dying. I was in stitches.

Avatar image for TheWalrusKing
TheWalrusKing

956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 TheWalrusKing
Member since 2003 • 956 Posts

I think that Far Cry 2 is much better than Crisis.

Details and Story are better,and that's good enough for me.

vaczec

im so utterly confused with what you just said, explain to me what story Farcry 2 has, apart from variations of "go to this spot and kill this man, cause hes bad"

Avatar image for BLUBBBER
BLUBBBER

367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 BLUBBBER
Member since 2006 • 367 Posts

Crysis is a better game overall, but the setting and linearality (near the end) really turns me off. I don't like the weapons in the game, aliens and the general feel in the game. I love Far Cry 2 way more just because of its believable setting and beautiful scenery. Of course, the game had terrible story and loads of repetitiveness

Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#79 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
i actually like Far Cry 2 more then Crysis.
Avatar image for Candy-Star
Candy-Star

4378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Candy-Star
Member since 2004 • 4378 Posts

I know most will go with Crysis. Which is fine. For me I had much more fun with Far Cry 2.

SavageM2
Yeah it had lots of problems and could have been improved vastly with some simple additions but at the end I still enjoyed a lot.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#81 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="vaczec"]

I think that Far Cry 2 is much better than Crisis.

Details and Story are better,and that's good enough for me.

TheWalrusKing

im so utterly confused with what you just said, explain to me what story Farcry 2 has, apart from variations of "go to this spot and kill this man, cause hes bad"

The awesome plot twist in the end, and the feeling the game gives you, trust no one, everybody dies , africa wins. Moral lessons in the conflict and what can it lead into.
Avatar image for lord_thorno
lord_thorno

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 lord_thorno
Member since 2007 • 26 Posts
i Would say that Crysis is better the Far cry 2 any Time Its not Even worth Comparing Far cry 2 really is a dissapointment
Avatar image for IMaBIOHAZARD
IMaBIOHAZARD

1464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#83 IMaBIOHAZARD
Member since 2008 • 1464 Posts
[QUOTE="TheWalrusKing"]

[QUOTE="vaczec"]

I think that Far Cry 2 is much better than Crisis.

Details and Story are better,and that's good enough for me.

dakan45

im so utterly confused with what you just said, explain to me what story Farcry 2 has, apart from variations of "go to this spot and kill this man, cause hes bad"

The awesome plot twist in the end, and the feeling the game gives you, trust no one, everybody dies , africa wins. Moral lessons in the conflict and what can it lead into.

I really liked Far Cry 2, and I also thought the story was arguably better than Crysis, although the presentation could've been a little better. Still, though, it's not as good as Crysis; Crysis is almost TOO good.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#84 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="TheWalrusKing"]

im so utterly confused with what you just said, explain to me what story Farcry 2 has, apart from variations of "go to this spot and kill this man, cause hes bad"

IMaBIOHAZARD

The awesome plot twist in the end, and the feeling the game gives you, trust no one, everybody dies , africa wins. Moral lessons in the conflict and what can it lead into.

I really liked Far Cry 2, and I also thought the story was arguably better than Crysis, although the presentation could've been a little better. Still, though, it's not as good as Crysis; Crysis is almost TOO good.

That plot twist in the end was awesome wasnt it?

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
CRYSIS. No question. Far Cry was interesting but had such flawed design despite how ambitious it was in many regards. Crysis's design is excuted in a much better fashion, and is also damn innovative in its own right.
Avatar image for smokinplayer
smokinplayer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 smokinplayer
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
could anybody tell me how to get the map up during gameplay on far cry 2. plz
Avatar image for smokinplayer
smokinplayer

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 smokinplayer
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
how to get the map up during gameplay on far cry 2 for the pc
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#88 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Press 5.

And R to zoom in and out. And right click to use the monocle.

Avatar image for jettpack
jettpack

3192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#90 jettpack
Member since 2009 • 3192 Posts

Crysis was GREAT.

Avatar image for chandu83
chandu83

4864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#91 chandu83
Member since 2005 • 4864 Posts

It's not even a contest.

Crysis is an extremely polished shooter while Far Cry 2 is an extremely polished turd.

MrWednesday14
You said it better than I could.
Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

Crysis was easily better than that boring brown game with Far Cry stamped on it.

Although I found it funny that leading up to Crysis' release the developers were saying oh yes we've learned a great deal from Far Cry, we learnt most people didn't like the mutants saying it changed what they loved about the game. So what do they do? The exact same thing of course.

We all fell in love with the great gameplay footage of Crysis, hiding in the follage and attaching a sniper scope and silencer to the gun then taking people out, then quickly running in grabbing guys going cloak etc etc and it seemed as if they had just improved on the good parts of Far Cry. Then I was running up and down a carrier spamming rockets into the bosses weak point thinking to myself... no... they really didn't learn at all.

How could you ruin the gameplay more than freezing the entire environment into something you can't use to your advantage... then making your enemies be able to fly around and detect you instantly. Silly move.