Topic. I hear it all over this board, and have no clue as to what it is or does.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Bulldozer is AMD's long awaited new generation of CPU's.
They will bring 8 core CPU's to the ordinary consumer market.
Wikipedia
I walked into that one. Thank you scottahunch for your informative answer and thank you GTR12 for your routine answer :P[QUOTE="GTR12"]
Its a type of machinary, normally used in construction sites.
LordsLoss
Well if you had bulldozer CPU, I could have said, but you just set that up, with your wording.
What the hell are we going to use 8 cores for? isn't 4 or 6 enough? I think 4 is plenty.katana_duoVideo and photo editors would use them for rendering etc. Also you gotta look at it in a futuristic point, considering most games are using 4 cores NOW. It's only a matter of time before hexacores become the 'standard' amount for games and so on.
[QUOTE="katana_duo"]What the hell are we going to use 8 cores for? isn't 4 or 6 enough? I think 4 is plenty.RaseshXVideo and photo editors would use them for rendering etc. Also you gotta look at it in a futuristic point, considering most games are using 4 cores NOW. It's only a matter of time before hexacores become the 'standard' amount for games and so on. Hmm....yeah this is true. Still it just seems excessive lol
People get hanged up to much on the 8 core thing without really understanding it's architecture.
Bulldozer can have 80 cores for all I care, The important thing is performance and price and both seem to be around Sandybridge's 2600K.
Blue-Sky
dont hate on it bro.....its the only thing keeping intel from a full blown monopoly, and we all know that aint right
[QUOTE="RaseshX"][QUOTE="katana_duo"]What the hell are we going to use 8 cores for? isn't 4 or 6 enough? I think 4 is plenty.katana_duoVideo and photo editors would use them for rendering etc. Also you gotta look at it in a futuristic point, considering most games are using 4 cores NOW. It's only a matter of time before hexacores become the 'standard' amount for games and so on. Hmm....yeah this is true. Still it just seems excessive lol
That's like saying hyperthreading is excessive.
It is something everyone should watch out for, especially those consumers who are wanting an upgrade. That being said i can't wait to see what Ivy Bridge will offer, Intel never seem to disappoint me.
[QUOTE="Blue-Sky"]
People get hanged up to much on the 8 core thing without really understanding it's architecture.
Bulldozer can have 80 cores for all I care, The important thing is performance and price and both seem to be around Sandybridge's 2600K.
blaznwiipspman1
dont hate on it bro.....its the only thing keeping intel from a full blown monopoly, and we all know that aint right
indeed stop the hatin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrGEo9ndEjw&feature=related
What the hell are we going to use 8 cores for? isn't 4 or 6 enough? I think 4 is plenty.katana_duoIt is not "full" cores. It is basically an improved version of hyperthreading, so the 8 cores are actually 4 "modules" of 2 cores each, making this a quad core with an improved version of hyperthreading. Frostbite 2.0 can use up to eight cores.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment