What performance do you get in stalker?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#1 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

Right now on the system I built yesterday, I am getting over 60 FPS outside, sometimes even into 80 and over. Inside areas with heavy shadows it can drop to 30fps. This is maximum possible settings, full AA and AF, 1280x720 resolution.

Just trying to get an idea of how my system is running and if it is running as well as it should be.

Specs are:

E6850

8800GTX

2GB 1066MHz RAM

Avatar image for D9-THC
D9-THC

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 D9-THC
Member since 2007 • 3081 Posts

I haven't tried it on my new system.

On an AMD64 3200+, 1gb ddr400 RAM, and a 256mb 6800 GT, the game was completely unplayable. I think it was poorly optimized. The graphics don't even look good but they run like total crap. The graphics remind me of the original HL :P

Avatar image for mega_deth
mega_deth

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mega_deth
Member since 2006 • 659 Posts

Right now on the system I built yesterday, I am getting over 60 FPS outside, sometimes even into 80 and over. Inside areas with heavy shadows it can drop to 30fps. This is maximum possible settings, full AA and AF, 1280x720 resolution.

Just trying to get an idea of how my system is running and if it is running as well as it should be.

Specs are:

E6850

8800GTX

2GB 1066MHz RAM

-Unreal-

ugh it should be performing WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY better than that lol

Avatar image for seabiscuit8686
seabiscuit8686

2862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 seabiscuit8686
Member since 2005 • 2862 Posts

If you look at my sig at the new computer (its not new anymore but hey, whatev)...it plays like butthole. I mean seriously, it is unplayable at 1280x1024 and not very at 1024x768 or whatever the lower rez is (granted I am playing this on medium high). This is the most poorly optimized game I have ever seen. It needs raw power, no finess.

That is with 2GB RAM, x1900GT OC, and x2 3600+ OC

Avatar image for zack87654
zack87654

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 zack87654
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

stalker is the most patheticly optimized game i have ever seen. even though i get great fps playing it, that dosent change anything.

i was running a e6700 oc'ed to 3.2ghz,8800GTX, 680i board, and 1gb of ram and i was getting above 100 fps, but there would always be strange spikes that sent me down to below 20. i got a second gig of ram and it never goes below 70.

Avatar image for LahiruD
LahiruD

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 LahiruD
Member since 2006 • 2164 Posts
I can play this game (I don't remember the settings mostly 1024x768 with a little bit higher graphic settings)) movies are very smooth but when playing I'm getting 20-25 FPS but sometimes it stucking for 2 or 3 seconds then comming back to normal(When turning very fast).
Avatar image for JD138
JD138

256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 JD138
Member since 2002 • 256 Posts
On this system: Athlon X2 4200 939 2 Gigs PC333 RAM 7900GT video card Dell 2007WFP @ 1680x1050 my framerates are in the 20's on medium settings. It's pretty much unplayable on high. Regardless, I love the game.
Avatar image for LouieV13
LouieV13

7604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#8 LouieV13
Member since 2005 • 7604 Posts
WOW I maxed it with AMD X2 4200+ 7600GS 2gb DDR2 Vista Prem lol no AA tho everything slided to the right im not kidding
Avatar image for deactivated-57ef6a3ad2935
deactivated-57ef6a3ad2935

5346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-57ef6a3ad2935
Member since 2004 • 5346 Posts

If you look at my sig at the new computer (its not new anymore but hey, whatev)...it plays like butthole. I mean seriously, it is unplayable at 1280x1024 and not very at 1024x768 or whatever the lower rez is (granted I am playing this on medium high). This is the most poorly optimized game I have ever seen. It needs raw power, no finess.

That is with 2GB RAM, x1900GT OC, and x2 3600+ OC

seabiscuit8686

You are bottle necking with your 3600 processor.
Avatar image for LouieV13
LouieV13

7604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 69

User Lists: 0

#10 LouieV13
Member since 2005 • 7604 Posts
[QUOTE="seabiscuit8686"]

If you look at my sig at the new computer (its not new anymore but hey, whatev)...it plays like butthole. I mean seriously, it is unplayable at 1280x1024 and not very at 1024x768 or whatever the lower rez is (granted I am playing this on medium high). This is the most poorly optimized game I have ever seen. It needs raw power, no finess.

That is with 2GB RAM, x1900GT OC, and x2 3600+ OC

jpazhman

You are bottle necking with your 3600 processor.

Wow, you know nothing. The X2 3600+ wont even bottleneck a 8800GTS you need to stop with this bottleneck crap.