Which one do you like?

First-person shooters like Crysis is it engaging like call of duty and what make call of duty franchise so popular.Crysis is a great game but at some point it is getting boring and the way enemies act after you kill them is somehow dull.I wish next Crysis game or any other FPS to come up wiith fresh ideas,so Do you like sandbox FPS or the other way around?

(...)the way enemies act after you kill them is somehow dull.bandtnt

Yea, i know, what u mean. They should be more lively after u kill them. Instead they just lie there....boring ;)

Jokes aside...

sandbox FPS or the other way around?bandtnt

Sandbox is alwas good, unless it's RPG. Then the task of creating an involving sandbox game becomes to difficult for most developers. If they succeed, however, the results are usually fantastic (see: Fallout series).

Yea, i know, what u mean. They should be more lively after u kill them. Instead they just lie there....boring ;)

Jokes aside... norolim

I mean there should be some sort of reaction after you shoot somebody like in Call of duty

I like a mix of scripted and sandbox, like Half-Life 1/2

A mix of bouth like having to choose missions in a huge world but missions to be scripted and linear... hmmm first person GTA.

Something like Far Cry 2 just better.

Far Cry 1 and Crysis >>> cinematic, heavily-scripted, corridor shooters (CoD series)

[QUOTE="norolim"]

Yea, i know, what u mean. They should be more lively after u kill them. Instead they just lie there....boring ;)

Jokes aside... bandtnt

I mean there should be some sort of reaction after you shoot somebody like in Call of duty

CoD has horrible AI. Anyone who thinks otherwise is wrong. Fun MP anywawys.

I like a mix of scripted and sandbox, like Half-Life 1/2

ventnor

I'd be looking forward to Rage, which is supposed to have some player choice. Games like CoD are fun for one or two playthroughs but its linearity (not to mention the horribly clichéd story) limits it greatly, so that would cause me to lean towards games that offer some amount of player choice (or at least the illusion of player choice, á la Half-Life 2 and Far Cry), and I can be sure of that judging by the countless playthroughs of DX.

problem is in Crysis there's way too much freedom - I mean huge map with choose whatever tactic you like and kill your opponents - but people were looking for this kind of freedom for long timePredatorRules

problem is in Crysis there's way too much freedom - I mean huge map with choose whatever tactic you like and kill your opponents PredatorRules

Way too much freedom in Crysis??? That's precisely what separates Crysis from so many other first person shooters on the market, and what makes it an incredibly fun game. The later (linear) levels in the game where the pacing was more tightly controlled to set the tone and story development is where the brilliant gameplay suffered a little.

At any rate, I can absolutely appreciate that people have different preferences, but I just had to LOL cause we're like diametric opposites in our preferences :D Though I can enjoy heavily-scripted games as well, games like Crysis take the gameplay in a first person shooter to another level in comparison.