What will be after 1080p?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for livinitup01
livinitup01

1245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 livinitup01
Member since 2004 • 1245 Posts

I first would just like to say that it's great to finally have a forum for Audio/Video hardware discussion.

I have heard the terms all the way up to 1080p where TV/movie viewing looks its best. 1080p resolutions have been around for at least 3 years now I think, before only as high as 1080i with some TVs or connectivity restricting this, but what next? It is said that after a certain TV size our eyes cannot comprehend the difference in quality but are people already wanting to advance past 1080p?

In the electronic world technologies advance so quickly to the point where we are now forced to constantly upgrade our TVs once every few years, if at all. This is because it seems as if as soon as we buy a new TV it becomes obsolete within a year of its purchase. Look at Sony and Samsung: Sony developed the OLED TV which has a contrast ratio of 1 million to one and Samsung currently at 500,000:1. Both these TVs' images can only still be upscaled to 1080p, even with the OLED's groundbreaking light-emitting technology. Will we see a technology advancing past 1080p in the near future?

Avatar image for coolcole1
coolcole1

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 coolcole1
Member since 2007 • 307 Posts
Actually 1080p has only been around for about a year and a half. Because until blu ray came out there really wasn't a source for it. But to answer your question it should be 1440p. But they will need a new medium for it. Takes up a lot of space. To find out more stuff look up ultra high def something will pop upfor wikipedia at least.
Avatar image for coolcole1
coolcole1

307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 coolcole1
Member since 2007 • 307 Posts
Actually 1080p has only been around for about a year and a half. Because until blu ray came out there really wasn't a source for it. But to answer your question it should be 1440p. But they will need a new medium for it. Takes up a lot of space. To find out more stuff look up ultra high def something will pop upfor wikipedia at least.
Avatar image for CJL182
CJL182

9233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 CJL182
Member since 2003 • 9233 Posts

Here you go, Super Hi-Vision lol.

http://www.dailytech.com/NHK+Demonstrates+Ultra+HD+Signal+16+Times+Better+Than+HDTV/article7466c.htm

Those crazy Japanese... lol

Avatar image for livinitup01
livinitup01

1245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 livinitup01
Member since 2004 • 1245 Posts
Wow, that technology won't be released until 2015!!! I guess it's safe to buy an HDTV now with 1080p, since the quality won't really change for another 7 years. This is great. Thanks guys.
Avatar image for mohmaaytah
mohmaaytah

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 mohmaaytah
Member since 2003 • 2397 Posts

I dont see the big deal with resolution at all if you are living in a cramped apartment and can barely tell the difference between 720p and 1080p on your 40" screen. Higher resolutions are nice, but do modern households even have the space to allow this superior resolution to manifest itself?
Avatar image for Fredrick2003x
Fredrick2003x

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Fredrick2003x
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts

I would say that no, modern households do not have the space for this suerprior resolution to manifest itself.

Not to mention that really the only way to get a true 1080p signal is through bluray, and I can't name one person I know in real life that has a 1080p television, let alone a bluray player (and yes, I do count Playstation 3).

I am saving up money for my 1080p television though, $500 in so far! :). I wish I got paid more than minimum wage this is taking forever. But my rant about taxes and modern living expenses is for another day.

Avatar image for xXXGODFATHAXXx
xXXGODFATHAXXx

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 xXXGODFATHAXXx
Member since 2008 • 157 Posts
1240p i think, that was the latest resolution unveiled at sony convention on a 45 plasma tv
Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts

I don't see much of a need for an increased resolution.

Usually with video, and distance sat, there's a limit to the detail you can see. No many people are going to have 100+ inch screens that would really benefit from over 1080p.

Though, for video games, you can sit closer to the screen and more detail is always better. But extra resolution at this point in the game wouldn't be much of an improvement over say better textures and enhanced anti-aliasing. If things are still jagged and blurry at 1440p not much of an improvement will be there since you are not using the resolutions full potential.

Thus, for the short future, 1080p screens with true blacks and other features would be god over more resolution, and games with full smooth anti-aliasing and sharper textures would make the games more lifelike and detailed, thus, more resolution isn't needed.

If you really need more resolution, go PC, get a 30inch PC screen, that's I think 2560*1600, about double the pixels of 1080p, then some kind of Sli setup with thousands spent on video cards.

Avatar image for Liquid_93_Snake
Liquid_93_Snake

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Liquid_93_Snake
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts
yeah i agreed pc is always better and always gonna be because it always in constant progration but i hate it cuz its too damn expensive to keep up you know, with a console its easy buy the game and play it, but a pc game u gota get the right video card, and sound card its a pain, but it is ultra better.
Avatar image for Spybot_9
Spybot_9

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Spybot_9
Member since 2008 • 2592 Posts
yeah i agreed pc is always better and always gonna be because it always in constant progration but i hate it cuz its too damn expensive to keep up you know, with a console its easy buy the game and play it, but a pc game u gota get the right video card, and sound card its a pain, but it is ultra better.Liquid_93_Snake
An expected ignorant statement from a level 1.
Avatar image for Shrinekeeper
Shrinekeeper

331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Shrinekeeper
Member since 2003 • 331 Posts

[QUOTE="Liquid_93_Snake"]yeah i agreed pc is always better and always gonna be because it always in constant progration but i hate it cuz its too damn expensive to keep up you know, with a console its easy buy the game and play it, but a pc game u gota get the right video card, and sound card its a pain, but it is ultra better.Spybot_9
An expected ignorant statement from a level 1.

because yours makes you so much smarter.

Avatar image for TimothyB
TimothyB

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TimothyB
Member since 2003 • 6564 Posts

Also, maybe here's what you've been dreaming of:
http://guru3d.com/newsitem.php?id=6993